please read apache manual and set up httpd.conf right. it's not only
possible, but very often used, i have >30 sites on one IP
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domai
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 06:00:27PM -0500, Brian Finniff wrote:
>
> My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
> Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
> address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP addres
; Oh and for reference, I am not talking about web redirects.
>
> Hi Brian,
> to be more generic in the answer, you can map as many FQDN (fully
> qualified domain name) as you want to a single IP via DNS (you can
> even enable wildcard records in certain DNS server software that wil
lified
domain name) as you want to a single IP via DNS (you can even enable wildcard
records in certain DNS server software that will match *.yourdomain.com to a
default IP).
That tells {client_software} that {this_FQDN} is {this_IP}.
{client_software}will use that information in w
Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP address and
somehow each one becomes distinct? If so, h
Hi,
> Of course, just setup a virtual host in your httpd.conf file point
> the dns to the same ip. Apache will take care of the rest.
To be a litthe bit more precise, in your Apache configuraton you need
something like:
NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1
ServerName www.first-serv
Of course, just setup a virtual host in your httpd.conf file point
the dns to the same ip. Apache will take care of the rest.
Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP address and
somehow each one becomes distinct? If so, how is this possible? C
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> -- Does anyone else have issues in this regard? Particularly, does
> anyone else have IPv6 enabled, or better yet in use that can provide any
> feedback?
>
I have a couple of ideas.
First, named has some flags like -4 and -6 (see man named).
Second, firefox has a config f
Jonathan,
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 20:41 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
[...snip...]
> however, right now "new" every website i browse is penalized with a 10-20
> second delay ...
[...snip...]
Type about:config in the Firefox address bar.
Then edit the following value: (default is false)
n
Quoting Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CONCLUSION:
If the last poster is right and it's only the browser is failing because
it uses it's own faulty internal DNS resolver, then this is obviously a
serious hindrance to the implementation of IPv6.
so a browser beha
;lanx-fa1.ibctech.ca. IN A
;; Query time: 0 msec
...Now, performing the same test, from the same server, using the same
DNS box looking for the exact same www site that the OP stated that was
a problem originally:
# INITIAL DNS LOOKUP
cohiba# dig www.srh.noaa.gov
; <<>>
i cant get the
> kernel to compile right now (thus eliminating the INET6 line), so im trying
> to figure another way out to stop this behavior).
It's not required you remove IPv6 from the kernel in order to receive
proper DNS A record responses, and even if IPv6 name services take
pre
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 20:41:13 -0500
Jonathan Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> however, right now "new" every website i browse is penalized with a 10-20
> second delay before the page finally starts loading. tcpdump is full of
> these:
hi there,
wouldn't it be your browser requesting the IPv6
reading the /etc/defaults/rc.conf, ipv6 appears disabled by default:
### IPv6 options: ###
ipv6_enable="NO"# Set to YES to set up for IPv6.
however, right now "new" every website i browse is penalized with a 10-20
second delay before the page finally starts loading. tcpdump is f
Thanks to all for their help. I was ignoring the forward DNS, and
many things don't resolve reverse DNS unless there's a matching
forward DNS.
duh.
thanks!
Eric Crist
On Oct 23, 2007, at 12:00 PMOct 23, 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
As I already stated, if I
Eric F Crist wrote:
> As I already stated, if I do a host 172.30.x.x, I get a the correct
> reverse resolution. dig works as well. What isn't working is the
> reverse resolution in certain command outputs, etc.
Note that the DNS tools (host, nslookup, dig) use their
own
ilter on protocol dns.
It will be plain as day whats happening.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) c:323.219.4708 o:703.749.9295x206
Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc.
http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com
10
At 07:23 AM 10/23/2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:51 PMOct 22, 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:51 PMOct 22, 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite some time now, but I'm having a prob
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
>We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
>(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
>for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
>172.30.x
Eric F Crist wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
> (private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
> for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
> 172.30.x network to work.
&g
At 12:02 PM 10/22/2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
172.30.x network to work.
Typing
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
172.30.x network to work.
Typing 'host ' returns a valid re
On Oct 11, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
So is there a way to have bind listening on the only interface and
IP address the host can have give different answers depending on
where the query comes from?
You can use BIND's "view" statement:
http://www.isc.or
Hello Jeff:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Goldberg
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 8:55 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Different DNS responses depending on query so
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
The host that runs my internal DNS server is down for the count (I've
already replaced the power supply on it once, and I don't feel like
doing it again). Although I had other uses planned for that machine,
the only useful thing it was doing was DNS for a loc
On Thursday 11 October 2007 17:55:20 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> The obvious answer would be to run two instances of bind, listening
> on different IPs (possibly using jails). But I don't have an IP
> address to spare on the DMZ. So is there a way to have bind
> listening on the only interface and
The host that runs my internal DNS server is down for the count (I've
already replaced the power supply on it once, and I don't feel like
doing it again). Although I had other uses planned for that machine,
the only useful thing it was doing was DNS for a local net and DHCP,
> You need to add the hostname dv6000 entry to hosts, or create your own zone
> files and run bind. As these are private IP's you need either to update
> hosts or run DNS. You may find it easier to give servers static private
> IP's that way you are assured your hosts
/hosts | sed '/^#/d'
::1 localhost localhost.my.domain
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain
You need to add the hostname dv6000 entry to hosts, or create your own zone
files and run bind. As these are private IP's you need either to update
hosts o
tatic
hosts file which matches the DHCP assignments, or set up local DNS.
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I have a Belkin N1 wireless router with a mix of wireless and wired
machines. 2 wired FreeBSD machines, 1 wired Windows machine, 1
wireless FreeBSD machine, -current wpi driver in the works, and a
wireless windows machine.
The wired FreeBSD machines get leases with dhclient. Looking at the
route
On Sep 28, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
How can I get FreeBSD to query the router for IP information for
other machines?
Your question isn't very clear, but if you want to configure FreeBSD
to use a nameserver on your router (or elsewhere), set up /etc/
resolv.conf. Otherwise,
How can I get FreeBSD to query the router for IP information for other
machines?
tomdean
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The router provides DHCP services.
The windows boxes can ping the FreeBDS boxes by name.
tomdean
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTE
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> option routers 192.168.2.1;
> option domain-name-servers 192.168.2.1,66.93.87.2,216.231.41.2;
> option domain-name "tddhome";
> option dhcp-lease-time 283824000;
> option dhcp-message-type 5;
> option dhcp-server-identifier
28 05:36:11;
rebind 3 2015/8/12 02:36:11;
expire 0 2016/9/25 17:36:11;
}
I cannot get DNS for machines inside the router
# dig dv6000
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1 <<>> dv6000
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAI
Hi list,
I'm trying to resolve a strange problem on my DNS resolver system for some
time now, and still have no clue where to catch the reason. Perhaps
someone here has some hints for me...
The prerequisites:
DNS Server with FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 running bind as resolver (hardware
suffi
e the request for a ticket and can
login just fine. However, right after logging into the XP client, I see the
following in the logfile for Kerberos (/var/heimdal/krb.log):
2007-07-30T12:51:12 Server not found in database:
DNS/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: No such entry in the database
Can someone please ex
ung on 07/27/07 08:19>>
Hi
I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal
file
(end in .jnl).
The default config is to use chroot and the running user as 'bind'.
The problem is that after named is started (/etc/init.d
Thanks for reply.
Your suggestion solved my problem, thanks.
Yes, /etc/init.d/named is a typo.
Regards
Patrick
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Dung wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
> > For dynamic DNS update,
Patrick Dung wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
> For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal file
> (end in .jnl).
> The default config is to use chroot and the running user as 'bind'.
>
> The problem is that after n
Hi
I use FreeBSD 6.2 and the base bind9.
For dynamic DNS update, bind9 automatically generate the journal file
(end in .jnl).
The default config is to use chroot and the running user as 'bind'.
The problem is that after named is started (/etc/init.d/named start),
the default chroot
the
results you've shown. That implies that there is something wrong
with the DNS delegation, and/or the various nameservers aren't
returning reliable results.
I think that the no authoritative means it is an answer from a
cache. Am I wrong?
If the server is configured to serve the
. That implies that there is something wrong
> with the DNS delegation, and/or the various nameservers aren't
> returning reliable results.
I think that the no authoritative means it is an answer from a
chache. Am I wrong?
> Perhaps part of the problem seems to be that:
>
george wrote:
I would like to ask how do I retrieve a txt record from DNS?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] dig iog.org.ua txt
; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> iog.org.ua txt
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 18333
;;
I would like to ask how do I retrieve a txt record from DNS?
I tried…
Type=txt
Type=TXT
Type=any
And none of them get my text record.
Another question I have is I installed dkim-milter but the maillog
Shows an error saying unknown signature algorithm rsa-sha256.
I am using
. That implies that there is something wrong
with the DNS delegation, and/or the various nameservers aren't
returning reliable results.
Perhaps part of the problem seems to be that:
% dig -t ns desktops.cs.ait.ac.th
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4 <<>> -t ns desktops.cs.ait.ac.t
..?
Stange, because I don't get such response, even when querying from
germany to my domain in Thailand. (Could have been a matter of time of
day, Friday 22:00 is busy time in Thailand, the DNS may have been hard
to reach).
> The answer everyone else gets, VAIO.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th, doesn&
t are willing to setup a PTR record.
That is, if the ISP *is* willing to set up a rDNS entry. I have had
clients move from their previous provider to us because the old provider
would not set up a reverse DNS entry for their statically assigned
IP(s). Sounds bad, but it happens.
> If you get a
n. :-)
If you get a single static IP, for example, normally the ISP or
netblock owner will not delegate that, but are willing to setup a PTR
record.
If you get a larger static netblock, especially a /24 or larger, then
your ISP can delegate reverse DNS to nameservers you run, and thus
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:09 PM, vuthecuong wrote:
>> I just confirm only:
>>
>> I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
>> reverse lookups?
>
> No. Reverse lookups are controlled by whoever owns the IP delegation
> for the netblock in question, and the
for the IP block isn't going to point to your server but
to the actual nameserver. Take a look at what happens when someone
using an external nameserver does the same queries:
Forward DNS lookup: (alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th is dynamic DNS)
banyan57: dig alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th
;
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:09 PM, vuthecuong wrote:
I just confirm only:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
No. Reverse lookups are controlled by whoever owns the IP delegation
for the netblock in question, and they are not going to configure PT
eally a better idea that you sent all your email thought FPT
>> email server.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
> OK I understood, this is one lession I learned today: In order to run
> "real" mail server,
> fixed IP address for
, this is one lession I learned today: In order to run
"real" mail server,
fixed IP address for forward and reverse DNS is must-have.
I will choose method of relaying through ISP though I prefer the first one.
Tnx you very much.
___
freebsd
> But my postfix only can receive mails from freebsd-questions mailing
> list, it can not send mail to this.
There is another thing you have to consider. As it is explained in
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=265093#post265093
your dynamic IP has been black listed (the IP was used
On 7/13/07, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand your problem.
dyndns.com is taking care of the forward dynamic DNS for you.
Now who is in charge of the reverse DNS for 58.187.106.120 (your
current IP)? I beleive it is FPT.
So FPT should upgrade its own reverse DNS
I understand your problem.
dyndns.com is taking care of the forward dynamic DNS for you.
Now who is in charge of the reverse DNS for 58.187.106.120 (your
current IP)? I beleive it is FPT.
So FPT should upgrade its own reverse DNS every time it gives an IP to
your server.
Right now if I make a
AIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With this mail addressed, I cand send/receive mail from/to my company,
Yahoo etc.
But my postfix only can receive mails from freebsd-questions mailing
list, it can not send
mail to this.
I recognized that the cause of this problem is that my DNS (on Freebsd
se
> file for me
Who is assigning the dynamic IP ?
Dynamic DNS only works with DHCP: DCHP gives and IP to a machine and
then it informes DNS that it has given that IP and that now the DNS
should update its synamic tables accordingly. You cannot have dynamic
DNS working alone (well I think so).
Pl
Hi Olivier Nicole
Tnx for ur quick response.
I'm very very new to both DNS and Freebsd.
Maybe I'm stupid because I already spent 3 days creating my zone file
and reverse file
but I still can not sussefull.
I'm running FreeBSD 6.2, I have DynamicIP: www.thecuong.gotdns.com.
Could
> I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
> reverse lookups?
Yes.
Forward DNS lookup: (alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th is dynamic DNS)
banyan57: dig alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th
; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> alrw17.desktops.cs.ait.ac.th
I just confirm only:
I'm using dynamicDNS, so I will able to specify the forward *AND*
reverse lookups?
Tnx
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
On June 25, 2007, gahn wrote:
> hi all:
>
> could anyone here recommend a software package for
> dynamic dns?
>
> thanks
I've used http://www.no-ip.com/ for a few years with good success. There is a
free version if you're not picky about your domain name. There is
gahn wrote:
> hi all:
>
> could anyone here recommend a software package for
> dynamic dns?
>
> thanks
>
/usr/ports/dns/ddclient
I am using it with no problems on all my Linux/BSD machines.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.
hi all:
could anyone here recommend a software package for
dynamic dns?
thanks
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news,
photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo
At 03:44 PM 5/31/2007, Rob wrote:
Hi, was hoping someone could help me with the correct syntax in my
named.conf for reverse DNS on a small subnet.
Say I have 10.0.0.0/27, such that actual addresses are 10.0.0.0 through
10.0.0.31 -- If I add a zone like:
zone "0.0.10.in-addr
Rob wrote:
Hi, was hoping someone could help me with the correct syntax in my
named.conf for reverse DNS on a small subnet.
Say I have 10.0.0.0/27, such that actual addresses are 10.0.0.0 through
10.0.0.31 -- If I add a zone like:
zone "0.0.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
Hi, was hoping someone could help me with the correct syntax in my named.conf
for reverse DNS on a small subnet.
Say I have 10.0.0.0/27, such that actual addresses are 10.0.0.0 through
10.0.0.31 -- If I add a zone like:
zone "0.0.10.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
fi
if your not running with -4 you will get this, unless you
have IPv6 configured of course...
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Barnett
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:46 PM
> To: freeBSD
> Subject: DNS Cache
Jack Barnett wrote:
> I'm running Bind 9.3.4 on FreeBSD 6.2 for my local network.
>
> It doesn't have any zones, it's just a local DNS that has a bunch of
> forwarders.
>
> The first request is slow (between 150 and 300 ms) - but after that
> (the next quer
I'm running Bind 9.3.4 on FreeBSD 6.2 for my local network.
It doesn't have any zones, it's just a local DNS that has a bunch of forwarders.
The first request is slow (between 150 and 300 ms) - but after that
(the next query on same domain) is fast (less then 10 ms usually).
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
freebsd wrote:
> I need to setup 2 DNS server and I would like these to be visible as a
> single IP address.
> Using CARP I'm able to obtain failover capabilities, but I need load
> balancing also. Any ideas other than putting
Hi
I need to setup 2 DNS server and I would like these to be visible as a
single IP address.
Using CARP I'm able to obtain failover capabilities, but I need load
balancing also. Any ideas other than putting another server in front of my
machines?
The DNS ip address will be hardcoded in
Thanks to everyone who replied, the solution is detailed below
Copy /usr/share/sendmail/cf/domain/generic.m4 -> /etc/mail/custom-domain.m4
softlink /etc/mail/custom-domain.m4 ->
/usr/share/sendmail/cf/domain/custom-domain.m4
Edit /etc/mail/custom-domain.m4 and remove the EXPOSED_USERS('root') l
On Apr 23, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Andrew Fremantle wrote:
Are you aware of any way of doing this stuff in the .mc file?
Should the .cf ever be remade, these changes would be blown away
Right-- seems to be for the .mc file (from /usr/share/sendmail/cf/
README):
There are always users that ne
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Andrew Fremantle wrote:
With all the configurations I've tried, emails are rejected by my
smarthost with an error like "sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
invalid; domain does not exist".
What I'd like to do is find a way to alter sendmail's perception of
my hos
At 02:19 PM 4/23/2007, Andrew Fremantle wrote:
Hello,
I've got a machine on the local network, with a local DNS name (which is
not a valid name in the global DNS).
My problem is that I cannot kludge sendmail into behaving nicely and allow
the periodic(8) mailings to get through.
Hello,
I've got a machine on the local network, with a local DNS name (which is
not a valid name in the global DNS).
My problem is that I cannot kludge sendmail into behaving nicely and
allow the periodic(8) mailings to get through.
The machine is named psyche.local
domain1.com is a d
net
>
> Explorer or Firefox or any other browser. The error message
>
> In all these cases is ; DNS in not reachable.
>
>
>
> Even if during this time window of about 2 minute I jump on
>
> The server the problem is the same.
>
>
>
> More interestin
Hi,
I have a network run under Windows 2003 server with
About 13 stations.
At least 5 times a day I cannot open a page with Internet
Explorer or Firefox or any other browser. The error message
In all these cases is ; DNS in not reachable.
Even if during this time window of about 2
at the client (tested under
> > both Linux and Windows) accepts.
> >
> > The client doesn't get the DNS resolver information and can't
> > ping anywhere, even by raw IP address, even to the router. The
> > router also fails to ping the client.
> Yeah, off
David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another in my mysterious problems list...
>
> pf.conf is set up to allow icmp anywhere. And dhcpd offers a
> plausible IP address and gateway that the client (tested under
> both Linux and Windows) accepts.
>
> The client d
Hello all,
Another in my mysterious problems list...
pf.conf is set up to allow icmp anywhere. And dhcpd offers a
plausible IP address and gateway that the client (tested under
both Linux and Windows) accepts.
The client doesn't get the DNS resolver information and can't
ping anywher
Hello there hiding behind an anonymous email account whoever you are,
Not knowing what you really ask for, since you don't provide much
information I assume that you want to setup a small dns for LAN with
forwarding to your ISP?
If this is correct may I suggest that you have look at d
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:16:46AM -1200, neo neo wrote:
> hi
>
> For NAT ;
>
> i already configure internal and external ip . And also finished gateway.
>
> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Will you be doing your own DNS or will that be done by
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:56:31 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
> >
> > Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
> > book is great. DNS is no t
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The
internet depends on it.
exactly. it's quite easy to make domains not synchronize to sl
neo neo wrote:
could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
Please stop posting the same question multiple times.
Also,
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html
Nick.
___
freebsd-questions
On Thursday 15 March 2007 14:53, neo neo said:
> could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
You really need to read the handbook. Most of your questions will be
answered there.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html
Bind and DNS questions here:
h
could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:16:46 -1200
"neo neo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The
inte
hi
For NAT ;
i already configure internal and external ip . And also finished gateway.
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
by the way , " route add default xx.xx.xx.xx " is setting gateway .. is it
right ?
very thankz... i am very happy for your support..
o spam...)
15 seconds per SMTP dialog
90 seconds for PF timeout tcp.close
the state table will have:
20 * (90 + 15) * 2 ways = 5.000 entries
Since any mail generates a few DNS queries (reverse DNS,
+ DSNRBL queries), the state table will also gets
2 ways * 60 seconds (t
timeout tcp.close
the state table will have:
20 * (90 + 15) * 2 ways = 5.000 entries
Since any mail generates a few DNS queries (reverse DNS,
+ DSNRBL queries), the state table will also gets
2 ways * 60 seconds (timeout udp.multiple) * 5 (DNS queries) * 20
(connections
he resolver would wait for the
>> full 30s DNS timeout before trying the next server (hence the cry dreaded
>> by sysadmins everywhere that "the Internet is slow today"), but nowadays
>
> Is there any way to configure this 30 second delay for older versions
> of Fr
se. It used to be that the resolver would
> >wait for the full 30s DNS timeout before trying the next server
> >(hence the cry dreaded by sysadmins everywhere that "the Internet is
> >slow today"), but nowadays
>
> Is there any way to configure this 30 second delay fo
On 10/28/06, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On recent FreeBSD, the resolver actually iterates through the listed
nameserver lines in order, sending the query out to each in turn until
it gets a response. It used to be that the resolver would wait for the
full 30s DNS timeout
501 - 600 of 1459 matches
Mail list logo
