Gunther Mayer wrote:
> > Don't use "reboot", use shutdown -r now. I also had the same problem
> > once
> > (had to get physical access to the box to fix it) and it was because
> > of
> > the "reboot".
> >
>
> Thanks. I guess I'll use shutdown -r now then in future. If it still
> happens then
Nejc S wrote:
Hello,
Afaic this only happens on a power loss or otherwise unclean shutdown
but I used the "reboot" command from the shell (in a background (sleep
Don't use "reboot", use shutdown -r now. I also had the same problem once
(had to get physical access to the box to fix it)
Hello,
> Afaic this only happens on a power loss or otherwise unclean shutdown
> but I used the "reboot" command from the shell (in a background (sleep
Don't use "reboot", use shutdown -r now. I also had the same problem once
(had to get physical access to the box to fix it) and it was because of
physical access to the console I realised that it choked
on the unclean /usr file system and was unable to proceed as the
automatic fsck failed, prompting for an emergency shell. An fsck -y
followed by a reboot sorted out the issue but it caused a good 1.5h of
total downtime which should have been
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:21:40 -0500
"Andrew Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:17 PM, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > There is also NTFS through ntfs-3g ,which is available for all of
> > the above (sysutils/fusefs-ntfs on FreeBSD). Having a native Windows
> >
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:17 PM, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is also NTFS through ntfs-3g ,which is available for all of the
> above (sysutils/fusefs-ntfs on FreeBSD). Having a native Windows
> filesystem is sensible on a portable drive, and fat32 is not a great
> filesystem.
>
> http:
t.
>
> The operating systems in my home include FreeBSD, NetBSD, Mac OS X and
> Windows XP Pro. If I want all of these systems to be able to read
> and write to the drive, what file system should I use? I know fat32
> is pretty universal, but is it advisable?
There is also NTFS
Windows XP Pro. If I want all of these systems to be able to read and write
to the drive, what file system should I use? I know fat32 is pretty
universal, but is it advisable?
yes, just don't put too many small files on it as it's wasteful.
and don't put too big files (in o
t.
>
> The operating systems in my home include FreeBSD, NetBSD, Mac OS X and
> Windows XP Pro. If I want all of these systems to be able to read and write
> to the drive, what file system should I use? I know fat32 is pretty
> universal, but is it advisable?
Well, the filesys
l of these systems to be able to read and write
to the drive, what file system should I use? I know fat32 is pretty
universal, but is it advisable?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
Hi,
FreeBSD 7, AMD64.
$ df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1d2.9G-67M2.7G-2%/var/www
$ mount
/dev/da0s1d on /var/www (ufs, local, soft-updates)
$
I found an email thread from 2006 where Suleiman Souhlal says the
culprit was a stale cylind
Seems like a shame to boot a nice 9TB disk pack off a floppy Disk or a
Pen drive. I mean you do what you have to but that just screams
'workaround'
Or worrying about 1 minute longer boot cycle on 90 days+ uptime screams
doesn't matter at all. it is workaround, but over strange BIOS software,
On our older servers that wouldn't even recognize a 2TB partition
(which is where the OS was too), we used a CF card and CF card adapter
to boot from. Slightly more gracious...
CD/DVD drive isn't bad too. anyway - you don't change kernel every day.
or pendrive. possibly floppy but i don't know
On our older servers that wouldn't even recognize a 2TB partition
(which is where the OS was too), we used a CF card and CF card adapter
to boot from. Slightly more gracious...
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Edward Capriolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Wojciech Pu
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:12:00 Edward Capriolo wrote:
> Seems like a shame to boot a nice 9TB disk pack off a floppy Disk or a
> Pen drive. I mean you do what you have to but that just screams
> 'workaround'
Or worrying about 1 minute longer boot cycle on 90 days+ uptime screams
optimization
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Wojciech Puchar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > Hi all. I'm trying to create a ~9TB partition on a new file server.
> > > I thought FreeBSD now supported this (I'm on 7.0), but I can't figure
> > > it out. I go into sysinstall, create the partition in fdisk
you talk about VM, not real memory. i don't think making 10GB swap is a
problem.
The problem is the time that it will take to fsck a 9TB filesystem.
depends mostly of file count not size.
my 1.4TB partition is checked shorter than 20GB squid partition
___
On 4/8/08, Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > it will be most likely large 32K blocks, so quick fsck and little RAM
> > >
> > >
> >
> > In my experience with UFS2 and fsck you will want to have a gig of ram per
> TB
> > of filesystem. You can get by with less sometimes, eventuall
it will be most likely large 32K blocks, so quick fsck and little RAM
In my experience with UFS2 and fsck you will want to have a gig of ram per TB
of filesystem. You can get by with less sometimes, eventually you'll get
bit. Most mere mortals don't take UFS2 past 6-8TB in production.
There
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 11:20:58 am Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> That looks like what I need. I've got a seperate 32GB array to boot
> >> off of, so that's perfect. Now to just read some man pages. Thanks!
> >
> > How many memory do you have in this machine ?? To fsck 9 TB you will
>
> there is
On 4/8/08, Brian McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm...didn't think of that...didn't think fsck used that much
> RAM...and thought it was independent of the file system size. Right
> now it's got 2GB.
so better you think a little more before execute and do so
That looks like what I need. I've got a seperate 32GB array to boot
off of, so that's perfect. Now to just read some man pages. Thanks!
How many memory do you have in this machine ?? To fsck 9 TB you will
there is swap too . but my 1.4TB partition can be fsck'ed on 1GB RAM
without swap.
On 4/8/08, Brian McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks like what I need. I've got a seperate 32GB array to boot
> off of, so that's perfect. Now to just read some man pages. Thanks!
How many memory do you have in this machine ?? To fsck 9 TB you will
need a LOT of memory
_
Hmm...didn't think of that...didn't think fsck used that much
RAM...and thought it was independent of the file system size. Right
now it's got 2GB.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Alexandre Biancalana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/8/08, Brian McCann <[EMAIL P
That looks like what I need. I've got a seperate 32GB array to boot
off of, so that's perfect. Now to just read some man pages. Thanks!
--Brian
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:39:48AM -0400, Brian McCann wrote:
> > Hi all.
Hi all. I'm trying to create a ~9TB partition on a new file server.
I thought FreeBSD now supported this (I'm on 7.0), but I can't figure
it out. I go into sysinstall, create the partition in fdisk using "A
= Use Entire Disk), write it to disk, exit sysinstall and re-run
it...and sysinstall does
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:39:48AM -0400, Brian McCann wrote:
> Hi all. I'm trying to create a ~9TB partition on a new file server.
> I thought FreeBSD now supported this (I'm on 7.0), but I can't figure
> it out. I go into sysinstall, create the partition in fdisk using "A
> = Use Entire Disk),
Hi all. I'm trying to create a ~9TB partition on a new file server.
I thought FreeBSD now supported this (I'm on 7.0), but I can't figure
it out. I go into sysinstall, create the partition in fdisk using "A
= Use Entire Disk), write it to disk, exit sysinstall and re-run
it...and sysinstall doesn
growfs can expand UFS filesystem. worked for me with normal partitions, if
you use geli with sector size != 512 bytes, it won't, but i've patched it
for that. still - it's buggy.
but really don't assume it won't screw up your filesystem...
if you like to try do:
a)unmount this fs
b) fsck it t
Actually, I am using GPT.
-Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Seaman"
To: "Jeffery Swan"
Subject: Re: Expanding file system
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:54:46 +
Jeffery Swan wrote:
> The problem is, df only reports back the original 9
Jeffery Swan wrote:
> The problem is, df only reports back the original 905 Gig. It seems that
> the RAID controller did migrate my data but left the additional space
> "raw". What I need to know how to do now is extend my original partition
> (slice) to include the newly added space without loos
I am currently running FreeNAS on FreeBSD as a NAS device and it works
great. Initially, I had a Highpoint RocketRAID card installed with 3 -
500 Gig drives attached configured in hardware as RAID 5. This gave me
about 905 Gig usefull storage.
The RAID card allows for adding hard drives via Online
> > 2) knowing the file system from 1), how to check the remaining space
> > in the file system?
>
> You normally just start writing and deal with the errors that come from full
> file systems when they show up. The C functions set errno accordingly.
>
> The rea
I want use md-disk as root file system.
OS: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
Environment = VMWare (Version 5) and Computer (CPU=Intel P4 2.4G,
Memory=Kingston 1G DDR400, Storage=2G CF)
create a less-than 100MB of image (image for ramdisk, mfs root)
The loader.rc {
load kernel // The
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
I am writing a C application that would store files in a directory.
Before it starts storing files, I would like the application to check
is there is enough space in the file system.
How to:
1) knowing the name of the directory, how toknow the file system it
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 11:25:39 schrieb Olivier Nicole:
> How to:
>
> 1) knowing the name of the directory, how toknow the file system it
>belongs to (not considering symbolic links, I can decide that the
>directory is always a real path);
>
> 2) knowing the fil
Hi,
I am writing a C application that would store files in a directory.
Before it starts storing files, I would like the application to check
is there is enough space in the file system.
How to:
1) knowing the name of the directory, how toknow the file system it
belongs to (not considering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>
> http://ffsdrv.sourceforge.net/
>
>
Didn't reconize any of my UFS filesytems... tried UFS Explorer
semi-worked (the file system I need is /dev/ad5s1 [note no partition
letter!]:monster# ls /dev/ad*
/dev/ad4/dev/a
On Monday 19 November 2007 04:32:15 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I have microslut vista as a dual boot (before anyone suggests wine
> please refer to previous threads on amd74 vs. wine) and want to access
> my FreeBSD file systems from it (and later linux when I install it as
> a triple boot). It i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have microslut vista as a dual boot (before anyone suggests wine
please refer to previous threads on amd74 vs. wine) and want to access
my FreeBSD file systems from it (and later linux when I install it as
a triple boot). It is the only machine on
On 10/30/07, Daniel Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I want to migrate a file system containing multiple jails from a small
> drive to a large (RAID-1) array. I want to do this with minimal
> downtime.
>
I did a migration like this, but instead of dump, I use
I want to migrate a file system containing multiple jails from a small
drive to a large (RAID-1) array. I want to do this with minimal
downtime.
Simply shutting down the jails and using dump/restore to move the file
system takes too long, but what if I do it in several steps like this:
1. "
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I was doing some research for file systems at work and came across
some semi-technical papers on a file system called elephant. Since
this paper mentions that the designers first tried their
implementation on FreeBSD 2.2.7, I thought I'd ask here if anyone has
Hi,
I was doing some research for file systems at work and came across
some semi-technical papers on a file system called elephant. Since
this paper mentions that the designers first tried their
implementation on FreeBSD 2.2.7, I thought I'd ask here if anyone has
ever heard of this file s
#x27;m not exactly familiar with. Or rather I am familiar with them, but
am not sure how they relate to the finished product (i.e. my file
system). First there is the block size set by default to 16KB, and
fragment size set to 1/8 of block size. I'm assuming that a block is a
group of sector
/usr/ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Hi again. Is there a FreeBSD equivalent of Linux's 'mke2fs'? I want to create
a disk image that is in ext2 format. On Linux, I would do:
dd if=/dev/zero of=some.img bs=1M count=1 seek=1024
/sbin/mke2fs -F -j some.img
Can
Hi again. Is there a FreeBSD equivalent of Linux's 'mke2fs'? I want
to create a disk image that is in ext2 format. On Linux, I would do:
dd if=/dev/zero of=some.img bs=1M count=1 seek=1024
/sbin/mke2fs -F -j some.img
Can I do something similar on FreeBSD?
--Paul Hoffman
_
Paul Hoffman wrote:
Hi again. Is there a FreeBSD equivalent of Linux's 'mke2fs'? I want to
create a disk image that is in ext2 format. On Linux, I would do:
dd if=/dev/zero of=some.img bs=1M count=1 seek=1024
/sbin/mke2fs -F -j some.img
Can I do something similar on FreeBSD?
--Paul Hoffman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question re reducing a filesystem in FreeBSD 6.2 - I am new to
FreeBSD - I am use to AIX
We have FreeBSD installed on a dell 1950 - I would like to reduce the size
of /usr in case I want to added the space to another file system.
We currently have
Hi,
I have a question re reducing a filesystem in FreeBSD 6.2 - I am new to
FreeBSD - I am use to AIX
We have FreeBSD installed on a dell 1950 - I would like to reduce the size
of /usr in case I want to added the space to another file system.
We currently have all our space allocated as
://phaq.phunsites.net/2006/08/11/realtime-file-system-replication-on-freebsd/
Looking at the link it seems he is actually asking about geom_gate.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Antonio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found this site with instructions to setup what is basically a network
> RAID-1:
>
> http://phaq.phunsites.net/2006/08/11/realtime-file-system-replication-on-freebsd/
>
>
> My question is: What experience does anyone have using this
Hi all,
I found this site with instructions to setup what is basically a network
RAID-1:
http://phaq.phunsites.net/2006/08/11/realtime-file-system-replication-on-freebsd/
My question is: What experience does anyone have using this solution on
a production environment?
I will appreciate
Ross Penner wrote:
> On 5/15/07, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:15:06PM -0600, Ross Penner wrote:
>>> I recently had my system freeze so I had to manually restart it. I was
>>> worried that there would be some problems with the filesystem so I
>>> looked in
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 06:34:42AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > I booted into single-user ("press 4") and got rid of tons of junk
> > left in /var/tmp. Then I did a mount -a and and fsck -y.
>
> But not in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gary Kline wrote:
> I booted into single-user ("press 4") and got rid of tons of junk
> left in /var/tmp. Then I did a mount -a and and fsck -y.
But not in that order. fsck -y *first*, then mount -a, then start
removing files from /va
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 02:49:59PM -0400, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote:
>
> El Mar, 15 de Mayo de 2007, 14:15, Ross Penner escribió:
> > I recently had my system freeze so I had to manually restart it. I was
> > worried that there would be some problems with the filesystem so I
> > looked into the
/
** Root file system
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
1549 files, 27349 used, 226466 free (650 frags, 28227 blocks, 0.3%
fragmentation)
** /dev/ar0s1e (NO WRITE)
** Last
nd I got the following:
>
> rosbot# fsck
> ** /dev/ar0s1a (NO WRITE)
> ** Last Mounted on /
> ** Root file system
> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
> ** Phase 5 -
On 5/15/07, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:15:06PM -0600, Ross Penner wrote:
> I recently had my system freeze so I had to manually restart it. I was
> worried that there would be some problems with the filesystem so I
> looked into the matter and discovered
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:15:06PM -0600, Ross Penner wrote:
> I recently had my system freeze so I had to manually restart it. I was
> worried that there would be some problems with the filesystem so I
> looked into the matter and discovered the utility fsck. I ran this as
> root and I got the
nd I got the following:
>
> rosbot# fsck
> ** /dev/ar0s1a (NO WRITE)
> ** Last Mounted on /
> ** Root file system
> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
> ** Phase 5 -
On May 15, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Ross Penner wrote:
[ ... about fsck... ]
It seems to my unexperienced eye that their are problems in some of
the filesystems, but they arn't being resolved. I tried running fsck
-y and nothing changed. What am I doing wrong? How can I resolve
these issues? Thanks fo
Modulok typed on 07/05/07 11:02:
> How does one determine the file system a disk uses, for disks that are
> not yet mounted? Example: You're handed a disk that has been sitting
> around in a closet for years, with no idea what it was used for. The
> department manager tells y
How does one determine the file system a disk uses, for disks that are
not yet mounted? Example: You're handed a disk that has been sitting
around in a closet for years, with no idea what it was used for. The
department manager tells you to see what it contains.
How do I mount it, if I
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are expanding at work and I am messing around with different setups.
>
> I need a file system that will *look* like its just on one machine,
> like when mounting with NFS, but because of the large am
On 01/05/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
We are expanding at work and I am messing around with different setups.
I need a file system that will *look* like its just on one machine,
like when mounting with NFS, but because of the large amount of data,
I really need to expa
Hi
We are expanding at work and I am messing around with different setups.
I need a file system that will *look* like its just on one machine,
like when mounting with NFS, but because of the large amount of data,
I really need to expand the files to several servers.
Also I need some kind of
:
> ronggui wrote:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > I am new to FreeBSD. I got my first question with FAT32 file-system.
> > It seems quite strange. I install FreeBSD 6.2 in my asus notebook.
> > When I mount windows file system, I cannot move directory even if as
> > root
.
>
> I am new to FreeBSD. I got my first question with FAT32 file-system.
> It seems quite strange. I install FreeBSD 6.2 in my asus notebook.
> When I mount windows file system, I cannot move directory even if as
> root.
>
> mount_msdosfs /dev/ad0s6 /mnt
> mkdir /mnt/1
&g
ronggui wrote:
Hello, all.
I am new to FreeBSD. I got my first question with FAT32 file-system.
It seems quite strange. I install FreeBSD 6.2 in my asus notebook.
When I mount windows file system, I cannot move directory even if as
root.
mount_msdosfs /dev/ad0s6 /mnt
mkdir /mnt/1
mkdir /mnt2
Hello, all.
I am new to FreeBSD. I got my first question with FAT32 file-system.
It seems quite strange. I install FreeBSD 6.2 in my asus notebook.
When I mount windows file system, I cannot move directory even if as
root.
mount_msdosfs /dev/ad0s6 /mnt
mkdir /mnt/1
mkdir /mnt2
mv /mnt/1 /mnt/2
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 2:34 am, you wrote:
> No idea. There is no manpage for getent on my (6.1) system, so
> I don't know what it might do.
Maybe it's new (to FreeBSD) as per 6.2. Anyway:
---
SYNOPSIS
getent database [key ...]
DESCRIPTION
The getent program
Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 12:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Such a report will be incomplete if the system in question is an
> > NIS client. For starters, see yp(8).
>
> Would "getent passwd" and "getent group" be more definitive?
No idea. There
On Monday 08 January 2007 12:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Such a report will be incomplete if the system in question is an
> NIS client. For starters, see yp(8).
Would "getent passwd" and "getent group" be more definitive?
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpU9vIlBUWYA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> > 2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD
> > System.. meaning how to get All Users/Groups list on a FreeBSD
> > Server?
>
> The information is in /etc/passwd and /etc/group. You can
> get a count with the "wc" command.
Such a report will be incomplete if the system
VeeJay writes:
> 1. How to get the Files listing of "Recently Changed" files under
> a File System based on date... for example Root /
man find
> 2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD
> System.. meaning how to get All Users/Groups list
Hello my friends
1. How to get the Files listing of "Recently Changed" files under a File
System based on date... for example Root /
2. How to see that how many Users are created on a FreeBSD System.. meaning
how to get All Users/Groups list on a FreeBSD Server?
--
Thanks
/etc/passwd & cat /etc/groups
Kind regards
Tim Nilimaa
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] genom VeeJay
Skickat: må 2007-01-08 15:29
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD-Questions
Ämne: FreeBSD File System, please help
Hello my friends
1. How to get the Files listin
chines (all with nearly full
discs). My hope is that I could use a single file system on this drive
which could then be plugged into any of these machines which run FreeBSD,
OS
X, or WinXP.
My usual recommendation for this very problem is the ext2 filesystem. As
far as I know, the drivers exist an
discs). My hope is that I could use a single file system on this drive
which could then be plugged into any of these machines which run FreeBSD,
OS
X, or WinXP.
My usual recommendation for this very problem is the ext2 filesystem. As
far as I know, the drivers exist and work reasonably well for
/Firewire Seagate drive with the
hopes of using it to store my growing collection of music, photos, etc.
currently spread across several different machines (all with nearly full
discs). My hope is that I could use a single file system on this drive
which could then be plugged into any of these machines
Hello all,
I recently picked up a big 700G external USB/Firewire Seagate drive with the
hopes of using it to store my growing collection of music, photos, etc.
currently spread across several different machines (all with nearly full
discs). My hope is that I could use a single file system on
On 16/12/2006 6:25 AM, FK wrote:
...
But ... I will lose one-month-long-worthing data,
which is horrible since I have modified a lot of data for the time.
Do I have any practical ways to back up the data without mounting it,
given that I could not fix the superblock?
Have you tried a Linux
,
which is horrible since I have modified a lot of data for the time.
Do I have any practical ways to back up the data without mounting it,
given that I could not fix the superblock?
--
FK.
From: FK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblo
.
From: FK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem?
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:27:56 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fk> Dear all members,
fk>
fk> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fk> Subject: Re: How can I fix "Cann
FK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If alternatives are all copies of the master,
> they must have the same contents. I checked and
> found they are equal.
>
> # dd if=/dev/da0s2a skip=160 bs=512 count=16 of=sb1
> 16+0 records in
> 16+0 records out
> 8192 bytes transferred in 0.013373 secs (612571 byt
Dear list members,
How can I fix "Cannot find file system superblock" problem?
I thought there would be a solution on the Internet, and
googled but could not find one yet.
I hope you would have some hints. Thank you.
Background:
FreeBSD6.0-RELEASE.
#disklabel /dev/da0s2
# /de
VeeJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have read this below quoted information that to increase performance, one
> can set a Block Size. If so, how much? Could some genius advise what to do?
Take the defaults.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing l
can be divided into
fragments, so that multiple, slightly oversized files can use one block to
store their extra tidbits.
FreeBSD defaults to 8KB blocks. If you're creating a large partition―say,
1GB or more―use 16KB
blocks. When you do this, you also need to change your fragment size. The
On 2006-10-18 14:34, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > The file `alias.log' is not rotated by `newsyslog.conf', so maybe we
> > should add it there? Then we can let `newsyslog' signal `natd' by:
> >
> > %%%
> > diff -r 4474abb9619a etc/newsyslog.conf
> > ---
Matthew Seaman writes:
> There doesn't seem to be any signal that you can send natd with the
> usual 'reread all config files and re-open all file descriptors'
> effect that most daemons understand.
The next obvious questions are "would that be desirable
behavior?" and "how hard would
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-10-18 07:13, Paul Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>> On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All,
My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I
have try to reboo
On 2006-10-18 07:13, Paul Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I
>>> have try to reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary
Paul Murphy writes:
>I have been trying to track down a similar problem! Using the
> above method I think I have found 'natd' to be the culprit.
> Should 'natd' receive a signal when 'alias.log' rolls over?
> Restarting 'natd' seems to have releases some megabytes.
That's not ac
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All,
My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I
have try to reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary files
inside / but I still get 12 MB of free space with total 495 MB
wo
On 2006-10-18 07:53, "Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
> My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I
> have try to reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary files
> inside / but I still get 12 MB of free space with total 495 MB
> worth of that partit
Office of CEO- rithy4u.NET writes:
> My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I have
> try to reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary files inside / but
> I still get 12 MB of free space with total 495 MB worth of that
> partition. Any ideas?
du -x / | sort -nr | he
Dear All,
My firewall server was running out of space on / partition I have try to
reboot/fsck and delete all unneccessary files inside / but I still get
12 MB of free space with total 495 MB worth of that partition. Any ideas?
Rgds,
--
*Rithy Ray, RCSA*
Chief Executive Officer
Web: www.rith
W. D. wrote:
> How do I get out of this mess?
>
> gzip: stdout: No space left on device
> Broken pipe
>
> df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/da0s1a 9918398644-7395 108%/
>
> I tried to do a backup:
>
> cd /
> mkdir archive
> tar -zcvpf /ar
301 - 400 of 838 matches
Mail list logo
