messages.
Thank you
Jun 8 10:16:34 mail kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards from 1721
usec to 1377 usec for pid 684 (rpc.lockd)
Jun 8 10:16:34 mail kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards from 528
usec to 459 usec for pid 678 (rpc.statd)
Jun 8 10:16:34 mail kernel: calcru: runtime went
Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr writes:
OK thank you Antonio :-)
Also, see the FAQ entry if you haven't already.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
that it was
fix in a r200768 now it is clear that i do not know that that code means
(in my eyes it's a bsd build or smth) but i'm currently running the latest
8.0-RELEASE-p3 available. Please advise on how to patch the kernel panic.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
the fix. Giovanni Trematerra gave a response that it was
fix in a r200768 now it is clear that i do not know that that code means
(in my eyes it's a bsd build or smth) but i'm currently running the latest
8.0-RELEASE-p3 available. Please advise on how to patch the kernel panic.
r200768 uniquely
Re.
lest I forget.
(...) I now will build
world kernel and hope that it'll come out fine.
And so it did.
kldxref /boot/kernel
The kernel runs now. So back to my ezjails.
Thanks to all,
Rgds.,
Peter.
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter
...@netserv /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# ( cd /usr/src/ make kernel
KERNCONF=NETSERV )
--
Kernel build for NETSERV started on Wed May 26 06:19:45 UTC 2010
--
=== NETSERV
mkdir -p
Dear list,
This probably is obvious but I don't seem to be able to figure out where I
should look in order to learn why I can't compile the bloomin' kernel, pse see
below.
Every time I update my KERNCONF, I try to remember to keep a copy of GENERIC so
I can diff against the updated one
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Peter Cornelius p...@gmx.net wrote:
Dear list,
This probably is obvious but I don't seem to be able to figure out where I
should look in order to learn why I can't compile the bloomin' kernel, pse
see below.
Every time I update my KERNCONF, I try
Estimado Jorge,
do the makebuildworld first.
That's odd - I even *installed* world without any issue?
Will try now anyways, though. Life's a mystery.
Gracias por apoyar,
Saludos cordiales,
Peter.
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter
Re.
do the makebuildworld first.
That's odd - I even *installed* world without any issue?
Will try now anyways, though. Life's a mystery.
Nope, no change.
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Peter.
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter
Peter Cornelius p...@gmx.net writes:
Re.
do the makebuildworld first.
That's odd - I even *installed* world without any issue?
You installed world without a new kernel?
That would be a good way to make unnecessary trouble for yourself.
Will try now anyways, though. Life's a mystery
--- On Sun, 5/23/10, Heshmat Ismail real_precious_st...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Heshmat Ismail real_precious_st...@yahoo.com
Subject: qemu error mounting cd and no internet connection with custom kernel
To: freebsd-emulat...@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, May 23, 2010, 8:35 PM
Hi all,
I have built
Hi all,
I enabled device random in my kernel configuration file , rebuilt and installed
my kernel , now startx works flawlessly , thank you Alexander Best and thank
you all.
Heshmat Ismail
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Try to compile it again without the -j option, will help to figure out
where is going wrong exactly.
Cheers,
Jiansong
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Antonio Kless antoniok@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I trying to build custom kernel to enable packet-filter.
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.net
-Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign
-fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100
--param large-function-growth=1000 -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone
-mfpmath=387
I have built and installed a custom kernel on i386 machine with the
8-RELEASE then installed xorg from the DVD,when i ran startx i got:
couldn't create cookie.When using GENERIC kernel startx works
flawlessly,but with my custom kernel i got this error.
Heshmat Ismail
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:54:21AM -0700, Heshmat Ismail wrote:
I have built and installed a custom kernel on i386 machine with the
8-RELEASE then installed xorg from the DVD,when i ran startx i got:
couldn't create cookie.When using GENERIC kernel startx works
flawlessly,but with my custom
Antonio Kless antoniok@gmail.com writes:
if_rum.o(.text+0x3868):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:2324: undefined
reference to `ieee80211_free_node'
At a guess, you've got the rum device without wlan.
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
That's right!
Thanks a lot, now it builts well.
2010/5/13 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org
Antonio Kless antoniok@gmail.com writes:
if_rum.o(.text+0x3868):/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_rum.c:2324: undefined
reference to `ieee80211_free_node'
At a guess, you've got
--- On Thu, 5/13/10, Heshmat Ismail real_precious_st...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Heshmat Ismail real_precious_st...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: startx couldn't create cookie with custom kernel
To: Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, May 13, 2010, 1:19 PM
# cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
Hi--
On May 13, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Heshmat Ismail wrote:
-cpuI486_CPU
-cpuI586_CPU
+#cpu I486_CPU
+#cpu I586_CPU
cpuI686_CPU
You don't really want to disable these. There are some kernel optimizations
which are only enabled
you need to re-enable device random. X needs it.
--
Alexander Best
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hello. I trying to build custom kernel to enable packet-filter.
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.net 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE #0: Sun Mar 21 05:25:24 UTC
2010 r...@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# export
declare -x BLOCKSIZE=K
declare -x FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES
Dear Sir,
My name is Heshmat Ismail.The output of uname-a is:-
FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #12: Tue May 11 11:05:22 UTC 2010
heshmat@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386
After I have built and installed my custom kernel (MYKERNEL),i installed xorg
and ran the command startx
kernel (MYKERNEL),i installed
xorg and ran the command startx but i got: couldn't create cookie.What could
be the problem with MYKERNEL? my kernel configuration file is attached with
this message.
Thanks,
Heshmat Ismail
An XORG cookie is dealing with X authority, not with a kernel config
What does kernel option UWX_TRACE_ENABLE do?
I did a quick search on the net, but no help.
many thanks
anton
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:51:59 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
AS What does kernel option UWX_TRACE_ENABLE do?
AS
AS I did a quick search on the net, but no help.
AS
from sys/ia64/conf/NOTES
# Build the unwinder with tracing support. This option is used to debug the
# unwinder itself
On 05/04/10 00:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Monday 03 May 2010 15:52:48 Traiano Welcome wrote:
Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)?
No. KSE support was removed over 2 years ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-March/084248.html
Note that only KSE was
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 05/04/10 00:38, Bruce Cran wrote:
[...]
Note that only KSE was removed; threading is of course fully supported by
other mechanisms.
Does anyone know of a paper(s) that compare the different threading
model of say FBSD,
Hi List
Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)?
Thanks in Advance,
Traiano Welcome
NOTE: This e-mail message and all attachments thereto contain confidential
information intended for a specific addressee and purpose. If you are not the
addressee (a) you may not disclose, copy,
On Monday 03 May 2010 15:52:48 Traiano Welcome wrote:
Is KSE support still in FreeBSD (8.0 and upward)?
No. KSE support was removed over 2 years ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-March/084248.html
--
Bruce Cran
___
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 07:09 +0200, xyz wrote:
Those numbers mean the size in mo, of linux kernel (3.2mo), and freebsd
kernel (33,9mo) for the same hardware configuration.
Linux is based more on a minimalist kernel with user mode modules - add
the modules and you'll find its larger, or take
Ok
I understand.
Thank you very much for your answer.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 07:09 +0200, xyz wrote:
Those numbers mean the size in mo, of linux kernel (3.2mo), and freebsd
kernel (33,9mo
On 4/23/10, xyz harvey.two.face.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Those numbers mean the size in mo, of linux kernel (3.2mo), and freebsd
kernel (33,9mo) for the same hardware configuration.
My kernel is 2.8 MB and ~30 MB are modules (all of them).
Is it difficult to update the patch?
Is it difficult
Hi
Thank you for your answer
But I can't believe that lighten the kernel of useless drivers, saves
only few bytes, by removing whole useless modules (sound, ata/sata, agp...).
Furthermore, I think about free space that could be save too, in the
hard drive this time.
Why for the same
On 4/22/10, xyz harvey.two.face.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your answer
But I can't believe that lighten the kernel of useless drivers, saves
only few bytes, by removing whole useless modules (sound, ata/sata, agp...).
Furthermore, I think about free space that could be save too
Those numbers mean the size in mo, of linux kernel (3.2mo), and freebsd
kernel (33,9mo) for the same hardware configuration.
Is it difficult to update the patch?
On 04/22/10 23:54, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/22/10, xyzharvey.two.face.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your answer
Hi everybody
I want to build a custom kernel, because my pc doesn't have much memory.
So I would like reduce the size of the kernel load in the memory, to
save her.
My question is, is it possible to save more memory, by removing the
whole agp drivers, and keeping only the driver needed
As far as I understand this is one of the main reasons to make a custom
kernel :)
So yes, you can do that if you do not need those kernel modules.
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
xyz harvey.two.face.k...@gmail.com
Sent by: owner-freebsd
Thank you for your answer.
But how I can only choose the intel agp driver, without all others by
puting agp in the kernel configuration file?
On 04/21/10 15:20, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
As far as I understand this is one of the main reasons to make a
custom kernel :)
So yes, you can do
xyz wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
But how I can only choose the intel agp driver, without all others by
puting agp in the kernel configuration file?
Please don't top post - it is bad form.
I think you may be confusing agp driver and video driver. The agp support
in the kernel
On 4/21/10, xyz harvey.two.face.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
But how I can only choose the intel agp driver, without all others by
puting agp in the kernel configuration file?
Currently you can not pick only intel agp code, agp module have
support for other vendors too.
I
How can I enforce this? Presently the system just hangs.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Halliday
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:17 PM
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: Force reboot after kernel panic.
How can I enforce this? Presently
hi everybody
I try to make a custom kernel (for a emachines notebook), but i always get
this same error or a similar (dependent of choosing ath_hal or for example
ath_rf2425):
*ar2425.o(.text+0x582): In function
`ar2425RfAttach':
/usr/src/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ar5212/ar2425.c:691: undefined
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html
rant
This is absolutely the worst section of an otherwise great
handbook ... Nothing short of a rewrite from scratch could
fix it ...
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 305, Issue 9, Message: 1
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:10:34 -0400 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Adam Vande More writes:
If compiled into the kernel, there's a set of optional settings
(VERBOSE, LOG_LINIT, DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT, etc) that can
Ian Smith writes:
So ... double-checking I'm doing this right:
1) in /boot/loader.conf:
ipfw_load=YES
ipdivert_load=YES
I thought from your earlier mail that you wanted to use in-kernel
NAT?
I want whatever works. :-)
Beyond that ... all other
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Robert Huff wrote:
Ian Smith writes:
So ... double-checking I'm doing this right:
1) in /boot/loader.conf:
ipfw_load=YES
ipdivert_load=YES
I thought from your earlier mail that you wanted to use in-kernel
NAT
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html
rant
This is absolutely the worst section of an otherwise great
handbook ... Nothing short of a rewrite from scratch could
fix it ...
As always, I'm sure a patch -- to provide that rewrite --
Adam Vande More writes:
If compiled into the kernel, there's a set of optional settings
(VERBOSE, LOG_LINIT, DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT, etc) that can be set there.
If using the module, how does one set these?
Logging is compiled into the modules and there are a few sysctl's
Adam Vande More writes:
If compiled into the kernel, there's a set of optional settings
(VERBOSE, LOG_LINIT, DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT, etc) that can be set there.
If using the module, how does one set these?
Logging is compiled into the modules and there are a few sysctl's
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
1) in /boot/loader.conf:
ipfw_load=YES
ipdivert_load=YES
2) in the kernel config:
#options IPFIREWALL #firewall
#options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8)
#options
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:10:34 -0400 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
So ... double-checking I'm doing this right:
1) in /boot/loader.conf:
ipfw_load=YES
ipdivert_load=YES
yes; see NAT HB 31.9.3
2) in the kernel config:
IMHO, and according to Adam Vandr More, kernel options
IMHO, and according to Adam Vandr More, kernel options are no
longer required.
The original reason I asked was:
30.6.2 Kernel Options
It is not a mandatory requirement to enable IPFW by
compiling the following options into the FreeBSD
loader
options. Section 31.9.4 describes alternatives for building a custom kernel. In
contrast, the chapter on ipfw states several times that NAT requires a custom
kernel - 30.6.1, 30.6.2, 30.6.5.7.
I want to use freebsd-update and building a custom kernel eliminates that
option.
Which
the handbook section on NAT, 31.9.3, I can achieve what I need with
boot loader options. Section 31.9.4 describes alternatives for building a
custom kernel. In contrast, the chapter on ipfw states several times that
NAT requires a custom kernel - 30.6.1, 30.6.2, 30.6.5.7.
I want to use freebsd-update
, I can achieve what I need with
boot loader options. Section 31.9.4 describes alternatives for building a
custom kernel. In contrast, the chapter on ipfw states several times that
NAT requires a custom kernel - 30.6.1, 30.6.2, 30.6.5.7.
I want to use freebsd-update and building
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
If compiled into the kernel, there's a set of optional settings
(VERBOSE, LOG_LINIT, DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT, etc) that can be set there.
If using the module, how does one set these?
Logging is compiled
kernel and world, but it usually just bombs out for me.
I would like to give this a go as well.
Peg
Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't
benchmark anything by my impressions were that at least disk access was a bit
slower not only during booting
Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't
[snip]
--
Compiling vbox/vbox-devel with gcc43
1) /usr/include/cam/cam.h needed #include stdio.h for FILE define,
complained by:
[snip]
and
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:34:59AM -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Leon Meßner wrote:
Hi,
if one uses the default labeling with current installer it is not
possible to rebuild the kernel (GENERIC). It fails on installing the
wlan.ko.
snip
/: write failed, filesystem is full
install
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
[...]
It's compiling right now.
I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after
the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
if the new gcc version will really make a significant
difference.
if the new gcc version will really make a significant
difference.
I would love to see the /etc/make.conf, /etc/src.conf and
/etc/libmap.conf files that were used for the build. I have tried compiling in
VBox a current kernel and world, but it usually just bombs out for me. I would
like
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
[...]
It's compiling right now.
I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
after
the next reboot.
So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet?
Hi,
if one uses the default labeling with current installer it is not
possible to rebuild the kernel (GENERIC). It fails on installing the wlan.ko.
Isn't that wrong somehow ?
=== wi (install)
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 if_wi.ko /boot/kernel
install -o root -g wheel -m 555
Leon Meßner wrote:
Hi,
if one uses the default labeling with current installer it is not
possible to rebuild the kernel (GENERIC). It fails on installing the
wlan.ko.
Isn't that wrong somehow ?
=== wi (install)
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 if_wi.ko /boot/kernel
install -o root
On Mar 29, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Aiza wrote:
This is the procedure you want to follow.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11680
And for greater detail
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11715
Thanks for the links. I will give them a try.
Jay
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:49:08 -0500, Jay Hall jh...@socket.net wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have been asked to explore the possibility of booting FreeBSD from a
memory stick. This was not a problem; worked great when installed from
the distribution CD.
What would be the best way to get
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have been asked to explore the possibility of booting FreeBSD from a
memory stick. This was not a problem; worked great when installed
from the distribution CD.
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
Thanks,
Jay
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Jay Hall wrote:
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This is what I have done, but now I cannot mount the memory stick.
I create an image of the s1a partition where the kernel I want to copy
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Jay Hall wrote:
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
OK, I managed t get our custom configuration on to the memory stick
using dump. After getting everything configured, what I thought was
correctly, I am
Jay Hall wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I have been asked to explore the possibility of booting FreeBSD from a
memory stick. This was not a problem; worked great when installed from
the distribution CD.
What would be the best way to get our custom configuration onto the
memory stick?
gcc43/libgomp.so.1
libobjc.so.3gcc43/libobjc.so.2
libssp.so.0 gcc43/libssp.so.0
libstdc++.so.6 gcc43/libstdc++.so.6
buildworld goes on normally it seems, but when I tried to build the kernel,
the first stop came from the option used by the kernel build -fformat-
extensions, which
to build the kernel with -Werror.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
of the new warnings you won't
be able to build the kernel with -Werror.
All right !! Thanks for replying !
There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is
enabled
How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for
world/kernel?
will this damage
for development but in your
case, where you're starting with a known good source tree with no
warnings with earlier compilers, it's not necessary to have the option
enabled. If the warnings are pointing to legitimate bugs, those bugs
also exist in a kernel built by gcc 4.2, so your kernel can't
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:24:10 +0200, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm?
I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang.
Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports?
ClangBSD had little to no runtime
with every compiler release, so
until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't
be able to build the kernel with -Werror.
All right !! Thanks for replying !
There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is
enabled
How can I disable -Werror globally
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:18:34PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
All right !! Thanks for replying !
There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is
enabled
How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for
world/kernel?
will this damage the resulting
Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24:
2010/3/24 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br
Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with
gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league?
This is what I use to compile kernel
On Thursday 25 March 2010 19:12:09 Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24:
2010/3/24 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br
Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel
with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i
/libobjc.so.2
libssp.so.0 gcc43/libssp.so.0
libstdc++.so.6 gcc43/libstdc++.so.6
buildworld goes on normally it seems, but when I tried to build the kernel,
the first stop came from the option used by the kernel build -fformat-
extensions, which is not accepted by gcc43, so I took it out of
/usr/src
in /boot/loader.conf. When I
rebooted I got a kernel panic.
Should this be considerd normal or is it something I should report?
Secondly I see there'a a reference to the lagg(4) man page. I think it
would help future readers of the above page if a comment about loading
if_lagg_load=YES
I have set upp aggregation of my wlan and and wired NIC following the
instructions in the handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-aggregation.html
I forgot to add the if_lagg_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf. When I
rebooted I got a kernel panic.
Should this be considerd normal
.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-marcel-freebsd.
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x8
fault code
Leslie Jensen wrote:
I have set upp aggregation of my wlan and and wired NIC following the
instructions in the handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-aggregation.html
I forgot to add the if_lagg_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf. When I
rebooted I got a kernel panic.
Should
. When I
rebooted I got a kernel panic.
Should this be considerd normal or is it something I should report?
No, it's not normal. Please, report it in an explicit way, commands
given and/or changes to rc.conf, loader.conf etc. Try first here
questions@ and then n...@.
Nonetheless I see
it causes a kernel panic?
If that's the case, you should report it to n...@. If you
could include a backtrace of the panic, it would be most helpful.
I have if_lagg_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf
and the following in /etc/rc.conf
wpa_supplicant_enable=YES
ifconfig_em0=up
# ifconfig_iwn0=ether
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Glenn Camilleri glenn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some processes and programs that are custom made to run on FreeBSD. I
suspect some poor implementation of tcp in these programs, but don’t have
the real proof.
[...]
Can you kindly advise ?
Using the
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Glenn Camilleri glenn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some processes and programs that are custom made to run on FreeBSD. I
suspect some poor implementation of tcp in these programs, but
Hello fellow FreeBSD mates,
I've always statically compiled in my modules into my kernel, rather
then using kldload, or throwing them in /boot/loader.conf. I'm just
wondering if there are actually any advantages to doing it this way.
Thanks,
Brandon Falk
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Brandon Falk falk...@gamozo.org wrote:
Hello fellow FreeBSD mates,
I've always statically compiled in my modules into my kernel, rather then
using kldload, or throwing them in /boot/loader.conf. I'm just wondering if
there are actually any advantages to doing
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:37:58 -0500, Brandon Falk falk...@gamozo.org wrote:
Hello fellow FreeBSD mates,
I've always statically compiled in my modules into my kernel, rather
then using kldload, or throwing them in /boot/loader.conf. I'm just
wondering if there are actually any advantages
sure there are advantages. with a module you can change code in src, recompile
the kernel module and then reload it. this lets you test your changes without
having to reboot.
i also use modules for devices i only attached every now and then, like a usb
dongle device for doing bluetooth. i only
in those
guides it alerted me that bandwidth modules weren't included in the bsd's
kernel... Anyway could anyone provide me with a good BSD walk trough for DOS
mitigation and if needed kernel modules and kernel module integration, mabe
other firewall (but with extended howto..) ... (basically
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Bogdan Webb bog...@pgn.ro wrote:
i've already searched the freebsd's mailing
lists and found some mitigation techniques, to bad that google ain't that
familiar with FreeBSD, and searchin' for guides is a pain...
http://www.google.com/bsd
--
Adam Vande More
and upon testing the rules in those
guides it alerted me that bandwidth modules weren't included in the bsd's
kernel... Anyway could anyone provide me with a good BSD walk trough for DOS
kldload dummynet, see loader.conf(5)
mitigation and if needed kernel modules and kernel module integration, mabe
I know the usual way of loading the linux module and configuring it in
rc.conf, but can it be compiled directly into the kernel?
If so, what would the line for it look like?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com wrote:
I know the usual way of loading the linux module and configuring it in
rc.conf, but can it be compiled directly into the kernel?
If so, what would the line for it look like?
options COMPAT_LINUX
or if you are on amd64
701 - 800 of 4710 matches
Mail list logo
