I have CenturyLink DSL, and I use the user-space ppp program in FreeBSD 9.1 to
make the PPPoE connection. From time to time (every few days) the connection
freezes up—no more data can be sent or received. No error shows up in ppp.log;
all I can see there is that there are no more
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:28:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:47 +, RW wrote:
> > ##enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf)
> >
> > You probably need this if you haven't set resolv.conf manually
> >
> > > set dial
> > > set login
> >
> > I don't
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:47 +, RW wrote:
> ##enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf)
>
> You probably need this if you haven't set resolv.conf manually
>
> > set dial
> > set login
>
> I don't think you need these.
Thank you :)
uncommenting "enable dns", commenting
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 16:47 +, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:13:40 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> ##enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf)
>
> You probably need this if you haven't set resolv.conf manually
>
> > set dial
> > set login
>
> I don't think you need
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:13:40 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
##enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf)
You probably need this if you haven't set resolv.conf manually
> set dial
> set login
I don't think you need these.
___
freebsd-qu
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 10:20 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> you do have an IP from your provider.
No.
> Is it your default route not getting installed ?
What is the default route?
By Ethernet I want to connect to an ADSL modem.
> Are you expecting nat to be working ?
No.
> After you are connecte
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 02:17 +1100, andrew clarke wrote:
> On Thu 2012-12-06 16:13:40 UTC+0100, Ralf Mardorf
> (ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com) wrote:
>
> > how do I have to set up PPPoE?
> > This doesn't work: [1]
>
> In what way does it not work?
>
> In your
On 12/6/2012 10:13 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do I have to set up PPPoE?
> This doesn't work: [1]
> [rocketmouse@freebsd] /usr/home/rocketmouse# ifconfig
> re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>
> options=389b
> ether 00:1e:8c:80:2a:eb
>
On Thu 2012-12-06 16:13:40 UTC+0100, Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com)
wrote:
> how do I have to set up PPPoE?
> This doesn't work: [1]
In what way does it not work?
In your example, at the very least you should be able to ping 213.191.89.25:
> tun0: flags=8051 met
Hi,
how do I have to set up PPPoE?
This doesn't work: [1]
Regards,
Ralf
[1]
[rocketmouse@freebsd] /usr/home/rocketmouse# ppp -ddial alice
Working in ddial mode
Using interface: tun0
[rocketmouse@freebsd] /usr/home/rocketmouse# cat /etc/ppp/ppp
Hi
This time I configured as simple as possible
with minimal settings, and voila things worked.
I successfully connected to internet in both
cases - DHCP server disabled in adsl modem, and
DHCP server enabled in adsl modem.
Thanks all of you guys for helping. :)
Here are config files:
## /etc/
n no explicit assignment to fxp0.
I'd leave fxp0 unset until you've fixed the other problems - it's not
necessary for PPP.
Modems and routers in PPPoE bridging mode don't normally require any
adjustment or other access so there's probably no need to assign
address anyway
n no explicit assignment to fxp0.
That should be the easiest test setting.
> I still don' get why FreeBSD is having trouble
> connecting via PPP.
Seems to be a specific problem. There is no general problem with
PPPoE on FreeBSD.
> I am trying every combinations that might work
Hi again,
This time I disabled DHCP on my fxp0 interface and
in my adsl modem too.
But the problem still exists.
This time I tried both approaches:
assigned an IP address explicitly to fxp0, and
then no explicit assignment to fxp0.
I still don' get why FreeBSD is having trouble
connecting via P
he underlying ethernet device if you want to route back-out
> into the router's LAN (PPPoE and IP can share a lan).
>
> You don't necessarily need DHCP with PPPoE because PPP can deliver the
> IP address, DNS etc by itself. If the ISP requires you to use DHCP you
> should pr
nly need to
configure the underlying ethernet device if you want to route back-out
into the router's LAN (PPPoE and IP can share a lan).
You don't necessarily need DHCP with PPPoE because PPP can deliver the
IP address, DNS etc by itself. If the ISP requires you to use DHCP y
s where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
>> way to connect to internet is an adsl modem in bridge mode
>> (assuming the mode in modem, can't be changed).
>> In such case the only utilty is ppp, which can be of help.
>
> Ok, usually bridge mode implies PP
y to connect to internet is an adsl modem in bridge mode
>> (assuming the mode in modem, can't be changed).
>> In such case the only utilty is ppp, which can be of help.
>
> Ok, usually bridge mode implies PPPoE and mpd5 does PPPoE. Maybe
> I'm missing your point.
&
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:38:47 +0530, Jack wrote:
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
I've been using PPPoE with a DSL modem for many years, using
FreeBSD 4, 5 and 7 with the system's PPPoE tools. The IP
was provided to the computer di
On 10/16/12 09:08, Jack wrote:
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
>
> After reading handbook and searching on various forums,
> I prepared the ppp.conf file, and tried starting the ppp via
> # ppp -ddial adsl
>
> Here '
On Tue 2012-10-16 20:38:47 UTC+0530, Jack (jacks.1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
>
> After reading handbook and searching on various forums,
> I prepared the ppp.conf file, and tried starting the ppp via
y to connect to internet is an adsl modem in bridge mode
>> (assuming the mode in modem, can't be changed).
>> In such case the only utilty is ppp, which can be of help.
>
> Ok, usually bridge mode implies PPPoE and mpd5 does PPPoE. Maybe
> I'm missing your point.
M
odem, can't be changed).
> In such case the only utilty is ppp, which can be of help.
Ok, usually bridge mode implies PPPoE and mpd5 does PPPoE. Maybe
I'm missing your point.
- Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:08, Jack wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
>> pppoe connection.
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> fxp0 is the ethernet inte
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:08, Jack wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
> pppoe connection.
[snip]
>
> fxp0 is the ethernet interface of my PC via which adsl modem is connected.
>
> Any suggestions ...
Consider using the
Hello
I'm using PPPoE link to connect to the INTERNET. my problem is that I have
to change my MAC address for my night time link. I do that using ifconfig
command before connecting the night link:
*killall ppp
ifconfig cdce0 ether 2a:00:00:00:00:00
ppp -ddial adslnight*
cdce0 is the inte
Hi Folks,
i try to setup a pppoe-server. Until now iv'e try this with rc_pppoe and mpd5,
both didn't work. The rp_pppoe implementation from ports are answering my PADI
but after PADS the system terminates the connection with "pppd terminated". The
setup from mpd5 fail
Thank you!
Found out!
From: Andreas Rudisch
To: Dánielisz László
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 4:04:27 PM
Subject: Re: pppoe related
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Dánielisz László wrote:
> What do you use to k
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Dánielisz László wrote:
> What do you use to keep alive your FreeBSD pppoe connection client even if
> there is no traffic? What do you set to reconnect the pppoe client
> automaticaly on any disconnection?
man ppp
-ddial
Andreas
--
Hi,
What do you use to keep alive your FreeBSD pppoe connection client even if
there is no traffic? What do you set to reconnect the pppoe client automaticaly
on any disconnection?
Thank you!
László
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Dánielisz László wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to configure my FreeBSD 8.0 machine for the purpose
> specified in the subject. Let's say I have two NICs in my PC: ext_if
> (for wan/pppoe connection) and int_if for my LAN. How would
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Dánielisz László wrote:
> Let's say I have two NICs in my PC: ext_if (for wan/pppoe connection) and
> int_if for my LAN.
> How would you manage to get work NAT with pf using PPPoE from my ISP
As a start your pf.conf could look a
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:51:26 -0700 (PDT), Dánielisz László
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to configure my FreeBSD 8.0 machine for the purpose specified in
> the subject.
> Let's say I have two NICs in my PC: ext_if (for wan/pppoe connection) and
> int_if for my LAN.
Hello,
I am looking to configure my FreeBSD 8.0 machine for the purpose specified in
the subject.
Let's say I have two NICs in my PC: ext_if (for wan/pppoe connection) and
int_if for my LAN.
How would you manage to get work NAT with pf using PPPoE from my ISP; I'd like
to use DHCP
will start his own pppoe
server you will be in strange trouble, there can be other issues too.
I guess your DSLAMs must have built in pppoe support and radius client, if its
there then every port of dslams can be separate broadcast domain. This will
cause you extra routing management (depe
Hello Michelle,
I think you better ask about the performance you should
expect out of a PPPoE server on the mpd forum. There
people on the forum with real numbers.
If I go with 1 U Sun Fire X4100M2 the Opteron has 4 Cores and 4 threads
per core (AFAIK there is a 8 threads version too)
I
to an "Ethernet Carrier Network" I could install one or
two PPPoE Servers in each village. But if one goes down, the second has
to handel 2500 client connections.
I *think* the number of clients is doable. I don't know about
the bandwidth.
Note: This is ONLY the base install
ients. How many concurrent PPP
sessions do you care to support?
And more importantly, how much aggregate bandwidth?
What I now need are a PPPoE Severs (round-robin and loadbalancing) which
must work using FreeRadius and PostgreSQL.
Don't understand what you mean round-robin and loadbalan
Iskratel
FTTH DSLAMS of 96 ports (each with 100MBit, but only one 1GE Upstream)
each.
What I now need are a PPPoE Severs (round-robin and loadbalancing) which
must work using FreeRadius and PostgreSQL.
There was someone on the which has suggested me to use
FreeBSD, because the PPPoE it is
e-connect on its own.
Do these three steps and if everything works, wait for the
random disconnection to happen. It should behave the same way.
tcpdump is your friend while trying the above.
OK, dud. Right now I got some problem here output tcpdump -ni rl1:
20:14:58.764661 PPPoE PADO [Host-Uni
nnect, plug
> the ethernet in and wait to re-connect on its own.
>
> 3) Then you should try the same with the DSL line, pull the plug
> from the modem and it should behave the same way, that is
> disconnect and re-connect on its own.
>
> Do these three steps and if everything work
budsz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
budsz wrote:
I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as
bridging to my box.
Could you run "tcpdump -ni rl1" while trying and post
it to the list?
If problem appear, I will do it. This problem n
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> budsz wrote:
>>
>> I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as
>> bridging to my box.
>
> Could you run "tcpdump -ni rl1" while trying and post
> it to the list?
If problem appear, I will do it. This problem not
budsz wrote:
I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as
bridging to my box.
Could you run "tcpdump -ni rl1" while trying and post
it to the list?
Nikos
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hi,
I got problem with FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE as router. I use TPLINK modem as
bridging to my box.
here is my /etc/ppp/ppp.conf:
default:
#set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command
#set log all
set log Phase tun command
speedy:
set device PPPoE:rl1
set authname xx...@isp.net
tings using nc, since initial packets, that
> is, small packets, are always smaller than your MTU. You can test
> MTU using fetch or ftp or nc + "GET /some.big.file".
I only tried to say, that the connection problems couldn't be an MTU
problem. Because I tried to connect from the
;. So the connection should also without an explicit
route for this Hosts use the default gw.
My Setup:
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
mppd to make an PPPOE connection to my internet service
provider.
PF as firewall
To isolate the problem I used an minimal pf.conf:
---
"inetif=ng0
lanif=vr0
scrub all m
ould also without an explicit
route for this Hosts use the default gw.
My Setup:
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
mppd to make an PPPOE connection to my internet service
provider.
PF as firewall
To isolate the problem I used an minimal pf.conf:
---
"inetif=ng0
lanif=vr0
scrub all max-mss 1492
pass qui
connected to an internal
network. The idea is to do some clever kind of load-balancing and/or
logging of DSL connections using pf.
All three DSL lines are configured to use PPPoE. I can successfully
bring any one of them up individually, but when I try to bring more than
one up, using either pp
internal network. The idea is to do some clever kind of load-balancing
and/or logging of DSL connections using pf.
All three DSL lines are configured to use PPPoE. I can successfully
bring any one of them up individually, but when I try to bring more
than one up, using either ppp or mpd5,
Hi guys!
Just wondering if any of you know how to filter traffic (PPPOE,TCP,IP) by
the means of ipfw, on bridge with FreeBSD 7.x installed, in the case when
all traffic passing through the bridge is encapsulated in PPPOE.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions
RW writes:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:14:40 +0530
> ___ Ashish Shukla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I wanted to know if I'm using user-mode PPPoE or kernel-mode PPPoE.
>> I'm following the handbook[1] to setup my PPP
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:14:40 +0530
___ Ashish Shukla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wanted to know if I'm using user-mode PPPoE or kernel-mode PPPoE.
> I'm following the handbook[1] to setup my PPPoE interface. Is there
> any way
Hi
I wanted to know if I'm using user-mode PPPoE or kernel-mode PPPoE. I'm
following the handbook[1] to setup my PPPoE interface. Is there any way I can
figure out this ?
And what is the difference between kernel-mode PPP and user-mode PPP ?
I'm running FreeBSD 7.0-RE
27;m using /usr/sbin/ppp to connect to the
internet as i have a pppoe account with static ip from my ISP. The
problem is that on the FreeBSD box i have download/upload speeds between
30k/s and 150k/s wich is really low. I've checked with a laptop(windows)
at that location and i got a download
ernet as i have a pppoe account with static ip from my ISP. The
problem is that on the FreeBSD box i have download/upload speeds
between 30k/s and 150k/s wich is really low. I've checked with a
laptop(windows) at that location and i got a download/upload speed
~6MB/s (advertised by the IS
At 01:17 PM 6/25/2008, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Hello list :)
I have a problem with my so called server, i'm using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE.
I connect to it trough ssh because i'm not in that location. Everything is
ok i'm using /usr/sbin/ppp to connect to the internet as i have a pppo
Hello list :)
I have a problem with my so called server, i'm using FreeBSD
7.0-RELEASE. I connect to it trough ssh because i'm not in that
location. Everything is ok i'm using /usr/sbin/ppp to connect to the
internet as i have a pppoe account with static ip from my ISP. The
We(An ISP) have already established PPPoe internet connection and have many
users.
PPPoE...you mean that you are an established Internet Provider that
supplies xDSL connections that require authentication to several users,
to which your termination point resides on a FreeBSD box?
I want
Dear All
We(An ISP) have already established PPPoe internet connection and have many
users.
I want my users to view our web site very first time of their web cruzing
progress.
Is there any possibility of it?
Thanx for your concern
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
On Mon, February 4, 2008 17:04, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:18:12AM -, Reinhold wrote:
>
>
>>>
> If you are connecting to the ISP it would be better not to
> specify IP to let them be negotiated.
How will I go ahead and set the static ips for both my w
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:18:12AM -, Reinhold wrote:
> >
> >>> If you are connecting to the ISP it would be better not to specify IP
> >>> to let them be negotiated.
> >>
> >> How will I go ahead and set the static ips for both my wan connections?
> >>
> >
> > If IPs are static then provider
>
>>> If you are connecting to the ISP it would be better not to specify IP
>>> to let them be negotiated.
>>
>> How will I go ahead and set the static ips for both my wan connections?
>>
>
> If IPs are static then provider itself will negotiate them every time
> same. If you will specify them and
> If IPs are static then provider itself will negotiate them every time
> same. If you will specify them and provider will request another,
> negotiation will fail. So I would not recommend you to specify them.
>
>> For wan1 I have one ip and for wan2 I have 5 ips
>>
>
> Probably for wan2 you have
et iface route default
set iface up-script /usr/local/etc/mpd/script-wan1.sh
set iface down-script /usr/local/etc/mpd/script-wan1.sh
set ipcp ranges 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
create link static L1 pppoe
set link action bundle WAN1
set auth authname "[EMAI
Reinhold wrote:
If you are connecting to the ISP it would be better not to specify IP to
let them be negotiated.
How will I go ahead and set the static ips for both my wan connections?
If IPs are static then provider itself will negotiate them every time
same. If you will specify them and pr
Hi.
Reinhold wrote:
Here is what I've done so far.
/usr/local/etc/mpd5/mpd.conf
The config you have made probably suits to mpd3/4, but not to mpd5. Mpd5
uses alike commands, but general configuration idea is different. There
is no mpd.links file in mpd5. Read new examples present in package.
Hi,
I'm building a new router/firewall for my work, I have installed freebsd7
and updated it and compiled pf into the kernel and installed mpd5 for
pppoe. Before I make this system life I would like your input on my mpd
settings.
We have 2 adsl lines and I want to use the new firewall to do
On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:11:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oct 24 12:33:35 nightmare ppp[859]: tun0: Debug: deflink: PPPoE:ed1:
> Cannot determine bandwidth
>
> I presume this is a result of the lost LQR packets.
No, bandwidth isn't known to ppp. You can ignore this warning.
There is no conne
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
You said you had wrong encapsulation type. Did you make any progress?
Yes.
Changing the encapsulation type brought the line up,
and things hobbled along...
However, the line is dropped after a few minutes,
apparently a result of not being able to determine line quality
ATM/DSL combination :)
>
> The modem is set to use VC-based multiplexing, vpi=0, vci=100
> These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
> required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
>
> I am assuming there should be no need for my ISP to be notified that
essed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on ed1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
00:20:18:72:8b:72 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype PPPoE D (0x8863),
length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x402DA4C1] [Service-Name]
00:20:18:72:8b:72 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype PPPo
d 0x3
ether 00:20:18:72:8b:72
#tcpdump -efntl -i ed1
tcpdump: WARNING: ed1: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on ed1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
00:20:18:72:8b:72 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, etherty
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:50:15 -0600
Gary Aitken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
> to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
>
> I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 05:31:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
> to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
>
> I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
> properly
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:00:27 +0500 Babek Ismayilov wrote:
> i need to configure PPPoE in FreeBSD 6.2.
> I tested but it didn't work out. I'm want to show you the result of the
> command:
> web# ppp
> Working in interactive mode
> Using interface: tun0
> ppp ON
Hi,
i need to configure PPPoE in FreeBSD 6.2.
I tested but it didn't work out. I'm want to show you the result of the
command:
web# ppp
Working in interactive mode
Using interface: tun0
ppp ON web> dial Internet
ppp ON web> ping box.az
Warning: ping: Invalid command
Warning: pi
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:37:43AM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:25 -0500
> Dave Curry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing
> > excessive CPU usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've be
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:25 -0500
Dave Curry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing
> excessive CPU usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've been running
> into is since the 5th, the message "Unexpected packet code
Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing excessive CPU
usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've been running into is since the
5th, the message "Unexpected packet code 9" has been showing up every 10
seconds in syslog, the CPU usage is maxed, I seem to be
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 06:48:47 Sean McLaughlin wrote:
> After following that "Cheaper Broadband with FreeBSD on DSL" article
> referenced in the handbook, I am not getting PPP to work with ADSL.
> ppp(8)'s prompt stays all lowercase after "dial", whether I do
> pap/chap or not.
Authenticat
After following that "Cheaper Broadband with FreeBSD on DSL" article
referenced in the handbook, I am not getting PPP to work with ADSL.
ppp(8)'s prompt stays all lowercase after "dial", whether I do
pap/chap or not. It looks like the carrier isn't responding(?)
Incidentally, the ISP is Telus and t
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
asdf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the FreeBSD 6.2 installer support a network install over an ethernet
> interface
> connected to a DSL modem using a PPPoE connection?
>
> I am switching ISPs from a cable-based provider to a D
Does the FreeBSD 6.2 installer support a network install over an ethernet
interface
connected to a DSL modem using a PPPoE connection?
I am switching ISPs from a cable-based provider to a DSL-based provider and
would
like to install FreeBSD on an old PC to set it up as a router/firewall for my
hi all.
I'm trying to solve one problem but with no success in 1 week.
I'm setting up Gateway server with PPPoE functionality for per LAN
users to authenticate and traffic shaping. Incoming Internet
connection is Ethernet. This PC have 2 NIC. LAN NIC do not have IP
assigned.
pppoe
On Monday 11 June 2007 22:54, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 04/06/07 Nikos Vassiliadis said:
> > ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a
> > decision made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly
> > interactively. You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log
>
> Indee
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:54, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 04/06/07 Nikos Vassiliadis said:
> > ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a decision
> > made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly interactively.
> > You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log
>
> Indee
On 04/06/07 Nikos Vassiliadis said:
> ppp does not write much on the console. And that is probably a decision
> made by the authors, since it is meant to be run mostly interactively.
> You can see its logs in /var/log/ppp.log
Indeed. I turned up the logging and I had to turn it down before it fil
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 20:38, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> I've turned logging up to All for ppp, for my DSL connection, and I've
> been disappointed to find that when it can't connect, ppp offers no
> help whatsoever as to why.
>
> I'm going to try rp-pppoe from
I've turned logging up to All for ppp, for my DSL connection, and I've
been disappointed to find that when it can't connect, ppp offers no
help whatsoever as to why.
I'm going to try rp-pppoe from ports, since on Linux it's actually
quite helpful in full debug, but I&
On Mon, 21 May 2007 14:39:06 +0800
"Brian Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my /etc/ppp/ppp.conf it has been "worked on" but so far
> seems to have been OK. As for regularly: it basically means several
> times a day for no reason that is apparent to me.
>
I'd try simplifing first
On Mon, 21 May 2007 14:39:06 +0800
"Brian Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my /etc/ppp/ppp.conf it has been "worked on" but so far
> seems to have been OK. As for regularly: it basically means several
> times a day for no reason that is apparent to me.
>
> default:
> set
Yes, it puzzles me why it happens in the first place, but as it hits the XP,
linux and BSD connections equally frequenly, I am assuming it is a function
of hardware or IP provider.
fwiw, looking at your conf, my ppp.conf contains one setting that
yours does not ...
enable tcpmssfixup
there's
Here is my /etc/ppp/ppp.conf it has been "worked on" but so far seems
to have been OK. As for regularly: it basically means several times a day
for no reason that is apparent to me.
default:
set timeout 180
enable dns
set log Phase Chat IPCP tun command
set redial
hi,
I'm not sure there is, I've had a similar problem like this before,
and I got around
it by writing a simple script that would try and ping a local site 4
times, and if no
responses got back it would killall ppp and delete the default routes
and tell ppp
to reconnect. It worked quite well whe
nnection. On My linux box I
> need to 'sudo pppoeconf' to reconnect. The FreeBSD handbook deals
> rather scantily with PPPoE, and I can find nothing much on googling.
> Any ideas how best to a) prevent being kicked off and b)
> reconnecting. At the moment I simply do 'su
pppoeconf' to reconnect. The FreeBSD handbook deals
> rather scantily with PPPoE, and I can find nothing much on googling.
> Any ideas how best to a) prevent being kicked off and b)
> reconnecting. At the moment I simply do 'sudo ppp -ddial internet' to
> be reassigned and
1 - 100 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
