> Hey list,
>
> I have a pretty low resource usage for users on my system, thus I have
> some low limits set in my /etc/login.conf. Particularly "openfiles," which
> is set to 128 for the default class. However, I started getting errors
> from Postfix saying it ha
Hey list,
I have a pretty low resource usage for users on my system, thus I have some low
limits set in my /etc/login.conf. Particularly "openfiles," which is set to 128
for the default class. However, I started getting errors from Postfix saying it
has hit this limit:
"postfix
Paul Kraus writes:
> That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the
> installation configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find
> it. Thanks.
>
> Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ?
No need. Looks like sahil@ has already fix
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
> Paul Kraus writes:
>
>> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
>> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
>> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' g
Paul Kraus writes:
> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd
> problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem
> (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make
> install' fails when trying to install
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:16:20 -0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
> When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use
> the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine
> with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails
When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use
the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine with
9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails when trying to install
the startup script to /usr/etc/rc.d
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
>> From: Mark Felder
>> Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
>&g
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 22 13:47:20 2012
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500
> From: Mark Felder
> Subject: Re: Sendmail and Postfix
>
> When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the ent
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:41:46 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
> /etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
> that came with the system; it's ignored.
Thanks! (Thanks too to the other
Hi--
On Jun 22, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
> executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
>
> The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
>
ase system. What is
> > the 'approved' way to get rid of /usr/bin/mailq? Or better, remove
> > Sendmail?
>
> You don't need to remove the base system sendmail. All you need to do
> is set up /etc/mail/mailer.conf properly -- and installing the postfix
> port
When you installed Postfix did you allow it to update the entries in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf ? If so, I wouldn't worry about the mailq binary
that came with the system; it's ignored.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
o do
is set up /etc/mail/mailer.conf properly -- and installing the postfix
port should do that for you -- and then any reference to
/usr/sbin/sendmail, /usr/bin/mailq, usr/bin/hoststat etc. will run
postfix instead. It's really very nicely done.
See mailer.conf(5)
Cheers,
Matthe
A little digging around has revealed that there are two 'mailq'
executables on my system: /usr/local/bin/mailq and /usr/bin/mailq.
The first is part of the mail/postfix-current port which I have installed
and use, and the second is presumably part of Sendmail, which I have not
instal
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 410, Issue 12, Message: 2
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:51:36 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi wrote:
| Ron wrote:
> > OK, I found the problem. It was the hostname not being set correctly.
> > What threw me was that it was correct in the rc.conf file, but I did not
> >
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:48:19 -0700
> From: Ron
> To: Robert Bonomi
> Subject: Re: Postfix + Courier IMAP local email problems
>
> On 12.04.2012 13:54, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there some simple I'm just messing up?
> >
> >
On 12.04.2012 13:54, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Apr 12 15:09:43 2012
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:01:10 -0700
From: Ron
To:
Subject: Postfix + Courier IMAP local email problems
I'm having a couple of issues with postfix and courier-imap on my
new
ma
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:28:40 -0700
Ron articulated:
{snip}
Why are you wasting time posting this question on the FreeBSD list
when it properly belongs on the Postfix forum.
You can start here to subscribe to the list:
<http://www.postfix.com/lists.html>
Then be sure to read all
On 12.04.2012 13:54, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Apr 12 15:09:43 2012
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:01:10 -0700
From: Ron
To:
Subject: Postfix + Courier IMAP local email problems
I'm having a couple of issues with postfix and courier-imap on my
new
ma
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Apr 12 15:09:43 2012
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:01:10 -0700
> From: Ron
> To:
> Subject: Postfix + Courier IMAP local email problems
>
> I'm having a couple of issues with postfix and courier-imap on my new
> machine
).
> I have also tried everything I can think of in how users are listed in
> postfix's virtual file and in /etc/aliases and server entries in main.cf.
You need to tell Postfix that mysite.com and mail.mysite.com are local.
See the mydestination keyword in main.cf.
> The second i
I'm having a couple of issues with postfix and courier-imap on my new
machine and I'm trying to figure out what is different from my old
machine. I've checked every config file I think of and they both seem
to be set up the same.
Here are the two issues:
If I send email fr
I need to bid out some work,
Is there anybody who is good at postfix with freebsd 8.2.
I am willing to pay an expert if he can assist me as I am having issue with my
system.
What is happening is mail is coming from machine A--à sent to a middle machine
X
which I think is acting as a
I have a postfix mta (beauty mate!) and I've managed to twist its
panties into a real tight knot by using a filter (smtpd), and through
using it to put my isp mail into a local box thanks to fetchmail.
The problem I'm facing is that it now won't send mail to any other users
on
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Mark wrote:
> My apologies for the cross-posting but I believe it is relevant.
That's still typically frowned upon, IMHO.
> I have been running postfix for 8+ months without problems. Recently ( a
> week or two) I had a user complain that he c
My apologies for the cross-posting but I believe it is relevant.
I have been running postfix for 8+ months without problems.
Recently ( a week or two) I had a user complain that he could no longer
send. It appears that postfix is no longer accepting SSL/TLS
connections. STARTTLS is
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:23:46 -0400
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Janos Dohanics
> wrote:
> > Could you comment on the pros and cons of using INST_BASE=on in
> > postfix on a production server?
> >
>
> Great question! I know there has b
Janos Dohanics writes:
> Could you comment on the pros and cons of using INST_BASE=on in postfix
> on a production server?
I wouldn't describe either the pros or the cons as particularly strong.
If you're not going to use sendmail, you might want to remove it. If
you do
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Eric Masson wrote:
> From rc.sendmail(8) :
See, know I also learned something today :-)
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscrib
Christer Solskogen writes:
Hi,
> You can do this a lot easier with just:
> sendmail_enable="NONE"
>From rc.sendmail(8) :
RC.CONF VARIABLES
The following variables affect the behavior of rc.sendmail. They are
defined in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and can be changed in /etc/rc.conf.
sendmail_ena
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Janos Dohanics wrote:
>> Could you comment on the pros and cons of using INST_BASE=on in postfix
>> on a production server?
>>
>
> Great question! I know there has been so
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Janos Dohanics wrote:
> Could you comment on the pros and cons of using INST_BASE=on in postfix
> on a production server?
>
Great question! I know there has been some discussion to be able to
choose your base MTA upon install but I don't know ho
Could you comment on the pros and cons of using INST_BASE=on in postfix
on a production server?
--
Janos Dohanics
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:48:36 -0400
Mark Moellering articulated:
> My apologies, I could not find the postfix mailing list initially.
> (it has been a "Deal with Microsoft software" day...)
> I have now found the proper list,
> Thank You
Before posting to the Postfix list,
My apologies, I could not find the postfix mailing list initially. (it
has been a "Deal with Microsoft software" day...)
I have now found the proper list,
Thank You
On 16-Mar-11 5:15 PM, Ilya Kazakevich wrote:
Your postfix does not relay mails from this client.
See http://www.p
Your postfix does not relay mails from this client.
See http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
<http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html>I suggest you to remove
your IPs from messages next time. By the way, postfix should have its own
mail-list, not freebsd:)
On Wed, Mar 16
I recently set up a postfix mail server on freebsd 8.1 with dovecot. I
am having trouble sending mail using Windows Live Mail.
The error I see in the logfiles is:
Mar 16 13:13:57 mail postfix/smtpd[5159]: connect from
c-68-40-255-141.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.40.255.141]
Mar 16 13:13:57 mail
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following link:
Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Webmaster
___
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jarrod Slick wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to.
> For more information on our business please click on the following link:
> Click here for our website
> We look forward to your continued busines
>When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which
>documents it.
Oh, definitely. Particularly if you decide on qmail.
R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote:
What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and
configure.
Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've
seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
I've used both and both have their advocates/supporters.
I used qmail for about 10 yrs and picked it when basically the choice
was qmail, sendma
On 2/1/2011 at 8:44 PM Paul Macdonald wrote:
|On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
|>
|> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix,
and
|> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
|>
|> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do
version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would
put me
off
aswell
postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the
system
>
> thanks in advance
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
>> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
>>
>> But I've never found
>>>>> "Jarrod" == Jarrod Slick writes:
Jarrod> If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would
Jarrod> substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's
Jarrod> maintainers.
In fact, given the legacy of other security tools c
could find a vulnerability -- that said, AFAIK that person no longer
> maintains the project. It requires lots of third party patches to be as
> functional as postfix, so to what extent these patches counteract the
> original coder's (apparent) secure coding practices is open to debate.
the project. It requires lots of third party patches to be as
functional as postfix, so to what extent these patches counteract the
original coder's (apparent) secure coding practices is open to debate.
If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would substantiate
your cl
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
qmail is more secure... but the design is just as alien to unix as sendmail is
for example, the fact that qmail uses custom libc, or at least did so on the
version i tried. that turns
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:44:24PM +, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >
> >No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
> >pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
> >
> >But I've
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:24 +
Paul Macdonald articulated:
> so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me)
> what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of
> changing?
Without knowing your exact configuration and requirements, answering
On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and
pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :)
But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to
do, and most of the knobs are set properly righ
>>>>> "Outback" == Outback Dingo writes:
>> |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by
>> |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding
>> |documentation; perhaps the
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by i
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by i
On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
|On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
|Alessandro Baggi articulated:
|
|> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
|
|"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
|numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servica
I like qmail, but I would, having written a book about it.
If you want something that works reasonably well out of the
box, I'd use Postfix. If you want something you can tweak to
do whatever you want, qmail is more of a toolkit.
Don't use the version of qmail in ports, it includes wa
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
Alessandro Baggi articulated:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards.
"Postfix" is act
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:32, Alessandro Baggi
wrote:
> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
>
> thanks in advance
That's a loaded question. Both have advocates, just like "vi or
emacs", "Linux or Nothing", "FreeBSD or OpenBSD", "OS X or
Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
thanks in advance
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Jerry ha scritto:
I have seen it posted here and on the Dovecot forum that upgrading to
mysql-5.5.8 on FreeBSD breaks both Postfix and Dovecot.
Fixed.
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
t; > to mysql-5.5.8 on FreeBSD breaks both Postfix and Dovecot.
> > > Apparently reverting to the mysql-client-5.5.7 corrects this
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > Can any one else confirm this or is this simply an isolated
> > > incident? If this is corre
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:37:38 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jerry
> wrote:
>
> > I have seen it posted here and on the Dovecot forum that upgrading
> > to mysql-5.5.8 on FreeBSD breaks both Postfix and Dovecot.
> > Appare
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I have seen it posted here and on the Dovecot forum that upgrading to
> mysql-5.5.8 on FreeBSD breaks both Postfix and Dovecot. Apparently
> reverting to the mysql-client-5.5.7 corrects this problem.
>
> Can any one else confirm
I have seen it posted here and on the Dovecot forum that upgrading to
mysql-5.5.8 on FreeBSD breaks both Postfix and Dovecot. Apparently
reverting to the mysql-client-5.5.7 corrects this problem.
Can any one else confirm this or is this simply an isolated incident?
If this is correct, is there a
Redd Vinylene 쓰시길:
> Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client?
> I'm tired of all this using mutt on several boxes, setting up virtual MySQL
> accounts and domains with crap webapps. Figured I'd just use Gmail for it
> all and be done with it
Redd Vinylene wrote:
> Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client?
[snip]
Hate to break it you, but Postfix is not client software.
FWIW though, there are two problem areas wrt to running a mail server.
There's running the mail server itself, and then
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
> Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client?
> I'm tired of all this using mutt on several boxes, setting up virtual MySQL
> accounts and domains with crap webapps. Figured I'd just use Gmail
Anybody hooked their Postfix servers up with Gmail to use it as a client?
I'm tired of all this using mutt on several boxes, setting up virtual MySQL
accounts and domains with crap webapps. Figured I'd just use Gmail for it
all and be done with it. Curious what sort of experiences
Hi,
It looks like mx2.freebsd.org is blacklisted by Sorbs.net:
Original Message Transcript of session follows.
In: EHLO mx2.freebsd.org
Out: 250-PIPELINING
Out: 250-SIZE 2560
Out: 250-ETRN
Out: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
Out: 250-8BITMIME
Out: 250 DSN
In: MAIL FROM:
Коньков Евгений wrote:
>
> # OUTGOING MAIL FROM IP
> smtp_bind_address=
>
>
Thanks, this is exactly what I needed!
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy
to maintain and to
In the last episode (Oct 26), Joe Auty said:
> Hello,
>
> I have a few IP aliases setup:
>
> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=9b
> ether 00:0c:29:79:d5:66
> inet netmask 0xff80 broadcast
> inet netmask 0xff80 broadcast
> inet netmask
that should
JA> be used is address3, when what is presented to my relayhost is address1.
JA> My rc.conf:
JA> ifconfig_em0="inet address3 netmask 255.255.255.128"
JA> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet address1 netmask 255.255.255.128"
JA> ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet a
tmask 255.255.255.128"
ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet address1 netmask 255.255.255.128"
ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet address2 netmask 255.255.255.128"
How do I get Postfix to use address3 in sending out mail? If I set
Postfix's myhostname to a FQDN that resolves as address3,
inet_i
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:38:54 +0100
Frank Shute wrote:
> You should use src.conf(5) and set WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes to avoid
> building sendmail nowadays.
I don't know why I said I had WITH_SENDMAIL=no, because I actually have
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes in /etc/src.conf!
> Postfix
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:40:22AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I installed a new server recently with postfix. I first rebuilt world using
> WITH_SENDMAIL=no and removed the sendmail files using 'make delete-old'. I
> installed postfix in /usr but now mailwr
Hi,
I installed a new server recently with postfix. I first rebuilt world using
WITH_SENDMAIL=no and removed the sendmail files using 'make delete-old'. I
installed postfix in /usr but now mailwrapper doesn't work - it runs using
100% CPU and never quits. I suspect it might be
On 31/05/2010 22:07, Tim Judd wrote:
On 5/31/10, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
similar like I wrote before, to do with my migration from Solaris 9 to
FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE.
Postfix is being run in a BSD Jail and so far I have disabled as much as
I could of sendmail which I did this to rc.conf
On 5/31/10, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> similar like I wrote before, to do with my migration from Solaris 9 to
> FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE.
>
> Postfix is being run in a BSD Jail and so far I have disabled as much as
> I could of sendmail which I did this to rc
Hi,
similar like I wrote before, to do with my migration from Solaris 9 to
FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE.
Postfix is being run in a BSD Jail and so far I have disabled as much as
I could of sendmail which I did this to rc.conf within the jail:
postfix_enable="YES"
sendmail_en
28657 (smtp), uid 125: exited on signal 11
>
> ..in my logs. I've tried forcing a rebuild of postfix and all dependency
> to no avail. I don't seem to be loosing any email.
>
> I'm assuming it's postfix (I don't use sendmail), but I could be wrong.
> Anyo
: exited on signal 11
> +pid 28657 (smtp), uid 125: exited on signal 11
>
> ..in my logs. I've tried forcing a rebuild of postfix and all dependency to
> no avail. I don't seem to be loosing any email.
>
> I'm assuming it's postfix (I don't use sendmail),
logs. I've tried forcing a rebuild of postfix and all dependency to no
avail. I don't seem to be loosing any email.
I'm assuming it's postfix (I don't use sendmail), but I could be wrong. Anyone
know what this is or where I should start looking? Did I not upgrade s
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:29 PM, perikillo wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:29 AM, perikillo wrote:
>> > Hi people.
>> >
>> > I'm working in my first spam gateway, using Postfix +
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:29 AM, perikillo wrote:
> > Hi people.
> >
> > I'm working in my first spam gateway, using Postfix + policyd-weight.
> >
> > I have 2 jails for this, the jail-A is the mail s
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:29 AM, perikillo wrote:
> Hi people.
>
> I'm working in my first spam gateway, using Postfix + policyd-weight.
>
> I have 2 jails for this, the jail-A is the mail server, where the mailboxes
> exist, they are on each user home directory:
>
>
Hi people.
I'm working in my first spam gateway, using Postfix + policyd-weight.
I have 2 jails for this, the jail-A is the mail server, where the mailboxes
exist, they are on each user home directory:
/home/user-1
/home/user-2
/home/user-3
...
/home/user-N
This jail-A have samba
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 13:34:07 Jerry wrote:
> I noticed that someone in another thread mentioned:
>
>
> "(2010-03-22) added option to install Postfix into the base"
>
>
> I have not been able to locate that item. Could someone list the URL
> for that noti
I noticed that someone in another thread mentioned:
"(2010-03-22) added option to install Postfix into the base"
I have not been able to locate that item. Could someone list the URL
for that notice or tell me where to look for it? :-?
Thanks %-\
--
Jerry
freebsd.u...@sei
On Tuesday 30 March 2010 09:31:00 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 30/03/2010 03:01:27, Tim Judd wrote:
> > I've never heard of either, but when I configure my IMAP server and
> > put any mail client to it, as soon as a mail is delivered, the mail
> > client is notified.
>
> That's the IDLE extension to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/2010 03:01:27, Tim Judd wrote:
> I've never heard of either, but when I configure my IMAP server and
> put any mail client to it, as soon as a mail is delivered, the mail
> client is notified.
That's the IDLE extension to IMAPv4 -- it's not a
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
> I've never heard of either, but when I configure my IMAP server and
> put any mail client to it, as soon as a mail is delivered, the mail
> client is notified.
>
> I don't use biff or comsat or anything similar. mine is a simple IMAP
> server pu
On 3/27/10, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Tim Judd wrote:
>> On 3/27/10, Ron (Lists) wrote:
>> > Is there a way to get my freebsd/postfix setup to send push
>> > notifications to an iPhone ... I know it can be done with
>> > Exchange and ActiveSync,
Dan Nelson wrote:
> For ActiveSync at least, the phone has to keep a TCP connection to
> the server open 24/7, and the server sends a notification when a
> new mail arrives. MobileMe probably works the same way. The IMAP
> protocol supports a similar "notify on new mail" option, but for
> some r
On Mar 28, 2010, at 3:49 PM, krad wrote:
> On 28 March 2010 21:38, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Mar 28), Ron said:
> > Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> > > IMAP, but not POP3, can be used to push, but the iPhone mail client
> > > doesn't support that [...]
> > So how is Mobil Me and Exchan
On 28 March 2010 21:38, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Mar 28), Ron said:
> > Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> > > On Mar 28, 2010, at 1:36 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > >> Er, no. POP3 and IMAP are "pull" services, wherein the client polls
> > >> the server periodically for any newly-
In the last episode (Mar 28), Ron said:
> Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 2010, at 1:36 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> >> Er, no. POP3 and IMAP are "pull" services, wherein the client polls
> >> the server periodically for any newly-arrived messages.
> >
> > IMAP, but not POP3, can be
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Mar 28, 2010, at 1:36 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Er, no. POP3 and IMAP are "pull" services, wherein the client
polls the server periodically for any newly-arrived messages.
IMAP, but not POP3, can be used to push, but the iPhone mail client
doesn't support
On Mar 28, 2010, at 1:36 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Er, no. POP3 and IMAP are "pull" services, wherein the client
> polls the server periodically for any newly-arrived messages.
IMAP, but not POP3, can be used to push, but the iPhone mail client doesn't
support that as far as I know. I
1 - 100 of 1139 matches
Mail list logo
