On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:07:50 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah. Limewire is written in Java (iirc), which makes it extremely
easy to port it to any system that can run java.
for P2P sharing rtorrent (/usr/ports/net-p2p/rtorrent) works excellent
if you only want
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:25:21 -0600
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Limewire website says it has versions for Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and
others, including OS/2 and Solaris.
furthermore, you can just download the source and make it run from within
Eclipse (with some tweaks regarding
because historically ISPs used those ports for throttling.
+1 . skype does the same thing. and it's p2p too , although a lot less so
than limewire.
well ther are excellent method to block skype when using HTTP proxy not
NAT ;) (skype can do through proxy)
Yeah. Limewire is written in Java (iirc), which makes it extremely
easy to port it to any system that can run java.
for P2P sharing rtorrent (/usr/ports/net-p2p/rtorrent) works excellent
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
These applications have predefined ports they use to start up the
bi-directional packet conversation. But them unsolicited packeted
come in from other pc nodes to share data using a wide range of high
port numbers. IPFW, IPF, and PF don't seem to have a
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800
Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching
the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are
blocked by design.
How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work?
I
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and
others without causing strange secondary problems.
Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm
forgetting something important.
ed
I
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and
others without causing strange secondary problems.
Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm
sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are?
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, often
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and
others without causing strange secondary problems.
Actually a default pf configuration
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:54:43 -0600
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are?
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:54:43 -0600
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are?
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
dick hoogendijk wrote:
I know, I'm cynical here, but limewire is not all bad!
...and, BTW, Limewire port is readily available for FreeBSD:
http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-p2p/limewire
LimeWire is a fast, easy-to-use file sharing program that contains no
spyware, adware or other
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the
fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc.
that's my
When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: Never use
Limewire, or anything like it.
just downloading/sharing files allows you to download viruses, but it's
up to you to run them.
well unless P2P program is really broken, or you are sharing executables.
for sharing movies,
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the
fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:28:49 -0600
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the last culprit get's his computer back, he
will find it running an operating system that is not supported by Limewire.
DOS 6.0 ? :P it's java...
The next time, he'll get it back without a network card.
ouch,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:52:16 +
RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
It is one of the
fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc.
The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to
block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass
Fbsd1 wrote:
[snip]
Limewire is a windows only application.
So how can you say it runs on solaris which is a flavor Unix?
Limewire is a Java program. It will run on any platform which has a
working Java run time environment installed. It is definitely not
Windows only.
-Jason
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800
Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching
the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are
blocked by design.
How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work?
Hi,
i
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files,
usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Andrew Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dick hoogendijk wrote:
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing
application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share
I've made a /etc/rc.firewall.local I may rename it in the future
to stand out more, but we'll see how it goes for now.
Neat. Have fun with the new firewall ruleset then.
Thanks. I wish it wasn't necessary, but the server runs MySQL
and if I turn TCPwrappers on, someone just
On 2007-08-02 14:49, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-08-02 12:36, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing firewall rules for a machine, and I'm wondering what
the standard is for putting my version of an ipfw firewall_script?
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing firewall rules for a machine, and I'm wondering
what the standard is for putting my version of an ipfw
firewall_script?
I'd normally drop it onto /usr/local/etc somewhere,
On 2007-08-02 12:36, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing firewall rules for a machine, and I'm wondering what
the standard is for putting my version of an ipfw firewall_script?
I usually save my rules in '/etc/pf.conf' or '/etc/ipfw.rules'.
It's not like the '/etc'
On 2007-08-02 12:36, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing firewall rules for a machine, and I'm wondering what
the standard is for putting my version of an ipfw firewall_script?
I usually save my rules in '/etc/pf.conf' or '/etc/ipfw.rules'.
It's not like
Gaspar Kiraly wrote:
I am in the process of setting up ipfw for my server and a small LAN of two pcs.
The FreeBSD server is used as an internet gateway with a dial up connection (ppp -auto -alias demand).
My network connection is working fine, however I am getting more and more junk mail lately.
Here is a rewrite of the FreeBSD handbook firewall section with
examples that will answer all your questions.
www.a1poweruser.com/FBSD_firewall/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gaspar
Kiraly
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 01:32:58AM +0100, Robert Downes wrote:
JJB wrote:
Fundamentally his keep-state rules work and yours don't.
I have used his script exactly, modifying only for the differences in my
ISP's addresses. Everything works as before, and still the check-state
rule is
On 2004-06-15 20:54, Robert Downes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm obviously missing something...
su-2.05b# ipfw -a list
00100 16 1144 divert 8668 ip from any to any in via rl0
00200 17 964 divert 8668 ip from any to any out via rl0
00300 0 0 check-state
00400 32 3296 allow ip
JJB wrote:
First indication is the hit count on the check-state rule. It's zero
which means there is never an match in the keep-state table. For all
practical purposes your firewall keep-state rules are useless.
I was suspicious of that too, but if I remove the keep-state option from
the allow
JJB wrote:
Fundamentally his keep-state rules work and yours don't.
I have used his script exactly, modifying only for the differences in my
ISP's addresses. Everything works as before, and still the check-state
rule is showing zero packets and zero bytes, even though keep-state
rules have been
On 2004-06-15 23:29, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-06-15 20:54, Robert Downes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm obviously missing something...
su-2.05b# ipfw -a list
00100 16 1144 divert 8668 ip from any to any in via rl0
00200 17 964 divert 8668 ip from any to any out
Whatever the rules I'm using I get this message when booting and starting
ipfw :
ipfw: bad arguments, for usage summary ipfw
except if I use the /etc/rc.firewall file but that's another I don't know
why? it doesn't work with the SIMPLE argument in /etc/rc.conf and
modified with the right values.
Mike Jackson wrote:
Hi,
I have a 5.2.1 firewall box that also has a mailserver.
Goal:
- firewall can send and receive mail - rest of the world
- firewall can send and receive mail - internal LAN machines
- firewall blocks internal LAN machines from connecting to
external SMTP servers
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, you're using ipf or ipfilter, not
ipfw, as I take it from your syntax.
# ipfilter logging
ipmon_enable=yes
ipmon_flags=-D /var/log/ipflog
I imagine the ipfilter gurus on the
list would like to see your entire
ruleset.
I had to
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
have something to do with it. If the machine
is running NAT/divert whatever, it might
well be diverting before blocking? But I'm
wrong so often it's not very funny ... and
I use ipfw instead of ipf.
One last thing, I forgot to
Hello
Here are my ftp rules:
[snip
# FTP
ipfw add allow tcp from any to any 20 keep-state
ipfw add allow tcp from any to any 21 keep-state
ipfw add allow tcp from any 20 to me 1024-49151 keep-state # aktives FTP
ipfw add allow tcp from any 20 to 192.168.1.1/24 1024-49151 keep-state
ipfw add
It would help if you posted you ipfw rules file so people can review
them to look for your problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin
Schweizer
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Firewall rules for ftp
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:19:09PM -0800, Chip wrote:
Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:38:34PM -0800, Chip wrote:
I noticed my firewall rules are not being read. I have rc.conf set to
read the file rc.firewall. In rc.firewall the first line is add divert
natd etc
- Original Message -
From: Alex de Kruijff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD Questions List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: firewall rules do not get read
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:19:09PM -0800, Chip wrote:
Alex de
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:38:34PM -0800, Chip typed:
I noticed my firewall rules are not being read. I have rc.conf set to
read the file rc.firewall. In rc.firewall the first line is add divert
natd etc etc. that is followed by pass all from any to any etc etc. Then
nothing after that is
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:38:34PM -0800, Chip wrote:
I noticed my firewall rules are not being read. I have rc.conf set to
read the file rc.firewall. In rc.firewall the first line is add divert
natd etc etc. that is followed by pass all from any to any etc etc. Then
nothing after that is
Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:38:34PM -0800, Chip wrote:
I noticed my firewall rules are not being read. I have rc.conf set to
read the file rc.firewall. In rc.firewall the first line is add divert
natd etc etc. that is followed by pass all from any to any etc etc. Then
www.kgb.ro/Ipfw-HOWTO
HTH,
petre
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 18:05 Anno Domini, fbsd_user wrote using one of
his keyboards:
The FBSD handbook gives the idea that IPFW is the only firewall.
FBSD also comes with ipfilter which is much easier to use and
sertup. Google the questions archives
Do a quick google search on building freebsd firewall. I was building
a FreeBSD firewall this week, and several of these sites were very
helpful. There are sites for both ipfilter and ipfw. So, take your
pick. I'm using ipfilter, but either firewall method will be sufficient
for most
The FBSD handbook gives the idea that IPFW is the only firewall.
FBSD also comes with ipfilter which is much easier to use and
sertup. Google the questions archives for loads of info about
configuring ipfilter. You will be glade you did.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas Holt wrote:
My problem lies in UDP rules. I think I have TCP figured out. My first
attempt blocked off DNS queries from the machine outward. I could query
the DNS server, but apps could not do lookups. i figure it has
something to do with ports above 1024, but I'm not sure how to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 02:31:55PM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote:
I want to setup a firewall (ipfw) on my freebsd 4.8 p3 server. The
machine runs web, ftp, ssh, dns, smtp, and imap to the outside world.
Does anyone have any links to example rules for servers? (I've already
looked at the
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:29:13PM +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 02:31:55PM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote:
I want to setup a firewall (ipfw) on my freebsd 4.8 p3 server. The
machine runs web, ftp, ssh, dns, smtp, and imap to the outside world.
Does anyone have any
52 matches
Mail list logo
