>Hello list,
>I have tried putting this on the samba mail list seems that no knows or
is willing to share, having got good help with freebsd >on here before,
I figured its worth a shot, apologises if it is not 100% OT.
>I am sure this has been asked a million times but here goes for +1
>I am loo
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, stan wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD machine serving as (among other things) a Samba server
> for an XP instance running under VirtualBox. The XP application is a data
> gathering one that polls continuously. I have set up things so that XP
> mounts the Samba share, and logs it's d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my problem. I installed the OpenLdap 2.4.10 server and SASL
client. I then went to install the Samba 3.0.30 Port and it tells me that
it needs to install OpenLDAP client 2.3.42, but the 2.4.10 is in the same
place and I need to deinstall it. I deinstall 2.4.10
Lisandro Grullon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have install samba version:3.0.26a from ports, the daemons appear to be
> working fine by enabling the apropiate parameters in rc.conf, yet I am
> speriencing the issue where SWAT is showing as the smbd and nmbd are not
> running nor will they re
Hi! You can find more about the status of Samba and IPv6 in my
presentation from SambaXP (see
http://www.ipv6consultancy.com/ipv6blog/?p=8).
I have also provide a patch that enables IPv6 in the Samba4 server. A
Howto and the Samba4 IPv6 patch can be found at
http://www.ipv6consultancy.com/ipv
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information
>> > from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single l
On 6/14/07, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information
> from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link
> in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6.
There's a link o
"Andrew Falanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does samba actually support this? I'm not turning up much information
> from the "official HOW-TO" at samba.org. In fact, not a single link
> in the HOW-TO even mentions IPv6.
There's a link on the Samba front page from last week.
The short version
On Sat, 19 May 2007 13:01:51 -0400
"Zane C.B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007 21:46:33 -0400
> "Zane C.B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any one know where I can find info on setting up FreeBSD so it
> > tries to automounting their home from a Samba server?
>
> Came across p
On Fri, 18 May 2007 21:46:33 -0400
"Zane C.B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any one know where I can find info on setting up FreeBSD so it tries
> to automounting their home from a Samba server?
Came across pam_exec, which after a bit of tweaking sort of takes
care of this.
Here is a patch to pa
The "fdisk -I da1" failed with SCSI parity error, so I took another look at the
manual for the 9GB drives and noticed that the J-4 pin block (12 pairs of pins
where SCSI Device ID's are set) on these drives says Pin 11 is a "Disable SCSI
Parity Check" jumper. I added a jumper on pin 11 on both 9
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:12:46PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote:
> Hi, Jerry:
>
> Yes, I want to run Samba (sorry the list of requirements from my original
> email got left off). I also want to have the server run scheduled backups of
> the mirror disk. However...
OK. I saw that later in your subj
Hi, Jerry:
Yes, I want to run Samba (sorry the list of requirements from my original email
got left off). I also want to have the server run scheduled backups of the
mirror disk. However...
I am not able to initialize da1 and da2 successfully. I went through the
process of running FDISK and th
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:39:28PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote:
> Thanks for the steps, Laszlo. I got as far as creating a freebsd slice on da1
> (both da1 and da2 have been low-level formatted).
> Now I have two questions:
>
> 1) When creating the slice on da1, I specified to use the entire disk, bu
Thanks for the steps, Laszlo. I got as far as creating a freebsd slice on da1
(both da1 and da2 have been low-level formatted).
Now I have two questions:
1) When creating the slice on da1, I specified to use the entire disk, but
there are 2 unused sections -- one before and one after the new sli
One more thought: I had to disable ACPI (as with the first server) to get
FreeBSD to boot. Could this have something to do with my problem, i.e., is some
manual configuration necessary to set up SCSI devices in FreeBSD?
Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 06:36 PM 4/19/2007, L Goodwin
There appears to be an issue with da1.
Please advise as to what the problem is and how to resolve it.
I'm getting similar "SCSI parity error" messages for BOTH of the following
commands:
1) gmirror label -b load sambavol /dev/da1 /dev/da2
2) fdisk -BI da1
Here is the output from the gmirror ca
*L Goodwin wrote:
>
> Both assume you only have 2 drives and want to mirror the drive
containing FreeBSD. I only want to mirror the data drive da1, and would
appreciate a concise set of steps for doing this right the first time.
1. First of all, you should install the base system on da0 and boot
I was initially hung up on the boot disk issue as well - everything in
the handbook applies to a data-only drive as well, except the part
about dumping the filesystem, etc. I presume your disks are
uninitialized.
I suggest a look at the actual gmirror manpage, it has more & better
examples, and
On Thursday 19 April 2007 03:24:36 pm L Goodwin wrote:
> Hello. I have a server with 3 SCSI drives. FreeBSD is installed on da0
> (4.3GB), and da1 and da2 (both identical 9GB drives) are to be used in a
> RAID 1 array for file storage on a LAN with Windows XP and Vista clients,
> using Samba to sha
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>You should update your ports tree. The latest version available is
>3.0.24, and it's recommended because there was a format string error of
>some kind in <=3.0.23d.
Ok, so I've updated my ports tree on my FreeBSD 6.2R system.
I
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007, Gerald Freymann wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:14:38 -0400
>Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I heard that Vista home was not designed for networking. You might be
>>better served by checking out an MS News forum regarding this problem. I
>>have often gotten better
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Gerald Freymann wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:14:38 -0400
Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I heard that Vista home was not designed for networking. You might be
better served by checking out an MS News forum regarding this problem. I
have often gotten better re
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:14:38 -0400
Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I heard that Vista home was not designed for networking. You might be
>better served by checking out an MS News forum regarding this problem. I
>have often gotten better results regarding the use of MS products with
>non
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:36:56 -0400
Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:30:40 -0400
>Gerald Freymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Now that I have my nice new HP OfficeJet 5610 printer here, I'm
>> trying to print to it remotely (it's connected to my Vista Home
>> Pr
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:30:40 -0400
Gerald Freymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that I have my nice new HP OfficeJet 5610 printer here, I'm
> trying to print to it remotely (it's connected to my Vista Home
> Premium computer).
>
> smbclient doesn't seen to want to co-operate.
>
> smbclient i
Ken Stevenson wrote:
A. Clausen wrote:
Slowly educating myself in FreeBSD. Have managed to get Samba set up
and can access my FreeBSD server, but trying to get SMBFS shares
mounted in fstab is causing me grief. Either I get errors about
invalid file system or I get nothing at all when I
A. Clausen wrote:
Slowly educating myself in FreeBSD. Have managed
to get Samba set up and can access my FreeBSD server,
but trying to get SMBFS shares mounted in fstab is
causing me grief. Either I get errors about invalid
file system or I get nothing at all when I issue
"mount -a", but the s
A. Clausen wrote:
Slowly educating myself in FreeBSD. Have managed to get Samba set up
and can access my FreeBSD server, but trying to get SMBFS shares mounted
in fstab is causing me grief. Either I get errors about invalid file
system or I get nothing at all when I issue "mount -a", but the
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Samba and ADS Support PLEASE...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Matt Edwards wrote:
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:31:05 -0600
> From: Matt Edwards <
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Matt Edwards wrote:
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:31:05 -0600
> From: Matt Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alexander Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Joerg Pulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: "Matt Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Joerg Pulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Samba and ADS Support PLEASE...
> When you build kerberos make sure you build it with WITH_LDAP=yes as
: "Joerg Pulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: Samba and ADS Support PLEASE...
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Matt Edwards wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Matt Edwards wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:47:55 -0600
> From: Matt Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Samba and ADS Support PLEASE...
>
> Is it necessary to modify the Makefile of the samba-devel
Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:41 PM
Subject: RE: Samba and ADS Support PLEASE...
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
I had the same problem. I ended up downloading the source from samba.org
and compiling myself. It too
hmm, try using the pw command to create your users. This is the command
line version of adduser and enables you to create users with a $.
I use the following script to quickly add machine trust accounts...
hope it helps.
#- begin script -#
#!/bin/csh -f
set MNAME = $1
set MGID = 201
At 1:41 PM +0800 8/12/03, Katinka Mills wrote:
I thought in the version with Freebsd 4.8 that you could
now use accounts with $ signs in them
The 'pw' command has been changed so that you can create
user accounts (and user groups) which end in a $. That's
all samba should need. I'm pretty sure th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Micheas Herman
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2003 2:52 PM
> To: FreeBSD List
> Cc: FreeBSD List
> Subject: Re: Samba and $
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 17:41, Jon Reynolds wr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guillaume
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2003 5:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: FreeBSD List
> Subject: Re: Samba and $
>
>
> Le Lun 04/08/2003 à 20:41, Jon Reynolds a écr
Le Lun 04/08/2003 à 20:41, Jon Reynolds a écrit :
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 12:25, Bob Collins wrote:
> > At 02:07 PM 8/4/2003 -0500, gfsd wrote:
> > >Why can't i create a user with a $ on the end? For machine trust accounts
> > >i need to add each one by hand, instead of on the fly creation. When I
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 17:41, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 12:25, Bob Collins wrote:
> > At 02:07 PM 8/4/2003 -0500, gfsd wrote:
> > >Why can't i create a user with a $ on the end? For machine trust accounts
> > >i need to add each one by hand, instead of on the fly creation. When I
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 00:02, Katinka Mills wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Micheas Herman
> > Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2003 2:52 PM
> > To: FreeBSD List
> > Cc: FreeBSD List
> > Sub
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 12:25, Bob Collins wrote:
> At 02:07 PM 8/4/2003 -0500, gfsd wrote:
> >Why can't i create a user with a $ on the end? For machine trust accounts
> >i need to add each one by hand, instead of on the fly creation. When I use
> >adduser it will not let me add a user with a $ on
At 02:07 PM 8/4/2003 -0500, gfsd wrote:
Why can't i create a user with a $ on the end? For machine trust accounts
i need to add each one by hand, instead of on the fly creation. When I use
adduser it will not let me add a user with a $ on the end, is there a way
around that?
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:08:44 -0500, John Wilson wrote:
>I am currently seeking advice in regard to allowing an XP Home Edition
>machine to have access to a FreeBSD mount. I've looked over Samba, and not
>only have I seen references to XP's inability to join a 'domain
>based-network', but also don
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Jason Hunt wrote:
> OT, but my understanding is that Windows XP Home Edition will not log
> in to NT4-based (SMB-only) networks, but only Windows 2000 (Active
> Directory) networks. However, Windows XP Professional will log in to
> both.
In my experience, XP Home is completel
hout being asked for another password.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Hunt
Sent: Sunday, 2 February 2003 9:33 AM
To: Bill Moran
Cc: John Wilson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba and XP?
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Bill Moran wrote:
>
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Bill Moran wrote:
> There's an XP machine right behind me that talks to our Samba server just
> fine. Just don't configure Samba to be a domain server.
>
> And, it does work just fine under domain systems as well. Samba just doesn't
> do active directory yet.
>
OT, but my u
If you don't want to install samba, find a windows ftp client that is easy
to use... seems I've seen some that pretend to be hard drives on your
desktop... can't remember the name, but the friend that had it seemed to
like it.
-philip
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, John Wilson wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> I am
John Wilson wrote:
Good Day,
I am currently seeking advice in regard to allowing an XP Home Edition
machine to have access to a FreeBSD mount. I've looked over Samba, and not
only have I seen references to XP's inability to join a 'domain
based-network',
There's an XP machine right behind me t
You could go upside-down and use the FreeBSD machine mounting a
XP-share.
You say that you're using XPhome so ActiveDirectroy or any other
Domain-Controlling issues shouldn't play a role.
I think mount_smbfs is your friend.
Best regards,
-Harry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> I am curre
51 matches
Mail list logo
