Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
thanks
People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time and
bandwidth. We have the test@ list for exactly this purpose.
Too true. Now, how do people find out about [EMAIL
01, 2005 10:42 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Sam Gonfle
Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
thanks
People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time
and
bandwidth. We
AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Sam Gonfle
Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
thanks
People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time
and
bandwidth. We
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
go through, you know it's not working. And subsequent tests can be the same
question/comment with a datestamp.
Just my 2 cents.
Now
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin
Kinsey
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:42 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Sam Gonfle
Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
thanks
People, please do
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
go through, you know it's not working. And subsequent tests can be the same
question/comment with a datestamp.
Just
What's wrong with top posting? ;-)
On 7/1/05, Robert Marella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
go through, you know it's not
On Friday 01 July 2005 13:30, Robert Marella wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can
post before you actually post a question? If your first
question/comment doesn't go through, you know it's not working. And
subsequent tests
Pardon my newness, but what is top posting?
Thanks,
Bryan
On Friday 01 July 2005 06:56 pm, Lane wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 13:30, Robert Marella wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can
post before you actually post a
that was a joke btw, lets not get into that too. anyways
You could always add an addendum to the SMTP rfc that states when
someone sends a blank message with the subject test it will send
back the message with OK in the body.
___
On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:29 AM, fbsd_user wrote:
So just because this guy was considerate and said 'test' in his
subject he gets criticized. But all the posts to this list for
selling drugs we all just ignore with no comments. And what good is
posting to the 'test' list when the sole purpose of a
On 2005-07-01 14:09, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that was a joke btw, lets not get into that too. anyways
You could always add an addendum to the SMTP rfc that states when
someone sends a blank message with the subject test it will send
back the message with OK in the body.
I'd
On 7/1/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[deleted]
While proposing ways to stop people from sending test messages to
lists, can someone find a way to filter out top posting as well? :-)
I'm not trying to stop anybody. I'm purposing ping for SMTP, The
construct is like an echo
On Jul 1, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 7/1/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[deleted]
While proposing ways to stop people from sending test messages to
lists, can someone find a way to filter out top posting as well? :-)
I'm not trying to stop anybody. I'm
On 6/30/05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
thanks
People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time and
bandwidth. We have the test@ list for exactly this purpose.
Who thinks that people sending
15 matches
Mail list logo
