On Jul 1, 2005, at 6:02 PM, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 7/1/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[deleted]
While proposing ways to stop people from sending test messages to
lists, can someone find a way to filter out top posting as well? :-)
I'm not trying to stop anybody. I'm pur
On 7/1/05, Bart Silverstrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [deleted]
>
> While proposing ways to stop people from sending test messages to
> lists, can someone find a way to filter out top posting as well? :-)
I'm not trying to stop anybody. I'm purposing ping for SMTP, The
construct is like an
On 2005-07-01 14:09, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that was a joke btw, lets not get into that too. anyways
>
> You could always add an addendum to the SMTP rfc that states when
> someone sends a blank message with the subject "test" it will send
> back the message with "OK" in the b
On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:29 AM, fbsd_user wrote:
So just because this guy was considerate and said 'test' in his
subject he gets criticized. But all the posts to this list for
selling drugs we all just ignore with no comments. And what good is
posting to the 'test' list when the sole purpose of a
that was a joke btw, lets not get into that too. anyways
You could always add an addendum to the SMTP rfc that states when
someone sends a blank message with the subject "test" it will send
back the message with "OK" in the body.
___
freebsd-questions@f
Pardon my newness, but what is "top posting"?
Thanks,
Bryan
On Friday 01 July 2005 06:56 pm, Lane wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 13:30, Robert Marella wrote:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >>I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can
> >> post before you actually pos
On Friday 01 July 2005 13:30, Robert Marella wrote:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >>I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can
> >> post before you actually post a question? If your first
> >> question/comment doesn't go through, you know it's not working. And
> >> subs
What's wrong with top posting? ;-)
On 7/1/05, Robert Marella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >>I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
> >>before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
> >>go through, you kn
Jerry McAllister wrote:
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
go through, you know it's not working. And subsequent tests can be the same
question/comment with a datestamp.
Just m
; That's all I have to say about that.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin
> Kinsey
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:42 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Sam Gonfle
> Subject: Re: Test
>
> I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
> before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
> go through, you know it's not working. And subsequent tests can be the same
> question/comment with a datestamp.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin
> Kinsey
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:42 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Sam Gonfle
> Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions
>
>
> Gre
ehalf Of Kevin
Kinsey
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:42 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Sam Gonfle
Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
>
>
>>thanks
>>
>
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
thanks
People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time and
bandwidth. We have the test@ list for exactly this purpose.
Too true. Now, how do people find out about [EMAIL
On 6/30/05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
> > thanks
>
> People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time and
> bandwidth. We have the test@ list for exactly this purpose.
>
> Who thinks that people
15 matches
Mail list logo
