On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Jonathan Horne wrote:
portupgrade is bombing due to the file tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip not being
found in /usr/ports/distfiles. however, when i visit
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml, there appears to be no
link or no information about such a file.
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I remember seeing some weeks ago that people had run into difficulties when
portupgrade moved from sysutils into ports-mgmt, and one recommendation was
to deinstall portupgrade and then
cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade
make install
Possibly silly question: will I
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 15:32, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
[can I upgrade portupgrade by]
portupgrade -NR --origin ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade
?
I'm fairly certain that /usr/ports/UPGRADING said what to do.
I checked UPDATING before I posted: it doesn't, just
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 15:32, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
[can I upgrade portupgrade by]
portupgrade -NR --origin ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade
?
I'm fairly certain that /usr/ports/UPGRADING said what to do.
I checked UPDATING before I posted:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 01:57:54 +0100
Patrick Lamaizière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm asking about the goal of the new option -L of pkgdb :
-L --fix-lost Check and restore lost dependencies against the ports tree.
What is a lost dependency ?
I hope I can explain this right. Its a
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:54 PM
To: Vizion
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade query
Vizion wrote:
I have multiple lines of stale dependencies reported from
pkgdb -F all
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2007 17:54
To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD
Subject: Re: Portupgrade out of swap - corrupt pkg info...
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
I updated the ports on my laptop
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:53:30 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Portupgrade out of swap - corrupt pkg info...
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
I updated the ports
Ok,
I found a solution. I had the same problem as described below.
I am using portsnap so :
# portsnap fetch
# portsnap update
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade
# make deinstall; make install clean
This will install version portupgrade-2.2.2_2,2 which corrects the bug.
Sincerly yours.
I am having the same problem.
I have tried the make fetchindex approach but it doesn't solve it for me.
you mentioned something about /usr/ports/UPDATING, but was unable to find
a relevant entry.
can you please tell me the entry date that helped you with this problem?
Thank you,
Tomoki Taniguchi
On 1/19/07, Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I remove a group so that FreeBSD's ports tree doesn't see it as
already allocated?
I was upgrading using portupgrade, when Apache errored. Error output
below:
--- Build of www/apache22 ended at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:18 -0800
George Vanev wrote:
Portupgrade is trying to add a group www with gid 80 which already exists.
Try cat /etc/goup | grep 80 (without quotes) to see which group is
assigned gid 80.
Then you can take measures changing the gid of that group.
Regards
--
George Vanev
What's strange is that 80
Got it sorted-- thanks for all who helped.
--Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sahil Tandon
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 3:36 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
Vizion wrote:
What does it mean when
Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Merritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 2:22 AM
To: Vizion
Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
At 01:40 AM 1/2/2007 -0800, you wrote
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 2:35:20 -0800
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will write a short script to check for changes in pkgtools.conf and
run it both before and after portupgrade is run. That way I will at
least have a handle on what is going on.
It wont change by itself.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in response to
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will write a short script to check for changes in pkgtools.conf and
run it both before and after portupgrade is run. That way I will at
least have a handle on what is going on.
It wont change by itself.
Sure -- but
On 02 Jan Vizion wrote:
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wont change by itself.
Sure -- but it must have been changed automatically on my system during
a package installation process- I certainly made no manual or other
entries in it and noone else has root access.
I know of NO port
Vizion wrote:
What does it mean when the message
--- skipping [portname] because it is held by user (specify -f to force)
Does said port appear in the HOLD_PKGS array within pkgtools.conf? From
that file:
# HOLD_PKGS: array
#
# This is a list of ports you don't want portupgrade(1) to
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:48:50 -0800
Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gi
I just wondered whether using portupgrade -a there might be any way
to have an initial interactive dialogue to set all option for all
ports to be upgraded during the run so as to facilitate an attendance
free upgrade
On Thursday 28 December 2006 09:48, Vizion wrote:
Gi
I just wondered whether using portupgrade -a there might be any way to have
an initial interactive dialogue to set all option for all ports to be
upgraded during the run so as to facilitate an attendance free upgrade
procedure.
Maybe
On Sunday 17 December 2006 04:57, Karl Sinn wrote:
Hi,
I just did portupgrade -a and at the end I see a list with 79 skipped
ports.
Why did he skip them, and how can I update them?
Skipped means they were up to date and didn't need updating. You can force an
update by using the f flag.
Hi * --
Funny thing, ps ax does to tell me the PID of portupgrade.
The process stopped while fetch a postgresql tarball. ps should list
portupgrade or at least fetch, right?
TIA,
Henry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote code execution:
http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ?
You
mato wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote code execution:
http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ?
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
mato wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote code execution:
http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
Isn't
mato wrote:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
mato wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote code execution:
http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
Matthew Seaman wrote:
mato wrote:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
mato wrote:
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote code execution:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:16:18PM +0100, mato wrote:
Matthew, that is a great answer!!
Thank you! :-)
The last question would be how to make make(1) /portupgrade/portsystem
to ignore FORBIDDEN.
make -DNO_IGNORE will get around this. But bypassing FORBIDDEN is
generally not wise.
--
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Hello,
According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
(3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit refuse
me to do so:
** Port
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Hello,
According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
(3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit refuse
me
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote code execution:
http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ?
You need to make config in /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-codecs, and
Today I found the CPU is drained up by 5 instances of
script and dialog, because everyday when portupgrade updates
python, it tried to display a menu in text mode and ask for a few
options (such as whether python should support IPv6 etc), which of
course hangs in cron job.
Some ports have a
On 11/6/06, Josh Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I found the CPU is drained up by 5 instances of
script and dialog, because everyday when portupgrade updates
python, it tried to display a menu in text mode and ask for a few
options (such as whether python should support IPv6 etc),
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 01:26, Josh Carroll wrote:
[snip: portupgrade waiting in config dialogs]
Some ports have a config make target which will save options. For
ports that do not, you can use pkgtools.conf and set MAKE_ARGS for
that port.
I know the answer is probably going to be one
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Hi people,
I just did the portupgrade -rf pkg-config\* to upgrade the apps, but i
think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probably is
On 28/09/2006 23:44, Pascal Bleyler wrote:
Hello,
i'm actually updating my installed ports with
portupgrade -a over a remote ssh session.
Before i have done a cvsup and a portsdb -Fu
There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port
is ruby.
pkg_info means i have
Bob wrote:
Is it safe to portupgrade several packages in parallel? Open several root
consoles and do a portupgrade in each one at the same time?
That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies
(fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict)
However you can tell
On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies
(fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict)
Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my
security audit) Was hoping to do them
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies
(fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict)
Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my
HI,
I've founded this atm:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=langportname=ruby1
8
what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :(
Thanks
Pascal Bleyler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pascal Bleyler
Sent:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Pascal Bleyler wrote:
HI,
I've founded this atm:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=langportname=ruby1
8
what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :(
Wait it out, add more RAM, or use a tool that requires less memory.
Pascal Bleyler wrote:
There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port
is ruby.
pkg_info means i have ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 installed
and under /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby is
ruby-1.8.5.tar.gz (i think it's the update version)
All ran fine but since 1hour top shows me the following:
Have you done a portsnap fetch update before ?
Aguiar Magalhaes a écrit :
Hi list,
I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the
portupgrade doesn't work.
--- Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1'
(archivers/arc)
--- Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make
flags: BATCH=yes
Yes, it's OK :)
But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
eoghan [EMAIL
On 24 Aug 2006, at 15:06, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Yes, it's OK :)
But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
Great, Thanks for that.
Eoghan
eoghan wrote:
On 24 Aug 2006, at 15:06, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Yes, it's OK :)
But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
Great,
But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
Great, Thanks for that.
Eoghan
Or, you could just run:
portsnap fetch
Johnny Choque wrote:
portmanager -u -l
It will save you time and trouble. It also assumes you have
'portmanager'
installed. Portsnap is part of the base system.
I'm newbie in Freebsd and initially I have use cvsup and portupgrade. I
haven't clear what is the difference to use
Johnny Choque wrote:
I'm newbie in Freebsd and initially I have use cvsup and portupgrade. I
haven't clear what is the difference to use portupgrade, portsnap,
portmanager, and other ones? Could you recommend us one of them?
Actually, it tends to be a matter of personal preference.
I prefer
In response to Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Why is the upgrade procedure recommended to be
portupgrade -R package
instead of
portupgrade -r package ?
If -R is Act on all those packages required by the given packages as well.
isn't it more important to rebuild the
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hello,
Why is the upgrade procedure recommended to be
portupgrade -R package
instead of
portupgrade -r package ?
If -R is Act on all those packages required by the given packages as well.
isn't it more important to rebuild the packages that depend on the package
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the advantage of using bdb4 instead of bdb1 while installing
portupgrade?
If you really want to follow it up:
the pkg-descr points you to that information.
I still dont see what is the advantage of using it with
On 05 Aug Kiffin Gish wrote:
I would like to disable building certain builds when running a
portupgrade -arR.
For example, if gnome2 is tagged for a rebuild, Galeon is not built
(because I don't use it and have deleted the package).
As I wrote earlier, see pkgtools.conf = HOLDPKG optionF2
On 03/08/06 Dave said:
Hello,
I'm getting an error from ruby whenever i run a portupgrade. Checking
portaudit i see this is a vulnerability. Is there a fiix for it?
I believe that the vulnerability is ruby itself, is it not?
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent
Try to use:
portupgrade -c -C -r -R -v -m DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes ruby
I hope this will solve the issue, if you are sure you want to updrate this
version :)
Ivailo Tanusheff
Senior System administrator
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:08:03AM -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting an error from ruby whenever i run a portupgrade. Checking
portaudit i see this is a vulnerability. Is there a fiix for it?
Thanks.
Dave.
cvsup your ports tree and rebuild ruby18. Some patches for ruby18 went
in
On 8/3/06, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting an error from ruby whenever i run a portupgrade. Checking
portaudit i see this is a vulnerability. Is there a fiix for it?
Thanks.
Dave.
i had these warnings too, just use portupgrade or portmanager to upgrade
your ports, there
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:07:39 +0800
jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi guys,
portaudit reperoted a vulnerability on the ruby package, so i did the
following:
# cvsup -L 2 ports-supfile
# portsdb -Uu
# portupgrade -rR ruby
but i encountered this error message, i can't upgrade ruby.
On 7/31/06, jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:07:39 +0800
jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi guys,
portaudit reperoted a vulnerability on the ruby package, so i did the
following:
# cvsup -L 2
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:50:28 +0800
jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:07:39 +0800
jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi guys,
portaudit
On 7/31/06, jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi guys,
portaudit reperoted a vulnerability on the ruby package, so i did the
following:
# cvsup -L 2 ports-supfile
# portsdb -Uu
# portupgrade -rR ruby
but i encountered this error message, i can't upgrade ruby.
--- Upgrading
On 7/20/06, Nagy László [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
*
--- Neil Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suddenly, portupgrade (and it's associated tools)
instantly core dumps.
followup:
force reinstall/reregister of /usr/ports/lang/ruby18
did the trick.
==
Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise and extol and honor the King of heaven, for all
his works are
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:43:05 -0400, Joe Auty wrote:
As of the latest portupgrade upgrade I'm getting the following error
message when I try to invoke and of the portupgrade scripts:
# pkgdb -F
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/bdb.so:
(NotImplementedError)
BDB needs compatible
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Andrey Slusar wrote:
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:43:05 -0400, Joe Auty wrote:
As of the latest portupgrade upgrade I'm getting the following error
message when I try to invoke and of the portupgrade scripts:
# pkgdb -F
HI
This problem is that the /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db has been damaged. What you
need to do is to build a new pkgdb.db file
First cd /var/db/pkg save the old pkgdb by
mv pkgdb.db - pkgdb.old
then you run pkgdb -u
after that you should be up and running again.
Psadi
jan gestre skrev:
On 7/3/06,
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 03:21, Psadi wrote:
HI
This problem is that the /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db has been damaged. What you
need to do is to build a new pkgdb.db file
First cd /var/db/pkg save the old pkgdb by
mv pkgdb.db - pkgdb.old
then you run pkgdb -u
after that you should be up and
I still have the same problem :
root 12:35 /var/db/pkg # portsdb -fuU
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: djvulibre-nox11-3.5.17_1
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ocaml-nox11-3.09.2
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry:
Le 06/07/2006 à 00:09:14+0200, Albert Shih a écrit
Hi all
After update portupgrade it seem (on my server) the «-b» option don't work.
I don't have any backup of my old package. That's very *
portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management
tool s
On 7/3/06, bsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmmh...
I have followed your instructions and am still facing a problem :
root 0:34 ~ # portversion -l
[Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ...
[Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ...
uninitialized constant PkgDB::BDB:
bsd wrote:
Hello,
I have a new problem that has just occured on my main mail server.
I am upgrading the ports on this server every two or three days using
portsnap and portupgrade.
After portsnap has updated it's index I do a portupgrade -arR to
upgrade all ports on the system.
Mutt
On 7/3/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 release and after upgrading portupgrade using
portupgrade itself I'm getting this message (message bellow) or similar one
everytime I run one of the portupgrade commands like pkgdb -u
Mmmh...
I have followed your instructions and am still facing a problem :
root 0:34 ~ # portversion -l
[Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ...
[Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ...
uninitialized constant PkgDB::BDB: Cannot update the pkgdb!]
Command
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 release and after upgrading portupgrade using
portupgrade itself I'm getting this message (message bellow) or similar one
everytime I run one of the portupgrade commands like pkgdb -u or -F,
portversion -L = or portupgrade
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:59:16 +0200, Andreas Wideroe Andersen wrote:
I can't seem to install portupgrade on my system. I'm running 4.7
STABLE (and I can't upgrade until later in July).
/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade #] make install clean
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 1618: warning: String
On Monday 19 June 2006 14:36, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
if not available locally I want to build the port
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note from the above that portinstall is presuming that -PP was used and
is not building the port. I can omit the '-p' and this stops the occurrence
of this error, but then I don't get a package creation and that means I'll
have to build this port from scratch every time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
if not available locally I want to build the port myself _and_ create a
package for future repetition. To prevent
Aguiar Magalhaes wrote:
Hi list,
I'm updating the Free 5.3 to Free 6.1. I've used the
sequence:
cvsup -g -L 2 freebsd.sup
mergemaster -p
mergemaster
cd /usr/src
make buildworld
make installworld
cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
config MYKERNEL
make cleandepend
make depend
make
make
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Different defaults.
Thanks a lot.
np.
Kris
pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400
Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved)
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget
works just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well.
What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :)
Kris
pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400,
Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget
doesn't have a problem with that.
More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the
problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine.
On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote:
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. This
Michael Collette wrote:
This problem only occurs when using portupgrade. Both pkg_delete and
pkg_deinstall work without error. Also, everything else in the process
that portupgrade goes through appears to work properly. Just that
/var/db/pkg directory won't delete when NFS mounted.
Have
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Michael Collette wrote:
This problem only occurs when using portupgrade. Both pkg_delete and
pkg_deinstall work without error. Also, everything else in the process
that portupgrade goes through appears to work properly. Just that
/var/db/pkg directory won't delete
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Michael Collette wrote:
No luck. I was back on 2.0.1 which I upgraded with pkg_delete and
pkg_add. Still the exact same error with deleting the /var/db/pkg
directory.
Let's make it clean. You have /var/db/pkg as nfs mounted? You can't
remove /var/db/pkg/portname
On Saturday 06 May 2006 13:28, Arno Schleich wrote:
Dear all,
I have observed the following behavior in portupgrade:
The operation
portugrade -a
results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the
database is accessed.
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg
Arno Schleich wrote:
portugrade -a
results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the
database is accessed.
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg ... Inappropriate
file type or format - /var/db/pkg/pkgdb; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the
pkgdb
No, I upgraded to 6.0 a couple of days after it was released. That must have
been eight or nine months ago ...
m: Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Arno Schleich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 14:37:45 -0700
Arno
Thanks, that improved the behavior. What I don't understand though is why
upgrading individual ports e. g. portupgrade xyz never resulted in that
problem ...
From: Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
CC: Arno Schleich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:38, Jonas Jacobsen wrote:
When i use portupgrade, i get this Warning all the time
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:980: warning: Insecure
world writable dir /tmp, mode 041777
have any of you seen that warning before,? and do you know how to make
it
have any of you seen that warning before,? and do you know how to
make
it go away ?
Not seen it but check the ouput of
$ ls -ld /tmp
(mode should be drwxrwxrwt)
Maybe it is drwxrwxrwx, in which case
# chmod o+t /tmp
will fix it. Otherwise I'm not sure.
Using portmanager would
301 - 400 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
