At 3:38 PM +0200 4/5/06, Jonas Jacobsen wrote:
When i use portupgrade, i get this Warning all the time
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:980:
warning: Insecure world writable dir /tmp, mode 041777
have any of you seen that warning before,? and do you
know how to make it go away
Kiffin Gish wrote:
I want to find out which ports need updating by running 'portupgrade
-arR' . However, I am getting the following error message:
Stale dependency: ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_3 -- lcms-1.14_1,1 -- manually
run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force.
As suggested, I run
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to find out which ports need updating by running 'portupgrade
-arR' . However, I am getting the following error message:
Stale dependency: ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_3 -- lcms-1.14_1,1 -- manually
run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force.
As
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 09:03 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want to find out which ports need updating by running 'portupgrade
-arR' . However, I am getting the following error message:
Stale dependency: ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_3 -- lcms-1.14_1,1 --
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi all,
For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the
ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now. Recently
though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports tree, still
using portupgrade once a
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi all,
For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the
ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now. Recently
though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports tree, still
using portupgrade once a
Hi Donald,
Thanks for the replies.
On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi all,
For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the
ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now. Recently
On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi Donald,
Thanks for the replies.
On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi all,
For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update
the ports
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi Donald,
Thanks for the replies.
On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi all,
For a long time I've been using cvsup and
On 3/18/06, Duane Whitty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi Donald,
Thanks for the replies.
On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 18 March 2006 15:50, Duane Whitty wrote:
Hi,
I seem to remember needing to run portsnap fetch extract update
the first time I ran portsnap. Afterwards portsnap fetch update
worked as I expected. Perhaps you have already tried this? If so,
my apologies for the useless noise.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 3/8/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I manually rm -rf a port, manually untar (ie glib.tar.gz), and do a
portupgrade -rR glib, will packages that have a specific dependency on
the old glib version get rebuilt? Or if not will they
On 3/8/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been told that tracking the whole port tree on a production server
is a bad idea. I kind of agree thinking about the old addage if it aint
broke don't fix it.
Arguably the best strategy for the base system. Arguably
a bad idea in case of
On 3/8/06, Chris Maness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I manually rm -rf a port, manually untar (ie glib.tar.gz), and do a
portupgrade -rR glib, will packages that have a specific dependency on
the old glib version get rebuilt? Or if not will they break (I am just
using glib as an example and
--- James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kiffin Gish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Peter wrote:
--- James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kiffin Gish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know the difference between running:
portupgrade -arR
and
portmanager -u
Just curious is all, thanks.
I have found portmanager to be more intelligent. When
you run it it takes a look at all installed ports and
then it
On Saturday 04 March 2006 19:20, Peter wrote:
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know the difference between running:
portupgrade -arR
and
portmanager -u
Just curious is all, thanks.
I have found portmanager to be more intelligent. When
you run it it
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:34:55PM +1100, Richard Burakowski wrote:
Scott Mitchell wrote:
performance reasons. However, I want downloaded distfiles and built
packages to go in /usr/ports where other machines can see them, but there
i don't save packages but i do have clients downloading
Scott Mitchell wrote:
performance reasons. However, I want downloaded distfiles and built
packages to go in /usr/ports where other machines can see them, but there
i don't save packages but i do have clients downloading into distifiles
as req'd by having /usr/ports and /usr/ports/distfiles
eoghan writes:
Im wondering if there is a log file generated by portupgrade and
where i would find it?
see PORTUPGRADE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
--- Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eoghan writes:
Im wondering if there is a log file generated by portupgrade and
where i would find it?
If you mean generated by portupgrade and separate from what is
printed to stdout/stderr, then not as far as I know. There are
On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote:
pkg_version -v shows:
avr-libc-1.2.5,1 needs updating (port has
1.4.3,1)
Note: all other ports show current except kde related items.
So, I updated my port collection:
/usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 2 ~/ports-supfile
pkgdb -vF
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:38:15PM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote:
pkg_version -v shows:
avr-libc-1.2.5,1 needs updating (port has
1.4.3,1)
Note: all other ports show current except kde related items.
So, I updated my
.
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:44:12 -0500
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:38:15PM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Steve Pauly wrote:
Kris,
I added TRYBROKEN= yes
in the Makefile and ran portupgrade avr-libc (getting further than
before) with the following results:
install -o root -g wheel -m 444
/usr/ports/devel/avr-libc/work/avr-libc-1.4.3/LICENSE
.
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Pauly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:31:57 -0500
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Steve Pauly wrote:
Kris,
I added TRYBROKEN= yes
in the Makefile
.
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Steve Pauly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:31:57 -0500
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Steve Pauly wrote:
Kris,
I added TRYBROKEN= yes
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:11:44AM -0500, George Fazio wrote:
I had the same issue. My mouse wheel stopped working, and imwheel started
using it for my broswer back/forward (instead of the buttons it's suppose to
use). I was able to get the mouse wheel working again by editing my
xorg.conf
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:11:44AM -0500, George Fazio wrote:
I had the same issue. My mouse wheel stopped working, and imwheel started
using it for my broswer back/forward (instead of the buttons it's suppose to
use). I was able to get the mouse wheel working again by
You can always tell xmodmap that you've got 11
buttons (or whatever xorg tells you in its log). Just
add ... 8 9 10 11 to the map and it will work fine
once again.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I fixed this problem by killing moused and setting the device to /dev/psm0.
I thought it was just me!
On 2/2/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can always tell xmodmap that you've got 11
buttons (or whatever xorg tells you in its log). Just
add ... 8 9 10 11 to the map and
A friend of mine pointed me to this message from one of the Xorg lists. I
have not yet had time to test it, and it will probably be a couple days
before I do. Hope this helps everyone out. -George
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Hopf
Sent: Thursday,
I had the same issue. My mouse wheel stopped working, and imwheel started
using it for my broswer back/forward (instead of the buttons it's suppose to
use). I was able to get the mouse wheel working again by editing my
xorg.conf file, but I'm still having issues with imwheel which seem to stem
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:57:21PM -0800, Luke Bakken wrote:
Hello all,
I'm in the process of doing a mega-portupgrade and I've noticed that
certain ports use the dialog command to collect options from the user.
I've searched for a way to ensure that these dialogs won't show up and
the
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:50:10PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
OK, my problem doesn't seem to be exactly the same. My machine hangs, and
when I check it the console screen is filled with the message, swap-pager:
indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 26650, size: 4096 and at that
point
At 04:25 AM 1/18/2006 +0100, you wrote:
Hi!
OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running
6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006
When I start a
# portupgrade -a
up to 671 MB swap are used and I see this message:
make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 04:25 AM 1/18/2006 +0100, you wrote:
Hi!
OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running
6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006
When I start a
# portupgrade -a
up to 671 MB swap are used and I see this message:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running
6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006
When I start a
# portupgrade -a
up to 671 MB swap are used and I see this message:
make: Max
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running
6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006
When I start a
# portupgrade -a
up to 671 MB swap are used and I
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:54:39AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running
6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006
When
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment
that is causing the port makefile to recurse. Probably USE_GCC or
some other USE_*.
That could be a hint. I can find legal options in
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
can I ?
Sort
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment
that is causing the port makefile to recurse. Probably USE_GCC or
some other USE_*.
That could be a hint. I can find
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment
that is causing the port makefile to recurse. Probably USE_GCC or
some other
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:51:12AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment
that is
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:51:12AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You are setting an illegal variable in
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:12:49AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:51:12AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris
At 12:55 AM 1/18/2006 -0500, you wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:54:39AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running
6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
Mike Loiterman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run portupgrade, I'm getting the following errors:
# portupgrade -a
** Makefile possibly broken: www/apache20:
Makefile, line 190: warning: duplicate script for target
print-closest-mirrors ignored
Makefile, line 197:
Subject: portupgrade errors
1. I deleted /usr/port/www/apache20
2. Deleted INDEX.*
3. cvsup'ed
4. portsdb -uU
5. pkgdb -F (No errors were shown).
6. portupgrade -arR
Still getting the same errors.
You might try this approach.
Update your ports tree.
Install
Hi,
On 1/14/06, Mathieu CHATEAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i have done a portupgrade -Rr bind9 on a server.
bind 9.3.1 was in /usr/sbin/named, but
bind 9.3.2 is in /usr/local/sbin/named
Now, i have 2 bind9 version on the same system...
any way to cleanup ? did i miss something ?
On 1/13/06, TuxGirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg ... - 320
packages found (-1 +0)
(...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG]
Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6]
The first
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:58 -0700
TuxGirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP
[Updating the pkgdb format:dbm_hash in /var/db/pkg ... - 320
packages found (-1 +0)
(...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG]
Segmentation fault
Quick, dirty and effective:
#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message - From: Tom Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: portupgrade freezing
Dave wrote:
Hello,
Last portupgrade i
Dave wrote:
Hello,
Last portupgrade i did showed portupgrade itself was in need of
updating. I ran portupgrade -arR and i got portupgrade v2.01,1, now
when i run a portupgrade command the system just sits there. I don't
get any output at all. I have uninstalled portupgrade and reinstalled
: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: portupgrade freezing
Dave wrote:
Hello,
Last portupgrade i did showed portupgrade itself was in need of
updating. I ran portupgrade -arR and i got portupgrade v2.01,1, now when
i run a portupgrade command the system just sits there. I don't
it just hangs as well. A pkg_info shows portupgrade
version 2.0.1,1.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: portupgrade freezing
Dave wrote
--On 9. december 2005 10:55 +0300 Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* On 09/12/05 08:51 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
--On 9. december 2005 9:33 +0300 Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* On 08/12/05 20:00 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to install
Sasa Stupar writes:
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade make install clean
=== Installing for portupgrade-20041226_8
=== portupgrade-20041226_8 depends on file:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/bdb.so - not found
===Verifying install for
--On 9. december 2005 7:37 -0500 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sasa Stupar writes:
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade make install clean
=== Installing for portupgrade-20041226_8
=== portupgrade-20041226_8 depends on file:
--On 9. december 2005 14:31 +0100 Herbert J. Skuhra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You have installed an OLD version of ruby-bdb which is no longer in the
ports. So update this port first and then try to build portupgrade again
(with the option WITH_BDB4=yes).
BR
Herbert
Thanx for the tip. I
I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my
FBSD 5.4. But it keeps giving me error about db43 allready installed:
snip
=== db43-4.3.29 is already installed
You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it
--On 8. december 2005 13:35 -0800 Dan O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my
FBSD 5.4. But it keeps giving me error about db43 allready installed:
snip
=== db43-4.3.29 is already installed
You may wish to ``make
Have you tried doing what the message suggests?
# cd /usr/ports/databases/db43
# make deinstall
# make reinstall
Then go and install portupgrade...
~Dan
Yes. I have tried that but still after I got the same error
while installing portupgrade.
Hmmm...
I'd try deinstalling db43,
--On 9. december 2005 9:33 +0300 Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* On 08/12/05 20:00 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my FBSD
5.4. But it keeps giving me error about db43 allready installed:
# make
* On 09/12/05 08:51 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
--On 9. december 2005 9:33 +0300 Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* On 08/12/05 20:00 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my FBSD
5.4. But it keeps giving me error
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P.
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
automate database and index maintenance?
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
automate database and index maintenance?
cvsup or portsnap, then portsdb -uUF. Work under
any
On Oct 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 make deinstall make clean make
reinstall
See what happens.
Talk about strange:
# cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for www/apache20
=== apache not installed, skipping
# make -V
I ended up deinstalling that apache installation (which I was not keen
on doing), and installing the apache20 port (which was the same
version (2.0.55) as the apache2 port ?), and, thankfully, it's
working fine. I'm also now able to run both 'pkgdb -F'and 'portsdb
-Uu' without ANY errors (except
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the
On Friday 28 October 2005 00:25, Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John
On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during
(2) make
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Date: Friday 28 October 2005 15:02
From: Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:29, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48,
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
On Friday 28 October 2005 19:51, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
problem was actually a dependency of the package to apache1.3. After I
ran 'pkgdb -F' and
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
problem was actually a dependency of the package to
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the
ultimate
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lowell Gilbert
How did you install ruby?
That's the program (as opposed to portupgrade) that's trying
to link to the wrong library, and the version
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:02 AM
To: Craig Deal
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the best way to keep the system up-to-date if you use packages? The
manual is fairly clear if you use ports, but things get kinda vague (for me
anyway) when it comes to packages. I have successfully installed (from
packages) a working system with
On 10/19/05, James Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:29:45PM +0400, Andrew P. wrote:
First, the other syntax seems much more readable:
'mplayer' = [
'WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=yes',
'WITHOUT_RUNTIME_CPUDETECTION=yes',
],
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:15 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Portupgrade problem
Craig Deal writes:
I installed portupgrade from packages today.
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I installed portupgrade from packages today. Whenever I run portupgrade
-arR or pkgdb -uvF I get the following message:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libcrypt.so.3 not found, required by
ruby18
I'm not sure what to do from here. I have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:39 PM
To: Craig Deal
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I installed
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:39 PM
To: Craig Deal
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I installed portupgrade from packages today. Whenever I run
portupgrade -arR or pkgdb -uvF I get the following message:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libcrypt.so.3 not found
Craig Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:40 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Craig Deal
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
401 - 500 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
