On 8/29/2012 1:32 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jack Stone writes:
Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12
installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in
increments to get well past EOL.
You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas b
On 8/29/2012 1:32 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jack Stone writes:
Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12
installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in
increments to get well past EOL.
You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas b
Jack Stone writes:
> Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12
> installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in
> increments to get well past EOL.
You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas before
suggesting them to you.
> Wonder
On 8/29/12 10:59 AM, David Newman wrote:
> On 8/29/12 8:08 AM, Jack Stone wrote:
>> On 8/29/2012 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>> Jack Stone writes:
>>>
uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD
7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009
Running perl5.10
On 8/29/12 8:08 AM, Jack Stone wrote:
> On 8/29/2012 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Jack Stone writes:
>>
>>> uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD
>>> 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009
>>>
>>> Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!)
>>> This is a production server.
>>>
On 8/29/2012 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jack Stone writes:
uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD
7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009
Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!)
This is a production server.
Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recomm
Jack Stone writes:
> uname -a FreeBSD mail.sagedata.net 7.0-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD
> 7.0-RELEASE-p9 #2: Sun Jan 18 19:59:27 CST 2009
>
> Running perl5.10 (yeah, old!)
> This is a production server.
>
>
> Been playing catchup on ports including perl as UPDATING recommends:
> portupgrade -o lang/perl5.
Parv wrote:
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Jorn Argelo
thusly...
About your problem, you should really recompile Perl from the
ports-tree if you want to upgrade your Perl version. And after you
did that, I always rebooted the machine. I don't know how it will
function without rebootin
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Jorn Argelo
thusly...
>
> About your problem, you should really recompile Perl from the
> ports-tree if you want to upgrade your Perl version. And after you
> did that, I always rebooted the machine. I don't know how it will
> function without rebooting the mac
Zan wrote:
uname -m = i386
which -a perl =
/usr/local/bin/perl
/usr/bin/perl
Please show:
uname -m
which -a perl
On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 01:30 P:M, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Zan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version
of pe
Please don't top-post.
Zan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 01:30 P:M, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Zan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version
> >> of perl (5.8.0) already there, but when I type 'perl
Zan wrote:
5.8 is from ports. 5.0.6. i think, is system based
In my 'usr/local/BIN' perl5.8.0 already exists.
ok
you need to install the perl from ports before using "use.perl port".
What I want to know is how to switch to 5.8.0 WITHOUT using "use.perl
port" because I already tried that
uname -m = i386
which -a perl =
/usr/local/bin/perl
/usr/bin/perl
Please show:
uname -m
which -a perl
On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 01:30 P:M, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Zan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version
of perl (5.8.0) alr
Zan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version
> of perl (5.8.0) already there, but when I type 'perl -v' I see that
> I'm running off of 5.0. Is there anything else I can do besides trying
> the "use.perl port" command? Because that doesn't
Zan wrote:
Hello,
Would you please help me?
in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version of
perl (5.8.0) already there, but when I type 'perl -v' I see that I'm
running off of 5.0.
5.8 is from ports. 5.0.6. i think, is system based
Is there anything else I can do b
Stefan Cars wrote:
Hi!
I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the
problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the
update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), probably becuase the
@INC changed and did not include the mach directory of 5.8.2. Is t
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:34:30PM +0100, Stefan Cars wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the
> problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the
> update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), probably becuase the
> @INC change
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:46:09PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> I haven't found big differences between 5.6 and 5.8, so I'd suggest you
> use 5.8. The main reason to stick with an older version is that you
> might develop scripts for platforms where the newer are not available.
I've noticed som
--On Thursday, December 30, 2004 7:54 PM -0800 Karl Agee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of
the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp sinc
Karl Agee wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of
the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp since
5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version.
I am co
Karl Agee wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most
of the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp
since 5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version.
I am co
Karl Agee wrote:
Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x
that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most
of the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp
since 5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version.
I am co
On Thursday 01 April 2004 07:05 am, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> I'm sure this is a silly question, but. I know about use.perl and
> so forth for the 4.x series.
>
> Yesterday I installed FreeBSD 5.2.1, and the active Perl port
> is /usr/ports/lang/perl, which is v. 5.6.1. I'd like to upgrade
> to 5.8
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 17:05, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> I'm sure this is a silly question, but. I know about use.perl and
> so forth for the 4.x series.
>
> Yesterday I installed FreeBSD 5.2.1, and the active Perl port
> is /usr/ports/lang/perl, which is v. 5.6.1. I'd like to upgrade
> to 5.8.2, wh
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:05:35AM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> Yesterday I installed FreeBSD 5.2.1, and the active Perl port
> is /usr/ports/lang/perl, which is v. 5.6.1. I'd like to upgrade
> to 5.8.2, which is in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 and thus I can't
> just do "portupgrade perl".
You ca
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Jez Hancock
thusly...
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:42:53AM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
> > At 08:48 PM 12/22/03, you wrote:
> >
> > >> $ portupgrade p5-\*
> > >>
> > >> However, when I try the command now I just get an error
> > >> message. Can anyone tell m
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:42:53AM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
> At 08:48 PM 12/22/03, you wrote:
>
> >> $ portupgrade p5-\*
> >>
> >> However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
> >anyone
> >> tell me the proper command?
> >>
> >
> >#portupgrade p5-* (as root)
>
> That
At 08:48 PM 12/22/03, you wrote:
> $ portupgrade p5-\*
>
> However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
anyone
> tell me the proper command?
>
#portupgrade p5-* (as root)
That gives me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# portupgrade p5-*
portupgrade: No match.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# p
At 01:41 AM 12/23/03, you wrote:
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I once saw, and used, a portupgrade command line to upgrade *all*
> installed perl modules. It went something like:
>
> $ portupgrade p5-\*
>
> However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
> anyone
Roger Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I once saw, and used, a portupgrade command line to upgrade *all*
> installed perl modules. It went something like:
>
> $ portupgrade p5-\*
>
> However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
> anyone tell me the proper command?
T
portupgrade :p5-
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:55:17PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
> I once saw, and used, a portupgrade command line to upgrade *all* installed
> perl modules. It went something like:
>
> $ portupgrade p5-\*
>
> However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:14:31AM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> Whats the best way to ensure that all perl modules are properly and
> automatically upgrade when perl itself is upgraded?
I've since discovered that I can shorten the time somewhat by using
`pkg_info -R perl-5.6.1_14` and then port
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:50:36PM +, Matt wrote:
> I am currently running freebsd 5.0-current and so do not have the perl
> installation as core. Perl 5.6.1 was installed as a dependency when I
> installed irssi from ports and everything has been using this since. I
> assume because this i
33 matches
Mail list logo
