Kyrre Nygård wrote:
> Hey!
>
> I was wondering if anybody could give me a quick cheat sheet for how to
> automatically:
>
> 1) Download all outdated ports
> 2) Switch to single user mode
> 3) Upgrade those ports
>
> Running portupgrade -a doesn't work very well when it's time to upgrade
> runnin
On 3/22/07, Kyrre Nygård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey!
I was wondering if anybody could give me a quick cheat sheet for how
to automatically:
1) Download all outdated ports
man portupgrade
(hint: -F option)
2) Switch to single user mode
3) Upgrade those ports
Please someone correct me if
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:17:48PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Doug Poland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on an i386 test box with apache
> > 1.3.37/PHP-5/MySQL-5. As the subject says, I'd like to replace
> > apache 1.3 with apache 2.2.
> >
> > I understand httpd.con
Doug Poland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on an i386 test box with apache
> 1.3.37/PHP-5/MySQL-5. As the subject says, I'd like to replace apache
> 1.3 with apache 2.2.
>
> I understand httpd.conf will change and that I'll have to edit that by
> hand, but is there a portupgr
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Jonathan Horne wrote:
portupgrade is bombing due to the file tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip not being
found in /usr/ports/distfiles. however, when i visit
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml, there appears to be no
link or no information about such a file.
Typ
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 15:32, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
[can I upgrade portupgrade by]
portupgrade -NR --origin ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade
?
I'm fairly certain that /usr/ports/UPGRADING said what to do.
I checked UPDATING before I posted:
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 15:32, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> Jonathan McKeown wrote:
>
> > [can I upgrade portupgrade by]
> > portupgrade -NR --origin ports-mgmt/portupgrade portupgrade
> > ?
>
> I'm fairly certain that /usr/ports/UPGRADING said what to do.
I checked UPDATING before I posted: it doesn't,
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I remember seeing some weeks ago that people had run into difficulties when
portupgrade moved from sysutils into ports-mgmt, and one recommendation was
to deinstall portupgrade and then
cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade
make install
Possibly silly question: will I b
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 01:57:54 +0100
Patrick Lamaizière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm asking about the goal of the new option -L of pkgdb :
> -L --fix-lost Check and restore lost dependencies against the ports tree.
>
> What is a lost dependency ?
I hope I can explain this right. I
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:54 PM
> To: Vizion
> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: portupgrade query
>
> Vizion wrote:
> > I have multiple lines of stale dependen
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 06 February 2007 17:54
>To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD
>Subject: Re: Portupgrade out of swap - corrupt pkg info...
>
>
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
>
&
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:53:30 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Portupgrade out of swap - corrupt pkg info...
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
I updat
Ok,
I found a solution. I had the same problem as described below.
I am using portsnap so :
# portsnap fetch
# portsnap update
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade
# make deinstall; make install clean
This will install version portupgrade-2.2.2_2,2 which corrects the bug.
Sincerly yours.
L
I am having the same problem.
I have tried the "make fetchindex" approach but it doesn't solve it for me.
you mentioned something about /usr/ports/UPDATING, but was unable to find
a relevant entry.
can you please tell me the entry date that helped you with this problem?
Thank you,
Tomoki Taniguch
Got it sorted-- thanks for all who helped.
--Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
George Vanev wrote:
Portupgrade is trying to add a group www with gid 80 which already exists.
Try "cat /etc/goup | grep 80" (without quotes) to see which group is
assigned gid 80.
Then you can take measures changing the gid of that group.
Regards
--
George Vanev
What's strange is that 80
On 1/19/07, Jay Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I remove a group so that FreeBSD's ports tree doesn't see it as
already allocated?
I was upgrading using portupgrade, when Apache errored. Error output
below:
---> Build of www/apache22 ended at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:18 -0800
(cons
On 02 Jan Vizion wrote:
> >
> >>Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It wont change by itself.
>
> Sure -- but it must have been changed automatically on my system during
> a package installation process- I certainly made no manual or other
> entries in it and noone else has root access.
I know
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in response to
>>Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I will write a short script to check for changes in pkgtools.conf and
>> run it both before and after portupgrade is run. That way I will at
>> least have a handle on what is going on.
>
>It wont change by itself.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 2:35:20 -0800
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will write a short script to check for changes in pkgtools.conf and
> run it both before and after portupgrade is run. That way I will at
> least have a handle on what is going on.
>
It wont change by itself.
Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Merritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: Vizion
> Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
>
>
> At 01:40 AM 1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sahil Tandon
> Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 3:36 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: portupgrade - skipping -held by user- meaning?
>
>
> Vizion wrot
Vizion wrote:
What does it mean when the message
---> skipping [portname] because it is held by user (specify -f to force)
Does said port appear in the HOLD_PKGS array within pkgtools.conf? From
that file:
# HOLD_PKGS: array
#
# This is a list of ports you don't want portupgrade(1) to
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:48:50 -0800
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gi
>
> I just wondered whether using portupgrade -a there might be any way
> to have an initial interactive dialogue to set all option for all
> ports to be upgraded during the run so as to facilitate an attendance
> free upgr
On Thursday 28 December 2006 09:48, Vizion wrote:
> Gi
>
> I just wondered whether using portupgrade -a there might be any way to have
> an initial interactive dialogue to set all option for all ports to be
> upgraded during the run so as to facilitate an attendance free upgrade
> procedure.
>
> Ma
On Sunday 17 December 2006 04:57, Karl Sinn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just did "portupgrade -a" and at the end I see a list with 79 skipped
> ports.
>
> Why did he skip them, and how can I update them?
Skipped means they were up to date and didn't need updating. You can force an
update by using the "f"
Hi * --
Funny thing, ps ax does to tell me the PID of portupgrade.
The process stopped while fetch a postgresql tarball. ps should list
"portupgrade" or at least "fetch", right?
TIA,
Henry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:16:18PM +0100, mato wrote:
>
> Matthew, that is a great answer!!
> Thank you! :-)
>
> The last question would be how to make make(1) /portupgrade/portsystem
> to ignore FORBIDDEN.
>
"make -DNO_IGNORE" will get around this. But bypassing FORBIDDEN is
generally not wise
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> mato wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
>>
>>> mato wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
is forbidden: Remote c
mato wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
>> mato wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
>>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
>>> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
>>> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:46:18 +, Vince wrote
> mato wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> > is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e43
mato wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
>
> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:46:24 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote
> > >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
> > >> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
> > >> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing
>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: multimedia/win32-codecs:
>> is forbidden: Remote code execution:
>> http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/24f6b1eb-43d5-11db-81e1-000e0c2e438a.html
>>
>> Isn't this behaviour flawed ?? Or am I missing something ?
You need to make config in /usr/ports/multimedia/win32-cod
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
>> (3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
>> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to freshports.org the newest multimedia/win32-codecs port
> (3.1.0.r1,1) is not vulnerable. I'm trying to upgrade version
> win32-codecs-3.1.0.p8,1 on my system but portupgrade + portaudit refuse
> me to do so:
>
>
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 01:26, Josh Carroll wrote:
> [snip: portupgrade waiting in config dialogs]
>
> Some ports have a config make target which will save options. For
> ports that do not, you can use pkgtools.conf and set MAKE_ARGS for
> that port.
I know the answer is probably going to be o
On 11/6/06, Josh Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I found the CPU is drained up by 5 instances of
> "script" and "dialog", because everyday when portupgrade updates
> python, it tried to display a menu in text mode and ask for a few
> options (such as whether python should support IPv6
Today I found the CPU is drained up by 5 instances of
"script" and "dialog", because everyday when portupgrade updates
python, it tried to display a menu in text mode and ask for a few
options (such as whether python should support IPv6 etc), which of
course hangs in cron job.
Some ports have a
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi people,
>I just did the "portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*" to upgrade the apps, but i
> think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
> skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probab
On 28/09/2006 23:44, Pascal Bleyler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm actually updating my installed ports with
> portupgrade -a over a remote ssh session.
> Before i have done a cvsup and a portsdb -Fu
>
> There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port
> is ruby.
> pkg_info means i have ruby18
Pascal Bleyler wrote:
There are only 3 ports needing an update, one of this port
is ruby.
pkg_info means i have ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 installed
and under /usr/ports/distfiles/ruby is
ruby-1.8.5.tar.gz (i think it's the update version)
All ran fine but since 1hour top shows me the following:
l
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:30:45AM +0200, Pascal Bleyler wrote:
> HI,
>
> I've founded this atm:
>
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=ruby1
> 8
>
> what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :(
Wait it out, add more RAM, or use a tool that requires less m
HI,
I've founded this atm:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=ruby1
8
what are my options? The PC has only 80M RAM ... :(
Thanks
Pascal Bleyler
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Pascal Bleyler
> S
Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
>
>> That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies
>> (fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict)
>
> Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my
On Thursday 28 September 2006 04:23, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
> That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies
> (fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict)
Likely they do; Mozilla, Seamonkey, Opera, and Firefox. (all flagged in my
security audit) Was hoping to do them a
Bob wrote:
>
> Is it safe to portupgrade several packages in parallel? Open several root
> consoles and do a portupgrade in each one at the same time?
That might cause problems if the programs have the same dependencies
(fetch conflict or even worse, build conflict)
However you can tell portupg
Have you done a "portsnap fetch update" before ?
Aguiar Magalhaes a écrit :
>Hi list,
>
>I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the
>portupgrade doesn't work.
>
>---> Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1'
>(archivers/arc)
>---> Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make
>flags: BA
Johnny Choque wrote:
> I'm newbie in Freebsd and initially I have use cvsup and portupgrade. I
> haven't clear what is the difference to use portupgrade, portsnap,
> portmanager, and other ones? Could you recommend us one of them?
Actually, it tends to be a matter of personal preference.
I prefe
Johnny Choque wrote:
>> portmanager -u -l
>>
>> It will save you time and trouble. It also assumes you have
>> 'portmanager'
>> installed. Portsnap is part of the base system.
>
> I'm newbie in Freebsd and initially I have use cvsup and portupgrade. I
> haven't clear what is the difference to use
> > >
> > > But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
> > >
> > > cd /usr/ports
> > > make fetchindex
> > > /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
> > > /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
> > > /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
> >
> > Great, Thanks for that.
> > Eoghan
>
> Or, you could j
eoghan wrote:
> On 24 Aug 2006, at 15:06, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
>
> > Yes, it's OK :)
> >
> > But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
> >
> > cd /usr/ports
> > make fetchindex
> > /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
> > /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
> > /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a
On 24 Aug 2006, at 15:06, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Yes, it's OK :)
But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
Great, Thanks for that.
Eoghan
Yes, it's OK :)
But may I suggest you to use this, when upgrading ports:
cd /usr/ports
make fetchindex
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/local/sbin/pkgdb -Fv
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -v -i -a -r -c -C
Ivailo Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
eoghan <[EMAIL
In response to "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Why is the upgrade procedure recommended to be
>
> portupgrade -R
>
> instead of
>
> portupgrade -r ?
>
> If -R is "Act on all those packages required by the given packages as well."
> isn't it more important to rebuild
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hello,
Why is the upgrade procedure recommended to be
portupgrade -R
instead of
portupgrade -r ?
If -R is "Act on all those packages required by the given packages as well."
isn't it more important to rebuild the packages that depend on the package
being rebuilt
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is the advantage of using bdb4 instead of bdb1 while installing
portupgrade?
If you really want to follow it up:
the pkg-descr points you to that information.
I still dont see what is the advantage of using it with portu
On 05 Aug Kiffin Gish wrote:
> I would like to disable building certain builds when running a
> portupgrade -arR.
>
> For example, if gnome2 is tagged for a rebuild, Galeon is not built
> (because I don't use it and have deleted the package).
As I wrote earlier, see pkgtools.conf => HOLDPKG optio
On 8/3/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting an error from ruby whenever i run a portupgrade. Checking
portaudit i see this is a vulnerability. Is there a fiix for it?
Thanks.
Dave.
i had these warnings too, just use portupgrade or portmanager to upgrade
your ports, there
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:08:03AM -0400, Dave wrote:
>
> Hello,
>I'm getting an error from ruby whenever i run a portupgrade. Checking
> portaudit i see this is a vulnerability. Is there a fiix for it?
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
cvsup your ports tree and rebuild ruby18. Some patches for ruby18 wen
Try to use:
portupgrade -c -C -r -R -v -m DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES="yes" ruby
I hope this will solve the issue, if you are sure you want to updrate this
version :)
Ivailo Tanusheff
Senior System administrator
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
"Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 03/08/06 Dave said:
> Hello,
>I'm getting an error from ruby whenever i run a portupgrade. Checking
> portaudit i see this is a vulnerability. Is there a fiix for it?
I believe that the vulnerability is ruby itself, is it not?
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelli
On 7/31/06, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi guys,
portaudit reperoted a vulnerability on the ruby package, so i did the
following:
# cvsup -L 2 ports-supfile
# portsdb -Uu
# portupgrade -rR ruby
but i encountered this error message, i can't upgrade ruby.
---> Upgrading 'ruby-1.8.4_8
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:50:28 +0800
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/06, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/31/06, Randy Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:07:39 +0800
> > > "jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
On 7/31/06, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, Randy Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:07:39 +0800
> "jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hi guys,
> >
> > portaudit reperoted a vulnerability on the ruby package, so i did the
> > following:
> >
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:07:39 +0800
"jan gestre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> portaudit reperoted a vulnerability on the ruby package, so i did the
> following:
>
> # cvsup -L 2 ports-supfile
> # portsdb -Uu
> # portupgrade -rR ruby
>
> but i encountered this error message, i can't
On 7/20/06, Nagy László <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
* x
--- Neil Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suddenly, portupgrade (and it's associated tools)
> instantly core dumps.
>
followup:
force reinstall/reregister of /usr/ports/lang/ruby18
did the trick.
==
Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise and extol and honor the King of heaven, for all
his works
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Andrey Slusar wrote:
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:43:05 -0400, Joe Auty wrote:
As of the latest portupgrade upgrade I'm getting the following error
message when I try to invoke and of the portupgrade scripts:
# pkgdb -F
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/bdb.
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:43:05 -0400, Joe Auty wrote:
> As of the latest portupgrade upgrade I'm getting the following error
> message when I try to invoke and of the portupgrade scripts:
> # pkgdb -F
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/bdb.so:
> (NotImplementedError)
> BDB needs compatib
Le 06/07/2006 à 00:09:14+0200, Albert Shih a écrit
> Hi all
>
> After update portupgrade it seem (on my server) the «-b» option don't work.
>
> I don't have any backup of my old package. That's very *
>
> portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management
> tool
I still have the same problem :
root 12:35 /var/db/pkg # portsdb -fuU
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: djvulibre-nox11-3.5.17_1
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ocaml-nox11-3.09.2
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ploticus-nox11-2.32
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 03:21, Psadi wrote:
> HI
>
> This problem is that the /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db has been damaged. What you
> need to do is to build a new pkgdb.db file
> First cd /var/db/pkg save the old pkgdb by
> mv pkgdb.db -> pkgdb.old
> then you run pkgdb -u
>
> after that you should be u
HI
This problem is that the /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db has been damaged. What you
need to do is to build a new pkgdb.db file
First cd /var/db/pkg save the old pkgdb by
mv pkgdb.db -> pkgdb.old
then you run pkgdb -u
after that you should be up and running again.
Psadi
jan gestre skrev:
On 7/3/06,
On 7/3/06, bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mmmh...
I have followed your instructions and am still facing a problem :
root 0:34 ~ # portversion -l "<"
[Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ...
[Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ...
uninitialized constant PkgDB::BDB: Cannot update the pkgdb!]
C
Mmmh...
I have followed your instructions and am still facing a problem :
root 0:34 ~ # portversion -l "<"
[Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ...
[Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ...
uninitialized constant PkgDB::BDB: Cannot update the pkgdb!]
Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/loca
On 7/3/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 release and after upgrading portupgrade using
portupgrade itself I'm getting this message (message bellow) or similar one
everytime I run one of the portupgrade commands like pkg
bsd wrote:
Hello,
I have a new problem that has just occured on my main mail server.
I am upgrading the ports on this server every two or three days using
portsnap and portupgrade.
After portsnap has updated it's index I do a "portupgrade -arR" to
upgrade all ports on the system.
Mutt nee
"E. J. Cerejo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 release and after upgrading portupgrade using
> portupgrade itself I'm getting this message (message bellow) or similar one
> everytime I run one of the portupgrade commands like pkgdb -u or -F,
> portversion -L = or portupgrad
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:59:16 +0200, Andreas Wideroe Andersen wrote:
> I can't seem to install portupgrade on my system. I'm running 4.7
> STABLE (and I can't upgrade until later in July).
> /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade #] make install clean
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1618: warning: Strin
On Monday 19 June 2006 14:36, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
> > ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
> > if not available locally I want to build the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the middle of configuring a repeatable jail installation with some
> ports - in a nutshell, I want to install from locally built packages, but
> if not available locally I want to build the port myself _and_ create a
> package for future repetition. To pre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note from the above that portinstall is presuming that -PP was used and
is not building the port. I can omit the '-p' and this stops the occurrence
of this error, but then I don't get a package creation and that means I'll
have to build this port from scratch every time
Aguiar Magalhaes wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm updating the Free 5.3 to Free 6.1. I've used the
> sequence:
>
> cvsup -g -L 2 freebsd.sup
> mergemaster -p
> mergemaster
> cd /usr/src
> make buildworld
> make installworld
> cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
> config MYKERNEL
> make cleandepend
> make depend
>
D]>
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400
Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved)
> I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget
> works just fine on the same machine.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
> just fine on the same machine.
Different defaults.
> Thanks a lot.
np.
Kris
pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
> FreeBSD default for "fetching" files from the web. It was having
> problems fetching files from FTP sites.
> No idea what the problem is.
Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. T
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote:
> Good day everyone!
>
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for "fetching" files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Mic
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget
doesn't have a problem with that.
More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the
problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine.
On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400,
Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using fetch for
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
> Good day everyone!
>
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well.
What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :)
Kris
pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp
Des
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
> I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
> doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
> works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
> portupgrade insists on using fetch for s
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Michael Collette wrote:
No luck. I was back on 2.0.1 which I upgraded with pkg_delete and
pkg_add. Still the exact same error with deleting the /var/db/pkg
directory.
Let's make it clean. You have /var/db/pkg as nfs mounted? You can't
remove /var/db/pkg/portname dire
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Michael Collette wrote:
This problem only occurs when using portupgrade. Both pkg_delete and
pkg_deinstall work without error. Also, everything else in the process
that portupgrade goes through appears to work properly. Just that
/var/db/pkg directory won't delete whe
Michael Collette wrote:
> This problem only occurs when using portupgrade. Both pkg_delete and
> pkg_deinstall work without error. Also, everything else in the process
> that portupgrade goes through appears to work properly. Just that
> /var/db/pkg directory won't delete when NFS mounted.
Have
Thanks, that improved the behavior. What I don't understand though is why
upgrading individual ports e. g. "portupgrade xyz" never resulted in that
problem ...
From: Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
CC: Arno Schleich <[EMAIL
No, I upgraded to 6.0 a couple of days after it was released. That must have
been eight or nine months ago ...
m: Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arno Schleich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 14:37:45
301 - 400 of 973 matches
Mail list logo