Re: portupgrade

Arno Schleich wrote: > portugrade -a > > results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the > database is accessed. > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... Inappropriate > file type or format - /var/db/pkg/pkgdb; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the > pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... -

Re: portupgrade

On Saturday 06 May 2006 13:28, Arno Schleich wrote: > Dear all, > > I have observed the following behavior in portupgrade: > > The operation > > portugrade -a > > results in a repetitive rebuild of the package database whenever the > database is accessed. > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ...

Re: Portupgrade & Ruby | warning: Insecure world

At 3:38 PM +0200 4/5/06, Jonas Jacobsen wrote: When i use portupgrade, i get this Warning all the time /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:980: warning: Insecure world writable dir /tmp, mode 041777 have any of you seen that warning before,? and do you know how to make it go away

RE: Portupgrade & Ruby | warning: Insecure world

> > have any of you seen that warning before,? and do you know how to make > > it go away ? > > Not seen it but check the ouput of > $ ls -ld /tmp > (mode should be drwxrwxrwt) > > Maybe it is drwxrwxrwx, in which case > # chmod o+t /tmp > will fix it. Otherwise I'm not sure. > Using portmanag

Re: Portupgrade & Ruby | warning: Insecure world

On Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:38, Jonas Jacobsen wrote: > When i use portupgrade, i get this Warning all the time > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools.rb:980: warning: Insecure > world writable dir /tmp, mode 041777 > > have any of you seen that warning before,? and do you know how to mak

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

On Saturday 18 March 2006 15:50, Duane Whitty wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to remember needing to run portsnap fetch extract update > the first time I ran portsnap. Afterwards portsnap fetch update > worked as I expected. Perhaps you have already tried this? If so, > my apologies for the useless nois

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

On 3/18/06, Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > > On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote: > > > >> Hi Donald, > >> > >> Thanks for the replies. > >> > >> On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06,

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

Donald J. O'Neill wrote: On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote: Hi Donald, Thanks for the replies. On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote: Hi all, For a long time I've been using cvsup and portu

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

On Saturday 18 March 2006 12:06, Jez Hancock wrote: > Hi Donald, > > Thanks for the replies. > > On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

Hi Donald, Thanks for the replies. On 3/18/06, Donald J. O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the > > ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now.

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote: > Hi all, > > For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the > ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now. Recently > though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports tree, still > using portupgrade once

Re: Portupgrade fails to upgrade after using portsnap

On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:06, Jez Hancock wrote: > Hi all, > > For a long time I've been using cvsup and portupgrade to update the > ports tree once a week; this has worked well for years now. Recently > though I changed to using portsnap to update the ports tree, still > using portupgrade once

Re: Portupgrade woes ...

On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 09:03 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I want to find out which ports need updating by running 'portupgrade > > -arR' "<". However, I am getting the following error message: > > > > Stale dependency: ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_3 --> lcms-

Re: Portupgrade woes ...

Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want to find out which ports need updating by running 'portupgrade > -arR' "<". However, I am getting the following error message: > > Stale dependency: ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_3 --> lcms-1.14_1,1 -- manually > run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force.

Re: Portupgrade woes ...

Kiffin Gish wrote: > I want to find out which ports need updating by running 'portupgrade > -arR' "<". However, I am getting the following error message: > > Stale dependency: ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_3 --> lcms-1.14_1,1 -- manually > run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > As suggested, I

Re: Portupgrade Operation

On 3/8/06, Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been told that tracking the whole port tree on a production server > is a bad idea. I kind of agree thinking about the old addage "if it aint > broke don't fix it." Arguably the best strategy for the base system. Arguably a bad idea in c

Re: Portupgrade Operation

On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 3/8/06, Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I manually rm -rf a port, manually untar (ie glib.tar.gz), and do a portupgrade -rR glib, will packages that have a specific dependency on the old glib version get rebuilt? Or if not will they

Re: Portupgrade Operation

On 3/8/06, Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I manually rm -rf a port, manually untar (ie glib.tar.gz), and do a > portupgrade -rR glib, will packages that have a specific dependency on > the old glib version get rebuilt? Or if not will they break (I am just > using glib as an example a

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...

Peter wrote: > --- James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800 > > > From: Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ... > > > To: freebsd-questions@freebs

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...

--- James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800 > > From: Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ... > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...

> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800 > From: Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ... > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...

On Saturday 04 March 2006 19:20, Peter wrote: > --- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to know the difference between running: > > > > portupgrade -arR > > > > and > > > > portmanager -u > > > > Just curious is all, thanks. > > I have found portmanager to be more intelligent.

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...

--- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to know the difference between running: > > portupgrade -arR > > and > > portmanager -u > > Just curious is all, thanks. I have found portmanager to be more intelligent. When you run it it takes a look at all installed ports and then

Re: portupgrade -s and NFS /usr/ports?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:34:55PM +1100, Richard Burakowski wrote: > Scott Mitchell wrote: > > > performance reasons. However, I want downloaded distfiles and built > > packages to go in /usr/ports where other machines can see them, but there > > > i don't save packages but i do have clients dow

Re: portupgrade -s and NFS /usr/ports?

Scott Mitchell wrote: performance reasons. However, I want downloaded distfiles and built packages to go in /usr/ports where other machines can see them, but there i don't save packages but i do have clients downloading into distifiles as req'd by having /usr/ports and /usr/ports/distfiles

Re: portupgrade log

--- Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > eoghan writes: > > > Im wondering if there is a log file generated by portupgrade and > > where i would find it? > > If you mean generated by portupgrade and separate from what is > printed to stdout/stderr, then not as far as I know. T

Re: portupgrade log

eoghan writes: Im wondering if there is a log file generated by portupgrade and where i would find it? see PORTUPGRADE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques

Re: portupgrade avr-libc error

. > - Original Message - > From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Steve Pauly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:31:57 -0500 > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -

Re: portupgrade avr-libc error

. > - Original Message - > From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Steve Pauly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:31:57 -0500 > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Stev

Re: portupgrade avr-libc error

On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:27:49AM -0500, Steve Pauly wrote: > Kris, > I added TRYBROKEN= yes > in the Makefile and ran portupgrade avr-libc (getting further than > before) with the following results: > > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 > /usr/ports/devel/avr-libc/work/avr-libc-1.4.3/LICE

Re: portupgrade avr-libc error

Original Message - > From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "David Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: portupgrade avr-libc error > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:44:12 -0500 > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:38:15PM -0600, David Kelly

Re: portupgrade avr-libc error

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:38:15PM -0600, David Kelly wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote: > > >pkg_version -v shows: > >avr-libc-1.2.5,1< needs updating (port has > >1.4.3,1) > >Note: all other ports show current except kde related items. > > > >So,

Re: portupgrade avr-libc error

On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Steve Pauly wrote: pkg_version -v shows: avr-libc-1.2.5,1< needs updating (port has 1.4.3,1) Note: all other ports show current except kde related items. So, I updated my port collection: /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 2 ~/ports-supfile pkgdb -vF

Re: portupgrade xorg-* -> mouse-wheel stops working under X

A friend of mine pointed me to this message from one of the Xorg lists. I have not yet had time to test it, and it will probably be a couple days before I do. Hope this helps everyone out. -George From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Hopf Sent: Thursday, February

Re: portupgrade xorg-* -> mouse-wheel stops working under X

I fixed this problem by killing moused and setting the device to /dev/psm0. I thought it was just me! On 2/2/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can always tell xmodmap that you've got 11 > buttons (or whatever xorg tells you in its log). Just > add ... 8 9 10 11 to the map

Re: portupgrade xorg-* -> mouse-wheel stops working under X

You can always tell xmodmap that you've got 11 buttons (or whatever xorg tells you in its log). Just add ... 8 9 10 11 to the map and it will work fine once again. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr

Re: portupgrade xorg-* -> mouse-wheel stops working under X

Ewald Jenisch wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:11:44AM -0500, George Fazio wrote: I had the same issue. My mouse wheel stopped working, and imwheel started using it for my broswer back/forward (instead of the buttons it's suppose to use). I was able to get the mouse wheel working again by editi

Re: portupgrade xorg-* -> mouse-wheel stops working under X

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:11:44AM -0500, George Fazio wrote: > I had the same issue. My mouse wheel stopped working, and imwheel started > using it for my broswer back/forward (instead of the buttons it's suppose to > use). I was able to get the mouse wheel working again by editing my > xorg.conf

Re: portupgrade xorg-* -> mouse-wheel stops working under X

I had the same issue. My mouse wheel stopped working, and imwheel started using it for my broswer back/forward (instead of the buttons it's suppose to use). I was able to get the mouse wheel working again by editing my xorg.conf file, but I'm still having issues with imwheel which seem to stem from

Re: portupgrade and dialog boxes.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:57:21PM -0800, Luke Bakken wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm in the process of doing a mega-portupgrade and I've noticed that > certain ports use the dialog command to collect options from the user. > I've searched for a way to ensure that these dialogs won't show up and > the

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:50:10PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote: > OK, my problem doesn't seem to be exactly the same. My machine hangs, and > when I check it the console screen is filled with the message, "swap-pager: > indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 26650, size: 4096" and at that > p

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

At 12:55 AM 1/18/2006 -0500, you wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:54:39AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > >>Hi! > >> > >>OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running > >>6.0-STABLE Free

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:12:49AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:51:12AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Wed,

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:51:12AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: You are setting an illegal variable in your

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:51:12AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > > > >You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or enviro

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment that is causing the port makefile to recurse. Probably USE_GCC or some other U

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:17:32AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>> > >>>You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment > >>>that is causing the port makefile to recurse. Probably USE_GCC or > >>>some other USE_*. > >>That could be

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: You are setting an illegal variable in your make.conf or environment that is causing the port makefile to recurse. Probably USE_GCC or some other USE_*. That could be a hint. I can find legal options in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk can I ? Sort of..b

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:54:39AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > >>Hi! > >> > >>OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running > >>6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CE

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: Hi! OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006 When I start a # portupgrade -a up to 671 MB swap are used and I see

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:25:57AM +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > Hi! > > OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running > 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006 > > When I start a > > # portupgrade -a > > up to 671 MB swap are used and I see this message: > > make

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Roger Merritt wrote: At 04:25 AM 1/18/2006 +0100, you wrote: Hi! OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006 When I start a # portupgrade -a up to 671 MB swap are used and I see this message: ma

Re: portupgrade eats my swap space

At 04:25 AM 1/18/2006 +0100, you wrote: Hi! OK, this is an old PIII 1 GHZ , 500 MB RAM running 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 15 05:56:00 CET 2006 When I start a # portupgrade -a up to 671 MB swap are used and I see this message: make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Res

Re: portupgrade errors

Subject: portupgrade errors > 1. I deleted /usr/port/www/apache20 > 2. Deleted INDEX.* > 3. cvsup'ed > 4. portsdb -uU > 5. pkgdb -F (No errors were shown). > 6. portupgrade -arR > > Still getting the same errors. You might try this approach. Update your ports tree. Install 'sysutils/port

RE: portupgrade errors

Mike Loiterman wrote: > When I run portupgrade, I'm getting the following errors: > > # portupgrade -a > ** Makefile possibly broken: www/apache20: > "Makefile", line 190: warning: duplicate script for target > "print-closest-mirrors" ignored > "Makefil

Re: portupgrade from bin 9.3.1 to 9.3.2

Hi, On 1/14/06, Mathieu CHATEAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > i have done a portupgrade -Rr bind9 on a server. > > bind 9.3.1 was in /usr/sbin/named, but > bind 9.3.2 is in /usr/local/sbin/named > > Now, i have 2 bind9 version on the same system... > > any way to cleanup ? did i miss some

Re: portupgrade and portversion seg-fault in freebsd 6.0

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:58 -0700 TuxGirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 > packages found (-1 +0) > (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] > Segmentation fault Quick, dirty and effective: # rm -f /v

Re: portupgrade and portversion seg-fault in freebsd 6.0

On 1/13/06, TuxGirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 > packages found (-1 +0) > (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] > Segmentation fault > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] The first thing I wo

Re: portupgrade freezing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - Original Message - From: "Tom Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:17 PM Subject: Re: portupgrade freezing Dave wrote: Hello, Last port

Re: portupgrade freezing

portversion -l "<" it just hangs as well. A pkg_info shows portupgrade > version 2.0.1,1. > Dave. > > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Sent: Wedne

Re: portupgrade freezing

EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:17 PM Subject: Re: portupgrade freezing Dave wrote: Hello, Last portupgrade i did showed portupgrade itself was in need of updating. I ran portupgrade -arR and i got portupgrade v2.01,1, now when i run a portupgrade command the

Re: portupgrade freezing

Dave wrote: Hello, Last portupgrade i did showed portupgrade itself was in need of updating. I ran portupgrade -arR and i got portupgrade v2.01,1, now when i run a portupgrade command the system just sits there. I don't get any output at all. I have uninstalled portupgrade and reinstalled

Re: portupgrade install problem

--On 9. december 2005 14:31 +0100 "Herbert J. Skuhra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You have installed an OLD version of ruby-bdb which is no longer in the ports. So update this port first and then try to build portupgrade again (with the option "WITH_BDB4=yes"). BR Herbert Thanx for the ti

Re: portupgrade install problem

--On 9. december 2005 7:37 -0500 Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sasa Stupar writes: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade && make install clean ===> Installing for portupgrade-20041226_8 ===> portupgrade-20041226_8 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebs

Re: portupgrade install problem

Sasa Stupar writes: > # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade && make install clean > ===> Installing for portupgrade-20041226_8 > ===> portupgrade-20041226_8 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/bdb.so - not found > ===>Verifying install for > /usr/local

Re: portupgrade install problem

--On 9. december 2005 10:55 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * On 09/12/05 08:51 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: --On 9. december 2005 9:33 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * On 08/12/05 20:00 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I am trying to insta

Re: portupgrade install problem

* On 09/12/05 08:51 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: > > > --On 9. december 2005 9:33 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >* On 08/12/05 20:00 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: > >>Hi! > >> > >>I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my FBSD > >>5.4. But it keeps

Re: portupgrade install problem

--On 9. december 2005 9:33 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * On 08/12/05 20:00 +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my FBSD 5.4. But it keeps giving me error about db43 allready installed: # make ins

Re: portupgrade install problem

Have you tried doing what the message suggests? # cd /usr/ports/databases/db43 # make deinstall # make reinstall Then go and install portupgrade... ~Dan Yes. I have tried that but still after I got the same error while installing portupgrade. Hmmm... I'd try deinstalling db43,

Re: portupgrade install problem

--On 8. december 2005 13:35 -0800 Dan O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my FBSD 5.4. But it keeps giving me error about db43 allready installed: ===> db43-4.3.29 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'

Re: portupgrade install problem

I am trying to install portupgrade from the ports collection on my FBSD 5.4. But it keeps giving me error about db43 allready installed: ===> db43-4.3.29 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly.

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/31/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/30/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 1

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/30/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/30/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/31/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep > > > this from happening again? What can/can't I

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/29/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep > > this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to > > automate database and index mainten

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

I ended up deinstalling that apache installation (which I was not keen on doing), and installing the apache20 port (which was the same version (2.0.55) as the apache2 port ), and, thankfully, it's working fine. I'm also now able to run both 'pkgdb -F'and 'portsdb -Uu' without ANY errors (except f

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Oct 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, John DeStefano wrote: cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 && make deinstall && make clean && make reinstall See what happens. Talk about strange: # cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/ # make deinstall ===> Deinstalling for www/apache20 ===> apache not installed, skipping # m

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/29/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep > this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to > automate database and index maintenance? > cvsup or portsnap, then portsdb -uUF. Work under an

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote: > > On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > status report finished > > > > == > > > > == > > >

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Friday 28 October 2005 19:51, John DeStefano wrote: > On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote: > > > On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > status report finished > > > > > ===

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote: > On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > status report finished > > > == > > > == > > > percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 / > > > T

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > status report finished > > == > > == > > percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 / > > TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 ) ) > > upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring ap

Fwd: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies Date: Friday 28 October 2005 15:02 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Friday 28 October 2005 13:29, John DeStefano wrote: > On 10

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

status report finished == == percentDone-=>0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 / TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=>1 ) ) upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during (2) make

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote: > > On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote: > > > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: >

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: > > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Aft

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote: > On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote: > > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: > > > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> O

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Friday 28 October 2005 00:25, Andrew P. wrote: > On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote: > > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: > > > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On 10/

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: > > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Aft

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote: > On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: > > On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and > >>>

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote: On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultima

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/27/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and > > source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate > > problem was actually a dependency of the

Re: portupgrade stale dependencies

On 10/27/05, John DeStefano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <...snip...> > > After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and > source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate > problem was actually a dependency of the package to apache1.3. After I > ran 'pkgdb -

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the best way to keep the system up-to-date if you use packages? The > manual is fairly clear if you use ports, but things get kinda vague (for me > anyway) when it comes to packages. I have successfully installed (from > packages) a working system

RE: Portupgrade problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:02 AM > To: Craig Deal > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > "Craig

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Lowell Gilbert > > How did you install ruby? > > That's the program (as opposed to portupgrade) that's trying > > to link to the wrong library, a

RE: Portupgrade problem

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lowell Gilbert > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:15 PM > To: Craig Deal; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > "Craig

Re: Portupgrade problem

"Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:40 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: Craig Deal > > S

Re: Portupgrade problem

well Gilbert > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:39 PM > > > To: Craig Deal > > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem > > > > > > "Craig Deal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >