On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]# portupgrade firefox
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed
to generate
Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]# portupgrade firefox
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..^Cfailed to generate INDEX!
index generation error
On stardate Sat, 8 Jan 2005, the wise Joshua Lokken entered:
You may be able to make this problem go away by doing:
# cd /usr/ports
# make fetchindex
Yes, this did the trick. I should have read /usr/ports/UPDATING though,
because the answer was in it...
Thanks for the answers.
Marco
--
Minnie
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote:
Hi,
when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of
4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the ports
pops up an dialog and asks me what I want to compile in (e.g. cups
asking me about what
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 03:24 am, Christian Tischler wrote:
Hi,
when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of
4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the
ports pops up an dialog and asks me what I want to compile in (e.g.
cups asking me about what drivers
Thanks for the quick answers.
christian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote:
Hi,
when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of
4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the ports
pops up an dialog and asks me what I want to compile in (e.g. cups
asking me about what
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:21, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote:
Hi,
when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of
4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the ports
pops up an dialog and asks me what
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +, Andrew Sinclair wrote:
Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade
is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On
occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is what
would have
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +, Andrew Sinclair wrote:
Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade
is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On
occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is
Moved to freebsd-questions by Andrew Sinclair. Eric Anderson wrote:
I have a few dedicated servers at a hosting company (about 3 hours
drive time away). On one of the systems I ran a 'portupgrade -arR'
this morning, and then disconnected (I ran it in a screen session).
About an hour later, I
On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly updating
ports.
Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL the
old ports? A 'pormanager -u sylpheed' is not
On Saturday 01 January 2005 04:30 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly
updating ports.
Am I to understand correctly that portmanager
Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would be happy
to help with testing.
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Portupgrade has one serious flaw in my opinion and that is running
something like pkgdb -F damages the port installation database as
far as
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 10:03 am, you wrote:
Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would
be happy to help with testing.
portmanager only handles packages in that it builds back up packages of
each port it updates, these packages are correctly build for your
I looked at pkgtools.conf, and I don't see a way to do what I want there.
My goal here is to make it *easy* for somebody to update the installed
ports on a machine.
Even if we could use MAKE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf to try and do this that
does not solve the problem I am seeing.
(There is a bigger
On Saturday 25 December 2004 12:29, Jay O'Brien wrote:
But it is there, so it will stay.
I doesn't *have* to stay, though:
1) Add 'WITHOUT_X11=YES' to /etc/make.conf .
2) Use You can use 'pkg_info -rR xorg-[whatever]' to see which ports depend
on a each of the X.org ports.
For each dependent
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Saturday 25 December 2004 12:29, Jay O'Brien wrote:
But it is there, so it will stay.
I doesn't *have* to stay, though:
1) Add 'WITHOUT_X11=YES' to /etc/make.conf .
2) Use You can use 'pkg_info -rR xorg-[whatever]' to see which ports depend
on a each of the
On Sunday 26 December 2004 09:04, Harlan Stenn wrote:
I have a couple of ports where I am using a Makefile.local to provide some
customizations for the local environment (I think they are for
postfix+SASL, and apache2+the experimental modules, but I could be
mistaken) where stock prebuilt
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:04:51AM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Is there a way to tell portupgrade that it should not *fetch* prebuilt ports
for these two packages? If the packages are already there I'm fine having
them installed (as it means they were built using the Makefile.local values
and
On Sunday 26 December 2004 03:04 am, Harlan Stenn wrote:
I have a couple of ports where I am using a Makefile.local to
provide some customizations for the local environment (I think
they are for postfix+SASL, and apache2+the experimental modules,
but I could be mistaken) where stock prebuilt
Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports
first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any
changed prerequisite packages as well.
If a way can be found to say Do not fetch these packages then this will
become a much easier process.
H
--
Is
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:36:12PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports
first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any
changed prerequisite packages as well.
I thought that's what you were asking for.
If a
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as
a Makefile.local file means I want to build that package with local changes.
H
--
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as
a Makefile.local file means I want to build
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as
a Makefile.local file means I
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package that has a
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for any package
I think a fair number of people would like to see it.
It would make it Lots Easier for people to upgrade their systems.
There are packages where it makes lots of sense to use the prebuilt ones.
Now that I think the only feature I want is for it to don't fetch if
there is a Makefile.local I'll
Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt
packages for
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:41:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
Er..the thread started with a question from a user who *knows about -P
and uses it*, but doesn't want portupgrade to fetch packages in a
specific situation.
Kris
Again, from the manpage
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 07:38:10PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote:
I think a fair number of people would like to see it.
It would make it Lots Easier for people to upgrade their systems.
There are packages where it makes lots of sense to use the prebuilt ones.
Now that I think the only
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:41:04PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want.
Er..the thread started with a question from a user who *knows about -P
and uses it*, but doesn't want portupgrade to fetch packages in a
specific situation.
Kris
Again, from the
Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it. The
only problem that might occur is between the deinstall/reinstall steps
I'll be missing the libraries for about a minute, when this happens I
just wait untill its finished reinstalling then continue.
Here is a recap of
albi wrote:
Jay O'Brien wrote:
hi,
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
- cut for brevity
-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86
So X is installed by default
Jay O'Brien wrote:
albi wrote:
Jay O'Brien wrote:
hi,
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
- cut for brevity
-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:54:04PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times
to fetch X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz, each time taking over an hour,
and when the file failed, it failed showing a checksum mismatch.
I tried it
On Saturday 25 December 2004 04:53 am, Peter Schuller wrote:
Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it.
The only problem that might occur is between the
deinstall/reinstall steps I'll be missing the libraries for about a
minute, when this happens I just wait untill
Frank Staals wrote:
Jay O'Brien wrote:
albi wrote:
Jay O'Brien wrote:
hi,
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
- cut for brevity
-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg
On Friday 24 December 2004 21:54, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
This is my first experience using portupgrade.
I ran cvsup successfully for ports-all. I ran pkg_version -v.
It showed a total of 28 ports, 20 needed updating. Of those,
16
RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 21:54, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
This is my first experience using portupgrade.
I ran cvsup successfully for ports-all. I ran pkg_version -v.
It showed a total of 28 ports, 20 needed updating. Of
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:58:03 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times
You dont need the -N switch, it's only used for new port installations,
not
upgrades. Using it carelessly is a bit dangerous, you may find youself
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru
RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:02:30 -0800, Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:54 am, RW wrote:
On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to
Jay O'Brien wrote:
hi,
Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM.
- cut for brevity
-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present?
a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86
___
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:54:04PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times
to fetch X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz, each time taking over an hour,
and when the file failed, it failed showing a checksum mismatch.
I tried it again today, and it was able
That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste
of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and sometimes
it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is always the right
thing to do. One way this has proved to be a benefit is I've never
had to run the
On Friday 24 December 2004 03:52 pm, Peter Schuller wrote:
That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste
of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and
sometimes it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is
always the right thing to do. One way
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:01:58PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1
I installed portupgrade and then ran
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1
I installed portupgrade and then ran portsdb
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1
I installed portupgrade
On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote:
I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup.
Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:10:36 +0100, thomas leveille wrote
also is this make switch suppesed to be provided when building perl or
when building openwebmail - which port please?
You need to build perl with this switch, according to the commit
history :
Update to 5.8.1.
Also:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Lapo Nustrini wrote:
If you have just gone from a 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5,
you are probably running into the following:
(From the Openwebmail README file at
http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt )
If you are using FreeBSD and your perl
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Lapo Nustrini wrote:
If you have just gone from a 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5,
you are probably running into the following:
(From the Openwebmail README file at
http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt )
If you are using FreeBSD and your perl
If you have just gone from a 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current
5.8.5, you are probably running into the following:
(From the Openwebmail README file at
http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt )
If you are using FreeBSD and your perl is compiled from port,
then please note
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:01:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote:
I just upgraded to 5-STABLE from an older version of 5, and wanted to rebuild
all my ports because of the ABI compatability breakage just before 5-RELEASE.
I ran across behavior in portupgrade that I don't understand - if I force
On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What command-line are you using?
Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option to
portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that without building the
port. Doing it without -u works fine.
-David
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What command-line are you using?
Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option
to portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:33:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What command-line are you using?
Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:33:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What command-line are you using?
Oops,
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 05:58, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Monday 29 November 2004 09:40 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at
dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current ports.
I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes much
faster. My problem is whenever i do a make search for a port the index.5
file is regenerated and that takes an
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote:
Hello,
I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current ports.
I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes much
faster. My problem is whenever i do a make search for a port the index.5
file is
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote:
Hello,
I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current
ports.
I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes
much
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote:
Hello,
I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current
ports.
On Monday 29 November 2004 09:40 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote:
Hello,
I've got a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 05:50:26AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote:
I'm running 5.3-RELEASE with a cvsup a few minutes old.
I'm trying to upgrade my apache-2.0.49 port via portupgrade.
This is the error I get:
[05:30:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/local/etc]# portupgrade apache
** Port marked as
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:45:03PM +0100, Webtech wrote:
Hi,
I need to upgrade open-motif from 2.2.2_2 to 2.2.3 but when I make the
upgrade, I've got :
zzz# portupgrade -ri open-motif-2.2.2_2
--- Session started at: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:40:18 +0100
--- Upgrade of
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 11:50 am, Brian W. wrote:
I've been having this problem for about a week now. I've already
deinstalled and reinstalled the ruby, rubybdb and portupgrade ports, what
else can I look at? The below process takes at least an hour, its a
k62-450. The no such user
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:45:03PM +0100, Webtech wrote:
=== open-motif-2.2.3 has known vulnerabilities:
xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities.
Reference:
http://people.freebsd.org/~eik/portaudit/ef253f8b-0727-11d9-b45d-000c41e2cdad.html
Please update your ports tree and try again.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:29:18PM -0800, Michael Shafae wrote:
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 system which I have installed
portupgrade--20040701_3, ruby-1.8.2.p2_1, and ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2.
Previously upgrading ports were effortless with portupgrade. Today, I
first CVSUP'ed
Michael Shafae wrote:
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 system which I have installed
portupgrade--20040701_3, ruby-1.8.2.p2_1, and ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2.
Previously upgrading ports were effortless with portupgrade. Today, I
first CVSUP'ed the ports tree, read /usr/ports/CHANGES and ran `make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things worked fine until last upgrade (this morning). Now I get the following
errors:
pc1# !?upgr
portupgrade -ra
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02:
/usr/ports/japanese/tk80 non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
Ok thanks for the detail response. I guess my confusion came from several
places - the handbook explicity gives an example where you can refuse
ports that aren't relevant to your environment (i refuse several such as
japanese, chinese)...
Can you explain (if you know off hand) why make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok thanks for the detail response. I guess my confusion came from several
places - the handbook explicity gives an example where you can refuse
ports that aren't relevant to your environment (i refuse several such as
japanese, chinese)...
Hmm. I wonder if we should
On Monday 01 November 2004 08:36 pm, dave wrote:
Hello,
New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest. I was
wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with portupgrade is still
occurring? If so, is there another port maintence tool equivalent? I was
really not
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest. I was
wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with portupgrade is still
occurring? If so, is there another port maintence tool equivalent? I was
really not happy when
On Monday 01 November 2004 08:36 pm, dave wrote:
Hello,
New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest.
I was wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with
portupgrade is still occurring? If so, is there another port
maintence tool equivalent? I was really not
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:55:06 +0200, Uros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have
WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf
'devel/subversion' = [
'WITHOUT_NEON=1',
'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1',
* Uros [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1054 10:54]:
Hello!
I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have
WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf
'devel/subversion' = [
'WITHOUT_NEON=1',
'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1',
'WITH_BERKELEYDB=42'
]
but
On Thu, 28 October, 2004 10:55 am, Uros said:
Hello!
I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have
WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf
'devel/subversion' = [
'WITHOUT_NEON=1',
'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1',
'WITH_BERKELEYDB=42'
]
oops, nevermind that one. i forgot to read the manpage before i posted.
On Saturday 16 October 2004 17:09, h wrote:
hi all,
my old laptop has been upgrading ports overnight but all updates
failed because portupgrade was bork and couldn't deinstall any old port.
i now fixed it, but how do i
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0100, Vince Hoffman wrote:
Hi all,
Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a
portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb.
only noticed it today but i did upgrade ruby recently so i tried following
the emergency
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0100, Vince Hoffman wrote:
Hi all,
Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a
portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb.
SNIP lots of info
any suggestions welcome
Gawd.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:52:57PM -0400, Bobb Shires wrote:
(dang webmail thing mangled my message. Sorry. Trying again)
pkgdb -F is asking me a question I don't understand.
What should I do here?
=== [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root/supfiles 24 - # pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:52:57 -0400
Bobb Shires [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(dang webmail thing mangled my message. Sorry. Trying again)
pkgdb -F is asking me a question I don't understand.
What should I do here?
=== [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root/supfiles 24 - # pkgdb -F
--- Checking the
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Seaman
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 4:14 AM
To: Matt Navarre
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote:
On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Mire, John wrote:
I'm still getting this error after a cvsup+buildworld, a make fetchindex and
I have deleted /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and rebuilt it, what's the patch?:
test# uname -v
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11 #12: Wed Oct 6 17:13:13 CDT 2004
[EMAIL
-
From: Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mire, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Matt Navarre [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu Oct 07 12:41:17 2004
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Mire, John wrote
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote:
On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
It could be a problem with the DBDriver. You could try this:
Edit /root/.cs...
and add
PORTS_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash
PKG_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash
Doesn't the DBDRIVER bug
On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking:
reichlieu# portupgrade -R gnucash
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot
convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError)
from
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote:
On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking:
reichlieu# portupgrade -R gnucash
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot
On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote:
On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking:
*snip*
It looks like the pkgdb has something
Mike Jarsulic wrote:
I am getting the following error while running portupgrade:
# portupgrade -arC
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 302
packages found(-0 +5) . done]
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot
convert nil into String
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:56:41PM -0400, John Cholewa wrote:
I started portupgrade -ra on my home mail server (FreeBSD
5.2.1-RELEASE) two or three hours ago. It says [Updating the pkgdb
format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 246 packages found (-0 +1) .
done], and the output hasn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure what's next: hedgehogs falling from the skies, perhaps? Mostly, I know
I'm flailing around in the newbie waters, an otherwise straightforward 5.2.1 install
(single user, desktop) gone horribly, horribly wrong. The story so far...
And what have
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 11733 port
entries found
.1000.2000.3000.4000.5000...
..6000.7000.8000/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/po
rtsdb.rb:587: [BUG] Bus Error
I could be wrong, but it
601 - 700 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
