On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:57:34AM -0500, Ralph M. Los wrote:
Has anyone ever had this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]portupgrade mozilla-devel
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:35:in `require': No such file to load -- pkgtools
(LoadError)
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:35
I can't seem
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, stan wrote:
I suddenly have a bunch of machines where I'mgetting portupgrade failures
on various ports wiht uninstall error.
I've found thta if I manually do a make deintall ; make resiantll
sequence on these, that I cna fix the proble,
Please mind: I am not sure about
On Mar 17, 2004, at 5:45 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
1) Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be
easily read.
I'm using Mail.app on OS X 10.3.3, and someone offering some advice
from this list also
asked me to fix line wrapping. I checked and checked, but found
nothing in
On Mar 17, 2004, at 5:45 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
1) Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be
easily read.
I'm using Mail.app on OS X 10.3.3, and someone offering some advice
from this list also
asked me to fix line wrapping. I checked and checked, but
On Mar 18, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Yup. I do it manually - just hit that nice big Enter/Return key
between
a couple of word when I get out around that far.
Which is why, on my mailer, quoting you gives a full line then one word
then a line...it kind of reminds me of a person
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:52:30PM -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Incidentally, can others on the list verify where my mail is wrapping?
I was working with someone offlist to see if, in Mail.app, my wrapping
is affected by the size of the composition window when I send the
message. I
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Bart Silverstrim thusly...
Incidentally, can others on the list verify where my mail is wrapping?
Love to! Your first reply did not wrap around ~72 characters; it
went until the width of my terminal (mutt 1.5.5.1_1 in xterm) for
all practical purposes.
On Mar 18, 2004, at 5:22 PM, Parv wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Bart Silverstrim thusly...
Incidentally, can others on the list verify where my mail is wrapping?
Love to! Your first reply did not wrap around ~72 characters; it
went until the width of my terminal (mutt 1.5.5.1_1 in
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:50:54PM -0700, SIMON TIMMS wrote:
Hi there,
I use to run portupgrade and when it ran into an interactive port
(like php) it would sit and wait for my input before continuing.
This worked fine and I didn't mind having to keep a bit of an eye on
portupgrade. However
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:32:17PM +1100, Ron Joordens wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently using portupgrade to upgrade my ports (obviously). I'm getting
errors on some of my ports. Eg config error on gedit2, and KDE fails for
unknown reason.
How do I direct my output to a file so I can
Ron Joordens wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently using portupgrade to upgrade my ports (obviously). I'm getting
errors on some of my ports. Eg config error on gedit2, and KDE fails for
unknown reason.
How do I direct my output to a file so I can review it to find the reason or
at least post it to
I am seeing many uninstall errors lately when I do a portupgrade
(particularily with Gnome).
Of course one can manually
# make deinstall make reinstall
but this is becoming a bit tiresome.
So I would like to know what is the reason of these errors:
One should think either a port is out of date
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
That still doesn't tell us anything. Look further back in the
portupgrade output and post the actual errors it encounters
(e.g. record the output to a file with script(1) or tee(1) and then
extract the relevant parts).
Great idea to use script for
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
Have you done the UPDATING process on portupgrade?
No. I will look after this first.
Thanks,
Uli.
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
| Germany |
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:39:18PM +0100, Michael Sig Birkmose wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently tried to switch from compiling everything myself from ports, to
use portupgrade -PP package_name.
However, after having run CVSUP on my ports tree, I run into the problem,
that the binary
On Monday 08 March 2004 01:51 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:39:18PM +0100, Michael Sig Birkmose wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently tried to switch from compiling everything myself from
ports, to use portupgrade -PP package_name.
However, after having run CVSUP on my
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:16:12AM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
I am seeing many uninstall errors lately when I do a portupgrade
(particularily with Gnome).
Of course one can manually
# make deinstall make reinstall
but this is becoming a bit tiresome.
So I would like to know
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:16:12AM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
I am seeing many uninstall errors lately when I do a portupgrade
(particularily with Gnome).
Of course one can manually
# make deinstall make reinstall
but this is
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:30:48AM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:16:12AM +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hi!
I am seeing many uninstall errors lately when I do a portupgrade
(particularily with Gnome).
Of
On Saturday 06 March 2004 09:20 am, Chris wrote:
What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321
packages found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from 'db' (databases/db2) to 'db2'
(databases/db2). ** No need to
On Saturday 06 March 2004 11:12 am, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2004 09:20 am, Chris wrote:
What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321
packages found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:20:53AM -0600, Chris wrote:
What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from 'db' (databases/db2) to 'db2' (databases/db2).
** No
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:30:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
That's not an error, so there's nothing to handle :-) If you want to
remove the warning then rebuild the db port with the -f flag to force
the rebuild.
Kris
Hi! I have the same messages, but pkgdb -f or pkgdb -fu don't remove
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:10:41AM +0100, Manuel Hernandez wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:30:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
That's not an error, so there's nothing to handle :-) If you want to
remove the warning then rebuild the db port with the -f flag to force
the rebuild.
Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Hi,
As described in
http://www.freshports.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
I've reinstalled portupgrade-\*.
And now when I try to run portupgrade I have such error:
novel /usr/local/bin $ portupgrade -sfr lang/ruby16
--- [Executing a command as root: sudo
Rob wrote:
I think this is because ruby-1.6 used to install /usr/local/bin/ruby, but by
the recent upgrade this becomes /usr/local/bin/ruby16 and ruby is not there
anymore. Since portupgrade needs ruby, portupgrade gets stuck as soon as
upgrading ruby-1.6 removes the /usr/local/bin/ruby
leafy writes:
Deinstall ruby 1.6 stuff (if you are paranoi[d])
pkg_deinstall -ri lang/ruby16
root@ pkg_deinstall -ri lang/ruby16
--- Deinstalling 'ruby16-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3'
delete ruby16-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3? n
--- Deinstalling 'ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15_1'
delete ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15_1?
On Monday 01 March 2004 07:48 am, Robert Huff wrote:
leafy writes:
Deinstall ruby 1.6 stuff (if you are paranoi[d])
pkg_deinstall -ri lang/ruby16
root@ pkg_deinstall -ri lang/ruby16
--- Deinstalling 'ruby16-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3'
delete ruby16-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3? n
--- Deinstalling
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:23:58PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote:
My machine just suffered a power-failure 6 hrs into a portupgrade -a
I restarted it after a pkgdb -F
Did I do the right thing?
Yep, that should be pretty safe (assuming e.g. fsck didn't discover
that the power failure caused
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:29:29PM -0600, Chris wrote:
Ok - I have been away for a spell - perhaps someone can led insight.
Granted, I have 5.2.1-RC installed, and granted I do a weekly cvsup of the
ports then a portupgrade.
But what the hell-o is up with the replacement of KDE-3.1.4 with
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:23:58PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote:
My machine just suffered a power-failure 6 hrs into a portupgrade -a
I restarted it after a pkgdb -F
Did I do the right thing?
Yep, that should be pretty safe (assuming e.g. fsck didn't discover
that the power failure caused
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Ouch!
I'm located somewhere deep within a portupgrade cycle. I misunderstood the
command (portupgrade -a), and assumed that it would only upgrade ports that
I had installed, not pkgs installed with pkg_add -r.
How can I avoid portupgrade touching big
On Friday 23 January 2004 6:21 pm, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Jeff Elkins wrote:
Ouch!
I'm located somewhere deep within a portupgrade cycle. I misunderstood the
command (portupgrade -a), and assumed that it would only upgrade ports
that I had installed, not pkgs installed with
From: Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: portupgrade overkill?
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 05:16:43 -0200
Hello people,
Check this out, if you will:
]# portinstall -RPv urwfonts
Have you checked
# man portinstall
with a /-R
Sorry, Your mail was cougth in my junk box.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:43:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex de Kruijff writes:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
The strange part is that on some of the servers the script works just
fine, and on others
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, William O'Higgins wrote:
Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through:
portupgrade -arR
It's been running for 15 hours or so now, and I'm wondering how much
longer it is likely to take? I realize that that depends grin /
Well, that depends; many
- Original Message -
From: Jan Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:37 AM
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, William O'Higgins wrote:
Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through:
portupgrade -arR
It's been running for 15 hours or so now, and I'm
William O'Higgins wrote:
Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through:
portupgrade -arR
It's been running for 15 hours or so now, and I'm wondering how much
longer it is likely to take? I realize that that depends grin /,
but I've love some anecdotal hints if anyone's got
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:33, William O'Higgins wrote:
Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through:
portupgrade -arR
Try the -n switch (ie. portupgrade -narR), this will show which ports will be
upgraded without doing so.
Bjarne
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:39 pm, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:33, William O'Higgins wrote:
Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through:
portupgrade -arR
Try the -n switch (ie. portupgrade -narR), this will show which ports will
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:24:31PM -0600, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:39 pm, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 18:33, William O'Higgins wrote:
Quite foolishly, I ran this command without thinking it through:
portupgrade -arR
Try the -n
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:41 am, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Howdy list,
Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I didn't
find anything in the portupgrade manpage.
I'm in the process of upgrading the ports on my 5.1-RELEASE
laptop, and I just executed the following command:
portupgrade -R
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:41 am, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Howdy list,
Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I didn't
find anything in the portupgrade manpage.
I'm in the process of upgrading the ports on my 5.1-RELEASE
laptop, and I just executed the following
On Friday 24 October 2003 01:38 pm, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:41 am, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Howdy list,
Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I didn't
find anything in the portupgrade manpage.
I'm in the process of upgrading the
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 01:38 pm, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:41 am, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
[...]
I come from the programming world and to update a library and not
update the codes that use it really bothers me. I do what
On Friday 24 October 2003 02:41 pm, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 01:38 pm, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:41 am, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
[...]
I come from the programming world and to update a library and
What versions of ruby do you have installed? I can remember back a
few versions, that uninstalling portupgrade and ruby and then
making and installing portupgrade was faster than fighting the
problems with ruby.
Kent
-su-2.05b# ruby -v
ruby 1.6.8 (2003-03-26) [i386-freebsd5]
Ivan
Ralph wrote:
I'm running 5.1 and I'm having the same problem as the other person with
portupgrade ...
so how do I uninstall Ruby? and portupgrade?
# pkg_delete -rx ruby
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade
# make install clean
Regards,
Jens
___
[EMAIL
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:37 am, ivan georgiev wrote:
What versions of ruby do you have installed? I can remember back a
few versions, that uninstalling portupgrade and ruby and then
making and installing portupgrade was faster than fighting the
problems with ruby.
Kent
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:37 am, ivan georgiev wrote:
What versions of ruby do you have installed? I can remember back a
few versions, that uninstalling portupgrade and ruby and then
making and installing portupgrade was faster than fighting the
problems with ruby.
Kent
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:37 am, ivan georgiev wrote:
What versions of ruby do you have installed? I can remember back
a few versions, that uninstalling portupgrade and ruby and then
making and installing portupgrade was faster than fighting the
problems with
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:02 pm, ivan georgiev wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:37 am, ivan georgiev wrote:
What versions of ruby do you have installed? I can remember back
a few versions, that uninstalling portupgrade and ruby and then
making and
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 05:48 pm, ivan georgiev wrote:
I use 5_1_RELEASE. I do not know what happened but now I get:
-su-2.05b# portupgrade -arR
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:325:in `deorigin':
failed to convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError)
from
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 09:02 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 05:48 pm, ivan georgiev wrote:
I use 5_1_RELEASE. I do not know what happened but now I get:
-su-2.05b# portupgrade -arR
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:325:in `deorigin':
failed to
I use 5_1_RELEASE. I do not know what happened but now I
get:
-su-2.05b# portupgrade -arR
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:325:in
`deorigin': failed to convert nil into String
(PkgDB::DBError) from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:918:in
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 07:50 pm, ivan georgiev wrote:
I use 5_1_RELEASE. I do not know what happened but now I
get:
-su-2.05b# portupgrade -arR
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:325:in
`deorigin': failed to convert nil into String
Alex de Kruijff writes:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
The strange part is that on some of the servers the script works just
fine, and on others it runs, and emails me what looks like a job well
done, but the distfile has NOT been fetched. When I then go to do
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
Here's a strange thing:
I have a number of servers which all run a portupgrade script every
night to fetch the latest distfiles automatically. I then complete the
upgrade when I decide I'm in the mood :)
The strange part
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:18:49AM +0200, Herbert wrote:
Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
This is a FAQ - you're doing something wrong. USE_GCC is a
makefile-internal variable.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:56:58AM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
Hi
I have just run portupgrade -a for the first time. About 2 hours later I
realized that portupgrade is not only building the port I built myself from
/usr/ports but also the packages which I did install from the CD. I
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 05:15 pm, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:56:58AM +0200, Stefan Malte Schumacher
wrote:
Hi
I have just run portupgrade -a for the first time. About 2 hours
later I realized that portupgrade is not only building the port I
built myself from
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:05:05PM -0700 or thereabouts, paul beard wrote:
I am having this problem as well on any port I try to install. I
have rebuilt pkgdb from scratch.
=== Installing for p5-SNMP_Session-0.95
=== Generating temporary packing list
=== Checking if
Joshua Oreman wrote:
This is a VFAQ lately. You need FBSD 4.7 or better.
No, you just need to install sysutils/pkg_install. I would suspect
it's a POLA violation to require an upgrade to get around a new
version of a utility program.
--
Paul Beard
http://paulbeard.no-ip.org/movabletype/
whois
Charles Howse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that I am ready to start installing applications, I have read *some*
of the documentation in man portupgrade and some articles on the web.
First, I did:
# tar -czvf dbpkg.tgz /var/db/pkg
Then:
#pkgdb -F
It found cvsupit was broken with no fix
Khairil Yusof wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:07, Bob Perry wrote:
I run FreeBSD 4.7 RELEASE. Just ran the portversion command for the
first time since last Saturday and the ouptut indicated that my
installed packages were up-to-date. Thought it odd so I ran pkg_version
command and picked
It doesn't read the tree. It uses INDEX.db, which you are supposed to
build after each cvsup of ports-all. To build INDEX.db, you need a
current version of INDEX. I get too many messages from portsdb -U and
use the sequence make index and then portsdb -u. I run these
everytime I cvsup
On Sunday 10 August 2003 07:55 am, Bob Perry wrote:
Khairil Yusof wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:07, Bob Perry wrote:
I run FreeBSD 4.7 RELEASE. Just ran the portversion command for
the first time since last Saturday and the ouptut indicated that
my installed packages were up-to-date.
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 22:07, Bob Perry wrote:
I run FreeBSD 4.7 RELEASE. Just ran the portversion command for the
first time since last Saturday and the ouptut indicated that my
installed packages were up-to-date. Thought it odd so I ran pkg_version
command and picked up 9 packages in
In the last episode (Jul 21), Per olof Ljungmark said:
4.6.2-RELEASE-p13
cvsup very recent
I get the following error on all ports I try to upgrade. Have seen
similar posts but unable to deduce how the problem was solved. Have run
pkgdb -F/portsdb -uU but no change.
=== Checking if
On Thursday 29 May 2003 11:59 am, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello, I have a strange problem on a couple of FreeBSD 4.7 machines which
share the same port tree (via NFS).
Whenever I try to upgrade a port I get:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:310:in `deorigin': failed to
convert nil
At 08:04 AM 5/29/03, you wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:51:33PM -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
: follow the suggestion and actually *use* the suggested refuse file you
: will then be unable to follow the other suggestion and ever use
: portupgrade, or else fix portupgrade so that it does not dump it
On Thursday 13 March 2003 11:54 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:22 AM 3/13/2003 -0800, you wrote:
I forced the portugrade of imake. That also rebuilt kde-3. I have
found that if you don't force, it only updates the ports that have
changed. It doesn't take care of the full b-dep dependancy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:50:11PM -0800, Daxbert wrote:
This will get your distfile downloads out of
/usr/ports as well. However, there's probably
a cleaner way to do this via a make.conf setting.
DISTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/ports/distfiles
should do it.
Cheers,
Scott
--
What I did was move my distfiles directory elsewhere and made a symbolic
link to it.
That means that the pointers are still valid in every compile, but they
exist elsewhere...
You could just empty distfiles with a rm -rf /usr/ports/distfiles/*
(don't forget the *)
Anthony
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daxbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Quoting Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice - it's
max is about 2Gb and there is about 1.7 in use. It seems a bit bloated and
I certainly don't need all the stuff that
Quoting Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daxbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Quoting Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice -
it's
max is about 2Gb and there is about 1.7 in use. It seems a bit bloated
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daxbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Quoting Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daxbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Quoting Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice -
it's
max is about
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I just upgrade XFree86 from 4.2 to 4.3 using portupgrade on 2 different
machines.
That statement doesn't make sense. Portupgrade upgrades pors, not the
system. So you can't upgrade from 4.2 to 4.3 with portupgrade. If you
actually upgraded the
On Thursday 13 March 2003 08:15 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgrade XFree86 from 4.2 to 4.3 using portupgrade on 2
different machines. On one portupgrade seems to have worked ok,
except that XFree86 does not function quite correctly - I shall
assume it is an XFree86 problem.
The
At 11:22 AM 3/13/2003 -0800, you wrote:
I forced the portugrade of imake. That also rebuilt kde-3. I have found
that if you don't force, it only updates the ports that have changed.
It doesn't take care of the full b-dep dependancy list.
Hmmm... now, that's interesting.
I did portupgrade of
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:54:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:22 AM 3/13/2003 -0800, you wrote:
I forced the portugrade of imake. That also rebuilt kde-3. I have found
that if you don't force, it only updates the ports that have changed.
It doesn't take care of the full b-dep
Quoting Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, any idea how I could reduce the size of the /usr/ports slice - it's
max is about 2Gb and there is about 1.7 in use. It seems a bit bloated and
I certainly don't need all the stuff that is in there...
Delete everything in
At 2003-03-14T03:06:33Z, Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Delete everything in /usr/ports/distfiles. And before you go to bed one
night do a make clean from /usr/ports. It takes some time...
`portsclean -CD' does pretty much the same thing in about 1% as much time.
--
Kirk
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:31, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I just upgrade XFree86 from 4.2 to 4.3 using portupgrade on 2 different
machines.
That statement doesn't make sense. Portupgrade upgrades pors, not the
system. So you can't upgrade from 4.2 to
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:42:02PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
I learned something out of this too. Fontconfig was modified and so I
tried -Rup fontconfig. Portupgrade just built fontconfig. Next I tried
-pur fontconfig. It rebuild Xft, which had also been upgraded, and just
repackaged
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:16 am, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:42:02PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
I learned something out of this too. Fontconfig was modified and so
I tried -Rup fontconfig. Portupgrade just built fontconfig. Next I
tried -pur fontconfig. It rebuild Xft,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:45:19AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:16 am, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:42:02PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
I learned something out of this too. Fontconfig was modified and so
I tried -Rup fontconfig. Portupgrade just
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Hope this helps to clear up some of the confusion.
--Stijn
Oh Mr Stijn. Listen, I am not tellimg you off, or making fun of you..Ok ?
I promise. But my eyes crossed, went sidewyas, took a holiday, crawled
across the floor looking
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:06:44PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Hope this helps to clear up some of the confusion.
--Stijn
Oh Mr Stijn. Listen, I am not tellimg you off, or making fun of you..Ok ?
I promise. But my eyes
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Portupgrade has too many ways it can go wrong for mere mortals.
I have offered to re-write it.
It will be a mega-project, but my offer is serious.
And ruby (don't take our love to town) will place a less than significant
role.
So
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:24:48AM +0100, Lauri Watts wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Monday 03 March 2003 00.23, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Well I am trying to be constructive. Not just a compainer...although it
sounds that way (having spent 2 unsuccessful days trying to get the
At 01:15 PM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:55 pm, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 05:15 AM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote:
snip
What portupgrade options are you using? When you do -r, you have
to force -f.
Very interesting. Where is that documented? I just did a quick read
On Monday 03 March 2003 06:30 pm, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 01:15 PM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:55 pm, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 05:15 AM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote:
snip
snip
On Marcus' advice I took a look at my version of Python. Somehow I
had version 1.6,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 08:22:33PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
At the risk of being accused of a complainer..
I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have
left me without a useable X system.
Guess it is back to the CD's.
Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release compilable
ports..especially for the big mothers like X/KDE.
I'm sure they do. However, they can't test in your environment. The X
ports built fine for me. I don't use KDE,
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
| At the risk of being accused of a complainer..
| I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have
| left me without a useable X system.
| Guess it is back to the CD's.
| Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release compilable
ports..especially for the big mothers like X/KDE.
I'm sure they do. However, they can't test in
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
At the risk of being accused of a complainer.
I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have
left me without a useable X system.
Guess it is back to the CD's.
Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:01 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release
compilable ports..especially for the big mothers
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:01 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
| On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
| In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
| Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release
| compilable ports..especially for the big
801 - 900 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
