Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-03 Thread Loren M. Lang
Subject: Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours little bit less reliable using local to UTC unless you are not affected by any daylight savings changes like Arizona in the US or, I'm sure, many other places around the world. There's no excuse for a mailserver

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-03 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:00:15PM -0800, Luke wrote: There's no excuse for a mailserver to not be synced to a NTP source. I'd extend that to apply to any server. Practically all the things a server does are dependent in some way on the correct time. I have three excuses: 1) NTP is

RE: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-03 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours Ted Mittelstaedt writes: There's no excuse for a mailserver to not be synced to a NTP source. I'd extend that to apply to any server. Practically all the things a server does are dependent in some way

RE: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-03 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Loren M. Lang Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 12:58 PM To: Luke Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:00:15PM -0800, Luke

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 02:22:40AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:36:41 -0800 Loren M. Lang wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:58:17AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:10:12 -0700 Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I got it all working

RE: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Loren M. Lang Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:29 AM To: Ian Smith Cc: Loren M. Lang; Pat Maddox; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours little bit less

RE: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:11:19 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Loren wrote: little bit less reliable using local to UTC unless you are not affected by any daylight savings changes like Arizona in the US or, I'm sure, many other places around the world. For a desktop or test machine,

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Loren M. Lang writes: Well, I haven't looked into all the details of how FreeBSD does this, but I gaurentee that there is a point where FreeBSD can crash and the clock could be knocked off an hour which wouldn't happen if it's running UTC. Traditionally, UNIX sets the real-time clock to UTC.

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Ted Mittelstaedt writes: There's no excuse for a mailserver to not be synced to a NTP source. I'd extend that to apply to any server. Practically all the things a server does are dependent in some way on the correct time. This is also increasingly true of desktops. Gone are the days when you

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Luke
There's no excuse for a mailserver to not be synced to a NTP source. I'd extend that to apply to any server. Practically all the things a server does are dependent in some way on the correct time. I have three excuses: 1) NTP is difficult to configure. I've done it, but it wasn't trivial. 2)

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Tom Trelvik
Luke wrote: 1) NTP is difficult to configure. I've done it, but it wasn't trivial. It's always seemed rather straightforward to me, what in particular gave you trouble, perhaps we could help? 2) Finding an NTP server willing to accept traffic from the public isn't easy either. For me it

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Robert Huff
Luke writes: 2) Finding an NTP server willing to accept traffic from the public isn't easy either. For me it involved a scavenger hunt through out-of-date websites and a lot of failed attempts. The overwhelming majority of ISPs I have used or inquired about had (at least) one

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 02), Luke said: There's no excuse for a mailserver to not be synced to a NTP source. I'd extend that to apply to any server. Practically all the things a server does are dependent in some way on the correct time. I have three excuses: 1) NTP is difficult to

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Luke
1) NTP is difficult to configure. I've done it, but it wasn't trivial. It's always seemed rather straightforward to me, what in particular gave you trouble, perhaps we could help? Well, there seemed to be two different services. One was something that would run only on boot. The other was a

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Luke wrote: That suggests larger problems on your system, to me, but I dunno. 3) If your clock tends to run noticably fast or slow, constant NTP corrections tend to do more harm than good, at least in my experience. It got to where I couldn't even run a buildworld because NTP kept tinkering

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Luke writes: 1) NTP is difficult to configure. I dunno. I configured it in a few minutes on my test box. 2) Finding an NTP server willing to accept traffic from the public isn't easy either. For me it involved a scavenger hunt through out-of-date websites and a lot of failed attempts.

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-03-02 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Tom Trelvik writes: That suggests larger problems on your system, to me, but I dunno. If NTP is configured to step instead of slew, it can cause the clock to jump a bit for a while. Slewing is smooth and avoids this, but it takes a lot longer for NTP to initially get the time right. --

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-28 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:58:17AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:10:12 -0700 Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I got it all working now. Not sure how to change the time zone with config files, so I just used sysinstall to change it to MST (time zone is

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-28 Thread Ian Smith
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:36:41 -0800 Loren M. Lang wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:58:17AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:10:12 -0700 Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I got it all working now. Not sure how to change the time zone with config files,

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Pat Maddox
It doesn't only happen when I receive mail from my gmail account - it's with all email that passes through this server. On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:54:56 +1000, Timothy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: check your gmail account it's set to the wrong time zone or something. if date gives the correct

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Pat Maddox writes: I forgot to give a bit of info. My local machine has the correct time of 10:05PM, and the server has the correct time of 11:05PM. If I send an email from a mail account on the server to gmail, it has the correct time. If I send an email from gmail back to the server,

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Pat Maddox
I've included the headers of messages from both Gmail and Hotmail, to show that it's not on Gmail's end. Also, here's the output from date: %date Sun Feb 27 02:42:21 CET 2005 They should show up in my inbox as being received at 1:40am or so, but they show up as 6:40pm instead. From Gmail:

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Pat Maddox writes: I've included the headers of messages from both Gmail and Hotmail, to show that it's not on Gmail's end. Also, here's the output from date: %date Sun Feb 27 02:42:21 CET 2005 That can't be right. You sent your message in reply to a message I sent at 9:34 CET. The time

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Pat Maddox
Alright, I got it all working now. Not sure how to change the time zone with config files, so I just used sysinstall to change it to MST (time zone is arbitrary, but since this is the zone I live in, it's convenient for me). Then I used ntpdate to sync it, and it's working well now. Thanks for

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Pat Maddox writes: Alright, I got it all working now. Not sure how to change the time zone with config files, so I just used sysinstall to change it to MST (time zone is arbitrary, but since this is the zone I live in, it's convenient for me). Well, no, time zone isn't arbitrary, it needs

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-27 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:10:12 -0700 Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, I got it all working now. Not sure how to change the time zone with config files, so I just used sysinstall to change it to MST (time zone is arbitrary, but since this is the zone I live in, it's convenient

Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-26 Thread Pat Maddox
I've been having a weird problem lately...when I download an email from my mailserver, the time is off by 7 hours. For example, if I receive an email at 9:30pm, it lists the time as 2:30pm in my mail client. I've determined that it's just a problem on received messages, because if I use my

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-26 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 26 February 2005 08:38 pm, Pat Maddox wrote: I've been having a weird problem lately...when I download an email from my mailserver, the time is off by 7 hours. For example, if I receive an email at 9:30pm, it lists the time as 2:30pm in my mail client. I've determined that it's

Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours

2005-02-26 Thread Pat Maddox
I forgot to give a bit of info. My local machine has the correct time of 10:05PM, and the server has the correct time of 11:05PM. If I send an email from a mail account on the server to gmail, it has the correct time. If I send an email from gmail back to the server, that's when it has the