-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Destination
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
On Tue
to
systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the
outside world from both subnets. My only remaining issue is getting
to the web app setup for the Linksys - I can only do it from a local
address (meaning a 192.168.1.x address). The Linksys refuses
connections from my 10.0.0.x
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings
on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now
connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have
routing to the outside world from both subnets. My only
remaining issue is getting to the web app setup
on the
Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to
systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the
outside world from both subnets. My only remaining issue is getting
to the web app setup for the Linksys - I can only do it from a local
address (meaning
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:42:27PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings
on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now
connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have
routing to the outside world from
I never explicity set the FreeBSD machine to enable NAT
between these subnets. Should I do so? Do I just add another
natd_interface to rc.conf?
You do not want to do this. The below config in rc.conf is correct. It
states that nat will only be enabled for the external interface, for
both
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Jason Morgan wrote:
...
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the
Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to
systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the
outside world from both subnets. My only
also have routing to the
outside world from both subnets. My only remaining issue is getting to
the web app setup for the Linksys - I can only do it from a local
address (meaning a 192.168.1.x address). The Linksys refuses
connections from my 10.0.0.x subnet. Is this a NAT issue?
Most
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:49:54PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question
. You seem to have built a reasonable understanding
of routing. I hope that you've actually understood/learned something
from all this. I think you have.
I'd say, if you have an extra nic, add a new 172.16/16 subnet in the
mix, and see if you can get that to work too. Either way, move on with
IPSec
being 192.168.1.1. Now, the FreeBSD machine and the
wireless router (192.168.1.2) communicate fine as does the wired subnet;
however, I am not able to connect from a 10.0.0.x client to the wireless
router. After running traceroute, etc, it seems that the FreeBSD machine
is simply not routing
to retrieve ports and so
forth. I'm suspecting either a routing or firewall issue. I'm using pf and
am natting all traffic from this new box to my external interface and
passing all traffic, that should be working. My network range is 10.8.0.0
and the range for this new box is 10.10.0.0 i believe my
, this part works but the box can't get to the
net to retrieve ports and so forth. I'm suspecting either a routing
or firewall issue. I'm using pf and am natting all traffic from
this new box to my external interface and passing all traffic, that
should be working. My network range is 10.8.0.0
On Oct 25, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Dave wrote:
Hi,
The netmask for my working setup is 255.255.0.0 same for the
nonworking setup. I am starting to wondering since the boxes are in
two different subnets if they need a route to each other?
Thanks.
Dave.
Yes, they do.
Dear all,
I would appreciate your advise regarding pppd and routing. FreeBSD
5.4-STABLE, pppd with mgetty acting as dial-in server with one
external modem. I can connect to server with no problem but it seems
like routing doesn't work for dial-in user. I cannot even ping the ip
address of dial
Ahnjoan Amous [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP
server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't
handling this well and I don't know how to fix it. Windows as well as Linux
DHCP clients do not have
El Dom 23 Oct 2005 20:22, Ahnjoan Amous escribió:
The long : I have a CellPipe ADSL router/bridge from Lucent. This device is
provided by our ISP. I am exploring the ZIPB functionality of the device to
allow my FreeBSD host to own the public IP. The basics of the configuration
for those
The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP
server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't
handling this well and I don't know how to fix it. Windows as well as Linux
DHCP clients do not have a problem with this and I am at my wits end trying
The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP
server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't
handling this well and I don't know how to fix it. Windows as well as Linux
DHCP clients do not have a problem with this and I am at my wits end
192.168.2.214/32 -interface rl0 -cloning
a giveaway should have been the duplicate mac addresses in your routing
tables which we all missed.
Richard,
Hmmm - that works! Thanks very much ...
... but given that solution, I would have thought that
route add -host 192.168.2.214 -interface rl0
in link_addr(3).
route add 192.168.2.214/32 -link -interface rl0:x:x:x:x:x:x
if you want the kernel to use arp to find the mac address, you
specifically have to tell it to:
route add 192.168.2.214/32 -interface rl0 -cloning
a giveaway should have been the duplicate mac addresses in your routing
to a specific host.
Was openvpn up
during you linux testing and down during your freebsd testing?
Yes - absolutely although I don't usually bother to provide NAT for the
2.214 access to 2.0
Can we
see your linux routing tables during the various stages?
Yup - here ya go:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
your linux testing. How does 2.214 know what to do with the
reply when it recieves the echo request from 254.245? Was openvpn up
during you linux testing and down during your freebsd testing? Can we
see your linux routing tables during the various stages?
Is it possible to preconfigure
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:59:53 +0200
Björn König [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Hepple wrote:
[...]
I just want to add an arbitrary machine (eg. with IP 192.168.2.214) to my
home network 192.168.254.0/24. Under Linux I just do a
route add -host 192.168.2.214 eth0
and I can ping
On 10/15/05, Bob Hepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I'm new to FreeBSD (5.3) and trying to make the transition from Linux. One
thing that has me stumped is a routing question... it must be something
really simple because I can do it all the time in Linux.
I just want to add an arbitrary
Hello!
I'm new to FreeBSD (5.3) and trying to make the transition from Linux. One
thing that has me stumped is a routing question... it must be something
really simple because I can do it all the time in Linux.
I just want to add an arbitrary machine (eg. with IP 192.168.2.214) to my
home
Bob Hepple wrote:
[...]
I just want to add an arbitrary machine (eg. with IP 192.168.2.214) to my
home network 192.168.254.0/24. Under Linux I just do a
route add -host 192.168.2.214 eth0
and I can ping it.
On FreeBSD I tried both
route add -host 192.168.2.214
On 28/09/05, Glenn Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:08 PM 9/28/2005, tsuraan wrote:
I have a freebsd 5.3 machine, with a jailed off machine running in it.
Let's call them host and slave (they have seperate IP addresses and
hostnames). Within the slave, I have sshd and apache running.
I have a freebsd 5.3 machine, with a jailed off machine running in it.
Let's call them host and slave (they have seperate IP addresses and
hostnames). Within the slave, I have sshd and apache running. In the
host, I just have sshd running. From within the slave machine, I can
connect to
At 04:08 PM 9/28/2005, tsuraan wrote:
I have a freebsd 5.3 machine, with a jailed off machine running in it.
Let's call them host and slave (they have seperate IP addresses and
hostnames). Within the slave, I have sshd and apache running. In the
host, I just have sshd running. From within
Ok, here´s the deal
I have my Freebsd 4.10 gateway/nat/firewall on my network.
On my LAN i have couple WIN machines and a Linux Redhat machine working ok
to outside and other machine´s with IP 192.168.255.252 eth0
I have one software running on Redhat Machine that uses SLIP and i have
.
[ ... ]
The first problem was a result of trying to use ARP to a machine not on the
local subnet, which the SLIP connection is not. If you're going to use that,
you either need to proxy arp for the box, or set up routing on both sides so
that the 192.168.255.x and 129.168.0.y subnets know
guessing that if you don't already know that RIP isn't
a routing protocol used to publish routes on the Internet,
that you don't have much IP address space. I think you will
find the costs to publish your routes will be an eye-opener.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
I'm looking for a reccomendation on the best software to publish RIP routes
for IPSpace I own.
I'm aware I'd have to get approval from my bordering routers to allow me to
publish routes for public space, but I am just looking to publish updated
routes (dynamically) via RIP or BGP from a FreeBSD
://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think Zebra is the software you are looking for. It will do some neat
stuff with routing.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello,
I have a Freebsd server and some bad routes are been showed to me.
Well, I didnt configured any routing protocols ...
With the command netstat -r I got a lot of routes with UGHD flags.
I just need the default route (gateway).
With the command netstat -rs I got this message:
127 bad
Joseh Martins wrote:
Hello,
I have a Freebsd server and some bad routes are been showed to me.
Well, I didnt configured any routing protocols ...
With the command netstat -r I got a lot of routes with UGHD flags.
I just need the default route (gateway).
With the command netstat -rs I got
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said:
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running
postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two
entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the
other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said:
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running
postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two
entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the
other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The
In the last episode (Apr 14), Kurt Buff said:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said:
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running
postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two
entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1,
the other is a PC
it as regular
internet traffic. The Cisco took care of routing the NAT'ted traffic
through the 65k link.
Or upgrade to a newer 6-port firebox :)
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
All,
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running
postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two
entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the
other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The PC
is starting to flake out, and I'd like to replace
Looks like I sent the first copy from an old address. Sorry if this dupes...
All,
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running
postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two
entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the
other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving
In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said:
I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running
postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two
entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the
other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The
PC is
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:13:47 -0500, PS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello I use freeBSD 4.11 with pppoe.
I used almost default ppp.conf (as in freebsd handbook) for dynamic ip.
my config is here http://block111.servehttp.com/ppp.conf
Twice a day I restart ppp from cron with `killall -INT ppp` and
Hello I use freeBSD 4.11 with pppoe.
I used almost default ppp.conf (as in freebsd handbook) for dynamic ip.
my config is here http://block111.servehttp.com/ppp.conf
Twice a day I restart ppp from cron with `killall -INT ppp` and if the
new connection default gateway is different then the old
Hello I use freeBSD 4.11 with pppoe.
I used almost default ppp.conf (as in freebsd handbook) for dynamic ip.
my config is here http://block111.servehttp.com/ppp.conf
Twice a day I restart ppp from cron with `killall -INT ppp` and if the
new connection default gateway is different then the old
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:13:47 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
Hello I use freeBSD 4.11 with pppoe.
I used almost default ppp.conf (as in freebsd handbook) for dynamic ip.
my config is here http://block111.servehttp.com/ppp.conf
Twice a day I restart ppp from cron with `killall
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:13:47 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
Hello I use freeBSD 4.11 with pppoe.
I used almost default ppp.conf (as in freebsd handbook) for dynamic ip.
my config is here http://block111.servehttp.com/ppp.conf
Twice a day I restart ppp from
At 10:20 PM 28/03/2005, PS wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:13:47 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
My isp gives free bandwidth from x till y, provided that a connection
starts after x and finishes before y... so, my smart freebsd pc sends
every day INT to ppp
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org;
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: PPP routing failure
Hi everyone -
I'm experiencing some funky routing failures when I dialup netscape
internet
via user-level PPP:
I can negotiate IPCP fine; get a point-to-point link via tun0:
myaddr
: PPP routing failure
Hi everyone -
I'm experiencing some funky routing failures when I dialup netscape
internet
via user-level PPP:
I can negotiate IPCP fine; get a point-to-point link via tun0:
myaddr: 172.143.224.146; hisaddr: 63.152.0.70
When the default route is setup to 63.152.0.70
Hi everyone -
I'm experiencing some funky routing failures when I dialup netscape internet
via user-level PPP:
I can negotiate IPCP fine; get a point-to-point link via tun0:
myaddr: 172.143.224.146; hisaddr: 63.152.0.70
When the default route is setup to 63.152.0.70, all of my packets
hello,
i have two private network segments, 192.168.0.x and 192.168.1.x connected
over a VPN Tunnel, freebsd, racoon and ipsec.
on one site we want to add a new network segment 192.168.3.x
is this possible and how is the correct syntax ?
this is what i have done:
gifconfig gif0 A.B.C.D
I need a way of routing all udp http traffic on ports 6881-6999 that hit
machine A to be passed through to machine B on the same ports .. how do i go
about doing this with as much simplicity as possible.
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
W I need a way of routing all udp http traffic on ports 6881-6999 that hit
W machine A to be passed through to machine B on the same ports .. how do i go
W about doing this with as much simplicity as possible.
-
Install pf,ipfw or ipf (I prefer pf
on networking stack:
quote
[] move IPv4 routing to its own optimized routing table structure and
add multi-path and policy-routing options. (planned)
/quote
I think this is the feature you are looking for: multi-path
I am also not sure of the status of this.
There are some hackish ways of dealing
Im confused.. if you have two T1s, then are using /30s dor the ranges? If
so.. what about not giving a default gateway for either one and just add
routes...
Are you attempting utilize this as just a router.?
Theres a section that covers setting up routing on interfaces in the
handbook:
http
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Routing Problem
Im confused.. if you have two T1s, then are using /30s dor the ranges?
If
so.. what about not giving a default gateway for either one and just add
routes...
Are you attempting utilize this as just a router.?
Theres a section that covers setting up routing
destination.
Because the TCP/IP version4 protocol uses a single default route in
FreeBSD's routing table at any one time for default route traffic, default
routers configured on multiple interfaces connected to two or more
disjointed networks can wreak routing traffic havoc.
In FreeBSD, you can
PROTECTED]
(516) 379-0001 Office
(516) 480-1870 Mobile/Emergencies
(516) 908-4185 Fax
http://www.meitech.com/
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:57 AM
To: Gustafson, Tim
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Routing Problem
Hi Tim
: RE: Routing Problem
Thomas (and John too),
Let me clarify a little bit.
What I have is this:
A single FreeBSD web server with a single NIC in it
Two T1 routers, each with a different subnet.
My FreeBSD box has two IP addresses assigned to it, one from the first
subnet and one from the second subnet
about being able to set up source
routing, but I haven't been able to find any HOWTO's about that.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
for traffic from the internet and routing traffic
to specific hosts. All traffic is sent to the firewall.
Firewall:
This firewall is an i386 arch FreeBSD 5.3 build currently running
ipf and ipnat and sits on the three networks 192.168.0.0/24,
192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24 (This may
with integrated firewall and nat
The firewall cannot be configured other than turning ports
on and off for traffic from the internet and routing traffic
to specific hosts. All traffic is sent to the firewall.
Firewall:
This firewall is an i386 arch FreeBSD 5.3 build currently running
Hi all,
Is it possible to do source routing in FreeBSD?
I want to set up a fBSD box with (3 nic's) 2 internet connections and a
private net, and do some source routing.
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Perica Veljanovski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to do source routing in FreeBSD?
You can do that with ipfw and fwd rules.
--
Christian Laursen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
of Atlantis is 192.168.0.71 and the IP address of the old
router is 192.168.101
Here are some bits a pices that might be usefull:
NOT VIA OLD ROUTER:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] %netstat -r -f inet
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
default
I'll by a second network card, setting it up with
a local ip-address/netmask.
A few questions arise:
1) I'll have to do some routing with my computer, is there a good
online tutorial you can recommend covering this rather simple case?
2) What's the easiest way to log the traffic to my ISP?
I don't
in my LAN also access
to the net, so I'll by a second network card, setting it up with
a local ip-address/netmask.
A few questions arise:
1) I'll have to do some routing with my computer, is there a good
online tutorial you can recommend covering this rather simple case?
I think
http
Hi
I've setup a router using FreeBSD 4.10 release
on a PII 350Mhz with 96 MB RAM.
I wonder if there are some tunable parameters I should tweak
( thru sysctl ? ) to tune the link to the ISP which is supposed
to be a 10 Mbits/s link ?
Thanks.
--
Cordialement/Regards
Frank Bonnet
Hi
I've installed an old PC ( PII 350 Mhz ) as a router
it works like a charm ;-) I wonder which tool I could install
on it to monitor a bit the routing process.
Thanks a lot.
--
Cordialement/Regards
Frank Bonnet
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:35:38 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote
Hi
I've installed an old PC ( PII 350 Mhz ) as a router
it works like a charm ;-) I wonder which tool I could install
on it to monitor a bit the routing process.
MRTG, Nagios or RRDtool would do the trick. I would prefer the latter
* Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1236 11:36]:
Hi
I've installed an old PC ( PII 350 Mhz ) as a router
it works like a charm ;-) I wonder which tool I could install
on it to monitor a bit the routing process.
cricket kicks the ass.
built on perl and rrdtool, really powerful config syntax
there,
I have the following network env. (IPs are not real though similar)
(INTERNET) - [? ? ? ?] Internet GW (cisco) [195.223.41.1] - switch -
hosts connected to the switch like 195.223.41.10 195.223.41.119 etc.
probably in the /24 range or maybe it uses classless routing I do
Good day!
Is it possible to tell cvsup to use another
machine's global access in fetching the freebsd source
updates??
Here's my office workstation setup:
(private ip) (pri/pub ip) (all public)
workstation router proxy server---internet
mail server
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Good day!
Is it possible to tell cvsup to use another
machine's global access in fetching the freebsd source
updates??
Here's my office workstation setup:
(private ip) (pri/pub ip) (all public)
workstation router proxy server---internet
Hi there,
I have the following network env. (IPs are not real though similar)
(INTERNET) - [? ? ? ?] Internet GW (cisco) [195.223.41.1] - switch -
hosts connected to the switch like 195.223.41.10 195.223.41.119 etc.
probably in the /24 range or maybe it uses classless routing I do
not realy
interface. This way both interfaces can get an IP from the same subnet.
If I understand route-to correctly, then no routing whatsoever is done on the
packet and the only thing that needs to be done before sending the packet is to
lookup up the MAC address of the destination? Now 80.221.x.1 only gets
to do is use squid's tcp_outgoing_address to divide
traffic by splitting the private ip class with squid's acl's. However
this does not work.
My question is: How do i route part of the private ip's trough rl0 and
the other part trough rl2. Can it be done only by routing or should i
use nat (on the rl2
Hi all
How I can tune the kernel to increase the performance
for routing purpose?
ls it just?
1/ loader.conf
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=65536
2/ sysctl.conf
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536
net.inet.udp.recvspace=65536
Do I need to edit something in kernel and re-compile
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a good white paper or tutorial that will explain how to
configure routing for freebsd.
A good pointer for understanding linux static routing will be apreciated
too.
I have already read the HandBook
Hello,
I am looking for a good white paper or tutorial that will explain how
to configure routing for freebsd.
A good pointer for understanding linux static routing will be
apreciated too.
I have already read the HandBook, but there are still couple of things
that I haven't catch.
Sincerly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Very good, I will try it and let you know thanks so much.
Cheers
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
| Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
|
| I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
| Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 06:38:05PM -0400, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
Hello All,
I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping, traceroute, ssh etc. the
linux box from my freeBSD machine however I am not able to ping the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I want to thank everyone for there help...attached are the config files
for my FreeBSD gateway. I have rc.conf, ipfw rule-set and my natd.conf
file. I thought that I took care of incoming traffic, maybe you all can
help me and show me if I
Hello All,
I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping, traceroute, ssh etc. the
linux box from my freeBSD machine however I am not able to ping the
gateway. What could be the problem, this is my configuration:
FreeBSD:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping, traceroute, ssh etc. the
linux box from my freeBSD machine however I am not able to ping the
gateway. What could be the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping, traceroute, ssh etc. the
linux box from my freeBSD machine however I am not able to ping the
gateway. What could be the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping, traceroute, ssh etc. the
linux box from my freeBSD machine however I am not able to ping the
gateway. What could be the
Hakim Z. Singhji wrote:
I am having problems getting a connection to my FreeBSD gateway from my
Mandrake 10 Linux Machine. I am able to ping, traceroute, ssh etc. the
linux box from my freeBSD machine however I am not able to ping the
gateway. What could be the problem, this is my configuration:
Hello,
In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have successfully
recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based wireless cards. I have also been
able to setup the card into access point Hostap mode correctly. I have tried the
bridging recommend in the FreeBSD
Hello,
In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have successfully
recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based wireless cards. I have also been
able to setup the card into access point Hostap mode correctly. I have tried the
bridging recommend in the FreeBSD
Hello,
In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have successfully
recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based wireless cards. I have also been
able to setup the card into access point Hostap mode correctly. I have tried the
bridging recommend in the FreeBSD
I just installed a secondary internet connection at my office, and I'm
having a bizarre issue...
I have a network card - dc0
That network card has a config roughly like
ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 11:12, Web Walrus (Robert Wall) wrote:
I just installed a secondary internet connection at my office, and I'm
having a bizarre issue...
I have a network card - dc0
That network card has a config roughly like
ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
ifconfig_dc0 inet 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.248
ifconfig_dc0_alias0 inet 2.3.4.5 netmask 255.255.255.248
defaultrouter=1.2.3.1
You need to change your netmask for the alias to 255.255.255.255 if it's
on the same network.
It's not on the same network; that's the problem. Two complete
you, that's where it will
go.
If your two networks can't both reach your source network, then yes, it
will break.
There are workarounds, most involve either a dynamic routing protocol
that can assign priorites to the different paths, or introducing an
external device (firewall, router
301 - 400 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
