UPSCABLE usb
UPSTYPE usb
My BackUPS RS 500 works fine using those and a empty DEVICE field.
how your UPS shows in dmesg?
It is possible this is a new/redesigned model that Apcupsd does
not handle correctly. (APC is famous for not having a consistant
interface, even model
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:36:46 -0800
mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
DDa == Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au
writes:
Would you do that with Python or something else?
DDa Depending on what you really need to solve decides your
DDa language. Others
Does FreeBSD support any type of software raid?
I have an old rack mount server which has 8 bays, but all SATA,
and NO raid. Sure would be nice to have a software raid
to create a NAS device.
--
Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz
___
freebsd-questions
Does FreeBSD support any type of software raid?
I have an old rack mount server which has 8 bays, but all SATA,
and NO raid. Sure would be nice to have a software raid
to create a NAS device.
Yes!
An example of setting up a 3 disk raidz might look like this:
zpool create myfancyraid
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:06:49PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:36:46PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
However, from personal experience, I know that Larry Wall understands
Object Oriented Programming, and Guido definitely doesn't get it.
Obviously, other people
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Does FreeBSD support any type of software raid?
I have an old rack mount server which has 8 bays, but all SATA,
and NO raid. Sure would be nice to have a software raid
to create a NAS device.
Sure, multiple ways, in fact:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012 6:13 PM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx
wrote:
Now we will try to have a graphical mode in Freebsd. With that we would
like
Hello all.
I have been reading in detail all your comments and advice.
Thank you very much for your time. I have clear vision now of what do
I need to do.
I comment today to my students the help we were getting and all of
them send you a BIG THANK YOU VERY MUCH comment. I hope that wieth
running graphically and then
use open source software to develop graphical windows applications.
Maybe I am wrong but until now I think my only option is to use
Phyton. Is that correct? For what I have searched Python will let me
create executables and will let me create Graphical solutions even
of money
to pay was not a good option. Others provide real free excutables for
runtimes but the products were expensive. I am now trying to, If
possible, have FreeBSD running graphically and then use open source
software to develop graphical windows applications.
Maybe I am wrong but until now I
Maybe I am wrong but until now I think my only option is to use Phyton. Is
that correct? For what I have searched Python will let me create executables
and will let me create Graphical solutions even for other platforms (Mac or
LInux or whatever runs Python).
I think that python is a
, have FreeBSD running graphically and
then use open source software to develop graphical windows
applications.
Maybe I am wrong but until now I think my only option is to use
Phyton. Is that correct? For what I have searched Python will let me
create executables and will let me create
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mxwrote:
Would you do that with Python or something else?
http://qt.nokia.com/
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:37:37 -0600
Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
Now we will try to have a graphical mode in Freebsd. With that we
would like to be able to develop graphical applications for Windows
(we all know that's the market and here some companies is what they
are
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Rod Person rodper...@rodperson.com wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:37:37 -0600
Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
Now we will try to have a graphical mode in Freebsd. With that we
would like to be able to develop graphical applications for Windows
for runtimes but the products were expensive. I am
now trying to, If possible, have FreeBSD running graphically and then
use open source software to develop graphical windows applications.
Maybe I am wrong but until now I think my only option is to use
Phyton. Is that correct? For what I have
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com
To: Rod Person rodper...@rodperson.com
Cc: Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx; FreeBSD Questions
questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Software Development using Freebsd
trying to, If possible, have FreeBSD running graphically and then
use open source software to develop graphical windows applications.
Maybe I am wrong but until now I think my only option is to use
Phyton. Is that correct? For what I have searched Python will let me
create executables
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Jorge Biquez jbiq...@intranet.com.mx wrote:
Now we will try to have a graphical mode in Freebsd. With that we would like
to be able to develop graphical applications for Windows (we all know that's
the market and here some companies is what they are looking), so
DDa == Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au writes:
Would you do that with Python or something else?
DDa Depending on what you really need to solve decides your
DDa language. Others have offered advice here, but may I suggest Perl?
DDa For most data and its proven ability to
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:36:46PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
DDa == Da Rock writes:
Would you do that with Python or something else?
DDa Depending on what you really need to solve decides your
DDa language. Others have offered advice here, but may I suggest Perl?
DDa For most
On 02/07/12 14:06, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:36:46PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
DDa == Da Rock writes:
Would you do that with Python or something else?
DDa Depending on what you really need to solve decides your
DDa language. Others have offered advice here, but
Hi All
Must be a year or so ago I posted looking for some advice on media streaming
software that had a some specific requirements, mainly that it would transcode
media on the fly to an MPEG2 stream so the dlna enabled TV could display the
stream, I did get some good advice at the time
and development.
We also offer custom software programming services, from software development
to support and enhancement.We have also our ready to use software like School
Management, Document Management, Appointment Scheduler, Complaint Management
Software, Farming ERP, Hospital Management Software
On 6/15/2011 11:20 AM, spidey wrote:
Good morning.
I have never used Freebsd. For that matter, I have not used Linux since
the early 1990s (1993 to be exact) Anyway...
BTW - I have your logo on my xwindows on the Linux box I am trying to
setup. I think it's great.
OK, so, you haven't
FreeBSD can also run a lot of Linux Applications just fine with the
Linux_Enable=YES added to /etc/rc.conf and, not only that, I've heard
/etc/defaults/rc.conf has it in lower case linux_enable=NO
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich
On 6/17/2011 7:58 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
FreeBSD can also run a lot of Linux Applications just fine with the
Linux_Enable=YES added to /etc/rc.conf and, not only that, I've heard
/etc/defaults/rc.conf has it in lower caselinux_enable=NO
Yea I know, I'm still awake from yesterday,
Good morning.
I have never used Freebsd. For that matter, I have not used Linux since
the early 1990s (1993 to be exact) Anyway...
BTW - I have your logo on my xwindows on the Linux box I am trying to
setup. I think it's great.
I have a need to use sendmail and DNS bind. Can someone tell
On Jun 15, 2011, at 8:20 AM, spidey wrote:
Can someone tell me which versions of sendmail and DNS Bind are in the
current Ubuntu 10??
Sure, but you're asking on the wrong mailing list: FreeBSD isn't Ubuntu.
[ Reply-to: set appropriately. ]
Regards,
--
-Chuck
Greetings!
Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some
software that only works on 32-bit.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Nerius Landys nlan...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit
FreeBSD without even using a jail.
Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for
example if you rebuild world/kernel following
I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit
FreeBSD without even using a jail.
Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for
example if you rebuild world/kernel following this:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook
Yes, I believe this has been possible since 7.2.
Mike
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Redd Vinylene reddvinyl...@gmail.comwrote:
Greetings!
Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use
some
software that only works on 32-bit.
Thanks
I've had success running [at least some] 32 bit software on 64 bit
FreeBSD without even using a jail.
Do you have /usr/lib32 on your system? This would get installed for
example if you rebuild world/kernel following this:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
Thanks a lot guys - I really appreciate it.
Redd
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
2010/12/6 Redd Vinylene reddvinyl...@gmail.com:
Greetings!
Can I run a 32-bit jail (or software) on a 64-bit server? I need to use some
software that only works on 32-bit.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then?
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3744 did not tell me much.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Redd Vinylene reddvinyl...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I create a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit machine then?
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3744 did not tell me much.
Thanks!
Use this as a start:
I wrote a utility (attached) to make the process really fast and easy:
jail_build(8): Build FreeBSD jails from binary distributions
Here's a simple howto:
Step 1: Create a landing zone for your binary distribution (jail_build(8) looks
in `/usr/repos' for binary distributions)...
sudo mkdir
Devin == Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com writes:
Devin sudo cd /usr/repos
This is pretty useless. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Devin == Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com writes:
Devin sudo cd /usr/repos
This is pretty useless. :)
I'd say it's _absolutely_ useless ^_^
Yes, indeed, the `sudo' should be omitted.
--
Cheers,
Devin Teske
- CONTACT INFORMATION -
My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is weather
this pulls updates from packages or ports.
P.s. I think I asked this before but it got lost in some other hubbub. So
appologies if I did ask already.
___
freebsd-questions
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is
weather this pulls updates from packages or ports.
There are a few applications, such as opera, that can phone home and
check for newer versions
On 11/27/2010 07:01 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500
Chris Brennanxa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is
weather this pulls updates from packages or ports.
There are a few applications, such as opera, that can phone
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Steven Susbauer ste...@too1337.com wrote:
On 11/27/2010 07:01 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:36:09 -0500
Chris Brennanxa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
My fbsd desktop is popping up with Software Update. My question is
weather this pulls updates from
On 11/18/10 03:12, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 16:58, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Thanks.
I got it. But it seems that my first porting task run into some difficulties
for the advanced porters, since there is no autotool environment.
By the way, the global
2010/11/18 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Well,
in this case, it would really be a 'nice to have', maybe this is worth a PR?
Try asking on the ports@ list. I'm not sure what the criteria is for
something being listed there - if something isn't going to be used by
very many ports, it
On 11/18/10 13:52, Rob Farmer wrote:
2010/11/18 O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Well,
in this case, it would really be a 'nice to have', maybe this is worth a PR?
Try asking on the ports@ list. I'm not sure what the criteria is for
something being listed there - if something isn't
Hello.
I try to create a port of a software which does not have a Makefile and
is build via a propriate csh script. Installation is done temporarely
into some lib's and exe's subfolder withing the source folder, so I need
to tell the top level Makefile of the port to use a specific build
2010/11/17 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Hello.
I try to create a port of a software which does not have a Makefile and is
build via a propriate csh script. Installation is done temporarely into some
lib's and exe's subfolder withing the source folder, so I need to tell the
top
On 11/17/10 22:01, Rob Farmer wrote:
2010/11/17 O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Hello.
I try to create a port of a software which does not have a Makefile and is
build via a propriate csh script. Installation is done temporarely into some
lib's and exe's subfolder withing the source
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 16:58, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Thanks.
I got it. But it seems that my first porting task run into some difficulties
for the advanced porters, since there is no autotool environment.
By the way, the global environment variable ${CSH} seems to
, one with). I
was wondering if there is software that will test the CPUs in a similar manner?
Thanks,
Ricky
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information
doesn't
for some reason), and it found no errors in two passes (one without ECC, one
with). I was wondering if there is software that will test the CPUs in a
similar manner?
Thanks,
Ricky
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
is
addressed. If you believe
On Friday 08 October 2010 01:12:55 Robert Bonomi wrote:
he'll tell you: I need to review the copyright notices, licenses, and
distribution restricions on _each_and_every_ item in that package. Go
check _every_ file you intend to include, bring me a list showing
1) every file name
2)
vendor states
that it applies to the entire tarball on their website. You should
reasonably expect that each piece of software (ie directory) within
contrib may be under a different license and needs to be reviewed.
It´s not about what a lawyer or an accountant expects or doesn´t.
It´s about what
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
mer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
[SNIP]
Or a third alternative... use the ACPI implementation from OpenBSD,
which doesn't have such a restriction.
Port it! I'll test it for you (on 9-CURRENT and, if possible, a
backport to 8-STABLE).
In your
:
By clicking on and downloading Fedora, you agree to comply with the
following terms and conditions:
Fedora software and technical information is subject to the U.S.
Export Administration Regulations and other U.S. and foreign law, and
may not be exported or re-exported to certain countries
Usually, the implications of distributing stuff internationally have a
really strict realation with what is exactly what you want to
export? ... which in this case, leads you straight into the reading
of the terms of the licenses of the software subject to international
distribution
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 03:23, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote:
Im saying what I already said.
And yet, you haven't really addressed my
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 03:23, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:19, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have a point, then there´s no point in me addressing your point
.. unless you are asking me for legal advice ..
Should that be the case, just let me know; I charge by the hour .. no
pro bono.
Seeing as your messages
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:23:02 +0200
From: Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se
To: Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com
Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Like it or not, Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping
export-restricted software
On 10/07/2010 12:46 PM, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:19, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have a point, then there´s no point in me addressing your point
.. unless you are asking me for legal advice ..
Should that be the case, just let me know; I charge by the hour
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:46:34 -0700
Subject: Re: Like it or not,
Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software
in the core
I understand that entirely. Which is why it would be reasonable (and
downright ethical
On 10/7/10 6:47 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:46:34 -0700
Subject: Re: Like it or not,
Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software
in the core
I understand that entirely. Which is why it would
Glen == Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com writes:
Glen Can this thread go away now?
Only when the problem goes away.
Is there a comprehensive list of restrictive sublicenses, or pointers to
same, somewhere prominent at the top of the core distro?
Or maybe some tool that would dynamically
On 7/10/2010 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote:
I would assume you already did that before walking into my office to
ask me about the set of licenses up for a review ... otherwise,
there´s no way to me to look close enough where I wasn´t asked to look
...
If you go tell your Dr. you have a
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 05:47:23PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Pure and simple, _if_ there is software involved, there *MAY* be export-
control issues.
*ANYONE* in the business of exporting software _should_ be aware of that
fact, and as a matter of basic 'due diligence' know about _their_
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Oct 7 18:28:10 2010
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:29:46 +1000
From: Danny Carroll f...@dannysplace.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Like it or not,
Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted
software in the core
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/178267
And yes, there it is, in /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/hardware/hwsleep.c:
* 4.3. Licensee shall not export, either directly or indirectly, any of this
* software or system incorporating such software without first obtaining any
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:40:54 -0700
mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/178267
...
So, is such approval on file with the FreeBSD Foundation?
without first obtaining _any_ _required_ license or other
approval ...
It doesn't say
RW == RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
RW It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if it's
RW required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's needed if
RW it's needed.
But doesn't this then shift the burden to every exporter, knowing or
unknowing, willing or
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:16:37 -0700
Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com articulated:
RW == RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
RW It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if
RW it's required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's
RW needed if it's
Jerry == Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net writes:
But doesn't this then shift the burden to every exporter, knowing or
unknowing, willing or unwilling?
Seems like an onerous burden. Is it well-documented?
Jerry Are you familiar with the axiom:
Jerry Ignorantia juris non excusat or
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:16:37PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
RW == RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
RW It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if it's
RW required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's needed if
RW it's needed.
But doesn't this
required to do so anyway.
Erik AFAICT the paragraph in question does not add any restrictions or
Erik burdens, it just points out potentially existing ones.
Yes, you always have to obey the law when you export. But this clause
seems to imply that the associated software *knowingly* triggers
to imply that the associated software *knowingly* triggers the
export laws, probably in a bad way.
Do you have a different opinion, and is it a legal opinion?
Either this clause needs to be hoisted to the front page of the FreeBSD
distro proper (Some software contained within may be subject
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 14:46, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
I understand that entirely. Which is why it would be reasonable (and
downright ethical) to ensure that every FreeBSD integrator be made well
aware of this restriction.
It hadn't occurred to *me* for example to
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Making the license more visible may be a good idea, but doesn't
Rob materially change the situation any.
I agree, it doesn't change it materially.
But for the casual integrator, making it very visible would help.
--
Randal L. Schwartz -
Rob Farmer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 14:46, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com
wrote:
I understand that entirely. Which is why it would be reasonable (and
downright ethical) to ensure that every FreeBSD integrator be made well
aware of this restriction.
It hadn't occurred to
Michael Powell wrote:
[snip] export restrictions have to do with acpi? Is
acpi a copyrighted, patented, or trademark otherwise owned by some entity?
Quite possibly so as it is in contrib. I just have no idea who might own
it. Or how it would fall afoul of crypto export restrictions.
Looking
Michael == Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com writes:
Michael I was under the impression that the most onerous of these
Michael export rules and restrictions applied to crypto technology. If
Michael this is so, what I don't quite grasp is what do crypto export
Michael restrictions have to do
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 03:40 pm, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/178267
And yes, there it is, in
/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/hardware/hwsleep.c:
* 4.3. Licensee shall not export, either directly or indirectly,
any of this * software
Jung-uk == Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes:
Jung-uk Please stop the FUD. ACPICA is actually triple-licensed, i.e.,
Jung-uk generic Intel software license, (three-clause) BSD-like license, and
Jung-uk GPLv2.
[...]
Jung-uk Historically FreeBSD never touched the license header. However, I
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 20:04, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that the most onerous of these export rules and
restrictions applied to crypto technology. If this is so, what I don't quite
grasp is what do crypto export restrictions have to do with acpi? Is
El 06/10/2010 11:18 p.m., Rob Farmer escribió:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 14:46, Randal L. Schwartzmer...@stonehenge.com wrote:
I understand that entirely. Which is why it would be reasonable (and
downright ethical) to ensure that every FreeBSD integrator be made well
aware of this restriction.
El 07/10/2010 12:11 a.m., Randal L. Schwartz escribió:
Michael == Michael Powellnightre...@hotmail.com writes:
Michael I was under the impression that the most onerous of these
Michael export rules and restrictions applied to crypto technology. If
Michael this is so, what I don't quite
/hwsleep.c - it is in all the files
within the acpica contrib directory, plus the upstream vendor states
that it applies to the entire tarball on their website. You should
reasonably expect that each piece of software (ie directory) within
contrib may be under a different license and needs
. But this clause
seems to imply that the associated software *knowingly* triggers the
export laws, probably in a bad way.
Do you have a different opinion, and is it a legal opinion?
To me it looks much more like a case of some corporate standard
cover-your-ass boilerplate text that is used regardless
On 09/21/2010 10:17 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:56:13 -0700
According to the FreeBSD website
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/outgoing-only.html), the easiest
way
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:34:15 -0500
Ryan Coleman edi...@d3photography.com articulated:
I'm thinking about installing either ezmlm or mailman.
I'm not against others; thoughts?
DADA Mail, http://dadamailproject.com/ is an excellent program. It is
not in the ports system although it is on my
lists on majord...@berklix.org to mailman.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Munich 18th Sept Free Software, Lectures Installs http://berklix.org/sdf/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Sep 22 00:32:52 2010
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 06:33:20 +0100
From: Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk
To: Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
Cc: Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Software to SEND log files only
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 06:33:20 +0100, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
Most mail servers will block sendmail's connections from a dynamic IP:
the advantage to ssmtp is that it forwards mail to the ISP's server.
That's sadly true (mostly because of the amounts of spam produced
by ordinary PCs
According to the FreeBSD website
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/outgoing-only.html), the easiest
way to send mail only is to install the mail/ssmtp port.
Does anyone have an example of a script or other method (maybe a cron
script?) that would e-mail my log files to me daily?
Thank you,
Ed
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com wrote:
According to the FreeBSD website
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/outgoing-only.html), the easiest
way to send mail only is to install the mail/ssmtp port.
Does anyone have an example of a script or other method (maybe
-- Original Message --
From: Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:56:13 -0700
According to the FreeBSD website
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/outgoing-only.html), the easiest
way to send mail only is to install the mail/ssmtp port.
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:56:13 -0700
From: Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Software to SEND log files only?
According to the FreeBSD website
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/outgoing-only.html), the easiest
way to send mail only is to install
I'm thinking about installing either ezmlm or mailman.
I'm not against others; thoughts?
--
Ryan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
101 - 200 of 1270 matches
Mail list logo
