Jack Barnett wrote:
Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD?
There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old
and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it.
Are there any other options available?
One more word for qemu. Works much faster with kqemu
right
On Feb 15, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i think it uses kemu, but its really a simple installation process,
the whole thing is just a package, contained in the iso image i
linked earlier.
i will look at it for fun, but - i always prefer "normal" than
"simple" installati
i think it uses kemu, but its really a simple installation process, the whole
thing is just a package, contained in the iso image i linked earlier.
i will look at it for fun, but - i always prefer "normal" than "simple"
installation process because it's good to know what actually happened.
__
i think it uses kemu, but its really a simple installation process,
the whole thing is just a package, contained in the iso image i linked
earlier.
On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
noone mentioned www.win4bsd.com , win4bsd can be used to run a
windows machine from within
noone mentioned www.win4bsd.com , win4bsd can be used to run a windows
machine from within freebsd nicely. performance is pretty good also.
does it need special requirements on kernel versions, modules etc?
On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:54 AM, neal wrote:
On Thursday 24 January 2008, Jack Barnett wr
Hey,
to download it:
For Win4BSD: ftp://ftp.vbridges.com/pub/releases/bsd/pro/1.1/Win4BSD-1.1.iso
I think you can try the trial for 30 days, after that, its 29.99USD
Thanks,
David
On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Jack Barnett wrote:
Hrm... I can't find it in the ports or a download version
Hrm... I can't find it in the ports or a download version of it?
I don't mind paying for it, but want to see if it actually works well
before buying it.
David Schulz wrote:
noone mentioned www.win4bsd.com , win4bsd can be used to run a windows
machine from within freebsd nicely. performance
noone mentioned www.win4bsd.com , win4bsd can be used to run a windows
machine from within freebsd nicely. performance is pretty good also.
On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:54 AM, neal wrote:
On Thursday 24 January 2008, Jack Barnett wrote:
So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other
option
On Thursday 24 January 2008, Jack Barnett wrote:
> So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other
> options?
I'm planning to do something similar but have moved to
Kubuntu to run VMWare, then I can run PCBSD as a
vm 'thingy' ;).
neal.
___
f
Jack Barnett wrote:
Robert Eckardt wrote:
It depends on what you want to do.
To clarify, I would like to run Windows XP at least
VMWare runs WinXP beautifully - but unfortunately VMWare doesn't well
under FreeBSD.
Last time I tried Qemu it was fairly slow.
So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed
Jack Barnett wrote:
> To clarify, I would like to run Windows XP at least
>
> VMWare runs WinXP beautifully - but unfortunately VMWare doesn't well
> under FreeBSD.
> Last time I tried Qemu it was fairly slow.
>
> So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other options?
Some other ideas...
Robert Eckardt wrote:
It depends on what you want to do.
To clarify, I would like to run Windows XP at least
VMWare runs WinXP beautifully - but unfortunately VMWare doesn't well
under FreeBSD.
Last time I tried Qemu it was fairly slow.
So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any o
El día Wednesday, January 23, 2008 a las 10:53:31PM +0100, Robert Eckardt
escribió:
> > VMWare on FreeBSD is a no-op. Someone should really remove that port.
>
> That's nonsense.
> The current (very old) port is quite out-dated and it took me some time
> to get it running right e.g. with VMwar
If you just want to run other FreeBSD's I whould try jail ( man jail ).
It's covered in the handbook too..
and it works PERFECT.
i run 14 jails on one machine, no problems.
the only (but big) disadventage are lack of IPv6 in jail. hope it will be
fixed.
___
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:23:16 -0500, Bill Moran wrote
> In response to Jack Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD?
> >
> > There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old
> > and still
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:11 -0600, Jack Barnett wrote:
> Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD?
>
> There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old
Jails and as a Xen guest --- probably with a NetBSD or GNU/Linux host.
There's always Solaris
In response to Jack Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD?
>
> There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old
> and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it.
VMWare on FreeBSD is a no-op. Someone
Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 13:11 -0600 schrieb Jack Barnett:
> Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD?
>
> There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old
> and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it.
>
> Are there any other opt
Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD?
There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old
and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it.
Are there any other options available?
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
19 matches
Mail list logo