On Thursday, October 06, 2005, at 07:22AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
*** MySQL Log 4.1.14 ***
051002 17:41:47 1 Connect Access denied for user
'abbc'@'localhost' (using password: YES)
This is the same authentication problem seen from the other side.
051002
On 10/5/05, Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2005 02:17 CEST schrieb Peter Wemm:
On Friday 30 September 2005 06:22 am, Olaf Greve wrote:
Then, I'm currently configuring a second beast, ee, server. :)
Being an AMD-64 19 server, running FreeBSD 5.4-Release
Am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2005 02:17 CEST schrieb Peter Wemm:
On Friday 30 September 2005 06:22 am, Olaf Greve wrote:
Then, I'm currently configuring a second beast, ee, server. :)
Being an AMD-64 19 server, running FreeBSD 5.4-Release AMD64. On it,
I instinctively installed the
On Wednesday, October 05, 2005, at 07:31AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, 3 October 2005 at 10:37:21 -0800, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 10/3/2005 09:41, Jared Kuolt seems to have typed:
There really isn't any reason not to
anymore since everything is backwards
On Wednesday, 5 October 2005 at 7:51:33 -0800, Peter Giessel wrote:
On Wednesday, October 05, 2005, at 07:31AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, 3 October 2005 at 10:37:21 -0800, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 10/3/2005 09:41, Jared Kuolt seems to have typed:
There
On Friday 30 September 2005 06:22 am, Olaf Greve wrote:
Then, I'm currently configuring a second beast, ee, server. :)
Being an AMD-64 19 server, running FreeBSD 5.4-Release AMD64. On it,
I instinctively installed the latest MySQL 4.0.x version (being
4.0.26) and it works flawlessly with
Am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2005 02:17 CEST schrieb Peter Wemm:
On Friday 30 September 2005 06:22 am, Olaf Greve wrote:
Then, I'm currently configuring a second beast, ee, server. :)
Being an AMD-64 19 server, running FreeBSD 5.4-Release AMD64. On it,
I instinctively installed the latest
On Monday, 3 October 2005 at 10:37:21 -0800, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 10/3/2005 09:41, Jared Kuolt seems to have typed:
There really isn't any reason not to
anymore since everything is backwards compatible.
I've found that Dovecot 1.0a3 has a problem with 4.1.x,
Can you give more details?
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for your answers!
I see that MySQL v5 is not mature enough for my likings to risk the
gamble already, and presently I have no need for triggers and stored
procedures (though they can be very handy, of course).
Regarding version 4.0.x versus 4.1.x: the same applies as
On 10/01/05 00:08 Andrew P. said the following:
linuxthreads were only important on FreeBSD 4.x.
Starting with 5.x we have a more efficient threading
model. Extensive testing did not reveal any significant
is this definitive, i.e. that on 5.x linuxthreads are worse off than native
freebsd
Olafo,
I've found that 4.1 works perfectly! It has been running on my web
servers, the longest one being just over 200 days, which was just after
MySQL 4.1 was pulled out of gamma and into release. 0 troubles at all.
I definitely recommend upgrading. There really isn't any reason not to
anymore
On 10/3/05, Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/01/05 00:08 Andrew P. said the following:
linuxthreads were only important on FreeBSD 4.x.
Starting with 5.x we have a more efficient threading
model. Extensive testing did not reveal any significant
is this definitive, i.e. that on
On 10/3/2005 09:41, Jared Kuolt seems to have typed:
There really isn't any reason not to
anymore since everything is backwards compatible.
I've found that Dovecot 1.0a3 has a problem with 4.1.x, 4.0.x works
perfectly with Dovecot though. Anyway, not *everything* seems to
be backward
Hi,
I've got a MySQL 4.0.16 DB running with several DB instances in it. So
far, so good, but I'm looking for a bit of advice.
I've got a few small questions:
Firstly: is it (for a webserver) better to compile MySQL with
linux-threads or without? I seem to recall having read that Linux uses
On 9/30/05, Olaf Greve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've got a MySQL 4.0.16 DB running with several DB instances in it. So
far, so good, but I'm looking for a bit of advice.
I've got a few small questions:
Firstly: is it (for a webserver) better to compile MySQL with
linux-threads or
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:08:32PM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. wrote:
As for the MySQL version (branch) - the only
difference you should care about is feature set.
If you feel comfortable without triggers and
stored procedures (their absence makes
many professional
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:25:37AM -0700 or thereabouts, Freddie Cash wrote:
Scott Long and Kris Kenneway ran various benchmarks back in the early
5.x days comparing MySQL 4 compiled with LinuxThreads, libc_r, libkse
(the default threading library on 5.x and 6.x), and libthr. In
17 matches
Mail list logo
