the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially planned).
4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like
/usr/local/ or other parts of the system).
The server accessing the data will be of two types :
1. 2 x Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS
2. 4 x FreeBSD (mainly 8
and of clients to support this file system
(including snapshots)
3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially planned).
4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like
/usr/local/ or other parts of the system).
The server accessing the data
to use ZFS and of clients to support this file system
(including snapshots)
3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially planned).
4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like
/usr/local/ or other parts of the system).
The server
that was to grant 5 or six critical servers access
to the NAS so that they can take advantage of :
1. space available on the NAS
2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file
system (including snapshots)
3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I
of :
1. space available on the NAS
2. ability of the NAS to use ZFS and of clients to support this file system
(including snapshots)
3. Access the server using iSCSI (at least this is what I initially
planned).
4. Mount part of their filesystem using data stored on the SAN (like
and using iSCSI over gigabit
Ethernet
so I can build zfs volumes from the iSCSI disks.
Poking around, the reports say that FreeBSD is a pretty good iSCSI
server in such forms as freenas, but a lousy iSCSI client, with the
first problem being that that kludges are required to get iSCSI
volumes
On 2012-10-29 08:29, John Levine wrote:
I'm trying to set up a freebsd image under vmware, but I need more
disk
space than the vmware hosts offer. So the guy who runs the hosting
place
suggests getting a 1U disk server and using iSCSI over gigabit
Ethernet
so I can build zfs volumes from
- Original Message -
From: Paul Wootton cas...@caspersworld.co.uk
To: Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone Tried to use iPXE to boot with iSCSI?
On 09/20/12 01:42, Bill Tillman wrote:
Interesting project you've got
On 19/09/2012 06:53, dweimer wrote:
I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could get
a system booting with no local disk using iSCSI running from my
FreeNAS box.
I got started, by first booting a 9.1-RC1 CD, into live CD, created a
/tmp/iscsi.conf used kldload to load
On 2012-09-20 09:42, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 19/09/2012 06:53, dweimer wrote:
I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could
get
a system booting with no local disk using iSCSI running from my
FreeNAS box.
I got started, by first booting a 9.1-RC1 CD, into live CD
I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could get a
system booting with no local disk using iSCSI running from my FreeNAS
box.
I got started, by first booting a 9.1-RC1 CD, into live CD, created a
/tmp/iscsi.conf used kldload to load the iscsi initiator, connected
- Original Message -
From: dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net
To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 1:53 AM
Subject: Anyone Tried to use iPXE to boot with iSCSI?
I was just trying some proof of concept testing to see if I could get
Folks
I have a FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE system that I'm connecting via iSCSI to a
Compellent SAN. The iscsi-initiator works fine but is very slow and given
to periodic (very short) hangs. The issue is that we have subversion on
it and it takes a long time to checkout some of our repos. Any
iqn = iqn.2010-09.com.enovafinancial:01:nut.postgres01
authmethod = none
I think you don't need such lines in iscsi.conf
Login session:
postgres01# iscontrol -v -n path1
After that what do you see in 'dmesg -a'?
And do you have logs at the iscsi target (3par)?
--
View this message
Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of timp
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 1:25 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 3par iscsi with 8.2?
No, I`m not. But have some experience in iscsi.
What kind
No, I`m not. But have some experience in iscsi.
What kind of trouble do you have?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/3par-iscsi-with-8-2-tp4306095p4307912.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Is anyone connecting to 3par SAN units using iscsi with release 8.2?
I am trying to do this, and having some trouble.
-Derek
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
I am trying to connect my FreeBSD 8.1 system to a FreeNAS server
hosting an iSCSI drive. I can successfully connect if I disable header
and data digests, but can't seem to get a connection using header and
data digests to succeed. I know the FreeNAS side is correct because I
was able
I am trying to install FreeBSD-8.1 on a iscsi target disk but when I start
installation it complains about No Hard disk found. I have iscsi enabled
network adapter and I can configure the iscsi disk in the network adapter's
iscsi ROM. When the system boots up from FreeBSD installation CD, I go
After scratching my head for a few weeks, I've decided to ask for some help.
First, I've got two machines connected by gigabit ethernet, network performance
is not a problem as I am able to substantially saturate the wire when not using
iscsi [say iperf] or ftp. Both systems are 8.1-RELENG
On 08.11.2010 09:13, DJ wrote:
After scratching my head for a few weeks, I've decided to ask for some help.
First, I've got two machines connected by gigabit ethernet, network
performance is not a problem as I am able to substantially saturate the wire
when not using iscsi [say iperf
Hello!
I have to implement Bacula using NetApp iscsi. I have already searched
for a while, but found only solutions for 7.x and higher or FreeBSD as
a iscsi target.
How can i do that on 6.4?
Greetings
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
work into a FreeBSD/iscsi-target:
# iscontrol -c /etc/iscsi.conf -n target0
iscontrol[817]: running
iscontrol[817]: (pass3:iscsi0:0:0:0): tagged openings now 0
iscontrol[817]: cam_open_btl: no passthrough device found at 2:0:1
iscontrol[817]: cam_open_btl: no passthrough device found at 2:0:2
Hello,
I am currently using a 7.2-STABLE with iSCSI enabled in the kernel. I
have tried to enable a file system which is 2.4TB in size (this is on
an amd64 architecture). I have followed different documentations I
found and can export an iSCSI target fine and initiate the iSCSI drive
either
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In our last exciting episode, Danny Braniss (da...@cs.huji.ac.il) said:
I guess it's time to fix this.
danny
Thank you very much for the pointer
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm running into some odd headaches regarding what looks like iSCSI initiat=
ors
going to sleep for approximately 30 seconds before returning to life
I'm running into some odd headaches regarding what looks like iSCSI initiators
going to sleep for approximately 30 seconds before returning to life and
pumping a ton of information back to the target. While this is happening,
system load climbs up alarmingly fast. Looking at tcpdumps in Wireshark
Hello
All is in the subject :-) Does anyone has setup such server configuration
A server running FreeBSD and supporting Samba server software with
OpenLDAP backend and using iSCSI as disk access protocol
to a Netapp filer for Samba volumes ?
I plan this so passed experiences are welcome
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr wrote:
Hello
All is in the subject :-) Does anyone has setup such server configuration
A server running FreeBSD and supporting Samba server software with OpenLDAP
backend and using iSCSI as disk access protocol
to a Netapp
Hi,
To gain an understanding on the performance of iSCSI vs. local disk IO
I'm looking for a tool.
My first thought was about iozone...
Any other ideas?
Thanks much in advance for your help,
-ewald
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
To gain an understanding on the performance of iSCSI vs. local disk IO
I'm looking for a tool.
My first thought was about iozone...
Any other ideas?
for linear transfer:dd
of course iSCSI disk will always be slower
___
freebsd-questions
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
To gain an understanding on the performance of iSCSI vs. local disk IO
I'm looking for a tool.
My first thought was about iozone...
iozone is ok, but a little complex to run. Any disk benchmark will be ok
- bonnie++, blogbench, etc. but each has an emphasis
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
To gain an understanding on the performance of iSCSI vs. local disk IO
I'm looking for a tool.
My first thought was about iozone...
bonnie++ is ok too.
Any other ideas?
Thanks much in advance for your help,
-ewald
not filesystem?
he asked about disk benchmarked not disk+filesystem
Make sure you know what you're benchmarking - for example if the iSCSI
drive (target) is hosted as a file in a regular file system, it will be
overly (and dangerously) cached on the server
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
My first thought was about iozone...
iozone is ok, but a little complex to run. Any disk benchmark will be ok
- bonnie++, blogbench, etc. but each has an emphasis on a different
aspect of the system. I think bonnie++ will be the simplest in your case.
can bonnie++
Ivan Voras wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:29:06PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently brought to my
Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:29:06PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently
2008/11/26 Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well good news ! it seems to be integrated inside
operating system isn't it ?
Yes, the patch is for -CURRENT (which means it will be present in the
8.0 release; bug the developers if you need it earlier).
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently brought to my attention problems with
iSCSI on FreeBSD. There is a patch available which fixes the issue, but
I felt you might want to know about
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently brought to my attention problems with
iSCSI on FreeBSD. There is a patch available which fixes the issue, but
I felt you
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently brought to my attention problems with
iSCSI on FreeBSD. There is a patch available which fixes the issue, but
I felt you
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:29:06PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently brought to my attention problems with
iSCSI on FreeBSD
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:29:06PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:44:23PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has tried to use ZFS over iSCSI ?
Another FreeBSD user recently brought to my attention problems
Hi,
My company is a storage RAID system company. There is one customer ask iSCSI
solution with my production of my company with FreeBSD 6.1. But I found some
information in the Internet, the iSCSI full support on FreeBSD is 7.0. Is it
mean FreeBSD 6.1 can’t support iSCSI?
BR,
Jeff
Jeff Chen - PTT 陳龍焜 wrote:
Hi,
My company is a storage RAID system company. There is one customer ask iSCSI
solution with my production of my company with FreeBSD 6.1. But I found some
information in the Internet, the iSCSI full support on FreeBSD is 7.0. Is it
mean FreeBSD 6.1 can’t
can't be iSCSI client, but iscsi-target is userlevel app, you may run on
any FreeBSD (most probably under any unix).
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Jeff Chen - PTT 陳龍焜 wrote:
Hi,
My company is a storage RAID system company. There is one customer ask iSCSI
solution with my production of my company with FreeBSD 6.1. But I found some
information in the Internet, the iSCSI full support on FreeBSD is 7.0. Is it
mean FreeBSD 6.1 can’t
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does open-iscsi has been ported to FreeBSD at 7.x ?
it doesn't seems to be at 6.x
Seems to be a linux specific implementation of iscsi and gnu licenced so
no we dont. However we have iscsi_initiator(4) in 7.x see the man pages
for details.
For a iscsi target
Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does open-iscsi has been ported to FreeBSD at 7.x ?
it doesn't seems to be at 6.x
Seems to be a linux specific implementation of iscsi and gnu licenced so
no we dont. However we have iscsi_initiator(4) in 7.x see the man pages
for details
Hello
Does open-iscsi has been ported to FreeBSD at 7.x ?
it doesn't seems to be at 6.x
thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm with a very strange problem in the FreeBSD 7.0R
I use the iscsi_initiator to mount two devices of a Dell MD3000i, the
file system is UFS.
The problem occurs when I make a copy of a great directory for inside of
the /data/email directory, passed some minutes of beginning of copy, the
SSH
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE on amd64 and want to connect
to an iSCSI storage array that has dual SAN controllers. I have
two independent paths between my FreeBSD box and the storage
array -- dual NICs, ethernet switches, and controllers.
Given my situation, I want to ensure I get better
Please clarify these :
(1) Is iSCSI initiator not currently implemented for FreeBSD ?
no idea.
(2) There is no iSCSI target daemon currently ?
/usr/ports/net/iscsi-target
unless you HAVE to interwork with iSCSI, use ggate.
___
freebsd-questions
Please clarify these :
(1) Is iSCSI initiator not currently implemented for FreeBSD ?
(2) There is no iSCSI target daemon currently ?
Check this post, it has step by step instructions for 6.x:
http://www.southernledger.com/blogs/ee99ee/?p=33
Please clarify these :
(1) Is iSCSI initiator not currently implemented for FreeBSD ?
(2) There is no iSCSI target daemon currently ?
Regards,
Onkar
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
* Onkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-16-2008]:
(1) Is iSCSI initiator not currently implemented for FreeBSD ?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
(2) There is no iSCSI target daemon currently ?
net
Sahil Tandon wrote:
* Onkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-16-2008]:
(1) Is iSCSI initiator not currently implemented for FreeBSD ?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
(2) There is no iSCSI
At my place of work, we're looking at implementing a SAN, most likely
with iSCSI, some time next year, and likely about 5-10TBytes.
I was wondering if FreeBSD could provide this on COTS hardware, but my
googling hasn't been successful.
From my reading of this list over the past couple of years
On 10/10/07, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At my place of work, we're looking at implementing a SAN, most likely
with iSCSI, some time next year, and likely about 5-10TBytes.
I was wondering if FreeBSD could provide this on COTS hardware, but my
googling hasn't been successful.
From my
On 10/10/07, pete wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/07, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At my place of work, we're looking at implementing a SAN, most likely
with iSCSI, some time next year, and likely about 5-10TBytes.
I was wondering if FreeBSD could provide this on COTS
hi all,
i have tried googling for the current status of iSCSI software and
hardware HBA support in FreeBSD. A lot of the hit's seem pretty
stale. Is there active development going on with support hardware
iSCSI HBA's in current by any chance? I have not been able to find
any listed cards
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:52, DAve wrote:
We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I
have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI
without much success.
We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more
In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said:
The developers response, for those who are interested.
hi Dave,
the initiator for iSCSI will hit stable/current real soon now.
that was the good news, now for the down side:
what was missing all along was recovery from network disconnects, so
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said:
The developers response, for those who are interested.
hi Dave,
the initiator for iSCSI will hit stable/current real soon now.
that was the good news, now for the down side:
what was missing all along was recovery from network
That only works if the target comes up within the 2min window that
SCSI allows for. It won't wait forever.
On 1/9/07, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 09), DAve said:
The developers response, for those who are interested.
hi Dave,
the initiator for iSCSI
returns.
Not sure if that is important as iSCSI is all new to me, still reading up on
it. Does FreeBSD do anything special to a NFS mount when it returns?
'k, maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but iSCSI != NFS ... iSCSI is just
removing your SCSI drives from your local server and putting them
a fsck when
the mount returns.
Not sure if that is important as iSCSI is all new to me, still reading up on
it. Does FreeBSD do anything special to a NFS mount when it returns?
'k, maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but iSCSI != NFS
I never said it was, my rather poor example (I said I was new
I never said it was, my rather poor example (I said I was new to iSCSI)
was if a remote file system crashes, who should fsck it? The server
(Target) or the client (Initiator)?
---
Clearly, the initiator. It owns the filesystem. Its just a big
anonymous file on the target with no relevant
We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I
have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI
without much success.
We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the
queue/on order. It is looking like FreeBSD may not provide
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:52, DAve wrote:
We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I
have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI
without much success.
We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the
queue
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:06 -0500 DAve wrote:
We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I
have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and
iSCSI without much success.
We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more in the
queue
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:52, DAve wrote:
We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I
have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and iSCSI
without much success.
We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several more
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:52:06 -0500 DAve wrote:
We are moving to SAN in the near future to resolve a host of issues. I
have been looking through archives for information on FreeBSD and
iSCSI without much success.
We currently have 15 servers running FreeBSD and several
I got bored, installed this on 5.3 with a Netapp F880.
Slow isnt the word..anyone else try this with similar results?
Like..max write speed is 600k/sec.
On 10/23/06, freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to have my mailboxes put on iSCSI (NetAPP).
I downloaded iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2
Hi,
I'm trying to have my mailboxes put on iSCSI (NetAPP).
I downloaded iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2 and have several questions:
1) is there some more documentation on this driver?
2) someone has pointed out how to specify user and password to pass to
iscontrol?
3) Which is the correct way to put
Freebsd ever hope to have a stable supported iscsi layer?
Thanks for any hints.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:37:27PM -0700, Jeff Mohler wrote:
Freebsd ever hope to have a stable supported iscsi layer?
Thanks for any hints.
I plan to starting testing FreeBSD 6.2 (when it is released) and iSCSI
within the next few weeks. We have seattled on an HP DL360 with a Broadcom
NIC
Hi there,
can FreeBSD be used as an iSCSI target (i.e., serving the iscsi disks) ?
idem AoE ...?
thanks!
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
He loves nature in spite of what it did to him.
Forrest Tucker
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot
for this, but can
anyone point me in the right direction. iSCSI seems to be it, but I'm
not sure.
all, don't get network attached storage confused with network attached
filesystem confused with clustered filesystem.
if you go for fibre channel network attached storage, it dosen't matter
if the host
from people.
ICBW but to me it seems that iSCSI is like a distributed NFS backend. You can
store the data on multiple devices, in multiple forms (as long as they
all talk iSCSI). You can also have two storage sites (geographically
separate) connected by fibre and use those for storage.
same
In the last episode (Nov 22), Wojciech Puchar said:
from people.
ICBW but to me it seems that iSCSI is like a distributed NFS backend. You
can
store the data on multiple devices, in multiple forms (as long as they
all talk iSCSI). You can also have two storage sites (geographically
just a cheap PC with cheap IDE drives..
Whole devices accessed directly can be a lot faster than NFS, since the
client doesn't have to constantly ask the NFS server whether the file
it's currently accessing has changed.
any problem to add such option to NFS?? with iSCSI you just CAN't do
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Whole devices accessed directly can be a lot faster than NFS, since the
client doesn't have to constantly ask the NFS server whether the file
it's currently accessing has changed.
any problem to add such option to NFS?? with iSCSI you just CAN't do it.
anyway
iSCSI enables block access to drives over IP. There is only so much you can
do with NFS and SMB.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: November 21, 2005 6:25 PM
To: Josh Endries
Cc: freebsd
affect of transfer speed for ONE process reading one file, but not
multiuser system.
Regardless of whether iSCSI is any good, it's a common access method for SAN
devices, and from what I've been told, may be the *only* access method. So
AFAIK it's SCSI over FC, SCSI over IP was next probably
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:13:45PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
anyway - for already existing iSCSI devices driver won't hurt of course,
but i'm sure nobody that understand things won't invest in such
technologies.
I've been looking at iSCSI, but if someone can suggest a better
alternative
I read in the status report that work is being done on iSCSI, which
is awesome. We're putting in a SAN at work, starting at probably 8 TB
and growing. I'm currently looking at a Coraid AoE
(ATA-over-Ethernet) solution since it seems to have good support for
FreeBSD and Windows drivers in the works
and growing. I'm currently looking at a Coraid AoE
(ATA-over-Ethernet) solution since it seems to have good support for
FreeBSD and Windows drivers in the works. On the other hand, iSCSI
has Windows support and FreeBSD in the works.
stupid question: can anyone explain me the sense and adventages
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:24:49AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
and growing. I'm currently looking at a Coraid AoE
(ATA-over-Ethernet) solution since it seems to have good support for
FreeBSD and Windows drivers in the works. On the other hand, iSCSI
has Windows support and FreeBSD
Is there a mature implementation of either iSCSI targets or NDAS (Ximeta)
for FreeBSD?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the last episode (Sep 06), Ansar Mohammed said:
Is there a mature implementation of either iSCSI targets or NDAS
(Ximeta) for FreeBSD?
There were at least two attempts at an iSCSI driver, but neither ended
up releasing anything. ximeta's web site says NDAS is patented, but it
looks similar
- Original Message -
From: Justin Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD Hackers freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: iSCSI (revisited?)
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable
option for creating SANs?
refrase question.
I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production
FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from.
for one, it depends on how deep are your
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable
option for creating SANs?
I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production
FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from.
Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup solution that people have
Justin Bennett wrote:
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a
viable option for creating SANs?
I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production
FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from.
Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup
Justin Bennett wrote:
All,
I was wondering what people thought of iSCSI and FreeBSD. Is it a viable
option for creating SANs?
I want to move away from tape backups, and have numerous production
FreeBSD machines that I need to back up data from.
Any other ideas for a disk to disk backup
What version(s) of FreeBSD, if any, support iSCSI storage connectivity?
Is there an open source FreeBSD iSCSI driver which would work with
ethernet adapters listed on the hardware compatibility lists? Do FreeBSD
drivers exist for iSCSI HBAs by Adaptec, Alacritech, Qlogic and/or
Intel? Any relevent
In the last episode (Feb 28), Sam Farmer said:
What version(s) of FreeBSD, if any, support iSCSI storage connectivity?
Is there an open source FreeBSD iSCSI driver which would work with
ethernet adapters listed on the hardware compatibility lists? Do FreeBSD
drivers exist for iSCSI HBAs
Is there planned iSCSI support in FreeBSD 4 or 5.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
