On 09/12/13 20:58, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
>
>> On 09/12/13 17:52, Warren Block wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages. I
>
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 09/12/13 17:52, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages. I
need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system. Is
it possible, or do I have to f
On 09/12/13 17:52, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
>
>> I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages. I
>> need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system. Is
>> it possible, or do I have to find a wi
ize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
It is possible. The OS provides the newfs_msdos tool.
There is no need to deal with "Windows" for this task.
Great, thanks.
I checked the newfs manpage but didn't look too carefu
es.
>>>> I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
>>>> Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
>>>
>>> It is possible. The OS provides the newfs_msdos tool.
>>> There is no need to deal with "Windows&
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
Sure, it's possible. For maximum compatibility, I
On 09/12/13 15:51, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
>> I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
>> Is it possible, or do I have to find
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
> I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
> Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
It is possible. The OS provides t
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:13:11 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 09/12/13 15:51, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:39:26 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
> >> I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
> >> I need to initialize a usb memory
I can't seem to find how to do this in the handbook or man pages.
I need to initialize a usb memory stick with an msdos file system.
Is it possible, or do I have to find a windoze system?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
(sorry for top post)
Heh, looks like the Alton Brown style of debugging ;D (for anyone that follows
his twitter feed)
--
Devin
On Aug 8, 2013, at 7:34 AM, william benton wrote:
> I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able to
> mount and unmount it but i
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:34 AM, william benton wrote:
> I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able
> to mount and unmount it but i can't copy files into the stick. please see
> the attached image for the commands I used and the results. I
I am trying to mount a memory stick at the command line. I seem to be able to
mount and unmount it but i can't copy files into the stick. please see the
attached image for the commands I used and the results. If you have any
suggestions on what the problem might be I would sure like to
Dennis Glatting pki2.com> writes:
>
> Is this message indicating I have a memory error? I'm seeing this
> message across two systems, one below:
>
> FreeBSD mc 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r252678: Thu Jul 4 03:47:52
> PDT 2013 root mc:/usr/obj/disk-1/src/sy
Is this message indicating I have a memory error? I'm seeing this
message across two systems, one below:
FreeBSD mc 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r252678: Thu Jul 4 03:47:52
PDT 2013 root@mc:/usr/obj/disk-1/src/sys/SMUNI amd64
Jul 4 15:11:10 mc kernel: MCA: Bank 2, S
On 05/14/2013 08:56 PM, Joe wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 05/14/2013 08:32 PM, Joe wrote:
When stopping vnet jails get message about lost memory pages.
What console commands show available memory pages so I can determine the lost
memory pages after 100 stopped jails?
Want to find out if that
When stopping vnet jails get message about lost memory pages.
What console commands show available memory pages so I can determine the
lost memory pages after 100 stopped jails?
Want to find out if that lost memory page message is bogus or not.
Thanks
The solution was given at revision 233760.
Link for description:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=233760
Thanks to all!
--
Respectfully,
Stanislav Putrya
System administrator
FotoStrana.Ru Ltd.
ICQ IM: 328585847
Jabber-GoogleTalk: root.vagner
mob.phone SPB: +79215788755
mob.p
On 03/19/2013 13:06, Vagner wrote:
Hi all!
Tell me please, how may I remove shared memory segment like this:
T:m shmid:65537 shmkey:0 mode:--rw-rw-rw- owner:root group:wheel creator:root
cgroup:wheel
NATTCH:2 SEGSZ:1048576000 CPID:2982 LPID:54375 ATIME:10:29:12 DTIME:15:56:14
CTIME:10:51:00
Hi all!
Tell me please, how may I remove shared memory segment like this:
T:m shmid:65537 shmkey:0 mode:--rw-rw-rw- owner:root group:wheel creator:root
cgroup:wheel
NATTCH:2 SEGSZ:1048576000 CPID:2982 LPID:54375 ATIME:10:29:12 DTIME:15:56:14
CTIME:10:51:00
Pid 2982 and pid 54375 is killed
On 7/3/2013 12:17 μμ, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:01:03 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I have a process that eats up al memory,
in my case science/paraview if I try to
analyse a large model. What should FreeBSD
do when a process tries to use all RAM or more?
In this case, the swap
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:01:03 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I have a process that eats up al memory,
> in my case science/paraview if I try to
> analyse a large model. What should FreeBSD
> do when a process tries to use all RAM or more?
In this case, the swap space would be use
I have a process that eats up al memory,
in my case science/paraview if I try to
analyse a large model. What should FreeBSD
do when a process tries to use all RAM or more?
I my case I get a complete freeze, can't even
login from the console, and requiring a cold
reboot. I guess this i
.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Reed A. Cartwright wrote:
> I have a 512GB memory system that has a 480GB (or so) L2ARC, and a
> raidz2 storage pool. No dedup or compression is enabled. Although, I
> will enable compression in the future.
>
> By default vfs.zfs.arc_max is abou
I have a 512GB memory system that has a 480GB (or so) L2ARC, and a
raidz2 storage pool. No dedup or compression is enabled. Although, I
will enable compression in the future.
By default vfs.zfs.arc_max is about 300GB and the L2ARC is hardly touched.
I've seen a couple hints recently o
Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, wrote:
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel.
Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system.
Such as a loadable kernel module.
Can not be ris
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, wrote:
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel.
Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system.
Such as a loadable kernel module.
Can not be risking the security of
Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:38:05 -0600, wrote:
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU & memory resources?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has to be compiled
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:38:05 -0600, wrote:
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU & memory resources?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU & memory resources?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Dima Naumov gmail.com> writes:
>
> Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost
> dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed
> and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with
> video memory
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:15:06 +0700, Dima Naumov wrote:
> Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost
> dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed
> and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with
>
Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost
dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed
and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with
video memory?
___
freebsd
Hi,
I recently had a discussion of PostgreSQLs memory usage on FreeBSD,
notably the display of the different memory types in top, on the
PostgreSQL mailing list [1]. My server has 32GB ram, of which approx.
8GB vanish from tops display after a while. My question was wether there
is a memory
located?
>
> That's one very old laptop. I think you'll need to install more memory
> or downgrade FreeBSD to an earlier version.
1998, I think (HP Omnibook 900). I use it for small network testing and
serial console access. It works well for this.
Well I've put 8-STABLE o
:
>>
>> panic: kmem_malloc(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated?
>
> That's one very old laptop. I think you'll need to install more memory
> or downgrade FreeBSD to an earlier version.
>
> 9.1-RELEASE isn't available yet, only 9.1-RC1 & RC2. Give
ated?
That's one very old laptop. I think you'll need to install more memory
or downgrade FreeBSD to an earlier version.
9.1-RELEASE isn't available yet, only 9.1-RC1 & RC2. Given it's
prerelease code it's plausible the 9.1-RC2 kernel requires more memory
at boot than
Hi,
I'm updating an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.1 with 64 MB ram (44MB
available) but now FreeBSD 9.1 panics at boot time:
panic: kmem_malloc(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated?
Any work-around?
Thanks regards.
___
freebsd-questions@fre
Gilbert wrote:
> >> >> Mickaël Canévet writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
> >> >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
> >> >> >
> &
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Mickaël Canévet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:03 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Mickaël Canévet writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> >> Mickaël Canévet writes:
>> >>
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:03 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Mickaël Canévet writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >> Mickaël Canévet writes:
> >>
> >> > I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by th
Mickaël Canévet writes:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Mickaël Canévet writes:
>>
>> > I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
>> > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
>> >
>
Mickaël Canévet writes:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Mickaël Canévet writes:
>>
>> > I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
>> > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
>> >
>
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 13:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Mickaël Canévet writes:
>
> > I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
> >
> > What I noticed when the server was pag
Mickaël Canévet writes:
> I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
>
> What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
> about 500MB of my 4GB swap partition was used before
Hello,
I was impacted by a memory leak that has been fixed by this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/namei-leak.patch
What I noticed when the server was paging is that it seems that only
about 500MB of my 4GB swap partition was used before crashing. I was
wondering why it didn't
On 08/12/12 11:12, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Trying to run a Linux app under 9-STABLE. I can start it once and stop
it once but all subsequent efforts produces a core dump.
I believe the reason being that this app stores licensing information in
shared memory and when it stops first time it
Trying to run a Linux app under 9-STABLE. I can start it once and stop
it once but all subsequent efforts produces a core dump.
I believe the reason being that this app stores licensing information in
shared memory and when it stops first time it fails to remove this info.
Is there a sysctl
er
>> doing that, the original fcgi problem happens when starting apache2.2 with
>> mod_fcgid in the configuration and being loaded
>> [Tue Aug 07 13:09:12 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
>> Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
>
Tue Aug 07 13:09:12 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
Thanks!
Chad
Since you manually installed apache22 and mod_fcgid from up-stream
sources maybe you missed something. As a test create another jail and
install the p
(78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
Thanks!
Chad
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES" in rc.conf should do it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
59:35 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
I did a search on this and found that I would probably need a system kernel
parameter changed from 0 -> 1
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed
So I did that. (And restarted the jail)
)Function not implemented: mod_fcgid:
Can't create shared memory for size 1192488 bytes
I did a search on this and found that I would probably need a system kernel
parameter changed from 0 -> 1
security.jail.sysvipc_allowed
So I did that. (And restarted the jail). However, I still get
Hi,
After a binary update to 8.3 i'm seeing wired memory increase steadily
over the course of about a week, after which point i need to reboot the
machine as it starts swapping.
Several other boxes were updated at the same time, and all ports rebuilt
post upgrade.
FreeBSD x.x.co
On 4 July 2012 20:52, J B wrote:
> It is in ports:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
> jb
[10001 eitan@radar ~ ]%whereis xrestop
xrestop: /usr/ports/x11/xrestop
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
1083 root 1 210 99444K 11544K select 0 1:28 0.00% Xorg
doesn't take much, only 11.5MB is resident
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
It is in ports:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
9716K 660K select 0 0:05 0.00% moused
...
Of course, opera is a big customer of RAM which i cannot decrease its memory
usage. then can i descrease the xorg's resident memory ?
Sincerely!
-
e^(π.i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-
http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/31801/what-is-in-wired-memory
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:35AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> top reports wired memory 128MB
>
>
> WHERE it is used? below results of vmstat -m and vmstat -z
> values does not sum up even to half of it
&g
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> > does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
> > subsystem ?
>
> IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
> FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
>
> any
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> >
> > "2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
> > longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
> > needed for new programs. In practice,
is relatively new. My guess is that if there is a problem it's ZFS
specific. If it were a more general problem I think we'd see a lot more
complaints, whereas ZFS already has a reputation for needing lots of
memory.
you may precisely set up a limits of memory that ZFS would use at most
real problem
analysis, only a wild mix of stuff non-related to FreeBSD sprinkled with some
magic 'memory management' dust.
The fact that FreeBSD DOES NOT page excessively on the same workload
relative to other OS (linux, netbsd) is one of most important thing i
decided to use it.
I
"2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by the OS when
needed for new programs. In practice, I?ve found that this isn?t the case, and
my system slows to a crawl and starts paging out to disk when
most importantly networking but certainly not memory subsystem.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% gre
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
IMHO no. OSX is somehow-microkernel based, they did take things from
FreeBSD but not this IMHO.
anyway - who cares
Something is deeply broken in OS X memory management
http://workstuff.tumblr.com
RW googlemail.com> writes:
> ...
> > ...
> > "2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but
> > is no longer) is supposed to be seamlessly reclaimed automatically by
> > the OS when needed for new programs. In practice, I’ve found t
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:32:39 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
> Adam Vande More gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/19036310553/two-things-that-really-helped-
> > speed-up-my-mac-and
> > http://dywypi.org/2012/02/back-on-linux.html
> &
anything when userland and kernel are out of
sync, that is if it runs at all without segfaulting. World and kernel being
out of sync would be operator error. In this case the values you are using
to somehow relate the symptom to memory management would be false.
As far as all the rest, such as
Adam Vande More gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/19036310553/two-things-that-really-helped-
> speed-up-my-mac-and
> http://dywypi.org/2012/02/back-on-linux.html
>
"2) Inactive memory (which is memory that has been recently used but is no
lo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:04 AM, jb wrote:
> If so, should FreeBSD adopt NetBSD's MM subsys, or just improve itself
> surgically ?
>
You ought first establish there is a problem. What you have cited is
recently reinvigorated trend that has taken on the air of the "BDS is
dying" troll. What y
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> "The related implementation in FreeBSD seems to have a similar problem:
>
> NetBSD users have also reported that UVM’s im- provements have had a positive
> effect on their applica- tions. This is most noticeable when physical memory
>
Chuck Swiger mac.com> writes:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
> > does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
>
> The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
>
> % grep -ri freebsd xnu-1699.24.23 | w
On Apr 25, 2012, at 5:31 AM, jb wrote:
> does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
> subsystem ?
The simple answer is no. A more complex answer:
% grep -ri freebsd xnu-1699.24.23 | wc -l
520
% grep -ril freebsd xnu-1699.24.23 | sort | uniq
Hi,
does OS X kernel share any code with FreeBSD kernel's memory management
subsystem ?
Something is deeply broken in OS X memory management
http://workstuff.tumblr.com/post/20464780085/something-is-deeply-broken-in-os-x-
memory-management
One of the problems that caught my eyes was ina
hat
> >> the following is a true statement:
> >>
> >> a page is accounted for in active + inactive if and only if it
> >> corresponds to one or more of the pages accounted for in the
> >> resident memory lists of all the proc
a page is accounted for in active + inactive if and only if it
>> corresponds to one or more of the pages accounted for in the
>> resident memory lists of all the processes on the system (as
>> per the output of 'top' and 'ps')
>
page is accounted for in active + inactive if and only if it
> > corresponds to one or more of the pages accounted for in the
> > resident memory lists of all the processes on the system (as per
> > the output of 'top' and 'ps')
> No.
>
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:30:07 -0500
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
> >* Resident corresponds to a subset of the pages above: those
> > pages which actually occupy physical/core memory. Notably pages may
> > appear in s
Thanks for your email, Chuck.
> > Conversely, if a page *does not* occur in the resident
> > memory of any process, it must not occupy any space in the active +
> > inactive lists.
>
> Hmm...if a process gets swapped out entirely, the pages for it will be moved
> to t
On 3/6/2012 2:13 PM, Luke Marsden wrote:
[ ... ]
My current (probably quite simplistic) understanding of the FreeBSD
virtual memory system is that, for each process as reported by top:
* Size corresponds to the total size of all the text pages for the
process (those belonging to
12M uwait 0 18.3H
> > 39.06% /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar JDownloade
> >
> > ...how can the size of the resident memory of pid 6913 be > 512
> > megabytes?
>
> I don't know but you can inspect the java application with the java
>
ee, 24% Inuse, 4K
> In
>
> PIDUIDTHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
> COMMAND 6913 1001 32 200 4252M 1312M uwait 0 18.3H
> 39.06% /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar JDownloade
>
> ...how can the size of the resident memor
0 4252M 1312M uwait 0 18.3H 39.06%
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar JDownloade
...how can the size of the resident memory of pid 6913 be > 512 megabytes?
this is wth a very recent HEAD on amd64.
cheers.
alex
___
free
e jail You should the see something like the
example below, where there is still one Pg on uid 70 but from the
jail's perspective it's the pgsql user who now has uid of 70124
Message Queues:
T ID KEY MODEOWNERGROUP
Shared Memory:
T ID
Le 5 janv. 2012 à 14:56, bsd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only
> able to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
>
> I have tuned my sysctl on master host as follow :
>
> kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
> kern.ipc.shmall=409600
> ker
Hi,
I am trying to run both postgres and zabbix in the same jail and I am only able
to start postgres or zabbix not both of them.
I have tuned my sysctl on master host as follow :
kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
kern.ipc.shmall=409600
kern.ipc.semmap=256
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1
security
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:57:52 +0700
Dmitriy Kryuk wrote:
> I'm running Transmission (http://www.transmissionbt.com/), а
> BitTorrent client on my FreeBSD 7.2 box. It requests large recieve
> buffers for its network connections. This leaves my system with
> absolutely no fre
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dmitriy Kryuk wrote:
>
> How do I make FreeBSD keep some memory free (and so avoid swapping) with
> Transmission running?
>
Your top(1) output doesn't indicate to me that swapping is a problem.
There were some performance problems with Transm
I'm running Transmission (http://www.transmissionbt.com/), а BitTorrent
client on my FreeBSD 7.2 box. It requests large recieve buffers for its
network connections. This leaves my system with absolutely no free
memory. If some process frees a large amount of memory, it gets consumed
abou
All:
Just got these messages in the log after installing FreeBSD 9.0-RC1
on an older machine. The system hasn't shown any glitches or
crashes, so the error wasn't fatal. I'm guessing that there was an
error in cache memory that was corrected by ECC; is this correct?
Nov
Jon Schipp writes:
> You wouldn't want to know when your machine has reached periods of high
> memory utilization?
No, I want to know when my machine would perform better if it had more
memory. Keeping memory in use when it otherwise would be "free" means I
get
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> I'm under the impression that virtual memory and physical memory usage are
> very different.
>
> e.g. vmstat and top report very different memory values.
>
If I assume this is an XY problem, and your true goal is find out
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> Jon Schipp writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Nov 3 08:17:46 2011
> > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:18:06 -0400
> > From: Jon Schipp
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Check Memory Usage
Jon Schipp writes:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
>>> RELEASE)?
>>> In vain of 'free'
Hello Jon,
Perhaps the port sysutils/freecolor.
Cheers ...
Mark
>Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
>RELEASE)?
>In vain of 'free' in Linux.
>I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking if
anyone
>has a "
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:06:19 -0400
Jon Schipp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
>
> > On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
> >> RELEASE)?
> >
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
>
>> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
>> RELEASE)?
>> In vain of 'free' in Linux.
>>
>> I know you can check
1 - 100 of 1459 matches
Mail list logo
