For those who havent tried it, I used sysutils/portmanager to fix my broken
gnome install...and it worked! everything is happy now.
Thanks to Mike Shultz for suggesting it.
--Karl
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger
Hello, freebsd-questions.
anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just
coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its simply 0 0 * * * portmanager -s
--
Best regards,
Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I followed Matthew Seaman's instructions, except that there was no
'portmanager.core' file created. The file that was created was
'pmStatus.core'. I assume that is the file that I am to work with.
In any event, I ran 'portmanager' to create the core dump, N
sauron# portmanager -h
reading /usr/local/etc/portmanager/pm-020.conf, size 1145
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
anyone has a similar problem with portmanager ?
thanks
Rick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch the
ports database, it won't mess up the collection, it walks dependencies
aut
I just ran portmanager -s and it said that it has been removed from
the ports collection. The "MOVED" file said
"sysutils/portmanager||2006-01-19|Author withdrew permission to
distribute". Does this mean it will not be available any more, or is
this temporary?
Does anyone h
Michael Lednev wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-questions.
>
> anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just
> coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its simply 0 0 * * * portmanager -s
>
Try this:
0 0 * * * /usr/local/bin/portmanager -s
--
Best regards,
Chr
Hello, Chris.
On 9 îêòÿáðÿ 2005 ã., 19:01:10 you wrote:
C> Michael Lednev wrote:
>> Hello, freebsd-questions.
>>
>> anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just
>> coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its simply 0 0 * * * portmanager -
On 09/10/05, Michael Lednev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Chris.
>
> On 9 îêòÿáðÿ 2005 ã., 19:01:10 you wrote:
>
> C> Michael Lednev wrote:
> >> Hello, freebsd-questions.
> >>
> >> anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as f
Hello, Alistair.
On 9 îêòÿáðÿ 2005 ã., 21:35:27 you wrote:
AS> What version of FreeBSD are you running?
AS> At the moment, portmanager dumps core on FreeBSD 6 (and presumably
AS> -CURRENT), the author is aware of it and AFAIK is currently trying to
AS> track down why and where.
AS
On 09/10/05, Michael Lednev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Alistair.
>
> that's another issue, currently portmanager from ports runs fine on
> 6.0-current in interactive environment, but coredumps from cron or
> something similar. the same behaviour on on 5.4-stab
On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:27, Alistair Sutton wrote:
> On 09/10/05, Michael Lednev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, Alistair.
> >
> > that's another issue, currently portmanager from ports runs fine on
> > 6.0-current in interactive environment, bu
Gerard Seibert wrote:
* REPLY SEPARATOR *
On 10/10/2005 5:45:56 AM, Gerard Seibert Replied:
Would it be possible to issue a $PATH statement from within the CRON to
alleviate this problem? I have not actually tried this method, but I do
use it for other programs that I run from CRON and
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 11:48, Igor Robul wrote:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> >* REPLY SEPARATOR *
> >On 10/10/2005 5:45:56 AM, Gerard Seibert Replied:
> >
> >Would it be possible to issue a $PATH statement from within the CRON to
> >alleviate this problem? I have not actually tried this me
On Sunday 09 October 2005 07:53, Michael Lednev wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-questions.
>
> anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just
> coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its simply 0 0 * * * portmanager -s
I'm not sure how to fix it but I've f
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 20:42, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Sunday 09 October 2005 07:53, Michael Lednev wrote:
> > Hello, freebsd-questions.
> >
> > anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just
> > coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its s
On Sunday 09 October 2005 07:53, Michael Lednev wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-questions.
>
> anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just
> coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its simply 0 0 * * * portmanager -s
Thanks to "Mark J. Sommer" <[EMAIL PROT
RW wrote:
I'm probably missing something, because I can't see what the problem is.
crontab(5) says you can define environmental variables in a crontab; and the
default system crontab already has a PATH variable pre-defined, although it
doesn't include /usr/local/bin in the path.
But you
On Thursday 13 October 2005 07:17, Igor Robul wrote:
> RW wrote:
> >I'm probably missing something, because I can't see what the problem is.
> >
> >crontab(5) says you can define environmental variables in a crontab; and
> > the default system crontab already has a PATH variable pre-defined,
> > al
Hi people,
as recently i have problem with firefox, i thought i will try to upgrade
my port by my way...
as i first run "portmanager -s > log" to see what ports are outdated, and
if that port seem critical, I will do
"portupgrade -R/-r " to fix it. it's probably
hi all, i was wondering if anyone else ran into a problem recently
when portmanager was moved to /usr/ports/ports-mgt/portmanger. i have
a nightly cron which runs a "portmanager -s" to give me a status
report in the morning on outdated ports. i believe when the move
occurred that p
Hello:
I run into errors when i run "portmanager -u":
00344 luit-1.0.2_2 /x11/luit
"Makefile", line 85: Could not find
/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/../../x11-servers/xorg-server/Makefile.inc
"Makefile", line 92: Malformed conditional (${X_WINDOW_SYSTEM:L} != xorg
hi guys,
sorry for this newbie question, i've been upgrading my box using portupgrade
but recently i'm experiencing some wierd logs that can't be explained nor
solved but luckily my box does not appear to be broken, i have a question
though regarding portmanager, someone on this l
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 10:15 am, Brian John wrote:
> When I try to upgrade my ports I just get error messages. Can
> someone help me out? I'll paste the output below.
>
> Thanks
>
> /Brian
>
> su-2.05b# portmanager -u
> portmanager 0.2.6_5 info: ex
ork with.
>
> In any event, I ran 'portmanager' to create the core dump, Next I ran 'gdb'
> which produced the following output:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $gdb /usr/ports/sysutils/portmanager/work/portmanager-0.2.0/portmanager/portmanager
> -c pmStatus.co
OK, I think I have it right this time. The following is the output from using
'gdb' with the 'pmStatus' binary.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / $
gdb /usr/ports/sysutils/portmanager/work/portmanager-0.2.0/pmStatus/pmStatus
-c pmStatus.core
GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 2002 Free
t; 'pmStatus.core'. I assume that is the file that I am to work with.
> >
> > In any event, I ran 'portmanager' to create the core dump, Next I ran
> > 'gdb' which produced the following output:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > $gdb
&
t; 'pmStatus.core'. I assume that is the file that I am to work with.
> >
> > In any event, I ran 'portmanager' to create the core dump, Next I ran
> > 'gdb' which produced the following output:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > $gdb
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Just updated to portmanager 0.3.9 from 0.3.7 and now every command
(except --help) is causing an assert:
$ sudo portmanager --version
rParseCommandLine 0.3.9_1
$ sudo portmanager --status
MGdbRead error: unable to open file /usr/local/share
7;t use my "refuse" file that stopped the non-
english docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
In trying to understand this issue, I found portmanager, and it looks
like it would perform the same function as portupgrade.
My questions: Is there a way around the "refuse" f
I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch the
ports database, it won't mess up the collection, it walks dependencies
automagi
cali wrote:
The same thing happened to me. Not sure where it was stuck but I was
getting a distinct sense of deja-vu watching the output (I don't really
mean deja-vu but I can't think of a better way to say it). I left it for
30 hours, and then cancelled it. I'm going to try and run it again
to
On Jan 26, 2005, at 4:38 AM, cali wrote:
I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch
the ports database, it won't mess up the
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 07:07 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
> updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
> portmanager -u to save on problems with updating; it doesn't touch
> the ports d
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 05:38 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 4:38 AM, cali wrote:
> >> I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
> >> updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
> >> portmanag
On Jan 26, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Thanks Bart for your patience, this one required me to set up
XFree86-4 on a FreeBSD 4.11 machine and back date all of the ports.
Perfectly understandable and I thank you for the efforts you're going
through to get portmanager updat
> On Wednesday 26 January 2005 05:38 am, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>> On Jan 26, 2005, at 4:38 AM, cali wrote:
>>>> I had (have?) several packages in the ports collection that needed
>>>> updating, and recently someone in the list was talking about using
>>>
d I thank you for the efforts you're going
> through to get portmanager updated so quickly.
>
> > So
> > now I know that on December 1st, 2004
> > /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri and /usr/ports/graphics/dri both
> > existed and both report their name as dri-5.0.2,2
correct dri
> > for XFree86-4. I have all of this running on a AMD450 so it is a
> > bit slow, my guess is I'll have solid answers in about 4 hours and
> > the quick fix will probably be to de-install graphics/xfree86-dri
> > then run portmanager -u.
>
> I
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 08:50 am, you wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > Bart, here is what I think will happen based on what I see here, I
> > think
> > it will get past XFree-4-servers ok, but the next program that
> > needs dri is going to bring the wrong on
To keep everyone informed, here is how portmanager's looping problem
with XFree86 is going to be handled:
portmanager version 0.2.4_1
Adding "three strikes checking". When "make" is run on a port
it gets 1 strike, if it's made a second time it gets 2
e:
To keep everyone informed, here is how portmanager's looping problem
with XFree86 is going to be handled:
portmanager version 0.2.4_1
Adding "three strikes checking". When "make" is run on a port
it gets 1 strike, if it's made a second time it gets 2 strikes and a
w
Please let us know when you get it posted!
>
> --
> Alan Gerber
The patch is being tested now and so far its working. It stops the
looping at the third attempt like planned. I just need let portmanager
-u finish so I know there are no surprises at the end. I promise I'll
post it to
I've submitted a PR for the interim fix to portmanager's looping problem
here is the link:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=76739
If anyone is in a hurry I will be glad to send the patch as an email
attachment, all you need to do is create
a /usr/ports/sysutils/portman
or is that question my intelligence and insult my
heritage. Well, it doesn't do either. It core dumps. This will happen
on more than one system running 6 Stable and the updated portmanager.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> pkg_info | grep portmanager
portmanager-0.4.1_4 FreeBSD installed ports st
On 1/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try portupgrade. It's what most people use.
>
> Kris
>
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To uns
Craig Deal wrote:
I just ran portmanager -s and it said that it has been removed from
the ports collection. The "MOVED" file said
"sysutils/portmanager||2006-01-19|Author withdrew permission to
distribute". Does this mean it will not be available any more, or is
this temporar
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:44:09PM -0800, Micah wrote:
> Craig Deal wrote:
> >I just ran portmanager -s and it said that it has been removed from
> >the ports collection. The "MOVED" file said
> >"sysutils/portmanager||2006-01-19|Author withdrew permission to
&g
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:44:09PM -0800, Micah wrote:
> Craig Deal wrote:
> >I just ran portmanager -s and it said that it has been removed from
> >the ports collection. The "MOVED" file said
> >"sysutils/portmanager||2006-01-19|Author withdrew permission to
&g
Micah wrote:
Check out http://portmanager.sunsite.dk/preface.html
"I have decided to remove portmanager from the FreeBSD ports tree
because I do not get along with the people in charge of FreeBSD ports."
Sounds pretty permanent to me.
Use portupgrade.
The web site in questio
I would like to know the difference between running:
portupgrade -arR
and
portmanager -u
Just curious is all, thanks.
--
Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
lete with either some errors, ignored
ports or both
***
at the end of an upgrade cycle, like a recursive rebuild? Or do other
tools have to be used outside of portmanager?
Than
On Monday 28 March 2005 04:08 am, you wrote:
> --- "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 March 2005 07:23 pm, you wrote:
> > > Mike: got an error running a portmanager -u.
> >
> > Freebsd
> >
> > >
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 22:30:26 -0700, "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: portmanager
Wrote these words of wisdom:
> On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:27, Alistair Sutton wrote:
> > On 09/10/05, Michael Lednev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hel
Here's the situation, I have 3 BSD servers sitting behind a pfsense
firewall. When I run portmanager on any of the 3 servers, inevitably it
runs into a distfile that can't be downloaded from an FTP site.
Although I haven't checked the log files on the firewall, I'm fairly
Hello
portmanager creates a backup package of each port it is about to upgrade
in case the upgrade fails and stores them in /tmp. Recently a machine
choked on a large unattended upgrade when /tmp filled up with .tbz's.
I've since changed --with-tempdir=/tmp in the Makefil
On Sunday November 05, 2006 at 12:16:52 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
> Hi people,
> as recently i have problem with firefox, i thought i will try to upgrade
> my port by my way...
>as i first run "portmanager -s > log" to see what ports are outdated, and
> if tha
ortupgrade only, but I see more and more people talk about
portmanager, so I thought it would be good to hear what others use.
On a related note, is portmaster comparable to the previous two?
Thanks,
--
Nino
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi there,
I keep running portmanager and throughout the portmanager run apache2.0
is getting built. I am tryign to get that to stop because apache2.2 is
installed, configured, and runing. I have it explicitly ignored in the
/usr/local/etc/portmanager/pm-020.conf
access1# grep apache pm
On Wednesday February 07, 2007 at 12:44:30 (PM) pete wright wrote:
> hi all, i was wondering if anyone else ran into a problem recently
> when portmanager was moved to /usr/ports/ports-mgt/portmanger. i have
> a nightly cron which runs a "portmanager -s" to give me a sta
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, pete wright wrote:
hi all, i was wondering if anyone else ran into a problem recently
when portmanager was moved to /usr/ports/ports-mgt/portmanger. i have
a nightly cron which runs a "portmanager -s" to give me a status
report in the morning on outdated ports.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:04 PM, gahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I run into errors when i run "portmanager -u":
>
> 00344 luit-1.0.2_2 /x11/luit
> "Makefile", line 85: Could not find
> /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/../../x11-servers
yes:
lab2# portmanager -v
rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9
--- On Wed, 9/10/08, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: portmanager errors
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 4:15 AM
> O
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
gahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Wed, 9/10/08, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: portmanager errors
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> &
thanks gerard:
no, i had the same errors. could portmanager bypass the failed package and
install rest of other packages? checked with manpage and don't seem to the case.
the only packages i didn't install are "games".
best
--- On Thu, 9/11/08, Gerard <[EMAIL PRO
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
gahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, i had the same errors. could portmanager bypass the failed
> package and install rest of other packages? checked with manpage and
> don't seem to the case.
>
> the only packages i didn
Hi All,
Having run "portmanager -u" several times now, I am
very pleased to say that my times have decreased from
an initial 38 hours to about 2 hours, per run.
Along the way, I have cleaned up "conflicts" and did
"pkg_delete" on several applications that were
&qu
jan gestre wrote:
> sorry for this newbie question, i've been upgrading my box using portupgrade
> but recently i'm experiencing some wierd logs that can't be explained nor
> solved but luckily my box does not appear to be broken, i have a question
> though regarding p
Hello!
I am using portmanager for updating my ports. I love its -p switch. Is
there any similar program with such option? I am asking because portmanager
is gone from ports tree.
" -p or --pristineUpdates a port if any dependency in it's
/
Hi,
If I want to retain a port option (that perhaps I passed at the command
line using -D) between uprades of a port, will portmanager handle this
automatically or do the options need to be placed in make.conf?
Thanks
Chris
___
freebsd-questions
Hi,
I am experiencing further difficulties with portmanager -slid. I was
successfully able to delete several leaf ports. However, when I try to
delete devel/p5-Locale-gettext or devel/gmake, portmanager core dumps
with the following message:
...
Nuking gmake-3.80_2
MGdbGoTop error: invalid
First time using portmanager. Using command line:
# portmanager -u -pi editors/openoffice-1.1 -l -f
It coredumps approx at line 00218 or so:
MGPMrController 0.3.4_0 info: running in forced update mode
portmanager 0.3.4_0
On Friday 25 November 2005 18:49, Wes Santee wrote:
> Just updated to portmanager 0.3.9 from 0.3.7 and now every command
> (except --help) is causing an assert:
>
> $ sudo portmanager --version
>
> rParseCommandLine 0.3.9_1
>
> $ sudo portmanager --status
> MGdbRead
Hi!
I'm trying to update libtool with portmanager but I get missing status.
Also there is a lot of ports with missing status. How can I solve this.
If I manualy upgrade libtool it works but portmanager failed to upgrade
(3 times).
regards
Hi there,
I am really not having luck with portmanager - even after following the man
page. I use portmanager and set using the pm-020.conf for configuration.
Even after explcitly ignoring the www/apache-* package it still wants to
attempt to install apache-1.3.34_* and creating a conflict
FreeBSD-4.9
portmanager-0.2.0_3
well I am not able to find a specific mail list for portmanager support.
anybody got clues why portmanager is having difficulies here and a nice cure
would be helpful?
--- snip ---
pkg_create: can't find package 'apache-1.3.33_1&
rtupgrade and then ran portsdb -Uu. It errored out,
> telling me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file that stopped the non-
> english docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
>
> In trying to understand this issue, I found portmanager, and it looks
> like it woul
e and then ran portsdb -Uu. It errored out,
> telling me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file that stopped the
> non- english docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
>
> In trying to understand this issue, I found portmanager, and it looks
> like it would perform th
D_Basics.html?page=1
>>I installed portupgrade and then ran portsdb -Uu. It errored out,
>>telling me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file that stopped the
>>non- english docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
>>
>>In trying to understand this issue,
ish docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
> >>
> >>In trying to understand this issue, I found portmanager, and it
> >> looks like it would perform the same function as portupgrade.
> >>
> >>My questions: Is there a way around the "refuse&quo
me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file that stopped
> > >> the non- english docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
> > >>
> > >>In trying to understand this issue, I found portmanager, and it
> > >> looks like it would pe
d portupgrade and then ran portsdb -Uu. It errored
>>>>>out, telling me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file that stopped
>>>>>the non- english docs and ports from being loaded on my HD.
>>>>>
>>>>>In trying to understand this
on portupgrade at
> >>>>>http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page
> >>>>>=1 I installed portupgrade and then ran portsdb -Uu. It errored
> >>>>>out, telling me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file that
installed portupgrade and then ran portsdb -Uu. It
> > > >> errored out, telling me that I shouldn't use my "refuse" file
> > > >> that stopped the non- english docs and ports from being loaded
> > > >> on my HD.
> > > >>
>
> That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste
> of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and sometimes
> it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is always the right
> thing to do. One way this has proved to be a benefit is I've n
On Friday 24 December 2004 03:52 pm, Peter Schuller wrote:
> > That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste
> > of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and
> > sometimes it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is
> > alwa
> Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it. The
> only problem that might occur is between the deinstall/reinstall steps
> I'll be missing the libraries for about a minute, when this happens I
> just wait untill its finished reinstalling then c
On Saturday 25 December 2004 04:53 am, Peter Schuller wrote:
> > Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it.
> > The only problem that might occur is between the
> > deinstall/reinstall steps I'll be missing the libraries for about a
> > min
Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would be happy
to help with testing.
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > Portupgrade has one serious flaw in my opinion and that is running
> > > something like pkgdb -F damages the port instal
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 10:03 am, you wrote:
> Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would
> be happy to help with testing.
portmanager only handles packages in that it builds back up packages of
each port it updates, these packages are correctly build fo
On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
> future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly updating
> ports.
Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL the
old ports? A 'pormanager -
On Saturday 01 January 2005 04:30 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
> > future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly
> > updating ports.
>
> Am I t
On Sunday 08 January 2006 18:30, Robert Marella wrote:
> Good Afternoon
>
> At times when in a hurry or not thinking as fast as my fingers, I try
> to run "portupgrade -s | grep OLD" from a regular user account instead
> of "sudo portupgrade -s | grep OLD".
do
--- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know the difference between running:
>
> portupgrade -arR
>
> and
>
> portmanager -u
>
> Just curious is all, thanks.
I have found portmanager to be more intelligent. When
you run it it takes
On Saturday 04 March 2006 19:20, Peter wrote:
> --- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to know the difference between running:
> >
> > portupgrade -arR
> >
> > and
> >
> > portmanager -u
> >
> > Just curious is a
> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
> From: Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
--- James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
> > From: Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Cc: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter wrote:
> --- James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:34:57 -0800
> > > From: Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager ...
> > > To: freebsd-questions@freebs
On Sunday 08 January 2006 18:30, Robert Marella wrote:
Good Afternoon
At times when in a hurry or not thinking as fast as my fingers, I try
to run "portupgrade -s | grep OLD" from a regular user account instead
of "sudo portupgrade -s | grep OLD".
do you mean "port
quot;.
do you mean "portmanager -s | grep OLD" by any chance?
I would expect portupgrade to insult my intelligence and question my
heritage or is that question my intelligence and insult my
heritage. Well, it doesn't do either. It core dumps. This will happen
on more than
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
