On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P.
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
automate database and index maintenance?
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in
On 10/30/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this
On 10/29/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep
this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to
automate database and index maintenance?
cvsup or portsnap, then portsdb -uUF. Work under
any
On Oct 28, 2005, at 7:31 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 make deinstall make clean make
reinstall
See what happens.
Talk about strange:
# cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/
# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for www/apache20
=== apache not installed, skipping
# make -V
I ended up deinstalling that apache installation (which I was not keen
on doing), and installing the apache20 port (which was the same
version (2.0.55) as the apache2 port ?), and, thankfully, it's
working fine. I'm also now able to run both 'pkgdb -F'and 'portsdb
-Uu' without ANY errors (except
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the
On Friday, October 28, 2005 3:25:14 AM, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Wrote these words of wisdom:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John
On 10/28/05, Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I feel that portmanager does a much better job of updating
without the problems that seem to crop up so often using portupgrade.
I've always been scared off by the comparatively
young age of portmanager. Besides, portupgrade
On Friday 28 October 2005 00:25, Andrew P. wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John
On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 05:53, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during
(2) make
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Date: Friday 28 October 2005 15:02
From: Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:29, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 ) )
upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48,
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=1 /
On Friday 28 October 2005 19:51, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
status report finished
==
==
percentDone-=0 = 100
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
problem was actually a dependency of the package to apache1.3. After I
ran 'pkgdb -F' and
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the ultimate
problem was actually a dependency of the package to
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and rebuilding the system and kernel... it seemed the
ultimate
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:49, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 8:32 PM, John DeStefano wrote:
On 10/27/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After clearing out the ports, updating ports (with portsnap) and
source, and
On 10/18/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/15/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries,
On 10/15/05, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
followed the suggestion in UPDATING to delete
On Saturday, October 15, 2005 9:21:00 PM, Andrew P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies
Wrote these words of wisdom:
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
followed the suggestion in UPDATING to delete XFree86 the imake-4 packages,
and install the full xorg port.
After all that, I got more dependency
On 10/16/05, John DeStefano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use portupgrade to update my installed ports. I ran into
trouble with dependencies with ImageMagick and xorg-libraries, and I then
followed the suggestion in UPDATING to delete XFree86 the imake-4 packages,
and install the full
30 matches
Mail list logo
