FreeBSD a écrit :
matt donovan a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:58 PM, FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
There is my situation:
I want to be able to use freebsd-update to update a FreeBSD 7.0-Release
installation to the latest security patches (I want an update and
not an
upgrad
matt donovan a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:58 PM, FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is my situation:
I want to be able to use freebsd-update to update a FreeBSD 7.0-Release
installation to the latest security patches (I want an update and not an
upgrade if I unde
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:58 PM, FreeBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is my situation:
> I want to be able to use freebsd-update to update a FreeBSD 7.0-Release
> installation to the latest security patches (I want an update and not an
> upgrade if I understand correc
Hi everyone,
I'm totally new to freebsd-update. I used to recompile the kernel and
the world when I wanted to update. But I think it's now time to take
advantages of the binary update possibility. I looked at the man pages
and some googling couldn't answer my questions prop
On Sunday 28 September 2008 00:29:01 Daniel Molina Wegener
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have 4GB machine and after updating to 6.4-PRERELEASE using
> 32bit intel based system. the complete system hangs if I do
> a "sysctl -a" under X terminal emulators. Also, I get a
> system hang during entropy harvesti
Hello,
I have 4GB machine and after updating to 6.4-PRERELEASE using
32bit intel based system. the complete system hangs if I do
a "sysctl -a" under X terminal emulators. Also, I get a system
hang during entropy harvesting.
The "sysctl -a" command freezes while is displaying ACPI
information,
_1 by
from source, I doubt that the binary updater, freebsd-update, would
work though.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
install 7.1 Beta
> now, but I have some questions:
>
> - Is it difficult/painful to update from 7.1 Beta to 7.1 Release when
> it comes available?
No
> - Should I expect big problems?
Probably not.
> - Is 7.1 Beta stable enough?
Can't say definitively based on presented
Is it difficult/painful to update from 7.1 Beta to 7.1 Release when
it comes available?
- Should I expect big problems?
- Is 7.1 Beta stable enough?
Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any docs about how to setup a own freebsd-update and
> portsnap-server/mirror? Or is the only way to setup some kind of
> proxy?
Proxy is recommended as per the man page; also see this thread for some
ba
Is there any docs about how to setup a own freebsd-update and
portsnap-server/mirror? Or is the only way to setup some kind of proxy?
--
chs
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Vlad GURDIGA пишет:
I guess this does not update my running kernel and I have to reboot to
really update it. Right? Or is there any way to do this without
reboot? O course I doubt it but I'd like to make sure I'm not missing
some magic feature... :-).
Yes, reboot i
Hello,
I've run today "freebsd-update fetch" and it found some updates,
including /boot/kernel/kernel:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 7.0-RELEASE-p4:
/boot/kernel/kernel
/boot/kernel/kernel.symbols
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S
/usr/src/sys/conf/
>> Although the mirror changes, that rest of the message is the same.
>> Except doing a ports freeze, I do not remember FBSD going 24 hours
>> without some port being updated. I was just wondering if this is
>> correct or if something is wrong with the mirrors.
> FreeBSD 7.1 maybe ? not sure if we
Hello,
Gerard:
Since last evening (2008-09-03), portsnap has been reporting this when
I run it:
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:16:07 -0400
Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although the mirror changes, that rest of the message is the same.
> Except doing a ports freeze, I do not remember FBSD going 24 hours
> without some port being updated. I was just wondering if this is
> correct or if something
Since last evening (2008-09-03), portsnap has been reporting this when
I run it:
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up
What am i missing or doing incorrectly? Thanks, Jerry
nutmeg# freebsd-update fetch
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 6.3-RELEASE from update1.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Inspecting system... done.
Preparing to
On 2008.08.16 12:39:56, Clint Olsen wrote:
> On Aug 14, John Nielsen wrote:
> > Do you have ffmpeg installed? Is it up-to-date? Are you using any WITH or
> > WITHOUT knobs for the make?
> >
> > I can't tell from the output you provided if this is relevant, but I
> > recently had to install the arc
On Aug 14, John Nielsen wrote:
> Do you have ffmpeg installed? Is it up-to-date? Are you using any WITH or
> WITHOUT knobs for the make?
>
> I can't tell from the output you provided if this is relevant, but I
> recently had to install the archivers/lzo2 port before I could get ffmpeg
> upgraded (
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 07:54:47 pm Clint Olsen wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I've not been able to upgrade my transcode port for some time. It
> eventually fails with:
>
> ERROR: requirement failed: cannot link against libavcodec
> libavcodec can be found in the following packages:
> FFmpeg http://www.
Hi:
I've not been able to upgrade my transcode port for some time. It
eventually fails with:
ERROR: requirement failed: cannot link against libavcodec
libavcodec can be found in the following packages:
FFmpeg http://www.ffmpeg.org/
Please see the INSTALL file in the top directory of the
On Sunday 10 August 2008 17:43:23 Warren Liddell wrote:
> I am using FreeBSD 7.0-CURREENT all ports/src upto date as of this
> morning.. when trying to compile oo below is the result during the make.
> What seems ot be causing this error ?
2 module(s):
icu
openssl
need(s) to be re
Yavuz Maslak wrote:
I use 7.0-STABLE-200805.
I want to update it to 7.0-STABLE-200807.
How do I update for the last updates clearly ?
is there a way to update without reboot the machine or with only one reboot ?
Use csup to synchronize your source:
- Copy the file /usr/share/examples
I use 7.0-STABLE-200805.
I want to update it to 7.0-STABLE-200807.
How do I update for the last updates clearly ?
is there a way to update without reboot the machine or with only one reboot ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
i wanted to upgrade them and
> >find it impossible...
> >
> >I am running
> > uname -a
> >FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0:
> >Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007
> >
> >I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it succes
i wanted to upgrade them and
> >find it impossible...
> >
> >I am running
> > uname -a
> >FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0:
> >Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007
> >
> >I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it succes
I am running
> uname -a
>FreeBSD everest.himalaya.network 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0:
>Mon May 21 19:48:05 ART 2007
>
>I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it successfully...then
>installed portmanager and portsaudit
>
>did a pkg_version -v and find the outdated ports, lik
I did a cvsup to update all ports which did it successfully...then installed
portmanager and portsaudit
did a pkg_version -v and find the outdated ports, like sec, mysql and
more
Now while trying to update with
portmanager sysutils/rsync -l -ui -f
#Then also tried without the f
get
d swa that they are now in
ports-mgmtBut i dont have that dir...so i was wondering how can i update
this changes on ports tree without using ports-all
Simple, you could add ports-mgmt to your ports-supfile
Is there a way to update de ports-supfile o r something to update and bring
the en
are now in
ports-mgmtBut i dont have that dir...so i was wondering how can i update
this changes on ports tree without using ports-all
Is there a way to update de ports-supfile o r something to update and bring
the entire ports-mgmt for instance to my ports colection?
i assume using cvsup dire
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:57:59AM +, AN wrote:
> Is there a way to get a mirror to sync up with the latest packages?
No.
You should _ask_ the people who maintain those mirrors to do that.
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-
-2.22.1.tbz 04/18/08 22:33:00. So, the mirror seems to be
about 2-3 months behind, is it possible to update it?
TIA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
-2.22.1.tbz 04/18/08 22:33:00. So, the mirror seems to be about 2-3
months behind, is it possible to update it?
TIA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 7/19/08 9:50 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
This is not a problem with freebsd-update. The kernel has not changed
between -p2 and -p3, so freebsd-update will not get you an updated
one. If you recompile the kernel afterwards, it will show -p3 because
of the change in /usr
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
This is not a problem with freebsd-update. The kernel has not changed
between -p2 and -p3, so freebsd-update will not get you an updated
one. If you recompile the kernel afterwards, it will show -p3 because
of the change in /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh (this changes
just rebuild your kernel
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
David Newman wrote:
Mark Boolootian wrote:
which leads me to conclude I've got -p3, including the BIND update.
However 'uname -a' says something else:
FreeBSD mumble.ucsc.edu 7.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p2 #0:
Wed Jun 18 07:33:20 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/
Mark Boolootian wrote:
which leads me to conclude I've got -p3, including the BIND update.
However 'uname -a' says something else:
FreeBSD mumble.ucsc.edu 7.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed
Jun 18 07:33:20 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENE
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Mark Boolootian wrote:
Hi folks,
I've done a couple of fresh installs on 7.0-RELEASE today, and
subsequently run freebsd-update. freebsd-update reports:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to
7.0-RELEASE-p3:
/boot/kernel/kernel
/boot/k
Mark Boolootian wrote:
Hi folks,
I've done a couple of fresh installs on 7.0-RELEASE today, and
subsequently run freebsd-update. freebsd-update reports:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 7.0-RELEASE-p3:
/boot/kernel/kernel
/boot/kernel/kernel.symbols
/us
The only thing uname will give you is the currently running kernel.
The update must not have changed the kernel.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:35:42 -0700
Mark Boolootian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> which leads me to conclude I've got -p3, including the BIND update.
> However 'uname -a' says something else:
>
> FreeBSD mumble.ucsc.edu 7.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p2 #0
Hi folks,
I've done a couple of fresh installs on 7.0-RELEASE today, and
subsequently run freebsd-update. freebsd-update reports:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 7.0-RELEASE-p3:
/boot/kernel/kernel
/boot/kernel/kernel.symbols
/usr/bin/dig
/usr/bin
On 7/12/08 4:11 PM, David wrote:
So, and this worked for me, delete everything in the freebsd-update db
directory, /var/db/freebsd-update.
It does involve re-downloading a lot of stuff. In hindsight, move the
sub-directory "files" else where and then re-populate once it is worki
upgrading a 6.3 box using portsnap and freebsd-update
*David Newman* dnewman at networktest.com
<mailto:freebsd-questions%40freebsd.org?Subject=upgrading%20a%206.3%20box%20using%20portsnap%20and%20freebsd-update&In-Reply-To=20080712175513.7ed1baed%40gumby.homeunix.com.>
/Sat Jul 1
On 7/12/08 9:55 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:25:34 -0700
David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
===>>> The textproc/p5-Text-ParseWords port has been deleted: Module
included in
core perl
===>>> Aborting update
Running "pkg_delete" reveals depe
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:25:34 -0700
David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ===>>> The textproc/p5-Text-ParseWords port has been deleted: Module
> included in
> core perl
> ===>>> Aborting update
>
> Running "pkg_delete" reveals dependenci
On a dual-CPU i386 box running FreeBSD 6.3, I'm having two issues with
portsnap and freebsd-update:
1. After running "portsnap fetch" I then do "portmaster -L >
portmaster.out" to see which ports need updating. But the output stops
on one of the perl ports:
=
[em_logo.gif ]
[em_photo.jpg]
Online Banking Alert
[em_promo2.gif ]
Update Your Online Banking
Because of unusual number of invalid login attempts on you account,
we had to believe that, their might be some security problem on you
account. So we have
--On Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:05:11 -0500 Joshua Frugé
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cachein
Joshua Frugé wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning vuln that seems to be all the rage lately?
I'm runni
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the top
> of someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet?
See the thread "BIND update?".
S
Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the top of
someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet?
--
Paul Schmehl
As if it wasn't already obvious,
my opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.
___
freebsd-q
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning vuln that seems to be all the rage lately?
I'm running freebsd 7.0-RELEASE-p
> Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the
> top of
> someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet?
>From -security :
>Dear all,
>
>Doug just updated the ports tree with the updated BIND ports. If you
>urgently want to upgrade and really cannot wait f
t; >
> >
> > Quoting "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >>
> >>For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
> >> frenzy, you can :
> >>
> >> 1) Update the Makefile :
> >&
t; Thanks,
> David
>
>
> Quoting "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
> > frenzy, you can :
> >
> > 1) Update the Makefile :
> >
> >>
addition problems or people into the
> equation?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
> Quoting "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>>
>>For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
>> frenzy, y
For those like me who don't know any better. How can I confirm your
suggestion will not be introducing addition problems or people into
the equation?
Thanks,
David
Quoting "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
For anyone looking to update the b
Hi,
For anyone looking to update the bind94 port due to the recent
frenzy, you can :
1) Update the Makefile :
>From : PORTREVISION= 1
To : PORTREVISION= 2
>From : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2
To : ISCVERSION= 9.4.2-P1
2) Drop this into distinfo :
MD5 (bind-9.4.2-P1.
Hi all
pwd_mkdb -C master_passwd_template
No errors
pwd_mkdb -p master_passwd_template
pw useradd -n test -u 1000 -c Test -m -M 0700 -s /bin/bash
pw: user 'test' disappeared during update
It has updated the /etc/group as follows:
test:*:1000:
But no test user entry in /etc/pass
FBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did contact the port maintainer, but he didn't respond at all. :(
>
> Any help in getting this port updated would be greatly appreciated!
Follow the guide linked previously in the thread and feel free to ask about
specific problems that you encounter. We sho
not updated Amanda in quite some time. Can
> > > someone give me some advice on how to roll my own ports install from the
> > > source tarball? Thanks.
> >
> > Did you try to contact the port maintainer? You probably want to check
> > with him/her before you update the p
Can
> > someone give me some advice on how to roll my own ports install from the
> > source tarball? Thanks.
>
> Did you try to contact the port maintainer? You probably want to check
> with him/her before you update the port no?
>
> In any case, it's a good idea
install from the
> source tarball? Thanks.
Did you try to contact the port maintainer? You probably want to check
with him/her before you update the port no?
In any case, it's a good idea to update the port because we're going
to need it here too!
Good luck,
David
--
Dav
FBSD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to install the current version of Amanda (misc/amanda-client and
> misc/amanda-server) and would like to install from the ports collection.
> However the port maintainer has not updated Amanda in quite some time. Can
> someone give me some advice on how
I need to install the current version of Amanda (misc/amanda-client and
misc/amanda-server) and would like to install from the ports collection.
However the port maintainer has not updated Amanda in quite some time. Can
someone give me some advice on how to roll my own ports install from the sou
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > >
> > >I have been updating 6.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Recently I
> > >upgraded it to RELENG_6_3 from source. Can I continue using
> > >freebsd-update or must I upgrade only from source from now on?
> > >
> > >
Hi all,
I'm having a problem updating my freebsd 7 amd64 box. After a recent
freebsd-update, the kernel and linker.hints were updated. However with
subsequent freebsd-updates, it reports that linker.hints still needs to
be updated. I can (re)install but always the same. The linker.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 07:39:12PM +0200, bsd wrote:
> --->> Wouldn't It be better to run amd64 instead of i386?
>
> I have seen that this will allow to take full capacity of the memory -
> on the other hand there seems to have restriction on the ports
> Can anyone let me know if these restricti
Adding some infos to the issue, plus partial answer…
Main answer still needed !!
Le 1 juil. 08 à 18:53, bsd a écrit :
Hello folks,
I have just baught brand new servers with an 8Gb memory attached to
each of these server.
I generaly use the "freebsd-update" procedure to update
Hello folks,
I have just baught brand new servers with an 8Gb memory attached to
each of these server.
I generaly use the "freebsd-update" procedure to update and apply
patches to the system.
Problem is the default kernel provided with freebsd-update does not
seem to ha
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> >
> >I have been updating 6.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Recently I
> >upgraded it to RELENG_6_3 from source. Can I continue using
> >freebsd-update or must I upgrade only from source from now on?
> >
> >
>
> I don't s
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> >
> >I have been updating 6.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Recently I
> >upgraded it to RELENG_6_3 from source. Can I continue using
> >freebsd-update or must I upgrade only from source from now on?
> >
> >
>
> I don't s
Rudi Kramer - MWEB wrote:
Hey Robert,
This error indicates that you are having some sort of connection issues,
I for instance get it when I forget to use our work proxy, here are
some steps you can try to remedy the problem:
1) Can you resolve update1.FreeBSD.org?
2) Can you ping update1.Free
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 30, 2008 2:22:41 PM +0200 Zbigniew Szalbot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
I read man freebsd-update but it has not answered my questions. That is,
after I have issued freebsd-update fetch/install, where can I find
information about if the installed u
--On June 30, 2008 2:22:41 PM +0200 Zbigniew Szalbot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
I read man freebsd-update but it has not answered my questions. That is,
after I have issued freebsd-update fetch/install, where can I find
information about if the installed updates require recom
freebsd-update only updates the installed sources, not all sources.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello again,
Not all updates include kernel updates, some are just userland.
If you are running a GENERIC, unomdified (from CD) kernel, this will
be updated in the process. freebsd-update shows you a list of updated
files, and will also show /boot/kernel/kernel if
Hello again,
Not all updates include kernel updates, some are just userland.
If you are running a GENERIC, unomdified (from CD) kernel, this will be
updated in the process. freebsd-update shows you a list of updated
files, and will also show /boot/kernel/kernel if this is updated. You
will
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Dear all,
I read man freebsd-update but it has not answered my questions. That
is, after I have issued freebsd-update fetch/install, where can I find
information about if the installed updates require recompiling the
kernel or system restart?
Thank you in advance
Dear all,
I read man freebsd-update but it has not answered my questions. That is,
after I have issued freebsd-update fetch/install, where can I find
information about if the installed updates require recompiling the
kernel or system restart?
Thank you in advance!
--
Zbigniew Szalbot
Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
I have been updating 6.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Recently I
upgraded it to RELENG_6_3 from source. Can I continue using
freebsd-update or must I upgrade only from source from now on?
I don't see why not. freebsd-update will download binary updat
Colleagues,
I have been updating 6.2-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Recently I
upgraded it to RELENG_6_3 from source. Can I continue using
freebsd-update or must I upgrade only from source from now on?
I conducted an experiment and got inconclusive results. I had upgraded
to RELENG_6_3-p2 where
Thanks. I love how I overlooked the simple answer. I'll give it a try.
On 6/27/08 1:05 PM, "Lowell Gilbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Anyone else experiencing issues related to phttpget when using
>&
Andrew Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone else experiencing issues related to phttpget when using
> freebsd-update? What I'm finding is that there is just enough delay between
> retrieval of the 6.2 and the 6.3 patches; that the upstream firewall closes
>
Anyone else experiencing issues related to phttpget when using
freebsd-update? What I'm finding is that there is just enough delay between
retrieval of the 6.2 and the 6.3 patches; that the upstream firewall closes
the NAT. Then phttpget attempts to retrieve the 6.3 patch set and just
as
Hello,
I'm not certain of the following. I think you needed to update to 6.3
first and after the first update, install compat6x. Regardless, you
may be able to recover by doing 'freebsd-update rollback'. That will
undo the most recent changes and hopefully get you a
I was using freebsd-update to upgrade from 6.2 to 7.0-RELEASE. The upgrade
and install of the kernel went fine, then I reran freebsd-update after
rebooting to get the userland stuff. Midway through installing updates,
I got the error:
Installing updates.../libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared
>> I have a proxy (squid) that gives Internet to a set of pcs, one of
>> them is a FreeBSD 6.2, when wanting to upgrade ports (
>> portsnap fetch) gives me the messages following:
>>
>> PC1 # fetch portsnap
>
> Did you mean (and actually type) 'portsnap fetch'?
>
I wrong to write
>> But I fail t
Edgardo Nuevo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a proxy (squid) that gives Internet to a set of pcs, one of
> them is a FreeBSD 6.2, when wanting to upgrade ports (
> portsnap fetch) gives me the messages following:
>
> PC1 # fetch portsnap
Did you mean (and actually type) 'portsnap fetch'?
Hi
I have a proxy (squid) that gives Internet to a set of pcs, one of
them is a FreeBSD 6.2, when wanting to upgrade ports (
portsnap fetch) gives me the messages following:
PC1 # fetch portsnap
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org Mirrors ... 4 Mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.Fre
That's not uncommon. For example when you go from one major FreeBSD version to
another you have to rebuild everything most of the time because of ABI changes.
or install misc/compat6x :)
Of course you could also wait for the building cluster to catch up and do a
binary upgrade (-P in portupgr
On 2008-06-06, Tuc at T-B-O-H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In UPDATING it says :
>
> Given the scope and sheer number of dependent ports, it may be more
> advisable to simply blow away all existing install ports (after
> keeping any local configuration changes), and rebuilding from scratch.
>
Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote:
I'm wondering just how many ports the author of that statement
has. I have a few to say the least. Actually a few hundred. Ok, well,
1102 to be a bit more specific Blow away and re-install 1102 ports?
I think he meant the ports tree, not necessarily the install
Looks like most of them are
Bump portrevision due to upgrade of devel/gettext.
Joachim Rosenfeld wrote:
Why did ~5k ports change in the last 24 hours?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
In UPDATING it says :
Given the scope and sheer number of dependent ports, it may be more
advisable to simply blow away all existing install ports (after
keeping any local configuration changes), and rebuilding from scratch.
I'm wondering just how many ports the author of that stat
Maybe it's because gettext got updated and it's required to rebuild all
ports that depend on it? See /usr/ports/UPDATING. Really I'm just guessing
here.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Joachim Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why did ~5k ports change in the last 24 hours?
> __
Why did ~5k ports change in the last 24 hours?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
1201 - 1300 of 2414 matches
Mail list logo
