buildworld
completes successfully? It is openssl from ports depending on libz.so.3
of FreeBSD 6.4, sendmail is compiled with openssl from ports for FreeBSD
7.3, which provides libz.so.4... The upgrade path 6.4 -> 7.3 with ports
openssl is probably not unique, others will have a similar upgrade p
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:13:18AM -0700, zaxis wrote:
>
> >uname -a
> FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jul 14
> 15:35:26 CST 2010
> r...@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386
>
> Now i want to up
>uname -a
FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jul 14
15:35:26 CST 2010
r...@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386
Now i want to upgrade it to 8.1 realease.
thanks!
-
e^(π⋅i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
h
On 2010-08-29 17:07, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
Why?
You only have to re-install all ports when cha
On 2010-08-29 16:55, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
When I try to do portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` I get a prompt
I tried the same commands using ssh from a
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
>
> Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
Why?
You only have to re-install all ports when changing between major releases
e.g. 7.x
Hello list.
I've upgraded a system from 8.0 to 8.1 and it went well :-)
Followed the portmaster manpage on how to reinstall my ports.
When I try to do portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` I get a prompt
CORRECT>portmaster `cut ~/installed-port-list` (y|n|e|a)?
I choose n and hit enter and g
Hi,
I recently updated a machine (running on VMWare) from 7.2 to 8.1.
This machine has two (virtual) disks. While the upgrade went rather
smooth ('make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel, reboot
into single user, mergemaster -p, make installworld, mergemaster,
reboot), I los
I'll try that.
See also discussion at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-July/057734.html
Following the link in the other thread to
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-February/055017.html
i made the changes to /usr/bin/krb5-config:
# diff /usr/bin/krb5
> From: "LeonMeßner"
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:04 PM
> To:
> Subject: openldap-sasl fails after 8.1 upgrade
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > after binary upgrading to freebsd8.1 from 7.2 i encounter an error
> > with openldap24, cyrus-sasl2 and kerb
:
Subject: openldap-sasl fails after 8.1 upgrade
Hi,
after binary upgrading to freebsd8.1 from 7.2 i encounter an error
with openldap24, cyrus-sasl2 and kerberos:
# ldapsearch uid=whatever
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Other (e.g., implementation
Hi,
after binary upgrading to freebsd8.1 from 7.2 i encounter an error
with openldap24, cyrus-sasl2 and kerberos:
# ldapsearch uid=whatever
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Other (e.g., implementation specific)
error (80)
additional info: SASL(-1): generic
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:23:22 -0700
> From: Chris Maness
> To: Mark Tinguely
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ftp login failing after upgrade to 8.1
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Mark Tinguely wro=
> te:
> > Chris Maness wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Mark Tinguely
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Chris Maness wrote:
>>>
I just upgraded to FreeBSD 8.1 and my regular user name seems to be
disallowed for ftp. I checked and my na
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> I just upgraded to FreeBSD 8.1 and my regular user name seems to be
>> disallowed for ftp. I checked and my name or group does not seem to
>> show up in ftpusers. Any suggestions as to what might have happened?
>>
On 10/08/2010 22:01:40, Chris Maness wrote:
> I just upgraded to FreeBSD 8.1 and my regular user name seems to be
> disallowed for ftp. I checked and my name or group does not seem to
> show up in ftpusers. Any suggestions as to what might have happened?
/etc/ftpusers is actually the list of acc
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> I just upgraded to FreeBSD 8.1 and my regular user name seems to be
>> disallowed for ftp. I checked and my name or group does not seem to
>> show up in ftpusers. Any suggestions as to what might have happened?
>>
I just upgraded to FreeBSD 8.1 and my regular user name seems to be
disallowed for ftp. I checked and my name or group does not seem to
show up in ftpusers. Any suggestions as to what might have happened?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@free
Yes Antonio, it was gtk2 and libgnomeprint..
thanksbookmarked it this time ;)
kenneth
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions
This one?
http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/CUPS#CUPS_and_Gnome_Warning
Cheers,
Antonio
On 29/07/2010 23:41, Kenneth Hatteland wrote:
When updating the cups port my cups networked printer tends to fall out
from firefox, epdfview etc.
Last time I found a webpage with some cups related ports
When updating the cups port my cups networked printer tends to fall out
from firefox, epdfview etc.
Last time I found a webpage with some cups related ports that had to be
rebuilt for it to work. But I forgot to bookmark it. Now I can not find
this page and I can`t piece together which ports it
On 28 Jul 2010, at 11:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Just one note. You are managing this machine remotely? No X on it?
Take the two step approach and you should have a running system
afterwards.
It's a mail server, no X but I do have physical access.
Michael Doyle
Network Administrator, Co
On 28 July 2010 11:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a source upgrade on one box from 6.4 to 7.2 or 7.3 without any
> problems.
>
> I later did a source upgrade to 8.0 on the same machine just to find out
> that USB has some problems, I went then back to 7.3 on thi
Hi,
I did a source upgrade on one box from 6.4 to 7.2 or 7.3 without any problems.
I later did a source upgrade to 8.0 on the same machine just to find out that
USB has some problems, I went then back to 7.3 on this machine.
I also did some source upgrades from 7.x to 8.0 on some other
On 27 July 2010 16:13, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:02:48PM +0100, Michael Doyle wrote:
> > I would like to upgrade a server that is currently running version 6.4
> > up to version 7.3
> > Having looked at /usr/src/UPDATING on a 7.3 machine, I do
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:02:48PM +0100, Michael Doyle wrote:
> I would like to upgrade a server that is currently running version 6.4
> up to version 7.3
> Having looked at /usr/src/UPDATING on a 7.3 machine, I don't see any
> major problems flagged.
>
> Given that I
I would like to upgrade a server that is currently running version 6.4
up to version 7.3
Having looked at /usr/src/UPDATING on a 7.3 machine, I don't see any
major problems flagged.
Given that I have console access to this machine, and I want to
preserve the user directories (it'
al to authmysqlrc.dist.
>>> - some make install options are not kept (maildrop - not compiled against
>>> mysql and courier imap - fam is compiled, even though initially was ruled
>>> out)
>>
>> Those aren't set up as OPTIONS, so they won't get s
t)
>
> Those aren't set up as OPTIONS, so they won't get stored in
> /var/db/ports.
>
>> The upgrade sequence is:
>>
>> # portsnap fetch update
>> # portmanager -u
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> See "alternative configu
not compiled against
> mysql and courier imap - fam is compiled, even though initially was ruled out)
Those aren't set up as OPTIONS, so they won't get stored in
/var/db/ports.
> The upgrade sequence is:
>
> # portsnap fetch update
> # portmanager -u
>
> Am
On 23/07/2010 17:19:54, Martin Koch Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will freebsd-install upgrade tell you, if any libraries version numbers got
> bumped, and thus if installed packages needs rebuilding?
>
> I followed the handbook and did the 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE upgrade
Hi,
Will freebsd-install upgrade tell you, if any libraries version numbers got
bumped, and thus if installed packages needs rebuilding?
I followed the handbook and did the 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE upgrade like:
freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade
freebsd-update install
shutdown -r now
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 07:37:59AM +, Alexandre L. typed:
> I think you have not understood the handbook.
> You MUST rebuild both base system and kernel to correctly upgrade your
> FreeBSD box to 8.1-RELEASE.
> If you let your system in 8.0-RELEASE and compile a kernel with
I think you have not understood the handbook.
You MUST rebuild both base system and kernel to correctly upgrade your FreeBSD
box to 8.1-RELEASE.
If you let your system in 8.0-RELEASE and compile a kernel with 8.1 sources,
you will have problem.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook
>FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jul 14
>15:35:26 CST 2010
>root at mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386
>
>Can i just use the following commands to upgrade to 8.1 kernel ? And does
>the virtualbox-ose st
>uname -a
FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jul 14
15:35:26 CST 2010
r...@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386
Can i just use the following commands to upgrade to 8.1 kernel ? And does
the virtualbox-ose still work under
Hallo
While upgrading port, I have the following problems:
- some cfg files are overwritten (authdaemon's authmysqlrc)
- some make install options are not kept (maildrop - not compiled against mysql
and courier imap - fam is compiled, even though initially was ruled out)
The upgrade sequen
On 07/18/2010 19:43, Dan Nelson wrote:
When I did it, I believe I just made copies of /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib
to ../lib32 (so 32-bit ports would still work), installed the 64-bit kernel
and world, rebooted, then upgraded all the ports over a week or so. I was
running zfs so I made a snapshot
Hi
> Since this is something that potentially almost everyone would need at
> least once this should be made very easy for the end user.
I am not sure what you mean. I have penty of machines that are 32 bits
and simply cannot run 64 bits.
If I ever replace one 32 bits machines with a 64 bits ne
In the last episode (Jul 18), Yuri said:
> Since this is something that potentially almost everyone would need at
> least once this should be made very easy for the end user.
When I did it, I believe I just made copies of /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib
to ../lib32 (so 32-bit ports would still work),
Since this is something that potentially almost everyone would need at
least once this should be made very easy for the end user.
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
g this, since it messed up a lot of things?
During the upgrade of all the packages using portupgrade, the pkgdb.db
got corrupted while upgrading ruby18-bdb, and interrupted the upgrade of
all packages (using portupgrade -af).
I've checked this by upgrading the port itself. Is this normal, an
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> What did you have in your /usr/local directory prior to the upgrade?
> Had you installed any ports? What is the output of the following command:
>
> pkg_info
>
>
it was only perl installed. That I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Barnard wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Please see your request below
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> It's possible that your disk device names changed during the upgrade and
>> /etc/fstab can no longer mount the previous
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> Mike Barnard writes:
>
> > sorry... RTFM -eU flags sorted me out... but I only get the directories
> an
> > no files created now may be rebuilding world will work :-/
>
> There are no files des
Mike Barnard writes:
> sorry... RTFM -eU flags sorted me out... but I only get the directories an
> no files created now may be rebuilding world will work :-/
There are no files described in the mtree file. I can't think of any
that should be there before you install ports...
__
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Mike Barnard wrote:
>
> mtree -p /usr/local < /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist
>>>
>>>
>> This is the command I have been looking for
>>
>
> hmmm... this give me no joy... mtree complains about the paths all missing,
> but does not create them. I can create files and
Mike Barnard writes:
>> mtree -p /usr/local < /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist
>>>
>>>
>> This is the command I have been looking for
>>
>
> hmmm... this give me no joy... mtree complains about the paths all missing,
> but does not create them. I can create files and directories in /usr/local
> manu
> mtree -p /usr/local < /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist
>>
>>
> This is the command I have been looking for
>
hmmm... this give me no joy... mtree complains about the paths all missing,
but does not create them. I can create files and directories in /usr/local
manually.
## Creating a file in /usr/l
Mike Barnard writes:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Lowell Gilbert <
> freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
>> (I thought buildworld did that for you, but apparently it doesn't.
>> Probably because you can't put it somewhere else if you like.)
>>
>
> I thought so too. Either the jou
he directory has the
> > usual files and directories, but after the upgrade, its empty. Good thing
> is
> > that I had not installed any ports.
> >
> > I'd like to avoid a reinstall, which is why I was wondering if there is a
> > way I can get this directory back
Hi Greg,
Please see your request below
> Hi Mike,
>
> It's possible that your disk device names changed during the upgrade and
> /etc/fstab can no longer mount the previous device on /usr/local. Do
> you see any error messages during the boot process?
>
>
no, I do no
Mike Barnard writes:
> 100% sure... I have tried to rebuild world but I still end up with an empty
> /usr/local.. Prior to upgrading from 8.0-RELEASE, the directory has the
> usual files and directories, but after the upgrade, its empty. Good thing is
> that I had not install
directory has the
usual files and directories, but after the upgrade, its empty. Good thing is
that I had not installed any ports.
I'd like to avoid a reinstall, which is why I was wondering if there is a
way I can get this directory back with its files and directories.
>
>
>
ped out my /usr/local
> directory! I did nothing out of the usual on this upgrade. Any one
> experienced the same thing? How do I safely get /usr/local populated again?
>
>
>
Hi Mike,
It's possible that your disk device names changed during the upgrade and
/etc/fstab can no
is before and I am little puzzled.
After upgrading my FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE, I ended up with FreeBSD
8.1-PRERELEASE and an empty /usr/local directory. It wiped out my /usr/local
directory! I did nothing out of the usual on this upgrade. Any one
experienced the same thing? How do I safely get /
Hi All,
I have never encountered anything like this before and I am little puzzled.
After upgrading my FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE, I ended up with FreeBSD
8.1-PRERELEASE and an empty /usr/local directory. It wiped out my /usr/local
directory! I did nothing out of the usual on this upgrade. Any one
First, Thanks Doug for responding to my mails.
> > I don't know (or understand) if I have to set a value
> to
> > PM_SU_VERBOSE
>
> That depends on your goal. Why are you setting this?
I thought that PM_SU_VERBOSE will explain the errors about my sudo problem. I
can use portmaster with sudo onl
Apologies for not answering sooner ...
On 06/29/10 13:37, Alexandre L. wrote:
> I have done tests last days, and now I can set PACKAGESITE correctly
> in user's .cshrc (I have unset the parameter in root's .cshrc). Else,
> I have set /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc, as described in the
> portmaster's
I have done tests last days, and now I can set PACKAGESITE correctly in user's
.cshrc (I have unset the parameter in root's .cshrc).
Else, I have set /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc, as described in the portmaster's
manpage.
Here my /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc
PM_SU_VERBOSE=
PM_SU_CMD=/usr/local/
> Objet: mod_proxy_html upgrade/reinstall outcomments line
> À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Vendredi 25 juin 2010, 8h29
> upgrading or reinstalling port
> www/mod_proxy_htmlevery time outcomments the
> line
> LoadModule proxy_html_module
> libexec/apache22/m
upgrading or reinstalling port www/mod_proxy_htmlevery time outcomments the
line
LoadModule proxy_html_module libexec/apache22/mod_proxy_html.so
if you had it previously in your apache.conf file ...
At your next run of # apachectl graceful, httpd gives an error and doesn't
start ...
I've noticed
On 06/24/10 06:10, b. f. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use
>> PORTMASTER tool to upgrade my ports via packages only. Then I added
>> the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc file,
> Hi,
>
> On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
> to upgrade my ports via packages only.
> Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
> file, and re-opened user's session :
> setenv PAC
Hi,
On my FreeBSD box running 8.0-RELEASE-p3, I have tried to use PORTMASTER tool
to upgrade my ports via packages only.
Then I added the following line to my user's .cshrc file and root's .cshrc
file, and re-opened user's session :
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.fr.freebsd.
After a recent Gnome upgrade I'm having a problem with a box on a USB KVM
switch.
FreeBSD test.fu.bar 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Wed Jun 9
20:18:01 IDT 2010 r...@test.fu.bar:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# pkg_info |grep gnome2
gnome2-2.30.1_1 The "meta
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 07:12, schrieb n dhert:
I have not php5-pdo_pgsql-5.3.2_1 on mystem since this is for PHP5
version 3.x, not for PHP5 version 2.x, which is the version of PHP I
use on my system... Two months ago PHP5-3.2 was automatically
installed as part of my daily portupgrades, but users on
On 6/9/10 9:26 PM, Fbsd1 wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
On 6/9/10 9:07 PM, Aiza wrote:
The upgrade function requires the -r newrelease flag.
The manpage does not state the formate of the newrelease value.
Is it just the release number like this 8.0 or is it like this
8.0-RELEASE?
8.0-RELEASE. I
Glen Barber wrote:
On 6/9/10 9:07 PM, Aiza wrote:
The upgrade function requires the -r newrelease flag.
The manpage does not state the formate of the newrelease value.
Is it just the release number like this 8.0 or is it like this
8.0-RELEASE?
8.0-RELEASE. I believe you can pull 8.0
On 6/9/10 9:07 PM, Aiza wrote:
The upgrade function requires the -r newrelease flag.
The manpage does not state the formate of the newrelease value.
Is it just the release number like this 8.0 or is it like this 8.0-RELEASE?
8.0-RELEASE. I believe you can pull 8.0-RELEASE-p2 using -r as well
The upgrade function requires the -r newrelease flag.
The manpage does not state the formate of the newrelease value.
Is it just the release number like this 8.0 or is it like this 8.0-RELEASE?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi,
Am 09.06.10 14:31, schrieb n dhert:
---> Upgrading 'davical-0.9.8.4' to 'davical-0.9.9' (www/davical)
---> Build of www/davical started at: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:48:38 +0200
---> Building '/usr/ports/www/davical'
===> Cleaning for davical-0.9.9
Unknown extension pdo_pgsql for PHP 52.
I have php52-5.2.13_2 (not php5-5.3.2, too many people had stuff only
compatible with the 5.2 version)
There was an upgrade of davical, but I get
---> Upgrade of www/davical started at: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:48:38 +0200
---> Upgrading 'davical-0.9.8.4' to 'davical-0.9.9'
Hi,
OK, the next day the TAB was OK again after the recompile of kdebase (part
of the necessary recompiles specified in /usr/ports/UPDATING - 20090309)
This was on a system already on 8.0 (upgraded from 7.2)
But I have another issue with that libusb on another system, which is stil
7.2.
I want to d
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:37:58 +, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have seach to net but i haven't find a way to update my system from
> 8.0-release to stable-8.
>
> can you tell me a way to do this?
Basically, this process contains two main steps: fetching the
sources, and compilin
le.html
Most FreeBSD users install FreeBSD-RELEASE then use the freebsd-update
command to either patch it with security updates or upgrade to a newer
version of RELEASE.
As far as I know you can't use freebsd-update to upgrade to/from
STABLE, only RELEASE.
Regards
Andrew
___
On 06/06/2010 4:37 μ.μ., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have seach to net but i haven't find a way to update my system from
> 8.0-release to stable-8.
>
> can you tell me a way to do this?
>
> thanks in advance
>
Since you are just starting with this, I would advise against it. Unle
hello,
i have seach to net but i haven't find a way to update my system from
8.0-release to stable-8.
can you tell me a way to do this?
thanks in advance
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-q
n dhert writes:
> But is there a workarround somehow in case I DO need to specify options
> different from the default ??
> I'd really want to know that, for in case ...
"cd /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4 && make config"
This is covered in "man ports".
___
f
, I do have :
> ]$ ls -la /usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9809 May 17 14:57
> /usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h
>
> On the other hand portupgrading always gives me:
> ---> ** Upgrade tasks 1: 0 done, 1 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
> ---> Listi
octl.h
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9809 May 17 14:57
/usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h
On the other hand portupgrading always gives me:
---> ** Upgrade tasks 1: 0 done, 1 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- devel
ecursive] Error 1^M
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14'^M
> gmake: *** [all] Error 2^M
> *** Error code 1^M
> ^M
> Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/hal.^M
> ---> Build of sysutils/hal ended at: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:09:33 +0200
> (consumed
>
ng directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14/hald'^M
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1^M
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14'^M
gmake: *** [all] Error 2^M
*** Error code 1^M
^M
Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/hal.^M
---> Build of sysutils/hal en
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:19:28 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> enough sarcasm
No sarcasm in here, just honest and fact-based statements (except
those obviously signed by a smiley).
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
made for a version 7 system, and
you suddenly have a version 8 system, problems may occur,
for example if a library is required that's not present
anymore.
> Have to say after 2 years of using BSD am seriously
> disappointed with FreeBSD, every other OS perform a
> clean upgrade e
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:58:48 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> So am I lead to believe FreeBSD is mean to be a "Mechanics"
> Operating system? I say that in the nicest way.
I wouldn't go that far, but FreeBSD, as well as repairing a car,
requires certain knowledge and experience, I agree.
>
maybe install it via net,
which is very common), then install samba, and finally get
your data back onto the system. But from my "diagnostics"
(which are, in fact, mostly guessings, due to the lack of
information from you, your performed commands and the
respnses), I would not reach for s
u (1) check FTP is up & running, (2) run "pkg_add -r samba34"
or maybe (3) run "freebsd-upüdate rollback" in SUM?
> - This is not a "clean upgrade" admittedly!
I think the OS has been upgraded properly. What does "uname -r" say?
It would REALLY be hel
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:29:28 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> I have sort of giving up and the "cant be arsed Ill put windows on"
> factor has stepped in.
Have you considered entering single user mode and trying to get back
to 7.2 ("freebsd-update rollback")? In this case, you will need to
re-
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:20:50 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> well surely if the upgrade IS going to affect ANY pre installed
> package that should be taken into consideration? - Im not having
> a dig, Im just suggesting how FreeBSD has fallen behind in the
> "User Experience&
ages about needing to
> upgrade.
Where did those messages come from? FreeBSD 7.2 is still supported
and no problem to run. I even know a setting where somebody is
using a 4.0 server for internal backups.
You should consider thinking about updating more intensively. There
has just been a relat
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:02:44 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> leopard# pkg_delete -x samba
> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/share/swat/js' doesn't exist
> pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/share/swat/js'
> pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packin
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:38:42 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> Ah seems like FTP as well as Samba is blocked after the upgrade
This explains the error message presented. If you want to install
from FTP, but FTP can't reach anything, then... well... no INDEX
for you. :-)
>
&
CD?
If you know which package to install - if you know its NAME - why
bother with sysinstall? Simply use "pkg_add -r ".
> This is like a poorly written shareware app!
No, I think it's acting completely as intended and predictable.
Maybe it's due to a partially failed upgra
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:38:22 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> ok so then running testparm i'm getting
>
> leopard# testparm
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libcrypt.so.4" not found, required by
> "testparm"
> leopard#
Seems like something failed during the update. Program version and
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:33:49 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree).
>
> Doesn't exist
To install FreeBSD from source, you need to install the "src"
distribution, or get the desired sources via CVS (csup). There
are examples
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:29:28 + (GMT), Andy Hiscock
wrote:
> Why during the upgrade process the "inspecting system" shouldnt
> be able to find and identify and prepair everything that needs
> to be upgraded and reconfigured accordingly.
Because this is the responsibility o
here!
>
>
>
>
My guess is you need to do some reading first, it seems you are
administering a system you don't quite understand.
When doing a minor version upgrade (i.e. from 7.0 to 7.2) there is no
need to touch anything in the extra programs you've installed (hint:
tho
ing the base system usually doesn't require
you to upgrade your applications as well. The freebsd-update
binary updating program takes care of everything.
> How do I install "Ports"?
The ports collection can be installed via sysinstall. Choose
configure - distributions - ports
Ah seems like FTP as well as Samba is blocked after the upgrade
I have ran FreeBSD 7 to 7.2 using the freebsd upgrade process painless in the
past, however..
Have followed the instructions for upgrade 7.2 to 8.0-P3 from the FreeBSD
website. As I am not a FreeBSD guru all I can say is
401 - 500 of 3523 matches
Mail list logo
