I'm probably going to make an ass out of myself which has certainly
happened before. Still, a disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking
about. Take everything I say with the whole canister of salt.
As I understand it, a symbol describes the relative entry point of a
function in a given block of
[skip]
When you try to run top, it looks for the symbol that represents nlist,
and when it can't find it, it doesn't know where to find the nlist
kernel function. I'm guessing nlist has something to do with a process
list... hence, when top can't find nlist, it throws a fit.
I think nlist
XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?
Anyone know if this will be the case?
Cheers,
--
Irvine Short
Sys Admin
SANBI, University of the Western Cape, South Africa
http://www.sanbi.ac.za
tel: +27-21-959 3645
fax: +27-21-959 2512
cel: +27-82-494 3828
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Le 2001-03-09, Irvine Short crivait :
XF86 4 on 4.3-RELEASE?
Anyone know if this will be the case?
The XFree 4 port already builds and works flawlessly on 4.2-STABLE.
Thomas.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 03:24:02AM +, j mckitrick wrote:
Hi all,
I recently heard that there might be filtered mailing lists out there that
only contain cvs entries that are being applied to -stable. Has anyone seen
these? How can I subscribe? It seems that might be a good
For anyone that's interested, this has been MFC'd to -stable now.
Use 'netstat -i' to return the stats associated with a particular
interface. ATM we only support IPv4 and IPv6 stats.
Joe
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 02:20:27PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
Back on Nov 7, 2000, Josef
On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:55, Josef Karthauser wrote:
It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but
this means doing clever stuff with the commits because it's possible
for a committer to affect more than one branch at a time.
This is also a goal of FreshPorts2. I
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:58:56PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:55, Josef Karthauser wrote:
It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but
this means doing clever stuff with the commits because it's possible
for a committer to affect more
On 9 Mar 2001, at 11:01, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:58:56PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
On 9 Mar 2001, at 10:55, Josef Karthauser wrote:
It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but
this means doing clever stuff with the commits
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Nope. When XFree86 4.x:
a) Supports a reasonable superset of all cards supported by 3.3.6
b) Doesn't halve OpenGL performance on cards like Matrox and nVidia
(3dfx sucks so much on both that it's not an issue).
c)
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Nope. When XFree86 4.x:
a) Supports a reasonable superset of all cards supported by 3.3.6
b) Doesn't halve OpenGL performance on cards like Matrox and nVidia
(3dfx sucks so much on both that
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have not seen this in the sysctl man page - so I haven't used it either.
Where can I get more info about it?
Try searching the FreeBSD mailing lists. It's usually associated with
the way the kernel maintains timekeeping with APM not being built
lo there,
I swear at some point I had q3test working under freebsd 4.0 with my voodoo2
card. The day the full retail version came out, I tried in vain for about a week to
get it working and gave up. I've decided to try again. I started out with a google
search, and only turned up
13 matches
Mail list logo
