On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:13:06PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Sergey Osokin wrote:
Is there any way to make it work?
To fool firewall?
Yes, looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-02-28 at 15:36:27 Quincey Koziol wrote:
QK I updated my machine to the latest stable source yesterday (2/27/03) and
===snip===
QK /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libkrb.so.3: Undefined symbol
_ossl_old_des_set_key
You probably need
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Please, people! If Port 5999 is blocked, the responsible person
doesn't want you to use CVSup. You will have to clear that issue.
If port 5999 is blocked, chances are your firewall admin doesn't even
know what CVSup is. If you send him an email he'll probably open it
I suppose this list is the right place?
4.8 pre-release problems:
A. The new __stdinp, __stdoutp, __stderrp in stdio.h is causing major
problems for 3.x binaries. E.g. such a binary uses compat/libc.so.3,
but also libm.so.2 -- the latter includes stdio.h but has no compat
version. All
You could funnel your CVS traffic through an open port like 80 or 22 or
tunnel it inside of HTTP or SSH, but this will require a gateway on the
outside, or someone running a CVS repository on one of those ports. If
you think that the fw admins watch their logs and traffic patterns then
you're
At 2003-02-28T14:36:27Z, Quincey Koziol [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I updated my machine to the latest stable source yesterday (2/27/03) and
I'm now getting this message when [attempting to] telneting into it:
On a side note, if you're interested enough in security to deal with
Kerberos, you
Hello!
Kirk Strauser wrote:
I updated my machine to the latest stable source yesterday (2/27/03) and
I'm now getting this message when [attempting to] telneting into it:
On a side note, if you're interested enough in security to deal with
Kerberos, you should permanently lose telnet.
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:59, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi!
But is there any way to do anything without asking firewall
admin to open 5999 port?
No, there is not. Well, there is, sort of ...
Please, people! If Port 5999 is blocked, the responsible person
doesn't want you to use CVSup.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:42:48AM -0600, Huver wrote:
BTW, I made the mistake of cvsup'ing to RELENG_4 from a 4.6.2, thinking I
was updating to 4.7, now I'll have to back down to 4.7+post-patches. I'm
entering a reqeust now: in the future, pre-release be made a new, short-
lived branch
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 16:42, Huver wrote:
BTW, I made the mistake of cvsup'ing to RELENG_4 from a 4.6.2, thinking I
was updating to 4.7, now I'll have to back down to 4.7+post-patches. I'm
entering a reqeust now: in the future, pre-release be made a new, short-
lived branch (delete it after
I could be mistaken, but my impression is that crypto code seems to
often screw up the build process. I'm not sure if this is because the
crypto code is restricted due to a need for the environment variable
USA_RESIDENT to be set to YES, or because crypto sources and crypto
licensing seems to
hi, there!
I suppose this list is the right place?
4.8 pre-release problems:
A. The new __stdinp, __stdoutp, __stderrp in stdio.h is causing major
problems for 3.x binaries. E.g. such a binary uses compat/libc.so.3,
but also libm.so.2 -- the latter includes stdio.h but has no
I've brought up STABLE on a Supermicro X5DPR-8G2+ motherboard which has
two 2.4GHz Xeons. In the BIOS setup, I disabled hyperthreading. The BIOS
even prints out a nice message during the POST that hyperthreading is
disabled.
The BIOS setting notwithstanding, STABLE fires up hyperthreading and
13 matches
Mail list logo
