Hi ..
Having read the man page, there is alot in there that makes me wonder
whether going with a HP Smart Array P600 is a wise idea ...
"The Compaq ciss adapters require faked responses to get reasonable
behavior out of them. In addition, the ciss command set is by no means
adequate to
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:47:13PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> > > $ sh
> > > $ PACKAGES=/home/packages
> > > $ export PACKAGES
> > > $ /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info -I xorg-clients-6.8.2
> > > pkg_info: can't find package 'xorg-clients-6.8.2' installed or in a file!
> > > $ PKG_PATH=/home/pack
Looks like it is broken for a while - "_sym_calloc2: failed to allocate HCB"
is always there...
And... Looks like Gerard Roudier havn't more interest in maintaining this
driver - there is the second generation of the original driver into linux
source three since 2001, which is newer ported to Fre
Hello Daniel and Bartosz:
Thank you for such prompt and helpful replies. Sounds like the Dell's
ATI will work just fine.
Graham/
Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
Mmm, the radeon man page claims Radeon 9000's are supported without
caveats.
Oops, I sent my initial reply off-list. To summarize
MS-KILA wrote:
still present trying to install 6.0 on a 600Mhz celery, 384 ram, 8g
hdd; ftp install. will attempt the explicit ip idea.
does every first attempt at ftp choke like this?
wayne
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
Hello all!
Discovering troubles with kde-apps startup I've faced with interesting
effect - starting of gdb konsole (as nonprivileged user) causes system
crash.
Here is an example:
gdb konsole
run
In my case this method 100% rebooting system in 80 seconds (mysterious
network wa
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate> which only test on
Hi,
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is
nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs
nate> which only test on Windows and so not everyone mak
Mmm, the radeon man page claims Radeon 9000's are supported without caveats.
Oops, I sent my initial reply off-list. To summarize for everybody else:
Yes, you're right; I was thinking the Radeon 9000 was a newer chip,
while it is an oder one (an rv250), which has been fully supported for a
wh
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> >Here is a patch that should fix the battery hangs on RELENG_6. It
> >was tested to work fine, although I need testing from an affected
> >user to verify it fixes the problem. It was committed to HEAD and
> >will be MFCed if it fixes the problem.
> >
My Dell C600 is affect
Nate Lawson wrote:
Here is a patch that should fix the battery hangs on RELENG_6. It was
tested to work fine, although I need testing from an affected user to
verify it fixes the problem. It was committed to HEAD and will be MFCed
if it fixes the problem.
Thanks a lot!
I'm a bit disappo
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:43, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> > I'd say the Dell's video is more likely to work (even 3d).
>
> Well, not quite yet. X.Org 6.8 doesn't have any 3D support for modern
> Radeon chips and the forthcoming 6.9/7.0 will have "experimental"
> support. But 2D is working just fine (
I'd say the Dell's video is more likely to work (even 3d).
Well, not quite yet. X.Org 6.8 doesn't have any 3D support for modern
Radeon chips and the forthcoming 6.9/7.0 will have "experimental"
support. But 2D is working just fine (I am typing this on an Inspiron
8600C with ATI Radeon).
I
Rob wrote:
> --- Peter Jeremy
wrote:
>>
>> Basically, wait until your system deadlocks. BREAK
>> into DDB.
>> As a start, run 'show lockedvnods', 'ps'. My guess
>> is that you'll see a lock that has a number of
waiters
>> which is probably the culprit.
>> Use 'panic' to get a crashdump and then
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:42, Graham North wrote:
> Am currently trying to choose between a couple of laptops, the luck
> winner of which will have Freebsd loaded alongside WinXP.
>
> Dell Latitude d600 with Radeon 9000? video, intel pro wireless
> or
> IBM R51 - Intel Extreme2, intel pro wireless.
>
>
> > $ sh
> > $ PACKAGES=/home/packages
> > $ export PACKAGES
> > $ /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info -I xorg-clients-6.8.2
> > pkg_info: can't find package 'xorg-clients-6.8.2' installed or in a file!
> > $ PKG_PATH=/home/packages/All
> > $ export PKG_PATH
> > $ /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info -I xorg-clients-
> $ sh
> $ PACKAGES=/home/packages
> $ export PACKAGES
> $ /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info -I xorg-clients-6.8.2
> pkg_info: can't find package 'xorg-clients-6.8.2' installed or in a file!
> $ PKG_PATH=/home/packages/All
> $ export PKG_PATH
> $ /usr/local/sbin/pkg_info -I xorg-clients-6.8.2
> xorg-client
>
> > On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
> > > > Joel Hatton wrote:
> > > > > What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
> > > >
> > > > That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
> > >
> > > This is certainly sensible, however it appear
> On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
> > > Joel Hatton wrote:
> > > > What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
> > >
> > > That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
> >
> > This is certainly sensible, however it appears that the onus h
Am currently trying to choose between a couple of laptops, the luck
winner of which will have Freebsd loaded alongside WinXP.
Dell Latitude d600 with Radeon 9000? video, intel pro wireless
or
IBM R51 - Intel Extreme2, intel pro wireless.
The main differences will likely be the video and maybe bi
Here is a patch that should fix the battery hangs on RELENG_6. It was
tested to work fine, although I need testing from an affected user to
verify it fixes the problem. It was committed to HEAD and will be MFCed
if it fixes the problem.
I'm a bit disappointed that no one reported this proble
On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
[snip]
> # pkg_info -I xorg-clients\*
> xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 X client programs and related files from X.Org
>
> # portupgrade -p xterm
>
> ... (building)
>
> ---> Installing the new version via the port
> ===> Installing for xterm-206_1
>
loader.old??? AFAIK loader is not rebuilt while compiling kernel and
there is no such file like loader.old created!
It is installed with world and not kernel then. Sorry for getting that
wrong, I didn't check. But it makes no difference to the original poster
because he reinstalled both world
boot:
Simply copy the default line and append ".old", as in:
boot: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/loader.old
loader.old??? AFAIK loader is not rebuilt while compiling kernel and there
is no such file like loader.old created!
Here, you can tell the loader to boot the previous kernel:
OK boot /boot/kernel.
On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
> > Joel Hatton wrote:
> > > What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
> >
> > That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
>
> This is certainly sensible, however it appears that the onus has now been
> p
> Joel Hatton wrote:
> > What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
>
> That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
This is certainly sensible, however it appears that the onus has now been
put on the maintainer of xorg-clients to change its installation process
Mark Andrews wrote:
Yes it is reasonable to expect ISP to fix things like this.
You pay the ISP to operate there part of the network within
the operational contraints of the RFCs (Standards track and
BCP).
I totally agree. Make sure when calling tech support on
> Hi,
>
> >>I understand the idea that bad values should be rejected, but in
> >>reality, I have the same DSL modem that these others have and there is
> >>no way to change the domain search list that it sends. No way that I
> >>could find at least. This is SBC-Yahoo in California, so there ar
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Rutger Bevaart wrote:
>
> There is no doubt that a lot of people have stable FreeBSD systems on Dell
> hardware. The strange thing is though that there are also a lot of people
> having problems with 1750's and 1850's (and therefore 2850's as well, as
> they have an identical
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi. I've got a system that's dying during the scsi probe of the
> initial install boot. The console messages are along the lines of:
>
> [...usual boot stuff...]
> vga0
> unknown: can't assign resources (port)
> unknown:
Doug White wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, [UTF-8] Václav Haisman wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>I got this panic on freshly installed FreeBSD 6. I did this df -h and
>>noticed that /mnt/oldroot/home is somewhat mangled. The /mnt/oldroot is
>>root of FreeBSD 4.11 system. I successfully copied some settings and
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, [UTF-8] V??clav Haisman wrote:
> Hi,
> I got this panic on freshly installed FreeBSD 6. I did this df -h and
> noticed that /mnt/oldroot/home is somewhat mangled. The /mnt/oldroot is
> root of FreeBSD 4.11 system. I successfully copied some settings and all
> user accounts fro
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Doug White wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > Updating proxy server running 5.4, i resolve enable acpi,smp
> > kernel to use HTT.
>
> You need to set
>
> machdep.hyperthreading_enabled="1"
Sorry, this should be:
machdep.
now, when i think of it, i suspect the reason might be CPUTYPE=pentium-m
The relevant bug is 75898, which I filed almost a year ago. It has been
fixed and MFC'd though, so it should not be affecting 6.0-release (I am
using CPUTYPE=pentium-m on 6.0 myself). Most likely, something else went
wro
I use CPUTYPE=pentium-m without any problems, and I'm pretty sure that the
kernel gets compiled without any optimizing, so I think you'll need to look
somewhere else for this problem.
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af martinko
Sendt: 22. n
I'm on a Dell 500m and acpi seems to work fine, other than it doesn't
register lid opening, which means that when I close the lid and open it
again, the screen is still blank. Does anyone know about this problem?
I can partly relate to the mouse issue. My mouse is very sluggish and its
slow to regi
A PR (bin/89410) about the handing of \[uW] in sh(1) on 6.0 caused
me to look for its introduction. I found that '\[hHWw$]' escape
sequences had been introduced in 5.4, mention of which so far has
been lacking from sh.1.
Could somebody please update the man page? Should i file a PR?
- Parv
-
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled="smbat", debug.acpi.disabled="smbat cmbat" and
debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat", that my laptop battery is not a
Hi everyone,
On a fileserver, one of the gmirror volumes has recently changed its
mountpoint. Therefore, I would like to change the name of the gmirror
to reflect this, as the current name is not very informational anymore.
Is there a 'gmirror rename' command I am misssing, or is this simply not
2005/11/21, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Laurent C wrote:
>
> >> This is almost certainly a mismatch between the kernel version and a
> >> monitoring tool that is trying to inspect kernel state (specifically,
> >> retrieve process lists). If your buildworld/installwor
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 00:36 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:14, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > Or you could try staying with PATA drives, but it's a losing battle - you
> > > will be hard pressed to find a new PC for which the devices are properly
> > > supported. (eg stuff like onb
dear all,
i recompiled kernel (and world) and it does not boot anymore. even
loader does not start. :-((
[note: version 6.0-release]
now, when i think of it, i suspect the reason might be CPUTYPE=pentium-m
-- long time ago i read either in freebsd or linux mailing lists
something along the l
Goran Gajic wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if this is known, but when I have tried compiling PAE kernel
with SMP enabled on 6.0-RELEASE I've got this mistake:
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -f
I get this when I boot -stable on my Dell M70 laptop:
Nov 22 09:25:12 mdaemon kernel: atapci0:
port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xbfa0-0xbfaf irq 9 at device
31.2 on pci0
Nov 22 09:25:12 mdaemon kernel: atapci0: failed to enable memory mapping!
Should memory mapping be working for tha
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 20 November 2005 at 23:01:41 -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
On Sun, November 20, 2005 01:59, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2005 at 21:37:03 -0600, Stephen
Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I recently upgraded from stable-6 of Nov 4 t
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
debug.acpi.disabled="smbat", debug.acpi.disabled="smbat cmbat" and
debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat", that my lapto
Hi,
I understand the idea that bad values should be rejected, but in
reality, I have the same DSL modem that these others have and there is
no way to change the domain search list that it sends. No way that I
could find at least. This is SBC-Yahoo in California, so there are a lot
of people o
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:14, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Or you could try staying with PATA drives, but it's a losing battle - you
> > will be hard pressed to find a new PC for which the devices are properly
> > supported. (eg stuff like onboard ethernet)
>
> /me groans...patches eh?
>
> I'm not a BSD guy
Hi,
I don't know if this is known, but when I have tried compiling PAE kernel
with SMP enabled on 6.0-RELEASE I've got this mistake:
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-st
Hi,
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:24:16 -0500
> Pierre-Luc Drouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok, there is new development. I realized by playing with
> debug.acpi.disabled="smbat", debug.acpi.disabled="smbat cmbat" and
> debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat", that my laptop battery is not a smbat,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I just read this thread and this issue affects
> me as well. Hopefully I'm not commenting on something that has been
> fixed but I can't test STABLE at the moment to verify that...
>
> I understand the idea that bad values should be rejected, but in
> reality, I hav
Mark Andrews wrote:
--61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:14:00PM -0800, Mark Space wrote:
Hi all,
=20
I just set up the latest 6.0 release, and I'm getting errors with the
On Sunday, 20 November 2005 at 23:01:41 -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
>
> On Sun, November 20, 2005 01:59, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 19 November 2005 at 21:37:03 -0600, Stephen
>> Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> I recently upgraded from stable-6 of Nov 4 to stable-6 of today on
>>> my Dell
There is no doubt that a lot of people have stable FreeBSD systems on Dell
hardware. The strange thing is though that there are also a lot of people
having problems with 1750's and 1850's (and therefore 2850's as well, as
they have an identical board).
We have installed about 4 1750's and 8 1850/
54 matches
Mail list logo
