Hi,
On 12/24/05, iwant4x4jeep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm upgrade my FreeBSD5.4 system to 6.0-STABLE. Now ACPI suspend-to-ram
> (sleepstate #3) don't work ( before upgrade all works fine)
>
> Processor - Pentium 4 2.4Ghz
> Mother Board - ASUS P4PE
>
> # dmesg | grep -i acpi
> ACPI APIC Table
I'm upgrade my FreeBSD5.4 system to 6.0-STABLE. Now ACPI suspend-to-ram
(sleepstate #3) don't work ( before upgrade all works fine)
Processor - Pentium 4 2.4Ghz
Mother Board - ASUS P4PE
# dmesg | grep -i acpi
ACPI APIC Table:
Features=0xbfebfbff
acpi0: on motherboard
acpi0: Overriding SCI Int
hello,
I got such entry mailed to me in last periodic run:
obsolete pre-RFC2553 sockaddr_in6 rejectedarplookup 62.21.28.103 failed: host
is not on local network
I've grepped through sys/compat/linux/linux_socket.c and looks like
there should be an \n on line 157.
regards,
--
Stanisław Halik,
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:13:38AM +0300, Anton Nikiforov wrote..
Dear ALL!
I have a Intel XEON based server and Compaq StorageWorks FC adapter with
FC disk subsystem.
I did not found any info about drivers available in
FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE-p8 (maybe vendor developed drivers
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:13:38AM +0300, Anton Nikiforov wrote..
> Dear ALL!
> I have a Intel XEON based server and Compaq StorageWorks FC adapter with
> FC disk subsystem.
> I did not found any info about drivers available in
> FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE-p8 (maybe vendor developed drivers/utilities?).
Building OpenSSH (as part of buildworld) from a RELENG_6 tree (RELENG_5
works fine from memory) results in binaries linked against the Kerberos
libraries, even when NO_KERBEROS is set in make.conf.
Although these libraries exist in the host environment, they do not in the
target environment (becau
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:26, James Tanis wrote:
> What reason is that? A reverse-lookup is no longer really a valid way
> of filtering out the undesireable unless your lucky enough to be
> dealing only with those who have the knowledge and ability to control
> those entries. Most residential i
Dear ALL!
I have a Intel XEON based server and Compaq StorageWorks FC adapter with
FC disk subsystem.
I did not found any info about drivers available in
FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE-p8 (maybe vendor developed drivers/utilities?).
Could you please help? is there any solution to make this three parts
(
Did you try with growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0*a* -J -R ?
I had the same problem but , i tried with this device (cd0_a)_ and it
worked.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscr
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > I have this box that apparently no longer likes FreeBSD's cdboot,
> > it prints something about BOOT/LOADER and then just reboots.
> > Any ideas how to debug something l
What reason is that? A reverse-lookup is no longer really a valid way
of filtering out the undesireable unless your lucky enough to be
dealing only with those who have the knowledge and ability to control
those entries. Most residential ips either have no reverse-lookup or
it's set to some long pai
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:54, Telegin Gennady wrote:
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/grn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/
>src/preproc/grn/main.cpp:692: error: expected primary-expression before
> '<'token
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/grn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/
I have heads up my source tree to RELENG_6, and for the `make
buildworld` I have got a compile error, last message of which is that:
c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O -pipe -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/preproc/grn/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/include
-I/usr/src/gnu/u
James Tanis wrote:
For whatever reason, I have had a similar problem which was solved by
entering the machines that you are logging in from into the hosts
file. I'm guessing it attempts a reverse lookup and your (as well as
my) dns/hostname does not match its reverse lookup entry.
On 12/23/05,
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:28:19 +0100
Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 18:52, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:38:15 +0100
> >
> > Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:10:19PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I and many others have offered to work on this. The core team has
> repeatedly stated that they won't integrate the efforts
Please provide hard evidence for this assertion. Merely repeating it will
not be sufficiently convincing. I wou
On Friday 23 December 2005 18:52, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:38:15 +0100
>
> Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > > I'm not sure this is the way to go, but ...
> > >
> > > Can someone put a document on what
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:38:15 +0100
Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure this is the way to go, but ...
> >
> > Can someone put a document on what is the desired model? I think we
> > have too much little pieces
For whatever reason, I have had a similar problem which was solved by
entering the machines that you are logging in from into the hosts
file. I'm guessing it attempts a reverse lookup and your (as well as
my) dns/hostname does not match its reverse lookup entry.
On 12/23/05, Michael A. Koerber <[E
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
After cvsuping latest RELENG_6:
make buildworld ( executes fine)
make buildkernel (gives an error - look below)
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -ffor
Essentially, you want a CVS (or equivalent tool) for the system
administrator. This could be a project management tool for OS binary or
source releases and updates.
The CVS concept would be able to manage the synchronization with current
source as it does now, and could include binary.
Then
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:10:19 +0530
Joseph Koshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www.infrastructures.org
> www.isconf.org
and perhaps also http://www.cfengine.org/
and probably others.
IMHO, FreeBSD is a good os, with good options on configuration and
management.
It is not a systems management tool
IIRC ATAPI Zip drives appear as "ATAPI Floppy Device" to the kernel,
you should be able to boot off of them but it might be a bit weird.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, s
El Viernes, 23 de Diciembre de 2005 16:17, Florent Thoumie escribió:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 16:12, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > El Viernes, 23 de Diciembre de 2005 15:38, Florent Thoumie escribió:
> > > On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure this is the
Xin> Hi
Hi.
On 19 Dec 2005 14:32:31 -0600, Douglas K. Rand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug> Tracing command swapper pid 0 tid 0 td 0xc0698e20
Doug> sched_switch(c0698e20,0,1) at sched_switch+0x14b
Doug> mi_switch(1,0) at mi_switch+0x1ba
Doug> scheduler(0,81ec00,81e000,0,c042f5d5) at scheduler+0x2
phk> Bring to system administration what source code
phk> version control brought to programming.
www.infrastructures.org
www.isconf.org
--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:12, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> El Viernes, 23 de Diciembre de 2005 15:38, Florent Thoumie escribió:
> > On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > > I'm not sure this is the way to go, but ...
> > >
> > > Can someone put a document on what is the desi
El Viernes, 23 de Diciembre de 2005 15:38, Florent Thoumie escribió:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is the way to go, but ...
> >
> > Can someone put a document on what is the desired model? I think
> > we have too much little pieces of disperse
After cvsuping latest RELENG_6:
make buildworld ( executes fine)
make buildkernel (gives an error - look below)
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -
On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> I'm not sure this is the way to go, but ...
>
> Can someone put a document on what is the desired model? I think we
> have too much little pieces of disperse notes about this.
>
> Also, some working notes about ports and RELENG_4/RELENG_
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hej there,
>
> Kobi Shmueli wrote:
> > Try checking /etc/resolv.conf on oboe first, adding a static entry to
> > /etc/hosts of the remote ip/host should speed dns checks as well.
> > You can also run ssh in verbose mode (ssh -v oboe) or/and run sshd in
El Miércoles, 21 de Diciembre de 2005 09:23, Doug Barton escribió:
> Howdy,
>
> As has been discussed for a couple weeks now, I have MFC'ed to
> RELENG_6 the changes in /etc/rc* that bring new-style boot scripts
> from the local_startup directories (by default /usr/local/etc/rc.d
> and /usr/X11R6/
On Friday 23 December 2005 14:51, Koen Martens wrote:
> Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> >On Friday 23 December 2005 11:12, Koen Martens wrote:
> >>Just a smallish issue with ipfilter and upgrading from 5.4 to 6-STABLE.
> >>The ipfilter implementation in the 6-STABLE kernel errs on the commands
> >>sent by
Hej there,
Kobi Shmueli wrote:
Try checking /etc/resolv.conf on oboe first, adding a static entry to
/etc/hosts of the remote ip/host should speed dns checks as well.
You can also run ssh in verbose mode (ssh -v oboe) or/and run sshd in debug
mode (sshd -d).
alternativly to check out wether i
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 11:12, Koen Martens wrote:
Just a smallish issue with ipfilter and upgrading from 5.4 to 6-STABLE.
The ipfilter implementation in the 6-STABLE kernel errs on the commands
sent by the 5.4 ipf binary. This can be an issue when you are upgrading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dawnshade wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 08:11, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
>
>>At 08.10 22/12/2005, dawnshade wrote:
>> >On Thursday 22 December 2005 04:22, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
>> >> It seems to me that also Oliver has the same bug (0M
On Friday 23 December 2005 11:12, Koen Martens wrote:
> Just a smallish issue with ipfilter and upgrading from 5.4 to 6-STABLE.
> The ipfilter implementation in the 6-STABLE kernel errs on the commands
> sent by the 5.4 ipf binary. This can be an issue when you are upgrading
> remotely without ser
Michael A. Koerber wrote:
> I have three machines that have had 5.4 and 6.0 installed. Two of the
three machines have very
> well behaved "ssh". However, the machine (laptop) named OBOE does not.
>
> Specifically "ssh oboe" will (most of the time) hang for around one
minute before asking for
Michael A. Koerber wrote:
All,
I have three machines that have had 5.4 and 6.0 installed. Two of the three
machines have very
well behaved "ssh". However, the machine (laptop) named OBOE does not.
Specifically "ssh oboe" will (most of the time) hang for around one minute
before asking fo
On 12/23/05, Michael A. Koerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have three machines that have had 5.4 and 6.0 installed. Two of the
> three machines have very
> well behaved "ssh". However, the machine (laptop) named OBOE does not.
>
> Specifically "ssh oboe" will (most of the time)
All,
I have three machines that have had 5.4 and 6.0 installed. Two of the three
machines have very
well behaved "ssh". However, the machine (laptop) named OBOE does not.
Specifically "ssh oboe" will (most of the time) hang for around one minute
before asking for a
prompt. However, if I'
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:34, Stefan Juhl wrote:
> Is anybody able to boot FreeBSD 5.x-STABLE from a ATAPI ZIP 750 .?
>
> I tried to, but it didn't work.
"it didn't work" is a pretty useless error message.
What happened? Is your BIOS set to boot off that device? Can it boot from it?
Have you tried
Hi!
Is anybody able to boot FreeBSD 5.x-STABLE from a ATAPI ZIP 750 .?
I tried to, but it didn't work.
I mounted the ZIP from a running 5.X-STABLE and made the normal release
procedure (installworld / installkernel .). I also gave bootcfg a try. But
nothing helped.
Or is there no way o
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:52:27 -0800
Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, how will this effect cups which installs a .sample file? and
> > any other port that does this?
>
> .sample files should go away. If for some reason a script must
> be modified to be useful, the sample version
I have consistently ignored all emails in this thread because the
use of the word "demand" in the Subject.
Whenever people use words like "demand" or "somebody should" in
FreeBSD contexts, it indicates cluelessness to me.
Cluelessness about how the project works and cluenessness about
how thing
Brian Candler wrote:
> I think the real concern here is: for how long after RELEASE_X_Y are binary
> patches for it made available?
I build FreeBSD Update patches for all the branches supported by the
FreeBSD Security Team.
To answer a couple of other questions:
FreeBSD Update is something which
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:26, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > the Internet? I was planning to use NFS/TCP secured by IPSec
> > transport mode, but anything less complicated would be greatly
> > appreciated ;-)
>
> This is one of the situations where r{dist,sync}'ing out the binaries
> makes more sense th
Hi All,
Just a smallish issue with ipfilter and upgrading from 5.4 to 6-STABLE.
The ipfilter implementation in the 6-STABLE kernel errs on the commands
sent by the 5.4 ipf binary. This can be an issue when you are upgrading
remotely without serial console and you have IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK
e
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:08:13PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > No, you're missing the point. More core OS upgrades means less
> > incremental patches (which are easier to apply than a full update).
>
> Right. I don't understand how B follows A here.
>
> These patches come from where? S
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:51:15AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Patrick M. Hausen, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Any suggestions for an alternative to NFS if your 'client' servers
> are located "all over the world" and you want to installworld across
> the Internet? I was planning to use NFS/TCP secure
Hi, Folks!
> On your central PC..
> buildworld once.
> builkernel once for each of the different kernels you are using.
>
> On each 'client' PC..
> NFS mount /usr/src and /usr/obj
> installkernel
> reboot
> installworld
Any suggestions for an alternative to NFS if your 'client' servers
are locat
> On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:27, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > > > > Do you have a mount which is a symlink?
> > > >
> > > > no, but many nfs.
> > > > minbari> mount
> > > > 132.65.16.100:/d/6 on / (nfs)
>
> > Breakpoint 1 at 0x402779: file dmnt.c, line 159.
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program:
52 matches
Mail list logo
