I just upgraded to RELENG_6 from 6.0 and after running for about a day
I got the following panic:
Jan 6 21:37:47 bigguy kernel: pid 30546 (gaim), uid 1001 inumber
10313 on /var:
filesystem full
panic: vm_object_backing_scan: object mismatch
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 22780 tid 100175 ]
Stopp
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:22:43AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2006, at 4:40 AM, James Long wrote:
>
> >>Yeah, I noticed that little tiny "UDP requests" note in the -h docs
> >>too. There's no reason to bind to all tcp addresses, and it is
> >>causing me heartburn for getting the ser
>
>
> David Malone wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:50:57AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
>>
>>>When I make snapshot of fs it removes "acls" flag from mount. While the
>>>command is "mount -u -o snapshot etc." I don't think it should remove
>>>the flag because it is not specified besides the sn
On Jan 6, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Scott Mitchell wrote:
We'll only be mirroring the internal drives too for now - the 4e/DC
seems
to be the only RAID option on the 1850 with battery-backed cache, and
doesn't cost much more for the extra peace-of-mind.
Then you'll be pleasantly surprised to know t
Paul.LKW wrote:
As I upgraded to 5.4 I found the raid utilities 'asr-util' no longer work
for me.
I tried to deinstall and install again, but the problem still !
The error message in the console after the comman 'raidutil -L raid' is :
Engine connect failed: COMPATILITY number
Any one know
David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:50:57AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
>
>>When I make snapshot of fs it removes "acls" flag from mount. While the
>>command is "mount -u -o snapshot etc." I don't think it should remove
>>the flag because it is not specified besides the snapshot o
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:14:41 +
Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Marius Nuennerich wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > it seems like /boot/nextboot.conf is neither deleted nor
> > nextboot_enable set to NO on the first line after a reboot.
> > So it is
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:22:04PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know about the DRAC with FreeBSD, but I assume that the BIOS of
> >> this Dell still supports BIOS redirection to serial port. If so,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:35:46AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Scott Mitchell wrote:
>
> >I may be getting a new Dell PE1850 soon, to replace our ancient CVS
> >server
> >(still running 4-STABLE). The new machine will ideally run 6.0 and
> >have a
> >PERC4e/DC R
Øystein Holmen wrote on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:03:18PM +0100:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm setting up a new server with FreeBSD 6.0. The motherboard I am
> planning to use is Asus A8N-SLI Premium. Does anyone know if the on-
> board ethernet controller (nve(4)) works?
Works for me with the newest 7-cur
Hi all!
I'm setting up a new server with FreeBSD 6.0. The motherboard I am
planning to use is Asus A8N-SLI Premium. Does anyone know if the on-
board ethernet controller (nve(4)) works?
Also I'm planning on getting this graphics controller: Gainward
GeForce 6200 TurboCache, PCI-Express.
Jo Rhett wrote this message on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:03 -0800:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:41:47AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > I believe core has a policy of never supporting vaporware... There is
> > always the chicken and egg problem with arguments like this... I'll
> > code this if y
On Fri, 2006-Jan-06 02:34:40 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:47:38AM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>> While I agree with much of your reasoning, I know exactly zero
>> people running a modified kernel of any version of Windows,
>> Mac OS X or Solaris, to name just three commerc
On Fri, 2006-Jan-06 03:03:18 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> Bottom line: Once code exists, then support can be talked about..
>
>This is bullhockey and you know it. Once the project is done, we'll
>authorize a budget for it? Once the season is over we'll know who should
>be on the starting team?
In
On Friday 06 January 2006 01:56 pm, Carsten Wald wrote:
> On Friday 06 January 2006 17:51, Gleb Kozyrev wrote:
> > man uvisor
>
> Great! Thank you. That's what I needed! -- uvisor.ko apparently
> uses ucom.ko and the ucom0 device I looked for is (temporarily)
> created. However, after pressing t
Dear all:
As I upgraded to 5.4 I found the raid utilities 'asr-util' no longer work
for me.
I tried to deinstall and install again, but the problem still !
The error message in the console after the comman 'raidutil -L raid' is :
Engine connect failed: COMPATILITY number
Any one know now to
Hi everybody,
I tried to install on my laptop (Toshiba M60-176) FreeBSD 6.0 STABLE and
it failed despite careful installation and web/archives search. It is a
multiboot installation (Windows XP/Linux Ubuntu/FreeBSD) driven by GRUB
4.95.
After the whole installation process ended, the reboot
On Friday 06 January 2006 17:51, Gleb Kozyrev wrote:
> man uvisor
Great! Thank you. That's what I needed! -- uvisor.ko apparently uses ucom.ko
and the ucom0 device I looked for is (temporarily) created. However, after
pressing the sync button the pilot can then be accessed through
the /dev/
On Jan 5, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Michael Vince wrote:
Items 3 and 4 significantly increase the performance of the
driver. On an
LSI 320-2X card, transactions per second went from 13,000 to
31,000 in my
testing with these changes. However, these changes are still fairly
experimental and sho
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
There's an interesting thread about the AMR RAID controller used in
the newer 18x0/28x0 Dells with the PERC/4 controller, and I know of
enough people using them that such improvements (by Doug Ambrisko?)
will be welcomed.
Carsten "CC" Wald wrote to on Fri, 6 Jan 2006
16:43:15 +:
CCW> I own an old palm pilot -- a m500 model -- and have the following
CCW> problem when I try to sync under 6-STABLE.
CCW> Whenever I pressed the HotSync-Button of that device -- connected to my
CCW> 6-STABLE box via a USB cable, th
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
> The only thing missing would be hardware power down. if that can be done
> via DRAC, that'll be an advantage :)
One big advantage of the DRAC is virtual media (floppy, CD) support.
Good for BIOS/firmware upgrades, booting a rescu
On 2 Jan, Lars Kristiansen wrote:
>> Attempting to catch up with my backlog of unread email, only 12K unread
>> messages to go ...
>>
>> On 24 Nov, Rob wrote:
>>
>>> I have cvsup'ed the sources to STABLE as of Nov. 23rd
>>> 2005.
>>> After recompiling/installing world and debug-kernel,
>>> I again
Hi,
I have a little (I hope) problem with my FreeBSD 6-STABLE.
I had pf+pflog working fine...
I added nss_ldap, pam_ldap etc.
Everything worked fine, until reboot.
I noticed strange message:
pflogd[244]: NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): ldap, passwd, endpwent, not found
Nevertheless everything work
Hej there,
Ralph Hempel wrote:
> Yes, you get that too. Full hardware power down. Wait as long as
> you want, then power the machine up. It's not the same as a remote
> reboot where you HOPE the server comes up far enough to get
> a console session.
>
Well, if the BIOS can do console redirection,
I'm in at work and turned off gdm in my rc.conf and rebooted.
The keyboard works fine! Then manually starting gdm and it
still works. That's great.
I think that something happened in the rc files that makes it
start earlier and that's conflicting with something that freezes
the keyboard.
Richar
Hello List,
I own an old palm pilot -- a m500 model -- and have the following problem when
I try to sync under 6-STABLE.
Whenever I pressed the HotSync-Button of that device -- connected to my
6-STABLE box via a USB cable, the pilot was recognized as a ugen0 device.
Using the pilot-xfer progr
The only thing missing would be hardware power down. if that can be done
via DRAC, that'll be an advantage :)
Yes, you get that too. Full hardware power down. Wait as long as
you want, then power the machine up. It's not the same as a remote
reboot where you HOPE the server comes up far enough t
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
CD> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/usr.sbin/rpcbind# rpcinfo -p
CD> > rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Port mapper failure - RPC: Success
CD>
CD> That's more annoying. It's not INET6 though; it's because the local
CD> transport is also tpi_cots_ord, so
Ralph Hempel wrote:
>
>> I've never enabled the DRAC card on any dell I have that came with
>> them...
>
>
> Hmmm. The DRAC card can save you a long drive sometimes. You actually
> get to look at the hardware boot process and can even adjust
> BIOS settings if needed. To get to a FreeBSD conso
On Jan 6, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
How old is your Cyclades box? Since mid 2002 these boxes don't send a
break when power cycled. And I know what I say, being an ex-
employee of
cyclades (o' course, technician). We had customers with quite a large
amount of sun servers and the
I've never enabled the DRAC card on any dell I have that came with them...
Hmmm. The DRAC card can save you a long drive sometimes. You actually
get to look at the hardware boot process and can even adjust
BIOS settings if needed. To get to a FreeBSD console, I think that
the OS actually needs
Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>
>> I don't know about the DRAC with FreeBSD, but I assume that the BIOS of
>> this Dell still supports BIOS redirection to serial port. If so, you can
>> have Monitor and Keyboard connected locally and use the serial c
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
I don't know about the DRAC with FreeBSD, but I assume that the
BIOS of
this Dell still supports BIOS redirection to serial port. If so,
you can
have Monitor and Keyboard connected locally and use the serial console
remote.
Just get a small
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:35:28PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> CD> > VK> I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this:
> CD> > VK>
> CD> > VK> rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9
> CD> > VK>
> CD> > VK> Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in
On Jan 5, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Scott Mitchell wrote:
I may be getting a new Dell PE1850 soon, to replace our ancient CVS
server
(still running 4-STABLE). The new machine will ideally run 6.0 and
have a
PERC4e/DC RAID card - the one with battery-backed cache. This is
listed as
I have an 18
On Jan 6, 2006, at 4:40 AM, James Long wrote:
Yeah, I noticed that little tiny "UDP requests" note in the -h docs
too. There's no reason to bind to all tcp addresses, and it is
causing me heartburn for getting the server certified...
Good grief, why not just firewall off the undesired UDP po
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Marius Nuennerich wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it seems like /boot/nextboot.conf is neither deleted nor
> nextboot_enable set to NO on the first line after a reboot.
> So it isn't a one shot anymore as the manpage claims.
>
> System is 6.0-RELEASE.
I think thi
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
There's an interesting thread about the AMR RAID controller used in
the newer 18x0/28x0 Dells with the PERC/4 controller, and I know of
enough people using them that such improvements (by Doug Ambrisko?)
will be welcomed.
Thanks for your n
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:12:06AM -0500, Ralph Hempel wrote:
> Scott Mitchell wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >On to my next question about running 6.0 on a Dell PE1850, since it seems
> >that the RAID card will work just fine...
> >
> >I'm thinking about getting the machine with a DRAC4 remote management
Hi there,
Scott Mitchell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm thinking about getting the machine with a DRAC4 remote management card.
> This looks to be OS-independent (you can configure through the BIOS) so I
> expect it will just work. I've seen various posts talking about how it
> tends to take over t
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
CD> > VK> I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this:
CD> > VK>
CD> > VK> rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9
CD> > VK>
CD> > VK> Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in /etc/rc.conf to just have the first
address,
CD> > VK> and I restarted rpcbind.
Hello,
I will try with malloc and Electric Fence. I have no idea how big must be a
process, because I use flow-capture for first time on this machine. Please,
if someone have experience with this tool, to share some statistics.
Only for information - flow-capture is a part of flow-tools in /us
Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
On to my next question about running 6.0 on a Dell PE1850, since it seems
that the RAID card will work just fine...
I'm thinking about getting the machine with a DRAC4 remote management card.
This looks to be OS-independent (you can configure through the BIOS) so I
Hi all,
On to my next question about running 6.0 on a Dell PE1850, since it seems
that the RAID card will work just fine...
I'm thinking about getting the machine with a DRAC4 remote management card.
This looks to be OS-independent (you can configure through the BIOS) so I
expect it will just wor
Hi there,
Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:20:13AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>>
>>So, uhh, how would your magical binary upgrade system handle custom kernels?
>>Why would it be any different? You still haven't explained how this would
>>work..
>
>
> Versioning of the core packa
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:53, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > you mean? Are you claiming someone from (or claiming to be from core)
> > said "Don't do this, we won't allow it"? If so, can you supply proof?
>
> I used to write a lot of patches to freebsd. I used to submit a lot of bug
> reports. I've found over t
> > I just know that core has either struck it down or been Silent.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 05:32:26PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> The latter is an entirely different case from the former, and you've been
> claiming core has done the former. This, and the above, tell me that
> you're not intere
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:20:13AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> For NFS mount, read: any network file system. You can also use, say IPSEC to
> protect the NFS packets (although I'm not claiming it's a trivial thing to
> set up..)
IPsec is trivial compared to the amount of code and localized
[flow-capture process too large]
On Fri, 2006-Jan-06 11:08:54 +0200, Todor Dragnev wrote:
>Can someone help with this ?
Help how? AFAIK, flow-control/flow-capture is not a FreeBSD port so
finding someone here with knowledge of it may be difficult. If you
think it's a problem with FreeBSD, you'r
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:41:47AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> I believe core has a policy of never supporting vaporware... There is
> always the chicken and egg problem with arguments like this... I'll
> code this if you agree to support it and maintain it/I will agree to
> support it once
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:50:57AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
> When I make snapshot of fs it removes "acls" flag from mount. While the
> command is "mount -u -o snapshot etc." I don't think it should remove
> the flag because it is not specified besides the snapshot option.
You probably want s
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:21:56PM +1100, Michael Vince wrote:
> FYI there also has been a big update to the amr driver which claims to
> dramatically increase performance among other things, interestingly
> enought it was augmented by Yahoo, I can only assume they are moving to
> Dell, yahoo fo
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:40:56PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >No. I want a binary update mechanism. Obviously if we have local
> >configuration options we'll have to compile our own binaries. But doing
> >the work of tracking system updates currently requires us to build our own
> >patch trac
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:26:12PM -0500, Ender wrote:
> I think what "integrated with the core OS" means from a user standpoint
> is: from a fresh minimum install of freebsd I can type
> "freebsd-update-whatever" and it will update my system.
Just "freebsd-update" ;-)
That works fairly well wi
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:11:58PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:02, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:26:44AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > > How do you expect these two to be handled in a binary upgrade?
> > > I can't see how it's possible..
> >
> > Look a
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:46:06PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> VK> I had rpcbind running with on two interfaces like this:
> VK>
> VK> rpcbind -h 192.168.100.200 -h 10.0.0.9
> VK>
> VK> Now, I changed rpcbind_flags in /etc/rc.conf to just have the
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:47:38AM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > > > 1. modified kernels are foobar
> > > > ..yet are practically mandatory on production systems
>
> > Look around. Every major commercial OS does it just fine.
>
> While I agree with much of your reasoning, I know exactly
When I make snapshot of fs it removes "acls" flag from mount. While the
command is "mount -u -o snapshot etc." I don't think it should remove
the flag because it is not specified besides the snapshot option.
Vaclav Haisman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:31:33 -0500
> From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpcbind lingering on IP no longer specified on command
> line
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
>
Can someone help with this ?
- Forwarded message from Jonathan Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jonathan Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Todor Dragnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
flow-tools@list.splintered.net
Subject: Re: [Flow-tools] Memory leak ?
D
DOC> I don't know if this will help, but mpd4 is the development version--I'd
DOC> try mpd 3 (/usr/ports/net/mpd). I'm using it for a VPN server on FBSD
DOC> 6.0, without any troubles...
The problem was solved. There was a tunnel loop.
With 400+ users mpd4 works much better than mpd3.18
--
[ /
62 matches
Mail list logo
