Hello,
I've been using these patches for some time with success. Although
slight correction to patches is needed - code placement changed a bit
(in case of line wrapping, see the attachments).
--- ata-chipset.c.orig Mon Oct 9 23:01:35 2006
+++ ata-chipset.c Wed Sep 5 22:08:02 2007
@@
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
You'd be best off with RELENG_7 and not 6.3, but yes, the controller in
question should work on RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_3.
Very well, seems like I am going to give RELENG_7 a try then.
Thanks to everyone
Hi,
We bought a new Dell PowerEdge 2950III with Perc 6/i and have the disk
geometry problem using 6.3 final or 7.0 RC1. Seems that we are not alone at
least one guy has similar problem reported earlier:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-01/msg00506.html
I was reading
Royce Williams wrote:
s3raphi wrote, on 1/18/2008 12:19 PM:
I am trying to run freebsd-update on 7.0-RC1 on a system with a ZFS
root and
am also having problems with flags:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# freebsd-update install
Installing updates...chflags: ///lib/libc.so.7: Operation not supported
Is
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Jakub Siroky wrote:
Hello,
I've been using these patches for some time with success. Although
slight correction to patches is needed - code placement changed a bit
(in case of line wrapping, see the attachments).
--- ata-chipset.c.orig Mon Oct 9 23:01:35 2006
+++
Kris,
Latest captures (of interest) - they're not hard to come by, it seems. I
see more than a couple of these every hour at least while I'm actively
doing anything on this system, and I've witnessed up to two or three
times that many at times.
It seems my initial glee about catching Epiphany
Hello!
Is this something, that should be fixed in the 6.3? The kernel is 6.2-STABLE
from June (see uptime).
Thanks!
-mi
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
TPTE at 0x8038 IS ZERO @ VA 7000
panic: bad pte
cpuid = 1
Uptime: 133d0h42m22s
Dumping 3583 MB (2
[ambrisko@ and scottl@ added to CCs]
Hi there,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Aldas Nabazas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We bought a new Dell PowerEdge 2950III with Perc 6/i and have the disk
geometry problem using 6.3 final or 7.0 RC1. Seems that we are not alone at
least one guy has similar
The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with
information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental.
The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say ULE is
the new recommended scheduler.
If ULE is in fact the current recommendation, then
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:48:56PM +, David Wood wrote:
[ambrisko@ and scottl@ added to CCs]
Hi there,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Aldas Nabazas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We bought a new Dell PowerEdge 2950III with Perc 6/i and have the disk
geometry problem using 6.3 final or 7.0
Jason C. Wells wrote:
The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with
information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental.
The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say ULE is the
new recommended scheduler.
If ULE is in fact the
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:48:56PM +, David Wood wrote:
[ambrisko@ and scottl@ added to CCs]
Hi there,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Aldas Nabazas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We bought a new Dell PowerEdge 2950III with Perc 6/i and have the disk
geometry problem using
Hi there,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik
Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:48:56PM +, David Wood wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Aldas Nabazas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
We bought a new Dell PowerEdge 2950III with Perc 6/i and have the disk
geometry
Jason C. Wells wrote:
X-Face:
#0jV*~a}VtKS-E/!EJpH('H1Va}24dxF0oT+.R3Gu8C;xhSC+|+H84YLbMvphuRT4cp3.|8EN_(2Eix/6{.Up~u`a^}0Lnb+9Fw|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]ZwA]5%_AU?}DezfE1!H?3E$!Yve7.O+..Jnb4:'6Ey_]FtFzU9=*l$1p/@gA,Ze^5]+r(XJ+m7`/vMDc$'wy|$nE`e
The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are
On 1/20/08, Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason C. Wells wrote:
The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with
information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental.
The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 07:40:07PM +0100, TooMany Secrets wrote:
On 1/20/08, Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason C. Wells wrote:
The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with
information found in the email archives. LINT says
Yes, maybe this is the same patch you've mentioned. In RELENG_7_0 I had
to manually update concerned files - look up the lines and add the
information at proper place. I don't understand the meaning of functions
besides chipset static definitions, but it has been working on
6.2-STABLE and
Hello Stephen,
Sunday, January 20, 2008, 7:12:49 PM, you wrote:
Jason C. Wells wrote:
The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with
information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental.
The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say
Just my info:
dmesg| grep ata
atapci0: ATI AHCI controller port
0xff00-0xff07,0xfe00-0xfe03,0xfd00-0xfd07,0xfc00-0xfc03,0xfb00-0xfb0f
mem 0xfe02f000-0xfe02f3ff irq 22 at device 18.0 on pci0 atapci0:
[ITHREAD] atapci0: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 4 ports detected
ata2: ATA channel 0 on
Hello,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:13:34 +0100
Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6715b notebook using ATI SB-600 chipset. With stock kernel, the ATA
I have a machine with an Asus M2A-VM HDMI motherboard[1], which also
have this chipset.
My patch has been tested on RELENG_7 as of 2008-01-19. Please
I should probably know that, but: what's the difference between these
branches?
Thanks
Jakub
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am using darwing in a mac book pro, when I open
terminal I get the following message that appears only
in my account, I would like to get help in order to
fix it.
Last login: Sun Jan 20 14:32:18 on ttys001
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale
Hi Jakub,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jakub Siroky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I should probably know that, but: what's the difference between these
branches?
RELENG_7 is 7-STABLE.
RELENG_7_0 will become 7.0-RELEASE, and is what you should track now if
you intend to upgrade to 7.0-RELEASE.
Greetings,
Well, after not having any luck with Xorg after a fresh install
of 7. I decided to try a more recent cvsup of the ports tree and
try again. After issuing:
cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile portsdb -uU pkgdb -F
And following up with a portupgrade -a -e -f -y
Portupgrade finished without
On 20/01/2008, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Well, after not having any luck with Xorg after a fresh install
of 7. I decided to try a more recent cvsup of the ports tree and
[...]
you need ports/x11-fonts/font-alias
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
--
Regards,
Kimi
Quoting Kimi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 20/01/2008, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Well, after not having any luck with Xorg after a fresh install
of 7. I decided to try a more recent cvsup of the ports tree and
[...]
you need ports/x11-fonts/font-alias
Thank you! You rock!
That
I have done everyday work on my ZFS-enabled FreeBSD7 box. It is having
4*250G disks in a RAIDZ array (the base system is on a separate disk).
%uname -a
FreeBSD ginger.apathy.szote.u-szeged.hu 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon
Dec 24 10:10:07 UTC 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
Silly me, forgot the [1] URL:
http://tinyurl.com/2ytg3w
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Wood wrote:
[ambrisko@ and scottl@ added to CCs]
Hi there,
What really needs to happen as a result of this thread is the following,
and I would appreciate volunteers taking up these tasks in some form:
1) FAQ entries written/updated/clarified/advertised as to how FreeBSD,
disklabels,
El vie, 11-01-2008 a las 18:15 +0100, Kris Kennaway escribió:
Krassimir reports that with these two fixes, the standard 7.0 kernel
has
performance:
#threadstransactions/sec
1 755
8 7129
40 6580
100 6768
Hi.
May i ask what
Volker wrote:
If nobody complains until tuesday (2008-01-22), I'll file a PR for
that patch.
Hi,
there was several PR's and patches for ATI.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-January/081982.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/079466.html
31 matches
Mail list logo
