Turn off rebooting in single-user mode after fail.

2009-07-27 Thread Paul P.
Hello. How to turn off automatic reboot in single user mode after power fails or sudden reset? Do i need to make passin value in fstab equal to zero just to turn off automatic FSCK fs check? The system is remote and it is VERY annoy to up it by hands after any fail.

Re: Turn off rebooting in single-user mode after fail.

2009-07-27 Thread Cristiano Deana
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Paul P.kame...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. How to turn off automatic reboot in single user mode after power fails or sudden reset? Do i need to make passin value in fstab equal to zero just to turn off automatic FSCK fs check? if i understood correctly: rc.conf:

Re: Turn off rebooting in single-user mode after fail.

2009-07-27 Thread Krassimir Slavchev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just put fsck_y_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf Disabling file system check is dangerous! Paul P. wrote: Hello. How to turn off automatic reboot in single user mode after power fails or sudden reset? Do i need to make passin value in fstab equal to

Re: smartctl: Unrecognized command 13

2009-07-27 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 25/07/2009 11:48 Andriy Gapon said the following: This is stable/7 i386: $ smartctl -t select,568157535-568159000 /dev/ad10 ... Unrecognized command 13 in ata_command_interface() Please contact smartmontools-supp...@lists.sourceforge.net Error Write Selective Self-Test Log failed:

Re: kern/134584: [panic] spin lock held too long

2009-07-27 Thread Attilio Rao
2009/7/26 barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it: It happened again, on shutdown. As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours. I don't know if it's related, but often quitting transmission,

Re: ataraid's revenge! (Was: Re: A nasty ataraid experience.)

2009-07-27 Thread Bruce Simpson
Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:57 +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: 6 months on, ataraid(4) did it again. Which ataraid(4) controller is this? Seeing a verbose dmesg would help. There are several patches in the PR database for ataraid problems, it would be worth having a

Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ?

2009-07-27 Thread Bruce Simpson
Luigi Rizzo wrote: Is there a recipe for a working flas9 or flash10 operation ? Allegedly PC-BSD ship a working Flash install, I have not tried it. I have had similar problems and tried similar recipes. The Flash player(s) thus embedded are not very stable, and can crash or hang with

Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ?

2009-07-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:55:08 +0100 From: Bruce Simpson b...@incunabulum.net Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org Luigi Rizzo wrote: Is there a recipe for a working flas9 or flash10 operation ? Allegedly PC-BSD ship a working Flash install, I have not tried it. I have had

Re: smartctl: Unrecognized command 13

2009-07-27 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote: AG $ smartctl -t select,568157535-568159000 /dev/ad10 AG ... AG Unrecognized command 13 in ata_command_interface() AG Please contact smartmontools-supp...@lists.sourceforge.net AG Error Write Selective Self-Test Log failed: Function not implemented AG

Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ?

2009-07-27 Thread barbara
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:15:22PM +0200, barbara wrote: On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 10:32 +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:20:09AM +0200, barbara wrote: An example of the URLs that is giving me problems is the following

Re: kern/134584: [panic] spin lock held too long

2009-07-27 Thread barbara
2009/7/26 barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it: It happened again, on shutdown. As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours. I don't know if it's related, but often quitting

Re: Weird portmaster behaviour -- everything fails to install

2009-07-27 Thread Andrew Reilly
Problem solved! In case anyone is interested, or has encountered a similar problem, I believe that my problem was that somehow my /var/db/pkg directory had a whole pile of near-duplicate entries corresponding to port revisions. Portmaster was checking the installed version against the MD5 hashes

Re: Weird portmaster behaviour -- everything fails to install

2009-07-27 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Andrew Reilly wrote: Problem solved! Well I'm glad to hear that in any case. :) In case anyone is interested, or has encountered a similar problem, I believe that my problem was that somehow my /var/db/pkg directory had a whole pile of near-duplicate entries

portmaster -s text (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped)

2009-07-27 Thread Doug Barton
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Ben Morrow wrote: The problem with that is if you install pkg A deliberately, but it then later becomes a dependancy of pkg B. If you remove pkg B (because it's no longer needed) there is then no evidence that pkg A was installed on purpose, rather than incidentally.