> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Peter C. Lai wrote:
>
>> I did a pxeboot zfs-root install the other day.
>>
>> If you copy the dvd to an nfs export as the root mount, hack the
>> requisite
>> files to do serial console then you will drop to a login prompt when it
>> boots over pxe-tftp. Had no problems set
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:20, fullermd@ wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 08:49:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of
jhell, and lo! it spake thus:
As I make final modifications to the script I will keep the below
URLs updated and welcome any bug reports or modification requests to
me personally.
Well,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:20, fullermd@ wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 08:49:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of
jhell, and lo! it spake thus:
As I make final modifications to the script I will keep the below
URLs updated and welcome any bug reports or modification requests to
me personally.
Well,
On 2/16/10, Jeff Dowsley wrote:
> Gentles
>
> I have an old HP Pavillion DV6000 laptop, which has a Broadcom USB
> wireless device. Worked under Windows Vista. I installed freeBSD 8-
> stable, and see as the last line in dmesg
>
> ugen2.2: at usbus2
>
> Ferreting with google suggests that 8.0 m
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 08:49:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of
jhell, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> As I make final modifications to the script I will keep the below
> URLs updated and welcome any bug reports or modification requests to
> me personally.
Well, here's one:
> OS Revision:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:20, 000.fbsd@ wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
[...]
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.c
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.c_min
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.c_max
c_max is vfs.zfs.arc_max, c_min is vfs.zfs.arc_min.
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.ev
On Mon 15 Feb 2010 at 15:05:09 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
On Mon 15 Feb 2010 at 14:11:47 PST Steven Friedrich wrote:
I suspect this means we won't get KDE 4.4 for quite some time...
I don't think that it was ever in the plan to get it in before the
freeze. Here's what Martin Wilke said in th
Gentles
I have an old HP Pavillion DV6000 laptop, which has a Broadcom USB
wireless device. Worked under Windows Vista. I installed freeBSD 8-
stable, and see as the last line in dmesg
ugen2.2: at usbus2
Ferreting with google suggests that 8.0 might have usb support for
the ndis wrappe
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Steve Polyack wrote:
I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that
great of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards that ship with
Dell servers as the PERC. The newest incarnations are better, but I
would try to get an Areca. T
* Maxim Sobolev [100215 04:49] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our company have a FreeBSD based product that consists of the numerous
> interconnected processes and it does some high-PPS UDP processing
> (30-50K PPS is not uncommon). We are seeing some strange periodic
> failures under the load in several such
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Steve Polyack wrote:
> I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that
> great of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards that ship with
> Dell servers as the PERC. The newest incarnations are better, but I
> would try to get an Areca. The ones we have te
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Peter C. Lai wrote:
I did a pxeboot zfs-root install the other day.
If you copy the dvd to an nfs export as the root mount, hack the requisite
files to do serial console then you will drop to a login prompt when it
boots over pxe-tftp. Had no problems setting up zfs root in
On Mon 15 Feb 2010 at 14:11:47 PST Steven Friedrich wrote:
I suspect this means we won't get KDE 4.4 for quite some time...
I don't think that it was ever in the plan to get it in before the
freeze. Here's what Martin Wilke said in the call for testing:
Before you ask we don't want to put
On 2/15/2010 6:04 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Steve Polyack wrote:
On 02/15/10 12:14, Dan Langille wrote:
7. Supermicro LSI MegaRAID 8 Port SAS RAID Controller $118
Dan,
I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that
great of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards th
Steve Polyack wrote:
On 02/15/10 12:14, Dan Langille wrote:
7. Supermicro LSI MegaRAID 8 Port SAS RAID Controller $118
Dan,
I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that great
of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards that ship with Dell servers
as the PERC. Th
I did a pxeboot zfs-root install the other day.
If you copy the dvd to an nfs export as the root mount, hack the requisite
files to do serial console then you will drop to a login prompt when it
boots over pxe-tftp. Had no problems setting up zfs root install by
skipping sysinstall and fixit entir
Just out of curiousity, would not an older server like this:
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?InvtId=DL145-5R (~$75 + shipping) or
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=DL360-6R&cat=SYS (~$190 +
shipping)
be a reasonable option? Unless you're looking to suck every last bit
of speed or
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 12:19:01 pm Erwin Lansing wrote:
>> In preparation for 7.3-RELEASE, the ports tree is now in feature freeze.
>>
>> Normal upgrade, new ports, and changes that only affect other branches
>> are allowed without pri
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my co
> How much ram are you running with?
8GB on amd64. kmem_size=16G, zfs.arc_max=6G
> In a latest test with 8.0-R on i386 with 2GB of ram, an install to a ZFS
> root *will* panic the kernel with kmem_size too small with default
> settings. Even dropping down to Cy Schubert's uber-small config will p
2010/2/15 Steven Friedrich :
> On Monday 15 February 2010 12:19:01 pm Erwin Lansing wrote:
>> In preparation for 7.3-RELEASE, the ports tree is now in feature freeze.
>>
>> Normal upgrade, new ports, and changes that only affect other branches
>> are allowed without prior approval but with the extr
On Monday 15 February 2010 12:19:01 pm Erwin Lansing wrote:
> In preparation for 7.3-RELEASE, the ports tree is now in feature freeze.
>
> Normal upgrade, new ports, and changes that only affect other branches
> are allowed without prior approval but with the extra
> Feature safe: yes tag in the c
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:07:32PM +0100, n j wrote:
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> > Is it possible for you to upload these captures somewhere on the web?
> > tcpdump -p -i {iface} -s 0 -n -w {somefile} should be sufficient.
>
> You can find the two pcaps at http://drop.io/llwiy8o. IP addresses and
> the d
On Hét, Február 15, 2010 10:15 pm, Dan Naumov wrote:
>>> A C2Q CPU makes little sense right now from a performance POV. For
>>> the price of that C2Q CPU + LGA775 board you can get an i5 750 CPU and
>>> a 1156 socket motherboard that will run circles around that C2Q. You
>>> would lose the ECC thou
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
[...]
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.c
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.c_min
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.c_max
c_max is vfs.zfs.arc_max, c_min is vfs.zfs.arc_min.
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.evict_skip
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.memory_throttle_count
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.size
I'm not
>> A C2Q CPU makes little sense right now from a performance POV. For the
>> price of that C2Q CPU + LGA775 board you can get an i5 750 CPU and a 1156
>> socket motherboard that will run circles around that C2Q. You would lose
>> the ECC though, since that requires the more expensive 1366 socket CP
Hello Jeremy,
> Is it possible for you to upload these captures somewhere on the web?
> tcpdump -p -i {iface} -s 0 -n -w {somefile} should be sufficient.
You can find the two pcaps at http://drop.io/llwiy8o. IP addresses and
the data have been anonymized, everything else has been left intact.
The
On 02/15/10 12:14, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supe
On Hét, Február 15, 2010 9:39 pm, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> Dan Naumov wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille
>>> wrote:
>>>
Dan Naumov wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Dan Naumov wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
>> Su
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:46:04AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Technical footnote: I wish I understood 1) the difference between
> ACPI-safe and ACPI-fast, and 2) how the system or OS "ranks" the
> timecounters (the higher the value in parenthesis, supposedly the more
> accurate/preferred it is
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 05:28:28PM +, Jonathan Belson wrote:
Hiya
After reading some earlier threads about zfs performance, I decided to test my
own server. I found the results rather surprising...
Below are my results from my home machine. Note that my dd size a
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 10:07 -0800, Matt Reimer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I have succesfully tested and used a "full ZFS install" of FreeBSD 8.0
> > on both single disk and mirror disk configurations using both MBR and
> > GPT partitioning. AF
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Artem Belevich wrote:
AB> It used to be that vm.kmem_size_max needed to be bumped to allow for
AB> larger vm.kmem_size. It's no longer needed on amd64. Not sure about
AB> i386.
AB>
AB> vm.kmem_size still needs tuning, though. While vm.kmem_size_max is no
AB> longer a limit, t
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have succesfully tested and used a "full ZFS install" of FreeBSD 8.0
> on both single disk and mirror disk configurations using both MBR and
> GPT partitioning. AFAIK, with the more recent -CURRENT and -STABLE it
> is also possible
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan Belson wrote:
> On 14/02/2010 17:28, Jonathan Belson wrote:
>
>> After reading some earlier threads about zfs performance, I decided to
>> test my own server. I found the results rather surprising...
>>
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded. I experiment
>>> * vm.kmem_size
>>> * vm.kmem_size_max
>>
>> I tried kmem_size_max on -current (this year), and I got a panic during
>> use,
>> I changed kmem_size to the same value I have for _max and it didn't
>> panic
>> anymore. It looks (from mails on the lists) that _max is supposed to
>> give a
>> max v
On 14/02/2010 17:28, Jonathan Belson wrote:
After reading some earlier threads about zfs performance, I decided to test my
own server. I found the results rather surprising...
Thanks to everyone who responded. I experimented with my load.conf settings,
leaving me with the following:
vm.km
In preparation for 7.3-RELEASE, the ports tree is now in feature freeze.
Normal upgrade, new ports, and changes that only affect other branches
are allowed without prior approval but with the extra
Feature safe: yes tag in the commit message. Any commit that is
sweeping, i.e. touches a large numb
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1. Samsung SATA CD/DVD
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 05:28:28PM +, Jonathan Belson wrote:
> Hiya
>
> After reading some earlier threads about zfs performance, I decided to test
> my own server. I found the results rather surprising...
Below are my results from my home machine. Note that my dd size and
count differ fro
>> * vm.kmem_size
>> * vm.kmem_size_max
>
> I tried kmem_size_max on -current (this year), and I got a panic during use,
> I changed kmem_size to the same value I have for _max and it didn't panic
> anymore. It looks (from mails on the lists) that _max is supposed to give a
> max value for auto-enh
The second of the test builds for the 7.3-RELEASE cycle, 7.3-RC1, is now
available for amd64, i386, pc98, and sparc64 architectures. The target
schedule as well as the current status of the release is available here:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/7.3TODO
The schedule has slipped by about a w
hw.bge.allow_asf: 0
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Giacomo Olgeni wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Are you running with hw.bge.allow_asf enabled?
>
>
>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsub
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:23 +0100, Martin Kristensen wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:27:04 -0600
> Robert Noland wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:37 -0800, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > > On February 13, 2010, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > > Ok, I've put up a patch at:
> > > >
> > > > http://people
On Sunday 14 February 2010 01:53:11 pm Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> What happens if you just load sdhci?
panic
> WHat happens if you load sdhci and mmcsd, but not mmc?
panic
> WHat happens if you load sdhci and mmc, but not mmcsd?
panic
>
> Given how earl
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick (from Mon, 15 Feb
2010 04:27:44 -0800):
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:50:00AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick (from Mon, 15 Feb
2010 01:07:56 -0800):
>On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:49:47AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
>>> I had a feeling someone woul
On 14.02.10 18:28, Jonathan Belson wrote:
The machine is a Dell SC440, dual core 2GHz E2180, 2GB of RAM and ICH7 SATA300
controller. There are three Hitachi 500GB drives (HDP725050GLA360) in a raidz1
configuration (version 13). I'm running amd64 7.2-STABLE from 14th Jan.
First of all, I tri
Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:33:07PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
Get a dock for holding 2 x 2,5" disks in a single 5,25" slot and put
it at the top, in the only 5,25" bay of the case.
That sounds very interesting. I just looking around for such a thing,
and could not find it
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:58:58 + Jonathan Belson wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2010, at 21:15, Joshua Boyd wrote:
> > Here are my relevant settings:
> >
> > vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0
^^ [1]
> I already had prefetch disabled, but ...
Just a note: prefetch is not disabled here
For the record, it appears that cvsup17.us.freebsd.org is serving outdated
files.
$ find . -name ata.h
./sys/ata.h
$ cd sys
$ ls -l ata.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 25308 Feb 6 12:35 ata.h
$ sudo -s
Password:
# rm ata.h
# csup -h cvsup17.us.freebsd.org -L 2 -g /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stand*
Pa
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:27:04 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:37 -0800, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > On February 13, 2010, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > Ok, I've put up a patch at:
> > >
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-radeon-test.patch
> > >
>
> http://people.freebsd
On 02/15/10 13:25, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Hi,
Our company have a FreeBSD based product that consists of the numerous
interconnected processes and it does some high-PPS UDP processing
(30-50K PPS is not uncommon). We are seeing some strange periodic
I have nothing very useful to help you with but
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:43:36AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> I'm getting:
>> cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g -Wall
>> -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>> -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast
Hi,
Our company have a FreeBSD based product that consists of the numerous
interconnected processes and it does some high-PPS UDP processing
(30-50K PPS is not uncommon). We are seeing some strange periodic
failures under the load in several such systems, which usually evidences
itself in IPC (ev
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:50:00AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Jeremy Chadwick (from Mon, 15 Feb
> 2010 01:07:56 -0800):
>
> >On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:49:47AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> >>> I had a feeling someone would bring up L2ARC/cache devices. This gives
> >>> me the oppo
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:00 -0700, Sean McCullough wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-stable folks!
>
> I sincerely hope I am in the correct place to inquire about a small
> problem I am having implementing FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE on my AMD Athlon-64
> machine. This machine runs FreeBSD 7.2 (amd64 version
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:30:31AM +0100, n j wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm reposting this from the freebsd-questions hoping for some answers.
> I feel there is something wrong here, but would really appreciate a
> second opinion before opening a bug report. The problematic part is
> marked with [what
Hi all,
I'm reposting this from the freebsd-questions hoping for some answers.
I feel there is something wrong here, but would really appreciate a
second opinion before opening a bug report. The problematic part is
marked with [what is this?].
- in case of successful connection:
[begin handshake
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 03:43:36AM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I'm getting:
> cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g -Wall
> -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-s
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick (from Mon, 15 Feb
2010 01:07:56 -0800):
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:49:47AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I had a feeling someone would bring up L2ARC/cache devices. This gives
> me the opportunity to ask something that's been on my mind for quite
> some time now:
>
>
I'm getting:
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign
-fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/c
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:33:07PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> >Get a dock for holding 2 x 2,5" disks in a single 5,25" slot and put
> >it at the top, in the only 5,25" bay of the case.
>
> That sounds very interesting. I just looking around for such a thing,
> and could not find it. Is there
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:49:47AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> > I had a feeling someone would bring up L2ARC/cache devices. This gives
> > me the opportunity to ask something that's been on my mind for quite
> > some time now:
> >
> > Aside from the capacity different (e.g. 40GB vs. 1GB), is there
> I had a feeling someone would bring up L2ARC/cache devices. This gives
> me the opportunity to ask something that's been on my mind for quite
> some time now:
>
> Aside from the capacity different (e.g. 40GB vs. 1GB), is there a
> benefit to using a dedicated RAM disk (e.g. md(4)) to a pool for
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 08:57:10AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Dan Naumov (from Mon, 15 Feb 2010
> 01:10:49 +0200):
>
> >Get a dock for holding 2 x 2,5" disks in a single 5,25" slot and put
> >it at the top, in the only 5,25" bay of the case. Now add an
> >additional PCI-E SATA co
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> DL> > SAS controller ($120):
> DL> >
> http://www.buy.com/prod/supermicro-lsi-megaraid-lsisas1068e-8-port-sas-raid-controller-16mb/q/loc/101/207929556.html
> DL> > Note: You'll need to change o
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
DN> >> PSU: Corsair 400CX 80+ - 59 euro -
DN> >
DN> >> http://www.corsair.com/products/cx/default.aspx
DN> >
DN> > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139008 for $50
DN> >
DN> > Is that sufficient power up to 10 SATA HDD and an optical dr
68 matches
Mail list logo
