On 2/27/2010 9:09 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2010, at 20:29, Robert Watson wrote:
> Progress on supporting 11n with atheros cards is on going. There's much more
> to it than adapting the rate control algorithm. Please stay tuned.
Are you aware if similar work ongoing for the mwl(4) based 80
Hi,
On 27 Feb 2010, at 20:29, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Spil Oss wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the confirmation!
>>
>> Is anything known re. a timeline for implementation of wireless-N? (8.1?
>> 9.0?)
>
> I know that Rui Paulo is working on this actively; I've added him to the C
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:28:48AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Additionally, while building a whole bunch of ports on this new system
> (about 30 or so, samba, ncftp, portaudit, bash, the usual suspects), I
> noticed the following in my logs during the build process:
>
> ---
Hello
I've very recently finished installing 8.0-RELEASE on some new
hardware and I noticed a few error messages that make me a bit uneasy.
This is a snip from my dmesg:
--
acpi0: on motherboard
acpi0: [ITHREAD]
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=
FreeBSD-EN-10:02.sched_ule Errata Notice
The FreeBSD Project
Topic:
Hi Pyun,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:12:01PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Since I don't have BCM5704 hardware it's hard to find which
> revision may affect to this issue. Could you narrow down which
> revision number started showing the issue?
I have BCM5704 hardware (Tyan S2882 system board). I
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 27-2-2010 21:32, Eirik Øverby wrote:
> >I've had a discussion with some folks on this for a while. I can easily
> >reproduce this situation by mounting a FreeBSD ZFS filesystem via
> >NFS-UDP from an OpenBSD machine. Telling
On 27-2-2010 21:32, Eirik Øverby wrote:
I've had a discussion with some folks on this for a while. I can easily
reproduce this situation by mounting a FreeBSD ZFS filesystem via
NFS-UDP from an OpenBSD machine. Telling the OpenBSD machine to use TCP
instead of UDP makes the problem go away.
Othe
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:40:43 +0100 Eirik Øverby wrote
about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
E> > So we see this problem with udp clients from OpenBSD and Linux.
E> I have not had the opportunity to test with Linux or anything else.
I guess all others who reported so far (including me) had Linux
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:38:19 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
JC> I should point out that the NFS+ZFS-based filer doesn't actually do its
JC> backups using NFS; it uses rsnapshot (rsync) over SSH. There is
JC> intense network I/O during backup time though, depend
On 27. feb. 2010, at 22.38, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:32:39 +0100 Eirik Øverby wrote
> about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
>
> E> I've had a discussion with some folks on this for a while. I can easily
> E> reproduce this situation by mounting a FreeBSD ZFS filesystem via
> E
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:36:47 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
DB> I have been running for the last few hours, 8-rel, and the only client
DB> is another
DB> 8-stable, furthermore, no ZFS, just plain UFS, and the leak is there!
Mounted via udp, not tcp, I guess...?
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:32:39 +0100 Eirik Øverby wrote
about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
E> I've had a discussion with some folks on this for a while. I can easily
E> reproduce this situation by mounting a FreeBSD ZFS filesystem via
E> NFS-UDP from an OpenBSD machine. Telling the OpenBSD machi
Hello folks
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion started by me regarding
abysmal read/write performance using ZFS mirror on 8.0-RELEASE. I was
using an Atom 330 system with 2GB ram and it was pointed out to me
that my problem was most likely having both disks attached to a PCI
SIL3124 controlle
On 27. feb. 2010, at 20.38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 08:21:05PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:15:52 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
>> wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
>>
>> WJW> > 81492/2613/84105 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
>> WJW> > 80
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Spil Oss wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation!
Is anything known re. a timeline for implementation of wireless-N? (8.1?
9.0?)
I know that Rui Paulo is working on this actively; I've added him to the CC
line as I'm not sure if he follows freebsd-stable.
Robert N M Watso
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 08:21:05PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:15:52 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
> wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
>
> WJW> > 81492/2613/84105 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
> WJW> > 80467/2235/82702/128000 mbuf clusters in use
> WJW> > (curren
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:26:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss
> wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
>
>
> DB> > Hm, I've got a server with 8-PRE from somewhen in Nov09 that is
> DB> > serving nfs from zfs fine and shows no leakage...
>
> DB> the binary search has started!
>
> After considering
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:26:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
DB> > Hm, I've got a server with 8-PRE from somewhen in Nov09 that is
DB> > serving nfs from zfs fine and shows no leakage...
DB> the binary search has started!
After considering the last email from
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:15:52 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
WJW> > 81492/2613/84105 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
WJW> > 80467/2235/82702/128000 mbuf clusters in use
WJW> > (current/cache/total/max) 80458/822 mbuf+clusters out of packet
WJW> > secondary
On 27-2-2010 8:02, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:12:39 +0100 Willem Jan Withagen
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs?:
WJW> Mine are now:
WJW> 41533/2402/43935 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
WJW> 41454/1572/43026/262144 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
WJW>
Thanks for the confirmation!
Is anything known re. a timeline for implementation of wireless-N? (8.1? 9.0?)
Kind regards,
Spil
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Spil Oss wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Got myself an Atheros AR5416 card
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Spil Oss wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Got myself an Atheros AR5416 card to upgrade my HostAP to Wireless-N speed.
>
> Somehow I can't find a way to convince the driver to go into 11n mode
>
> # ifconfig wlan0 mode 11b
> # ifconfig wlan0 mode 11g
> # ifconfig wla
Hi All,
Got myself an Atheros AR5416 card to upgrade my HostAP to Wireless-N speed.
Somehow I can't find a way to convince the driver to go into 11n mode
# ifconfig wlan0 mode 11b
# ifconfig wlan0 mode 11g
# ifconfig wlan0 mode 11n
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA (media): Device not configured
# uname -a
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:26:02 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
DB> > Hm, I've got a server with 8-PRE from somewhen in Nov09 that is
DB> > serving nfs from zfs fine and shows no leakage...
DB> the binary search has started!
DB> sorry, have to go know :-) [realy],
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:14:56 +0200 Daniel Braniss
> wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
>
> DB> anyways, I am running tests on an 'unused' server, only me using it to
> DB> 'make world'
> DB> and it's leaking.
>
> Hm, I've got a server with 8-PRE from somewhen in Nov09 that is serving
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:14:56 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
DB> anyways, I am running tests on an 'unused' server, only me using it to
DB> 'make world'
DB> and it's leaking.
Hm, I've got a server with 8-PRE from somewhen in Nov09 that is serving
nfs from zfs fi
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:24:10 +0200 Daniel Braniss
> wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
>
> DB> I doubt it, but here is another shot:
> DB> are we all running samba? I'm asking because the lock manager keeps
> DB> dying and ...
>
> Nope, no samba on my side. I am running lockd and sta
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:24:10 +0200 Daniel Braniss
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
DB> I doubt it, but here is another shot:
DB> are we all running samba? I'm asking because the lock manager keeps
DB> dying and ...
Nope, no samba on my side. I am running lockd and statd on the server
I have the same trable as Richard Mace
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-December/209334.html
nfs server
]>uname -a
FreeBSD bazar 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Thu Feb 25 14:42:08 MSK 2010
In rc.conf:
nfs_server_enable="YES"
#nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 16"
nfsv4_serve
30 matches
Mail list logo
