On Friday 29 April 2011 07:59:39 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I intend to commit the following change soon and MFC it after a short
> period of time. Please test it if you use multimedia applications, both
> native and Linux, especially if they deal with audio recording/capture.
>
> Thank you.
Seems to
On Friday 29 April 2011 01:51:24 Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 29 April 2011 11:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> CC'ing hselasky and thompsa for review of this.
>
> For failure logs (so far ia64 and arm), please see end of this page:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-April/th
I intend to commit the following change soon and MFC it after a short period of
time. Please test it if you use multimedia applications, both native and Linux,
especially if they deal with audio recording/capture.
Thank you.
Original Message
Message-ID: <4db6f7ba.4070...@freeb
Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> > Also identify function doesn't work from the OS (no problem
> > via the card BIOS). Don't remember having any luck with sg3_util
> > package either but worth trying again.
>
> I don't use SAS myself, but wouldn't the command be "inquiry" and not
> "ide
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running 8.2-RELEASE-p1 within VMWare ESXi 4.1-u1 I want to use raw
> devices as hard disks. I create the devices using this link:
>
> http://www.mattiasholm.com/node/33
>
> I tried 3 different hard drives (Seagate 2x80GB and 1x400G
On 29/04/2011, at 10:38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Could you please provide output from "zfs get all poolname"? Myself and
> others would like to review what settings you're using on the
> filesystem. If it's a separate filesystem (e.g. pool/foobar), please
> also provide output from "zfs get all
Jeremy:
> I don't mean to sound critical, but why do you guys do this? The reason
> I ask: on actual production filers (read: NetApps), you don't go yanking
> out the FC cable between the HBA and the NA and expect everything to "be
> happy" afterwards. Most SAN administrators tend to reboot an
On 29/04/2011, at 11:43, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>> I will note something, however: your ARC max is set to 3072MB, yet Wired
>> is around 4143MB. Do you have something running on this box that takes
>> up a lot of RAM? mysqld, etc..? I
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> I will note something, however: your ARC max is set to 3072MB, yet Wired
> is around 4143MB. Do you have something running on this box that takes
> up a lot of RAM? mysqld, etc..? I'm trying to account for the "extra
> gigabyte" in Wired
On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Be aware there are all sorts of caveats/complexities with iSCSI on
FreeBSD. There are past threads on -stable and -fs talking about them
in great detail. I personally wouldn't go this route.
Why can't OS X use CIFS? It has the ability to moun
ZFS volumes (zvol s) can definitely be resized using the volsize property:
# zfs get volsize mypool/myvol
NAMEPROPERTY VALUESOURCE
mypool/myvol volsize 2G -
# zfs set volsize=4g mypool/myvol
Mac OS 10.5 and later allows you to resize Journaled HFS+ volumes (using
diskutil or
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:43:47AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2011, at 5:26, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> I have the following ZFS related tunables
> >>
> >> vfs.zfs.arc_max="3072M"
> >> vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1"
> >> vfs.zfs.txg.timeout=5
> >> vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable=1
> >
On 29 April 2011 11:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> > ===> usr.sbin/usbdump (all)
> > cc -O -pipe -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wpo
On 29/04/2011, at 5:26, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> I have the following ZFS related tunables
>>
>> vfs.zfs.arc_max="3072M"
>> vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1"
>> vfs.zfs.txg.timeout=5
>> vfs.zfs.cache_flush_disable=1
>
> Are the last two actually *working* in /boot/loader.conf? Can you
> verify by
On 29/04/2011, at 2:16, Malcolm Waltz wrote:
> I doubt the issues you are encountering have much to do with ZFS.
>
> It sounds like you are using TimeMachine over NFS. Obviously, Apple does not
> support that configuration:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=time+machine+nfs+site:apple.com
>
> I
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:06:32PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> ===> usr.sbin/usbdump (all)
> cc -O -pipe -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings
TB --- 2011-04-28 22:26:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-28 22:26:40 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-28 22:26:40 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 22:26:51 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 22:26:51 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:26:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:26:53 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:26:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:27:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:27:10 - /usr/bi
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
>
> I've seen cases where entries in /boot/loader.conf throw parser errors
> during loader(8) when quotes aren't used. The man page denotes that
> quotes are required, which doesn't appear to be true? Possibly the
> parser only throws erro
2011/4/28 Jack Vogel :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:17:11 pm Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
>> > Though they mention that HT MSI windows is disabled. I'm not sure,
>> > whether this matters.
>>
>> Yes, that is probably what breaks this.
>>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:27:04PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 3:56:01 pm Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:33:22PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > > Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
> > >
> > > I find that whenever my laptop (over wi
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:17:11 pm Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I really don't know (I haven't done that intentionally). There is
> > nothing special in /var/log/messages:
> > kadlubek# grep -i msix /var/log/messages
> > Apr
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:17:11 pm Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really don't know (I haven't done that intentionally). There is
> nothing special in /var/log/messages:
> kadlubek# grep -i msix /var/log/messages
> Apr 28 21:37:03 kadlubek kernel: em0: Using MSIX interrupts with 0 vect
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 3:56:01 pm Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:33:22PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
> >
> > I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine
it's backing up to grinds to a halt..
Well, rebuild your kernel so the driver is not static, then you can load and
unload
the driver to see what happens. You only have one interface, no em1?
Jack
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really don't know (I haven't done that intentionally). There is
On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:33:22PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
>>
>> I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine it's
>> backing up to grinds to a halt.. Other sys
Hi,
I really don't know (I haven't done that intentionally). There is
nothing special in /var/log/messages:
kadlubek# grep -i msix /var/log/messages
Apr 28 21:37:03 kadlubek kernel: em0: Using MSIX interrupts with 0 vectors
Though sysctl suggests, that I haven't disabled MSIX:
kadlubek# sysctl -a
TB --- 2011-04-28 20:03:30 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-28 20:03:30 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-28 20:03:30 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 20:03:37 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 20:03:37 - /usr/bin/
Notice this: em0: Using MSIX interrupts with 0 vectors
ZERO vectors are not a good sign :) You need to look at your system, you
have MSIX
disabled or something? Maybe some message in /var/log/messages??
Jack
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed
Hi,
I've installed Intel Gigabit CT Desktop Adapter in my FreeBSD 8.2 box
and I can't see any incoming traffic on this card. Even ARP resolution
doesn't work. Though I see the outgoing traffic on the other end.
Relevant info:
kadlubek# uname -a
FreeBSD kadlubek 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEA
AFP is not the same as HFS+. Time Machine will work better with AFP than NFS
or SMB/CIFS, but it's still not using native HFS+ unless you are using block
storage (even if you use AFP with an HFS+ filesystem).
Time Machine cannot function at all without accessing HFS+ directly. If you
are usin
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:33:22PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
>
> I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine it's
> backing up to grinds to a halt.. Other systems streaming stuff over NFS from
> it also tend to stall
On Apr 28, 2011, at 12:17 PM, George Kontostanos wrote:
> I am using TM over smb on a ZFS Raidz1 pool of my fileserver with no problems
> whatsoever.
>
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> tank/apple 37.2G 82.8G 37.2G /tank/apple
>
> Oldest back
I am using TM over smb on a ZFS Raidz1 pool of my fileserver with no
problems whatsoever.
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
tank/apple 37.2G 82.8G 37.2G /tank/apple
Oldest backup 14 December 2009
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote
On Apr 28, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
>
> I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine it's
> backing up to grinds to a halt.. Other systems streaming stuff over NFS from
> it also tend to stall..
>
> I pre
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Ronner wrote:
> On 4/28/11 4:03 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
>> Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
>>
>> I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine
>> it's backing up to grinds to a halt.. Other systems streaming stu
I doubt the issues you are encountering have much to do with ZFS.
It sounds like you are using TimeMachine over NFS. Obviously, Apple does not
support that configuration:
http://www.google.com/search?q=time+machine+nfs+site:apple.com
In my opinion, TimeMachine should only be used with block sto
> Is this simple to do? When I setup my home ZFS server, I couldn't get
> it to boot from ZFS, so I configured 2 disks as 'boot' discs:
Its fairly simple - I generally dont boot from ZFs either, my
standard config has a 4 gig UFS boot partition, and then a large zpool
on the rest of the drive. usu
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Pete French wrote:
> Is not the problem here that you are trying to GPT label a gmirrored disc ?
> If you instead gmirror two GPT partitions then the problem goes away
> doesnt it ? Thats how I set things up - use parititoning on the ohysical
> drives, and then put
On 28/04/2011 17:02, Edho P Arief wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
Granted, there may be reasons why it wasn't done like this in the
beginning, but my non-GEOM programmer's eyes can't see any.
I believe one of the reason is it would prevent conversion from
non-gmirr
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Pete French wrote:
>> Correct. The layering is not, in itself, the issue. The issue is
>> that the loader or kernel or whatever reads the first sector of the
>> disk, finds a GPT so it then looks for the backup GPT in the last
>> physical sector of the disk and
> Correct. The layering is not, in itself, the issue. The issue is
> that the loader or kernel or whatever reads the first sector of the
> disk, finds a GPT so it then looks for the backup GPT in the last
> physical sector of the disk and doesn't find it. At this point,
> gmirror is not loaded (
Hi,
On 4/28/11 4:03 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine it's
backing up to grinds to a halt.. Other systems streaming stuff over NFS from it
also tend to stall..
Are you using zfs co
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> Granted, there may be reasons why it wasn't done like this in the
> beginning, but my non-GEOM programmer's eyes can't see any.
I believe one of the reason is it would prevent conversion from
non-gmirror disk to gmirror one as explained here
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Edho P Arief wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.04.11 01:30, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>>
>>> gmirror doesn't touch the start of the disk, but saves it's metadata
>>> in the last sector of the disk, and creates a new GEOM pro
Does anyone else use ZFS to store TM backups?
I find that whenever my laptop (over wifi!) starts a TM the ZFS machine it's
backing up to grinds to a halt.. Other systems streaming stuff over NFS from it
also tend to stall..
I presume that TM is doing something which causes ZFS some issues but I
hi,
ok, here we go: I've installed hastmon and both FreeBSD nodes and one on
Linux Debian as watchdog:
Simple setup:
# cat /etc.local/hastmon.conf
resource sanip {
exec /usr/local/_rbg/bin/san-ip
friends iscsihead-m iscsihead-s nos
on iscsihead-m {
re
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 28.04.11 01:30, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>
>> gmirror doesn't touch the start of the disk, but saves it's metadata
>> in the last sector of the disk, and creates a new GEOM provider that's
>> one sector shorter.
>>
>> GPT stores it's part
On 28.04.11 01:30, Freddie Cash wrote:
gmirror doesn't touch the start of the disk, but saves it's metadata
in the last sector of the disk, and creates a new GEOM provider that's
one sector shorter.
GPT stores it's partition table in the first sector of the disk, and
saves a backup copy of it
49 matches
Mail list logo
