On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:30:48 -0800
Greg Bonett wrote:
> That's a good idea - but the zpool is made of geli devices. Illumos can't
> attached FreeBSD geli devices can it?
Export the raw geli devices over iSCSI and assemble the zpool on Illumos that
way :)
_
Greg Bonett wrote:
> > My next plan would be reporting the problem with sufficient
> > information so the bug can be fixed.
> >
> > Destroying the dataset or the whole pool seems like papering over the
> > real issue to me and you could still do it if the PR gets ignored for
> > too long or a dev
I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and
benevolent question:
regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same
as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my
computers what was release at that time and got it up and
working perfectly. In other words, is it th
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 17:33 +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> I'm quite happy to see 9.1 out and want to ask polite and
> benevolent question:
> regarding times on the site, are iso and img files the same
> as 2 weeks ago? To remind noble readers. I installed on my
> computers what was release at that ti
> There are md5 and sha256 sums posted at
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/announce.html for the official
> release. Just compare them to the sum for the image you downloaded and
> installed.
I can't. That is the trouble. I downloaded an image on the job
and set usb stick at now broken hdd.
There were no changes in releng/9.1 since tagging...
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-file-content-tp5773668p5773676.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-stable@free
(Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
Last night I did a csup to retrieve the whole cvs repository. I noticed
that huge numbers of files in doc and www have been deleted. Is this
intentional, or is it the svn to cvs program not working properly? And
if it is the latter, a
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
>
-doc@ is a better choice.
> Last night I did a csup to retrieve the whole cvs repository. I noticed
> that huge numbers of files in doc and www have been de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/2012 11:58 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> wrote:
>> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
>>
>
> -doc@ is a better choice.
Thanks. I thought of that mome
Greetings,
The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
post this question:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
>>
>
> -doc@ is a better choice.
>
>> Last night I did a cs
On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
> post this question:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
> >> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
> >>
>
Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
> On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
>> post this question:
>>
>> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> wrote:
>> >> (Not sure
On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H wrote:
> Sigh...
> IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
> left out.
SVN has a number of features which makes development much easier.
What did you find easier to accomplish with CVS than with SVN?
> Are there _any_ CVS server
On 31 Dec 2012 20:40, "Chris H" wrote:
>
> Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
> > On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
> >> post this question:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06A
On 12/31/12 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote:
| I'm sorry, but the exporter scripts were always a stopgap.
That's what I was afraid I would hear. Recently, I was informed by SF.NET,
that my account would be upgraded, and all the projects I have, which all
use CVS, would be "upgraded" to SVN (which renders
On 12/31/2012 03:40 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 12/31/12 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> | I'm sorry, but the exporter scripts were always a stopgap.
>> That's what I was afraid I would hear. Recently, I was informed by
>> SF.NET,
>> that my account would be upgraded, and all the projects I have,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote:
> Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
>> On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
>>> post this question:
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06
Greetings Eitan, and thank you for your reply.
> On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H wrote:
>> Sigh...
>> IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
>> left out.
>
> SVN has a number of features which makes development much easier.
>
> What did you find easier to accom
Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
> On 31 Dec 2012 20:40, "Chris H" wrote:
>>
>> Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
>> > On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Greetings,
>> >> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
>> >> post this
Greetings Alfred, and thank you for the response.
> On 12/31/12 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> | I'm sorry, but the exporter scripts were always a stopgap.
>> That's what I was afraid I would hear. Recently, I was informed by SF.NET,
>> that my account would be upgraded, and all the projects I have, w
I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9.
Following the update build times for packages have increased by a
factor between 5 and 20. I.e. I have packages that used to build in
5 minutes and now take an hour.
I'm suspecting the file system ever since I saw that the majority of
Greetings Kevin, and thank you for the reply.
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
>>> On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
Greetings,
The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
post thi
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>
> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9.
> Following the update build times for packages have increased by a
> factor between 5 and 20. I.e. I have packages that used to build in
> 5 minutes and now take an hour.
>
> I'm susp
On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>>
>> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9.
>> Following the update build times for packages have increased by a
>> factor between 5 and 20. I.e. I have packages that used to build in
>
On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9.
>>> Following the update build times for packages have increased by a
>>> factor between 5 a
There are arguments on both sides; some (perhaps you) feel SVN has/
provides more options, others (maybe myself) feel the same can be
accomplished with CVS, and that migration only causes more initial
(and unnecessary) overhead. I'll leave it at that. :)
Chris,
I think you've gotten to your NYE
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> There are arguments on both sides; some (perhaps you) feel SVN has/
>> provides more options, others (maybe myself) feel the same can be
>> accomplished with CVS, and that migration only causes more initial
>> (and unnecessary) overhead. I
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 02:05:11AM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 01:49, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > On 01/01/2013 01:29, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9.
> >>> Following t
On 12/31/12 7:32 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
There are arguments on both sides; some (perhaps you) feel SVN has/
provides more options, others (maybe myself) feel the same can be
accomplished with CVS, and that migration only causes more ini
29 matches
Mail list logo
