There is something unusual about these files. The 12.1 version shows an entry
for the 12.1-RELEASE. It does not exist in the 12.2 version even though
entries go back for a number of years before that.
The 12.2 version has the entry for 20190913 appearing ahead of the entry for
20190914. One
> On 26 July 2020, at 13:31, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 01:11:33PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a production system (12.1-RELEASE-p6) that is showing around 1 GB of
>> Laundry pages. There are over 6 Gb Inact and 1 Gb free. I can u
I have a production system (12.1-RELEASE-p6) that is showing around 1 GB of
Laundry pages. There are over 6 Gb Inact and 1 Gb free. I can understand why
the system would want to not prioritize laundering those pages as there is
plenty of available pages. However, does that mean that I have ab
I have a number of production servers that only have bge and I don't see that
listed in either category. None of them are running FreeBSD 12 yet as it has
not been released. Also there are some with rl. Those are add-on boards so
they could be changed, but would require extensive effort as th
> On 20 June 2017, at 10:31, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Zoran Kolic wrote on 2017/06/20 17:12:
>>> Generally (and previously) the advice is to go via the next major version so
>>> you should go:
>>>
>>> 9.3 -> 10.x -> 11.x not 9.3 -> 11.x
>>
>> Exactelly what I want to avoid
> On 16 October 2016, at 08:24, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>> I would like to know what experience and tips people on this list have
>> regarding this update. Doug Hardie made it successfully. To my eyes,
>> i
> On 9 August 2016, at 04:40, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> I upgraded my local machine to the above revision a few days ago. Since then
>> I have seen the local em0 card locking up and getting he following
>> messages in dmesg
>>
>> em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
>> em0: link state cha
> On 7 August 2016, at 23:05, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>
>> The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and
>> the server is running 11.0-BETA4.
>
> I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch.
> Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < some
> On 7 August 2016, at 21:27, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>
>> However, that patch works and I am now able to upgrade to 11.0-BETA4.
>
> Would you continue informing us with the end result of your procedure.
> Personally, I will go the same way on my home nodes. I'm sure latter
> RCs would be more frien
> On 7 August 2016, at 13:59, Florian Ermisch
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 7. August 2016 08:37:45 MESZ, schrieb Kurt Jaeger :
>> […]
>>> I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be
>>> upgraded. I can't go to 10.x as it won't boot on that hardware.
>>> However, 11.0 does boot. I ca
> On 6 August 2016, at 23:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might
>> be corrected to upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0?
>
> Does
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211354
>
> help ?
>
>> I have a number of producti
Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be corrected to
upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the beta's and none of them
will do the upgrade even with the EN applied. Bug 211398 has the details.
I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be
Is there any information available on when freebsd-update might be corrected to
upgrade some 9.3 systems to 11.0? I have tried all the beta's and none of them
will do the upgrade even with the EN applied. Bug 211398 has the details.
I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be
> On 17 February 2016, at 17:45, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie writes:
>
>>> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you measured that paging (not swapping; that's a more extreme
>>&g
> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> hiren panchasara writes:
>
>> On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote:
>>> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?:
They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually
swapped, which woul
> On 4 November 2015, at 08:15, Mark Martinec
> wrote:
>
> Upgrading 10.2-RELEASE-p6 to 10.2-RELEASE-p7 now solved ntpd crashes
> (apparently fixed by: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-15:20.vm).
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> Mark
>
ntpdc hangs when you do a peers command on 9.3. Eventually it return
> On 23 September 2015, at 03:44, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>> I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons,
>>> out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service
>>> to start before non-system (local) ones. I bet I'm not the first one to
>>> a
> On 23 September 2015, at 01:44, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons,
> out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service
> to start before non-system (local) ones. I bet I'm not the first one to
> as
Some more testing indicates that the problem is most likely in close, not mmap.
I modified the program to the following:
zool# more test.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
int rc, pid, fd;
char *cp;
char cmd[10
> On 30 July 2015, at 01:39, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 July 2015, at 23:44, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> [reformatted]
>>
>> On 2015-Jul-29 17:41:33 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I
> On 29 July 2015, at 23:44, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> [reformatted]
>
> On 2015-Jul-29 17:41:33 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t
>> figure out what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and
>>
> On 29 July 2015, at 17:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t figure out
> what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and currently it has over 2GB
> in use. ps shows only a kernel module [intr] with a W status. Ob
> On 29 July 2015, at 18:57, Chris H wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:41:33 -0700 Doug Hardie wrote
>
>> I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t figure
>> out what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and currently it has over
>>
I have several FreeBSD 9.3 systems that are using swap and I can’t figure out
what is doing it. The key system has 6GB swap and currently it has over 2GB in
use. ps shows only a kernel module [intr] with a W status. Obviously that
isn’t using the space. No other process shows a W in its stat
> On 26 March 2015, at 18:02, Chris H wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:28:15 -0400 J David wrote
>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>> As Kevin already noted; stopping firefox, and starting it again,
>>> seems the only solution.
>>
>> The machines in questions are servers
On 6 August 2013, at 09:18, Ted Hatfield wrote:
> I too have been updating my systems by updating and building from source. To
> recompile and install sendmail from the /usr/src tree you can run these
> commands.
>
> cd /usr/src/lib/libsm; make clean; make obj; make depend; make
> cd /usr/src
As I previously indicated, I have tested a couple more Minis and updated the
instructions with what I learned. Here is the revised version:
2.12Installing FreeBSD on an Apple Mac Mini
The Mac Mini is an attractive server platform. Its small, runs cool, low
powered, and reasonably cheap.
I have documented what I have completed and what remains to be done for the
install of 9.1 on a Mini. I wrote this as a section of the Handbook, although
its not in the right format as I don't know what that format is. I believe
this needs to be retained in the documentation somewhere easily f
On 7 March 2013, at 17:00, John Mehr wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:18:23 -0800
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 7 March 2013, at 11:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Ric
On 7 March 2013, at 11:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Richard Kuhns wrote:
>
> > On 03/07/13 01:59, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >> I have a new Mac Mini and have encountered the same problem
On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Richard Kuhns wrote:
> On 03/07/13 01:59, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I have a new Mac Mini and have encountered the same problem reported last
>> year by Richard Kuhns. YongHyeon PYUN provided some patches to the kernel
>> that resolved the problem.
I have a new Mac Mini and have encountered the same problem reported last year
by Richard Kuhns. YongHyeon PYUN provided some patches to the kernel that
resolved the problem. However, without an internet connection its a bit tricky
to get them into the system. Here is the approach I believe w
b 13, 2013 at 05:29:53PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>>>> 13.02.2013 17:25, Doug Hardie ??:
>>>>>> Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the
>>>>>> following interface:
>>>>>>
>>>
On 13 February 2013, at 02:29, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 13.02.2013 17:25, Doug Hardie пишет:
>> Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the
>> following interface:
>>
>> msk0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>>
>> option
Monitoring a tcpdump between two systems, a FreeBSD 9.1 system has the
following interface:
msk0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=c011b
ether 00:11:2f:2a:c7:03
inet 10.0.1.199 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet6 fe80::211:2fff:fe2a:c703%msk0 prefixl
On 1 January 2013, at 21:16, Chris H wrote:
>> On 1 January 2013 15:17, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> On 1/1/13 6:55 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 1 January 2013 02:54, Derek Kulinski wrote:
>
> That said I would totally understand you being upset if FreeBSD would
> decide to
On 29 November 2012, at 13:44, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 13:33 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 29 November 2012, at 06:01, Gary Palmer wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:46:51PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On 29 November 2012, at 06:01, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:46:51PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 28 November 2012, at 20:01, Devin Teske wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>
>>&
On 28 November 2012, at 20:01, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have installed 4 systems from the same FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 disk. Three of
>> them worked just fine. The last one is causing a problem. It will not look
>> in
I have installed 4 systems from the same FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 disk. Three of them
worked just fine. The last one is causing a problem. It will not look in
/usr/local/lib/ for shared libraries. I did the standard install, moved in
some source, compiled it and tried to run it. The library is there
On 26 November 2012, at 12:53, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 11/26/12 21:27, Bas Smeelen wrote:
>> On 11/26/12 17:25, Jakub Lach wrote:
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regarding FAQ, some info about journalling should be added to
>>> "Chapter 9 Disks, File Systems, and Boot Loaders", especially now,
>>> when SU+
On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote:
> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how
> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and
> robust than 9.0-RELEASE?
It appears to be for me. I had problems with 9.0 not reading CDs and rebooting
w
With FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 you can assign the same link local address manually to two
different hosts on the same network. The Neighbor Solicitations are not
responded to and you end up with non-working addresses. The simple way to
reproduce this is to boot two systems on the same network and get th
I just completed the update to 8.1 Beta 1 in hopes that there would be a driver
for the wireless card. No luck. The update went just fine. No problems
observed so far.
pciconf shows:
no...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27901814 chip=0x07811814 rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Ra
On 2 April 2010, at 04:27, Denny Lin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>>> While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
>>> sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best dec
On 27 March 2010, at 13:37, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Mar-26 17:18:30 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried to upgrade a 7.2 system to 8.0. It uses a SCSI drive. It
>> works fine on 7.2.
>
> We will need some more details before we can help you.
>
>> Howeve
I tried to upgrade a 7.2 system to 8.0. It uses a SCSI drive. It works fine
on 7.2. However, it would appear that during the upgrade process when running
make delete-old (?) there is a note about make delete-old-libs (?). Don't do
that at that point. End of system. Make installworld fails
On 8 March 2010, at 12:33, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I run a number of 4 core systems with em interfaces. These are production
>> systems that are unmanned and located a long way from me. Under unusual
>> conditions i
On 8 March 2010, at 06:53, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>> If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail*
>> with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp",
>> "uptime", and a brief description of the
I have switched to working hardware. Sure makes a difference ;-)
Now I am down to a couple issues:
1. When booting I first get the following:
F1: FreeBSD
F5: Drive 0
F6: PXE
Boot: F1
At that point it just sits and starts adding #s at the end of the Boot
statement. If I press F5 (none of
On 15 September 2009, at 01:52, Doug Hardie wrote:
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a where but its way too much to type accurately by hand
I have been following the discussion on mergemaster and one item is a
bit annoying. You can use -U in the command args which sets
"AUTO_UPGRADE=yes". That flag is not in mergemaster.rc. It could be
easily added to the rc file, but I suspect it would conflict with -p.
Hence it seems like
On 29 April 2009, at 08:01, Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:33 -0300, Paulo Fragoso wrote:
Hardware:
MB: Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2
acd0: DVDR at ata3-master SATA150
ISO MEDIA BOOT
7.2-RC2-i386-dvd1.isoDVD-RW OK
7.2-RC2-i386-livefs.iso CD-RW
On Apr 18, 2009, at 14:05, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have encountered a rather interesting issue trying to install
rc1. The system boots and then says there is no disk in the CD
drive. The rc1 disk1 downloaded fine and the checksums matched.
The CD will mount fine in other systems and can
I have encountered a rather interesting issue trying to install rc1.
The system boots and then says there is no disk in the CD drive. The
rc1 disk1 downloaded fine and the checksums matched. The CD will
mount fine in other systems and can easily be read. I then let 7.0
boot on the test
On Jan 26, 2009, at 12:54, Julian Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Reference:
From: Xian Chen
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:45:56 -0500
Message-id: >
Xian Chen wrote:
Hi All,
I can use scp to move files from a linux to my Freebsd machine.
But, when I try to use WinSCP under windows, it
Is the Live Filesystem CD supposed to be bootable? 7.0's was but I
can't get the 7.1 disc to boot. It works fine if I boot from CD 1 and
then switch.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
On Jul 12, 2008, at 15:33, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 02:37:21PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I installed 7.0 release when it first came out. However, because
of the
TCP problems with users on cable modems I had to switch to Stable
to get
the fix. I haven't update
I installed 7.0 release when it first came out. However, because of
the TCP problems with users on cable modems I had to switch to Stable
to get the fix. I haven't updated the source since then and now there
are some updates on the verge of being released that need to be
included. Howeve
On Apr 6, 2008, at 22:38, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 08:18:20PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 17:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:05:18PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 14:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008
On Apr 6, 2008, at 17:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:05:18PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 14:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 02:45:24PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 02:37:06PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote
On Apr 6, 2008, at 14:45, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 02:37:06PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
Somewhere between FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0 getenv has been changed to
return a
null if an environment variable is set but has no value. I don't
find
anything anywhere i
Somewhere between FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0 getenv has been changed to
return a null if an environment variable is set but has no value. I
don't find anything anywhere in the documentation/man pages on this.
As a result, you cannot distinguish between a variable that is not set
and one that is
I recently upgraded 3 of my 5 servers to 7.0. Two of them are on
new hardware and one is on hardware that used to run 6.2. Since
then, 2 of my thousands of users are unable to access the servers
running 7.0. They can access the server running 6.2 just fine.
What happens is the server re
I recently upgraded 3 of my 5 servers to 7.0. Two of them are on new
hardware and one is on hardware that used to run 6.2. Since then, 2
of my thousands of users are unable to access the servers running
7.0. They can access the server running 6.2 just fine. What happens
is the server re
I have just installed 7.0 on some new hardware. Have never tried
earlier versions. There are a couple of unexpected items that I do
not understand.
1. When booting there are a few messages like:
acd0: TIMEOUT - READ_BIG retrying
When the system is booted off CD (like insta
On Dec 7, 2007, at 02:25, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
Between 6.2 and 7 /boot has grown from 45 MB to 114 MB. That poses
a significant issue for those of us who have been running
production systems for many years. I have the root partition set
to 200 MB which has been
Between 6.2 and 7 /boot has grown from 45 MB to 114 MB. That poses a
significant issue for those of us who have been running production
systems for many years. I have the root partition set to 200 MB which
has been more than enough. Its no longer usable. 7.0 beta will not
install proper
On Jul 19, 2007, at 10:08, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
As the subject says, on my 6-stable systems ntpd just sits there
and does
nothing. The logs only mention when the daemon gets started or shut
down. It
complains when servers are not reachable, but does nothing when
they are available.
The d
I have found what I believe is a "bug" in installworld for FreeBSD
6.2. I do not believe this was in 6.1 as I would have encountered
the same problem there. I run a number of production servers. I
maintain the source on one development machine where it is built and
tested. To upgrade a
On May 21, 2006, at 22:41, David Nugent wrote:
A good failover strategy comes into play here.
If you have one, then taking a single production machine off-line
for a short period should be no big deal, even routine, and should
not even be noticed by users if done correctly. This should be
On May 21, 2006, at 20:55, Colin Percival wrote:
If you administrate system(s) running FreeBSD (in the broad sense
of "are
responsible for keeping system(s) secure and up to date"), please
visit
http://people.freebsd.org/~cperciva/survey.html
and complete the survey below before May 31st,
On Apr 27, 2006, at 11:12, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
options QUOTA
This definitely effects performance on 6.x since it makes your
filesystem giant-locked, which may also interfere with your network
processing.
Any in
On Apr 5, 2006, at 16:28, jason wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Chris wrote:
Some possible clarity? Are there other user crontabs running?
Nope. It's basically a single-user system.
You might want to check the start times for those processes with the
cron log. That may give some clues.
_
On Apr 2, 2006, at 12:22, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:25:59PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE. This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-
SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD devel
I am building a tool to identify the file that has a specific LBA.
The approach I am using is to search through each inode from number 2
up. This approach works well with UFS1 file systems as then
preinitialize all the inodes. However, UFS2 does lazy inode
initialization so there are alw
I have a large disk that has several failed sectors. The drive
basically is the article storage for news so it has lots of files.
Basically the error messages I get during the inn expire operation is
there are a couple failed sectors where the drive cannot successfully
read the sectors.
On Jan 30, 2005, at 12:17, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 02:47:08PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In other words, it's an impossible dream to hope that all scripts
will
conform to this or any of the other possible choices (remember the
perl
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:43:01AM -0800, Rich Wales wrote:
I'm running 5.3-RELEASE-p5 on a system that is functioning as a
NAT router/firewall using "pf". It works just fine, but . . . .
The external (Internet) network connection is giving me incoming
traffic addressed to other users all over my
I am getting a rash of vm errors that started a couple days ago -
FreeBSD 4.6:
> vm_page_cache: attempting to cache busy page
>
I don't seem to find anything obviously wrong in the system. How do I
tell which process is causing the problem? It looks like something is
hung, but I don't see an
At 15:10 +0200 6/12/02, Thomas Quinot wrote:
>Le 2002-06-12, Doug Hardie écrivait :
>
>> ypbind, to not create a pid file. I have a process that periodically
>> checks the important server pid files and makes sure the process is
>> still allive. It then pages me
I don't know if this is the best place to send this, but I just
encountered a problem that took a long time to diagnose. I believe
the cause was ypserv terminating. It was definitely gone and when I
restarted it, things worked properly again. However, ypserv, and
ypbind, to not create a pid
At 9:24 +1000 10/18/01, Gregory Bond wrote:
>If this is an old machine that was installed with an old version and
>has been upgraded, then you will probably be running the original boot blocks.
>Try installing the latest boot blocks with disklabel.
I see in the source that boot2 reads the /boot.c
I just heard a most interest tale of woe. A new user installing
4.3-Release wanted some ports. I gave him specific instructions, in
writing, on how to build those ports. For some reason he ignored the
step to cd to the specific port and did essentially:
cd /usr/ports
make
The system dutifu
At 22:56 -0700 5/14/01, Christopher Shumway wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2001, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> Thats the mode it seems to be in without that argument. Packets go
>> through the system for some time, then you get a bunch listed. It
>> used to output a line
Is there a problem with tcpdump on 4.3-Release? On a system with
very low packet rates, tcpdump never displays any packets. Its as if
its in buffered mode. Eventually it will show traffic, but it
appears that some of the packets are not actually displayed. On a
system with lots of traffic,
How are you preventing unauthorized access via the PM2? I haven't
found any way to prevent it.
At 16:04 -0700 5/14/01, Jason DiCioccio wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I've found the Portmaster 2E to be quite good at this too :)..
>
>- - Original Message -
>From
88 matches
Mail list logo
