RE: Upgrading from 6.4 to 7.2

2009-07-31 Thread Helge.Oldach
Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:07 PM: Willem Jan Withagen wrote: Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Willem Jan Withagen wrote: With a 6.4 of last night So I guess 6.4 - 7.2 needs to go via 7.0 ?? It is already fixed. http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195987

RE: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-31 Thread Helge.Oldach
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote on Monday, October 29, 2007 9:13 AM: any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? machine is mostly IO-bound, showing 100% disk load with 8 or sometimes even 3 mB/s, 300-400 tps (it's 2 SATA300 disks in gmirror) This is how rrdtool

RE: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-26 Thread Helge.Oldach
Kai Lockwood wrote on Friday, January 26, 2007 5:10 AM: Oliver Fromme wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: BTW, what is the reason this hack isn't included in the base kernel / code? Because it is probably unnecessary? I run a recent 6-STABLE and use the

RE: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and Flash 7 patch

2007-01-25 Thread Helge.Oldach
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:51 PM: On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600 ejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new file. BTW, what is the reason this hack isn't included in the base kernel / code?

RE: Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support

2006-12-22 Thread Helge.Oldach
Pete French wrote on Friday, December 22, 2006 2:44 PM: Because everybody knows that odd numbered releases aren't stable. I've been 20 years in electronics comouting and thats the first time I have ever heard anyone say that! Steer clear of '.0' releases is well known, but suspecting

RE: gnokii on FreeBSD 6.0 and Dell PE 2850

2006-03-24 Thread Helge.Oldach
Mar 22 08:41:38 nefarian kernel: sio0: 2 more silo overflows (total 16) This is often related to interrupt contention. Probably your new machine shares the IRQ of /dev/cuad0 with other devices. If another device hangs on the IRQ for too long, the cuad0 silo will overflow and you are losing

RE: opinion on which software RAID to use

2006-03-02 Thread Helge.Oldach
Vivek, Frankly, for smaller, desktop-sized boxen I prefer atacontrol. Once set up at installation time, it just works. I even managed to hotswap drives on certain ATA controllers, provided that the drives are on different channels. On the server end, I still prefer SCSI-based hardware RAID.