At 01:29 AM 2/14/02 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>Some of the other IDE raid cards will allow you to use a master and slave
>on the same channel. From what I understand the problem with this is that
>if a slave dies, it could potentially take out the master or vice versa.
Performance is the issue
At 06:34 PM 4/17/01 -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
>We're not going to let you. Resistance is futile.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Ian Perrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 6:29 PM
>Subject: subscribe
>
>
> >
> > subscribe
> >
And wh
At 08:18 PM 4/9/01 -0700, Yann Sommer wrote:
>Heya all,
>
>I've been following this thread with some extra attention, since I remember
>beeing new to FreeBSD and complaining about a dedicated Server I ordered,
>running BETA. It is just, as has been mentioned a few times before on this
>list, again
At 10:04 PM 4/9/01 -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>I like the idea of stable-supfile, so it should stay. standard-supfile
>should *definitely* refer to the -REL in which it is a part of. In that
>case, a novice user who doesn't change anything would end up cvsup'ing code
>that they already have
At 02:31 PM 3/7/01 -0500, Russell D. Murphy Jr. wrote:
>Another datapoint. . .
>
>I changed make.conf on, I believe, Dec. 6:
>
># CFLAGS= -O -pipe
>CFLAGS= -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro
>
>(There's also:
>
>COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe)
>
>(I gather that -mcpu is redundant.) I r
At 03:26 PM 11/13/00 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:06:41PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
>wrote:
> > * I'm going to go ahead and bump -current's libc today in preparation of
> > * doing in -stable if it comes down to it. I know Garret has been waiting
> > * t
At 03:35 PM 11/14/00 -0500, Evan S wrote:
>I cvs'uppd my ports collection like the handbook and UPDATING file said
>to, will that be enough so after I make installworld and merge master my
>ports won't have to be recompiled?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Evan Sarmiento ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>http://sekt7.org/es
Wh
At 03:22 PM 11/14/00 +, G D McKee wrote:
>Hi
>
>How can I get a second FreeBSD server to masquerade through another one
>hooked up to the internet using ppp without enabling nat in ppp.conf
>file. Everything else from other PC's goes through squid or socks5 proxies.
>
>Can I do anything wit
At 01:23 AM 11/13/00 -0500, jack wrote:
>There're all kinds of ways around it, including a local patch
>that puts it back in. I'm just curious about why a convenient,
>IMO, feature was dropped.
It was semi-broken and in some opinions, an easily replaced, minor feature
that.
Check the cvs-all
At 01:30 PM 11/12/00 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>I dont have any direct experience with the controllers listed below on
>FreeBSD, however I did try the Fasttrak a year or so ago on NT and was
>less than impressed with it under even a medium load. The IDE RAID card I
>have had good experience w
At 11:54 AM 11/3/00 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--hedge trimmer--
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Larry
> Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> > > > > > > > > > Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > US Mail: 1905 Steamb
At 08:32 AM 10/25/00 +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote:
>In case it helps anyone else, the error in the subject line was due to
>compiler optimisations.
>
>Going back to -O -pipe and rebuilding everything fixed it. Oddly
>enough, -O3 -march=i686 -mcpu=i686 -ffast-math worked fine on 3.3, but not
>on 4.1.
At 10:36 PM 10/10/00 -0400, Nader Turki wrote:
>OK guys, I understand all that, but the thing is. I already did "make
>world" and
>got disconnected and i did telnet to the box again and did "make world" again!
>So, Is that going to be a problem?
Possibly.
Strongly suggest you start over and don
At 12:10 AM 10/10/00 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > I can report the same failure. My config dmesg is attached to this
> > message. The ahc driver put on the 4.1 Release CD works and the system
> > boots and operates with no problems detected. This problem occurs when
> > the machine is booted f
Hmmm...
One thing I miss by using the "new" method is the install.debug target.
"make installkernel.debug" is a big long, but would only take 3 lines in
Makefile.inc1 plus documentation.
Just a minor suggestion.
Jeff Mountin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator
FreeBSD - the powe
Hmmm...
If you build with this option and remove /bin/(t)csh, buildworld will die
when /usr/bin/vgrind is called like so:
===> share/doc/papers/kernmalloc
touch _stamp.extraobjs
(cd /usr/src/share/doc/papers/kernmalloc; soelim kernmalloc.t) > kernmalloc.ms
vgrind -f < /usr/src/share/doc/papers/
At 01:58 AM 8/22/00 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Noor Dawod wrote:
>
> > Yes, it can, and I've alreaedy done just that. But then again, all other
> > legitimate visitors will be locked out...
>
>Depends how smart the rate-limiting is. If it's at the application level
>you know
At 07:33 PM 7/29/00 +0200, John Hay wrote:
> > .if exists(${.CURDIR}/../../crypto/openssl/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c) && \
> > (${USA_RESIDENT} != YES || defined(MAKE_RSAINTL))
> > SUBDIR+=librsaintl
> > .endif
> >
>
>No, you only need USA_RESIDENT=NO. It won't harm if you have MAKE_RSAINTL=YES,
>b
At 05:25 PM 7/29/00 +0200, John Hay wrote:
>You have 2 options. If you have the crypto distribution with source, you
>can go into /usr/src/secure/lib/librsaintl and build and install it. If
>you don't want to build it, you can install the crypto distribution from
>ftp.internat.freebsd.org, its cry
At 07:38 AM 5/6/00 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>On Thursday, 4 May 2000 at 17:00:35 -0500, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> > At 11:40 AM 5/4/00 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> >> There's a separate issue about whether to build kernels with debug
> >> symbols by default. Th
At 06:30 PM 3/22/00 -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>I guess I don't see how to use, eg, da0a without being "dangerously
>dedicated". When I did my install of FBSD 3.3, the partitioning
>process asked if I was sharing the disk or not. I said no, so it took
>over the entire disk, but I still get the lo
At 10:07 AM 3/21/00 -0700, John Reynolds~ wrote:
>I would have to agree with Jordan here. Of course with the plethora of PC
>hardware combinations out there (with some of the marginally designed
>components people pick up) it is impossible for the developers to make sure
>100% of everything "works
At 04:28 PM 3/19/00 -0800, Sameer R. Manek wrote:
>I got this message on a cvsup performed today, at about Sun Mar 19 15:07:18
>PST 2000, anyone else get a similar message? and should i be concerned about
>it?
Not quite the same here: Should not be a problem, since the entire file is
fetched.
At 11:20 AM 3/19/00 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brandon Fosdick writes:
>: I thought of that, but I didn't know what the devices w/o slice numbers
>: did. Guess I should have just tried it.
>
>Devices w/o slice numbers are the "compatibility" devices. These map
>to t
At 08:41 AM 3/17/00 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On 2000-Mar-17 08:19:36 +1100, "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >Not sure if the behaviour changed, but the other gotcha is that / and swap
> >must be sequential on the disk (or was it same partit
At 08:33 PM 3/16/00 +0100, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>If possible, you should install a small NTFS partition and a small
>FreeBSD slice (only ``/'') below the 1023rd cylinder and use the
>remaining space as you see fit for both NTFS and FreeBSD.
Not sure if the behaviour changed, but the other gotch
At 12:03 PM 3/16/00 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Also, I'd like to suggest modifying 'installkernel' to install the
>kernel it builds as /kernel, rather than as /${KERNEL} (which usually
>means /GENERIC). This bit me the first time, and even though it's harmless
>not everyone is saavy enoug
At 11:08 PM 2/17/00 -0800, Jorge Aldana wrote:
>Before you go out and buy any card make sure the network you're plugging
>it into is going to work with it. Huh, you say. Well we had all Intel
>Pro/100's working just fine (although we had to muck with ifconfig as
>follows for 100BT ifconfig_fxp0="i
Not to start off another thread on make.conf options such as NOUUCP, NOYP,
NO a somewhat cryptic:
Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A previous posting of mine conveyed the idea of variables like
> NOUUCP=true, NOSENDMAIL, NONAMED, NOYP, SUID_BINARIES_root='/usr/bin/su
> ...' etc., in ma
At 10:21 AM 11/17/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>Will be December 15th. The traditional code slush will go into effect
>on the 1st. November would be an excellent month for merging your
>changes, after which I'll be exercising my usual perogative of
>inspecting all potential changes with a
At 06:47 PM 10/14/99 +0200, Vadim Chekan wrote:
>Tom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Vadim Chekan wrote:
>> > From FreeBSD-3.2 (I checked this on 4 machines)
>> > =
>> > bash-2.03$ host 212.109.34.132
>> > 132.34.109.212.IN-ADDR.ARPA is a
At 09:37 AM 10/12/99 -0400, Daniel Tso wrote:
>> A link doesn't have (used) permissions. You must look to the permissions
>> of the file where the link points to.
>>
>> Think about it. If the permissions of the link matter, everybody can make
>> a link to every program and give himself the permis
At 09:43 AM 9/16/99 +0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
>My biggest objection to vinum is that it will do what you tell it to,
>and then complain afterwards, rather than complain about it at the time
>you try to do it. Two good examples:
>
>1. You can add drives partitions that haven't yet been MAKEDE
At 02:30 AM 9/16/99 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> My apologies. I was under the impression that it was still
>considered alpha code, but then I guess if it was it probably
>wouldn't have migrated to the -STABLE tree, now would it?
None needed, but we're not the only ones that assumed that
At 03:45 AM 9/16/99 +0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
>Also, keep in mind that vinum does very little in the way of sanity checking.
>It's very happy to trash your data if you tell it to do something even a
>little bit unusual.
Like anything it will only do what you tell it, so in a way I'm of agree
At 02:09 PM 9/15/99 -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>Perhaps we're seeing this differently, but "sworn off vinum" says to me
>"never using it again", and that's the point I was trying to make.
>People try something that's still under development, get bitten, and
>then claim forever after that the pro
At 12:25 PM 11/18/99 +0100, Sascha Blank wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 02:54:05PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
>> What happened to every 4 months?
>
>I wonder too. Is it really such a good idea to shorten the release
>cycle even more so that we will have four releases a
At 02:42 PM 11/18/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> My psychic powers are telling me that this information will find it's
>> way on to the front page of Slashdot in the near future.
>
>Heh. Wow, I wonder how he does it folks! :)
"Believe them. They're for real" - late night psyhic ads
>> A
38 matches
Mail list logo
