Re: svn revision stable/9

2013-04-23 Thread John Mehr
is not svn, it can't get it, thus there's nothing to print. svnversion is the specific binary that is required, but svnup does not pull in metadata. As always, thanks for the insights Glen -- that was the piece I was looking for.  :-) John Mehr might be able to comment on this, but here's

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-04-14 Thread John Mehr
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:41:46 +0300  Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote: On 13.04.2013 11:29, Markiyan Kushnir wrote: The only thing I would like to add -- tree lookup did make a good effect on CPU consumption. John, I'm just curious, did you consider sys/tree.h for tree

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-04-12 Thread John Mehr
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:28:10 +0300  Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote: ok, looks like the mere fix to the strlen() call as you suggested earlier doesn't resolve the issue of CPU eating up. On 12.04.2013 08:43, mrb...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:09:53 AM

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-04-12 Thread John Mehr
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT)  mrb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14:57 PM UTC+6, mrb...@gmail.com wrote: I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two statically linked binaries on http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/ I'm sorry,

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-04-10 Thread John Mehr
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:05:28 +0200  Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de wrote: Hi, all, first a big big thank you to John an all others involved for all the work. A bit more slowly than cvsup but definitely a lot more convenient than using plain subversion. Part of the slow performance may

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-24 Thread John Mehr
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 05:55:19 +0200  Markiyan Kushnir markiyan.kush...@gmail.com wrote: Hello John, Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-16 Thread John Mehr
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 02:14:30 +1100 (EST)  Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:11:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)  Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: svn0.us-west.freebsd.org as per example, but it's the closest to here anyway

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-13 Thread John Mehr
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:29:45 +1100 (EST)  Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:32:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100  Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote: [..] Hello

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-13 Thread John Mehr
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:57:13 -0600 (MDT)  Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, John Mehr wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100  Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote: What'd you think about a syntax extension along the lines of svnup --bsd-base svnup

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-13 Thread John Mehr
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:50:43 -0400  David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote: On Tue, March 12, 2013 19:32, John Mehr wrote: This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of least surprise, I'm all for it.  The one default

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-12 Thread John Mehr
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100  Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote: On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400   Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com wrote: Hello John, This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-12 Thread John Mehr
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:10:41 -0400  Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote: --- On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote: On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400 Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-03-11 Thread John Mehr
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400  Patrick McEvoy patmce...@mac.com wrote: Hello John, This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time / inclination, would you like to do a quick walk through svnup?**If you have a machine that will run Skype, I could record you doing a walk through

Re: Sanity Check on Mac Mini

2013-03-08 Thread John Mehr
I have investigated the bless command and nothing I find on google gives me any good ideal on what folder/file to bless.  I am wondering if just using the volume command and ignoring folder and file would work? Hello, If memory serves, I used it in device mode and used the --setBoot option

Re: Sanity Check on Mac Mini

2013-03-07 Thread John Mehr
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:18:23 -0800  Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote: On 7 March 2013, at 11:57, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote: On 7 March 2013, at 06:42, Richard Kuhns r...@wintek.com wrote: On 03/07/13

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-02-24 Thread John Mehr
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:31:10 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote: I downloaded it and looked at the source. svnup.c:1002: warning: zero-length printf format string svnup.c:1020: warning: zero-length printf format string svnup.c:1027: warning: zero-length

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-02-23 Thread John Mehr
Hello all, I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-02-01 Thread John Mehr
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:47:52 +0100 Arrigo Marchiori ard...@yahoo.it wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:48:31AM -0500, Isaac (.ike) I tried the attached script to download http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ In 27 minutes it downloaded 67 megabytes, corresponding to 42

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-02-01 Thread John Mehr
Hey Jonn, this news is better than my Monday AM coffee. Once you have something working, however crudely, I'd love to link/post/reference it on the growing wiki page- so folks can give it a whirl. https://wiki.freebsd.org/UsersFetchingSource (If this project succeeds, it will neatly get rid

Re: Svnsup architecture

2013-01-27 Thread John Mehr
. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 07:40:45PM -0600, John Mehr wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100 Arrigo Marchiori ard...@yahoo.it wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy 1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates a text file

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-27 Thread John Mehr
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:03:35 -0500  Isaac (.ike) Levy i...@blackskyresearch.net wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:27 PM, John Mehr wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100   Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a lightweight, dependency-free

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-25 Thread John Mehr
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:27:23 +0100  Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net wrote: Also I'd like to mention John Mehr, who's work on a lightweight, dependency-free, BSD licensed program to pull source using the svn protocol (couldn't say it better, so I use his words :-)). Hope this will make

Re: Svnsup architecture [was: Re: svn - but smaller?]

2013-01-25 Thread John Mehr
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100  Arrigo Marchiori ard...@yahoo.it wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy 1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates a text file (called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be almost complete. To answer one of

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-24 Thread John Mehr
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:34:33 +1100  Dewayne dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au wrote: The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs the expected task of being able to pull source, without having to acquire a port.  Regardless of our individual

Re: svn - but smaller?

2013-01-24 Thread John Mehr
For testing against svn.freebsd.org -- this is pull only? So you only need read permissions on svn.freebsd.org?  That's fine: the SVN repository is open to public access and you can just use it without asking permission.  Although I'd use one of the mirror sites listed in the handbook rather