On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Pete French wrote:
> So, I was trying to create a disc witha sector size of 4096 bytes, and I
> assumed that simply creating a zvol with that blocksize would do the trick.
> But it appears that whatever the blocksize is on the xvol, diskinfo is
> reporting the sect
I get the following
error:
pid 30 (sh), uid 0: exited on signal 12
Bad system call
Any idea what is going wrong here?
Beste regards,
Sven.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
(100baseTX )
status: active
Is this because of the new binaries (natd) are not yet installed?
Op 12-11-2018 om 19:56 schreef Eugene Grosbein:
13.11.2018 1:36, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
I am busy trying to upgrade FreeBSD from 10.4 stable to 11.0 releng with make
world.
I did the following
have not had this problem where there is only one drive and
it occupies da0.
Sven
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 09:30 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:19:12AM +0800, Iva Hesy wrote:
> > I have a gateway running FreeBSD 4.10-p3. Normally, the mode of
> > /dev/null should be 666, but recently, I find that its mode is changed
> > to 600 automatically after reboot, I
exactly the same
ifconfig parameters DOES work! The Dell can associate just fine.
Regards,
Sven
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
a symlink,
those that want compatibility with a majority of the scripts already
written can have the link created.
Just a thought,
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
001-amd64-miniinst.iso
I used this on a dual opteron system with 8GB of RAM with no problem
(i.e. the >4G RAM issue was resolved on this snapshot). Upgrading to 5.4
PRE is straightforward from there.
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
to implement this and, if so, what does your
configuration file look like? If not, could this be added as a feature
request for gvinum?
Sven Willenberger
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 15:51 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 March 2005 at 23:43:00 -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > Greg 'groggy' Lehey presumably uttered the following on 03/19/05 22:11:
> >> On Sunday, 20 March 2005 at
nd it seemed to have gone away (for me)
with the 5.3 release(s). I never did hear of a definitive resolution for
this issue; your backtrace is alarmingly similar to the one that I had seen.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-July/031576.html
I do see you say you tried other harddrives .. which ones did you use?
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
__
We find the LSI MegaRaid 320-2x series works great (using it on a dual
opteron system), especially with the battery-backed cache ... can be
picked up for just under $1k
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
he newly generated cf file.
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
not be as easy as simply adjusting
vfs.hibufspace upwards but would instead involving add either a
loader.conf or kernel option of some "master" setting that affects
hibufspace, bufspace, and related tunables. Or would this involve
editing one of the system fi
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:44 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Sven Willenberger wrote this message on Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:58 -0400:
> > We are running a PostgreSQL server (8.0.3) on a dual opteron system with
> > 8G of RAM. If I interpret top and vfs.hibufspace correctly (which
or calculate what is needed based on RAM and system
usage?
Also, will increasing BKVASIZE require a complete make buildworld or, if
not, how can I remake the portions of system affected by BKVASIZE?
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
l/freebsd-stable/2005-April/013679.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-July/031576.html
I don't know if anyone is actually looking into this (behind the scenes
maybe) or whether we just need to accumulate a critical mass of similar
notices to raise an eyebrow. If your sy
ers use the "default" class for
login.conf purposes which has not been modified from its installed
settings. Any ideas on how to a) troubleshoot this or b) fix this (if it
is something obvious that I just cannot see).
Thanks,
Sven
___
freebsd-s
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:43 -0400, Douglas McNaught wrote:
> Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > FreeBSD 5.4-Release
> > PostgreSQL 8.0.3
> >
> > I noticed that the nightly cron consisting of a vacuumdb was failing due
> > to "unable
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 11:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ERROR: out of memory
> > DETAIL: Failed on request of size 536870910.
>
> That's a server-side failure ...
>
> > Again, if I log in as myself and try
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:59 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>
> > Unix user root (and any psql superuser) the vacuum runs fine. It is
> > when
> > the unix user is non-root (e.g. su -l pgsql -c "vacuumdb -a -z")
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 21:54 +0200, Juergen Dankoweit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 29.06.2005, 14:59 -0400 schrieb Vivek Khera:
> > On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> >
> > > Unix user root (and any psql superuser) the vacuum runs fine
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:40 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2005, at 4:12 PM, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Something I have noticed,
> > when the memory error occurs during the psql session (after a failed
> > vacuumdb attempt) the memory stays at 6
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:58 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:40 -0400, Charles Swiger wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 2005, at 4:12 PM, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > > Something I have noticed,
> > > when the memory error occurs during
Tom Lane presumably uttered the following on 06/29/05 19:12:
Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have found the answer/problem. On a hunch I increased maxdsiz to 1.5G
in the loader.conf file and rebooted. I ran vacuumdb and watched top as
the process proceeded. What I s
gested things like turning off SMP or using a PCI
network card instead of the onboard (em) network. As is pointed out the
issue really crops up with more than one seagate drive on the adaptec
(ahd) controller, even with the drives upated to their latest bios.
Switching to a different hard drive man
d make also hung at some lex
command.
Any suggestions, or is the current source broken? Do I need to install a
new lex binary, which I can get from a -STABLE box which I upgraded last
week?
Thanks,
Sven
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
just yesterday with a 3Ware RAID controller. Search
deja.com for extra information.
Good luck,
Sven
"johan.andersson" wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I have a big problem installing FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE
> The problem is:
> I have a Raid-card (Adaptec 7896), but the freebsd-installat
machines,
which then can be mirrored to all of them.
So my intention is to build clusters of www-server, mysql-server ...,
which boot from the same root fs, use the same /usr, /usr/local ...
wait for suggestions
thanks
regards
Sven Huster
Senior IT Systems Administrator
*BSD, Linux, Solaris
To Un
d that simply have to be
added the system or is there a way with sysctl that it could be done. The plan here
is use gmirror such that /dev/da1 on A is mirrored with the /dev/da1 on B using iscsi.
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
> > "da"
> > devices, it starts to do some type of naming queue after the second device.
> > If I am
> > to use these devices in any type of automated setup, how can make sure that
> > after
> > these commands, "da6" will always be targe
ystems that may
see a lot of files added, modified, deleted to the filesystem(s)?
I would be interested to hear anyone's experience with any (or all) of
these methods and caveats of each. I am leaning towards ggate(dc) +
zpool at the moment assuming that zfs can "smartly" reb
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:54 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:07:14AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > 3) The send/recv feature of zfs was something I had not even considered
> > until very recently. My understanding is that this would work by a)
> &
ll processes trying to use the device hang in D status. I have tried
pkill'ing ggatec to no avail and ggatec destroy returns a message of
gctl being busy. Trying to ggatec destroy -f panics the machine.
Does anyone know how to successfully time out a failed ggatec connection
so that I can zpool detach or somehow have zfs removed the unavailable
drive?
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
actually a
shame as the recover process swapping from master to slave and back again was so
much cleaner and faster than using gmirror.
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ther boxes to
change INIT and BACKUP/MASTER states, but *nothing* is noted. Does CARP
simply not work that way with devd (i.e. only the creation of the CARP
device, not any subsequent states, work )?
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
GA...
I'm using the sio device. Even tried putting flags on 0x30 -> no
difference at all. Tried the uart device and removing sio from my
kernel but that resulted in having NO serial ports at all...
Any help is much appreciated!
Sven
___
freebsd-
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 18:52, Sven Hazejager wrote:
> I'm pulling my hair out on this one! Can't get the serial console to
> work with nanoBSD, either 7.2-p4 or 7-STABLE. A 8.0 nanoBSD image
> works fine (which I have not created myself). The symptom is that all
> ker
array and the only
way I can see to upgrade the fw is to use the megacli utility.
Thanks,
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 22:11 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Sven Willenberger writes:
> | FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #3: Tue Oct 10 13:58:29 EDT 2006
> | LSi 8480e SAS Raid card
> |
> | mount:
> | linprocfs on /compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local)
> | linsysfs on /compat/linux
the meantime to have some
semblence of stability? I assume downgrading to 5.5-RELENG is out of the
question but perhaps disabling SMP?
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:15 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:01:19AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:38 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > > Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 23:20 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:29:58PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
<>
> >
> > > FWIW, I do see the following appearing in the /var/log/messages:
> > > ufs_rename: fvp == tvp (can't happen)
> > > about once or twice a day, but cannot corre
rocess? Alternatively has
anyone converted a (g)vinum mirror into a gmirror setup?
Thanks
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Sven Willenberger presumably uttered the following on 12/18/06 12:33:
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 23:20 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:29:58PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> <>
>
>>>
>>>> FWIW, I do see the
s above and allow me to see the panic to terminal when the
system does panic (and allow me to even trace, etc via the kdb
debugger) ?
Thanks,
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
let me know. In
the interim I may switch to either using the base100 ethernet port (fxp)
or turn off SMP.
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:06 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>
> > I am starting a new thread on this as what I had assumed was a panic in
> > nfsd turns out to be an issue with the bge driver. This is an amd64 box,
> > dual pro
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 12:50 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:06 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>
> >>> The short and dirty of the dum
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:50 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 09:37, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 12:50 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2007-
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:09 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 12:53, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:50 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 09:37, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-01-
Bruce Evans presumably uttered the following on 01/09/07 21:42:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 09:37, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 12:50 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>>> Oops. I should have as
On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 15:11 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:04:13PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sven Willenberger presumably uttered the following on 12/18/06 12:33:
> > > On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 23:20 +0200, Kostik Belouso
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:33:33AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>
> > > This is indicating a problem either with your bge hardware or the driver.
> > >
> > > Kris
> >
> > I suspect the dr
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 15:24 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:03:28PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:33:33AM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > >
>
On Friday 02 March 2007 16:37, Rômulo Lima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good morning, my name is Rômulo Lima, I had a problem when make an upgrade
> in my Freebsd Server from version 6.1 to 6.2. Before upgrade my SATA disc
> controller was working normally:
>
> atapci1: port
> 0xec00-0xec0f,0xe480-0xe487,0xe4
numbers, ggated will not start
claiming to not have enough buffer space.
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:38 +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:58:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> >> I am trying to set up a HA type system involving two identical boxes and
> >> have gone through the foll
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 16:18 +0300, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 April 2007 at 16:15:35 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:38 +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> > > Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:58:56AM
here?
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:50 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> I currently have a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 SMP with dual intel PRO/1000PM
> nics configured as follows:
>
> em0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
> options=b
> inet 192.168.0.18 netmask 0xff00 broad
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> > all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > > Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at
> > >
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 18:46 +0200, Clayton Milos wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sven Willenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jeremy Chadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: CARP
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 11:27 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 14:44 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 11:27 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > > On 4/20/07, Jerem
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:05 -0700, Michael Collette wrote:
> I realize there is a previous thread discussing this, but my symptoms
> seem to be a little bit different. Here's the stats...
>
> FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Fri Apr 27 17:28:22 PDT 2007
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x10
tachi drives with no issues (much easier to change drive
manufacturers than try to respec the servers we were using or do some of
the borderline-absurd workarounds that Seagate suggested).
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
order to do this the installer would have to
recognize /dev/stripe/md0 as a valid "drive" -- is there any way to have
this happen?
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To un
03fff irq 77 at device
2.1 on pci6
ahd1: [GIANT-LOCKED]
aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 101-133Mhz, 512 SCBs
Thanks,
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:53 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:41:06PM -0500, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > I am having some issues getting any (write) performance out of an LSi
> > Megaraid (320-1) SCSI raid card (using the amr driver). The system is an
&g
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:08 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 02:10 PM 01/03/2006, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>
> >I cvsupped a 6.1 prerelease and found no performance improvements. I did
> >some further tests and the performance issues seem very specific to the
> >mirr
work or would the geom layer prevent this from
working properly? If not, is there a recommended way of upgrading a
vinum array to a gvinum or gmirror array?
Thanks,
Sven
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 19:15 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
> > I have an i386 system currently running 5.2.1-RELEASE with a vinum
> > mirror array (2 drives comprising /usr ). I want to upgrade this to
> > 5.
rong data usage numbers. Notice the negative "Used"
numbers
below:
> df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a496M 63M393M14%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K 0B 100%/dev
/dev/da0s1e989M -132M1.0G -14%/tmp
/d
Peter Jeremy presumably uttered the following on 07/26/06 15:00:
> On Wed, 2006-Jul-26 13:07:19 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:
>> One of my machines that I recently upgraded to 6.1 (6.1-RELEASE-p3) is also
>> exhibiting df reporting wrong data usage numbers.
>
> What did y
try
ftp ftp.host.domain
ftp> passive
should switch passive on or off not sure now.
does it work then?
Sven Huster
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Schweizer
> Sent: 02 September, 2001 19:44
> To
tability (hence
the RELENG_4_4), but dirpref seems to have no downsides...
Thanks,
Sven
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
79 matches
Mail list logo
