available, making interrupt sharing non-existent (for
right now, at least).
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
value in keeping the driver around.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
these days.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
application for IFS. Do you still have any of
your work on this, and would you be able to share it?
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:12 PM 12/24/2007, Scott Long wrote:
For others who might want help with this, tweaking
vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is what is needed. A bit of a balancing act is
needed if you're on i386 since you'll risk exhausting KVA unless you
also tweak KVA_PAGES.
Hi Scott
squid, you __must__ tune the
DIRHASH, otherwise you'll spend a lot of time doing pathname lookups.
What filesystem is linux using?
Would you mind if I logged into your test system and looked around to
help diagnose the problem?
Scott
___
freebsd
Brett Glass wrote:
At 07:14 AM 12/24/2007, Scott Long wrote:
Brett,
There could be several problems here:
1. WITNESS, INVARIANTS, malloc debugging. Are any of these turned on for you?
I don't recall if malloc debugging got turned off yet for the
7.0 snapshots.
I nuked debugging when I
Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:10 AM 12/24/2007, Scott Long wrote:
Did you also nuke malloc debugging?
I believe I did. I tried to take out all debugging to make it a fair test.
They were. The drives are SATA.
Connected to what controller?
Whatever comes standard on the Intel S5000
are never truly getting cleaned, or never getting
their flags cleared so that this loop knows that they are clean, then
it's feasible that they'll accumulate over time, keep on getting flushed
every 30 seconds, keep on bogging down the loop, and so on.
Scott
and building again.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be 64-bit unclean in ways that will make it work with
amd64 but not with PAE.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
happen?
Willy Nilly. Commit away!
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
got it built in 8 minutes on this Dual Quad Core Xeon (hw.model:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5345 @ 2.33GHz)
I used -j10 i believe.
-Scott Oertel
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
. My vote is to nip the madness in the bud
on if_em and have two (or more drivers) that support their hardware
families well instead of one driver that supports multiple families
marginally.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
...
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATA's fault for lying about the
error recovery behind CAM's back. Blah. There is a unification project
underway to address this. Until then, what you're seeing is harmless.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
that FreeBSD abuses for
handling interrupts. Note that amr0 and ehci2 are acting similar. It's
mostly harmless, but it does waste CPU cycles. I wouldn't expect this
on a recent version of FreeBSD, though, at least not from the e1000
driver.
Scott
connected to a simple ATA/SATA controller (both of which have also been
observed to do high amounts of I/O with no problems), I suspect that the
problem is with your disk device, not with FreeBSD. I don't know
anything about a hyperdrive though, so more information might help.
Scott
to
isolate the problem, all the reports I've seen were from people using AMD
systems.
Are you talking about problems with ATA controllers, AMD64 (or
i386+PAE), and more than 4GB of RAM? Or something else?
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
.
This leads to an assumption, the error has to do with very high IOs per
second on a SMP machine.
Either that or file system errors. Does fsck run ok or does it say
anything unusual?
No, filesystem corruption has nothing to do with g_vfs_done messages.
Scott
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Either that or file system errors. Does fsck run ok or does
it say
anything unusual?
No, filesystem corruption has nothing to do with g_vfs_done
messages.
Well, perhaps not directly but I think filesystem corruption can
indirectly
be the twa driver. Are you really generating that
much I/O?
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:05:38PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Scott Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get FreeRADIUS 2.0 working inside a FreeBSD
6.2-STABLE jail.
The work I've been doing with the Alan DeKok of FreeRADIUS starts with
this message:
https
Thanks in advance!
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Decibel! wrote:
Is there anything like top, but for filesystem activity? Google hasn't
turned up anything...
Usually I use top -m io, but I like also using systat -iostat 2, or
systat -vmstat 2, they both show more of a snapshot of the activity on
each disk
-Scott Oertel
Isaac Levy wrote:
Hi All,
I hate to say, I'm picking up from this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-January/031970.html
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Scott Long wrote:
I don't see how they could be related. I've committed a fix for the
Areca problem.
Scott
LED so you can discover
the mapping. Just about every management app that I know of does (yes,
they do exist for FreeBSD from many vendors!), and many also have the
feature in their BIOS.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Try:
wheel:*:0:root,us
It looks like pam was stopping at the first matching line as you would
expect from the man page for the group file. If there is a bug it is in
the more liberal interpretation by other software.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAM requires that Giant-free drivers use sleep locks.
Since this code is actively maintained by AMCC/3Ware, some amount of
coordination would be needed with them to ensure the changes are
accepted.
Scott
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hi!
When i installed twas driver on 6.2-STABLE it said
[FAST]
i
with the tty subsystem or the USB stack is very
important. My recent change to make ATAPI-CAM Giant-free made CD
burning a lot more pleasant for people.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Howard Goldstein wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Howard Goldstein wrote:
Would someone confirm (or disabuse!) me of the belief that these 3ware
Escalade 8106-LP2 (2 port sata raid controllers) related messages are
informational and the UFS device is retrying after it sees ENOMEM
causing these?
Aug
this.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howard Goldstein wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Howard Goldstein wrote:
Testbed: Pair of WDC3200AAKS 320gb SATA, freshly newfsd 10gb filesystem
mounted with softupdates, remounted after each test
P4 @ 3ghz on a P4P800 in 6.2-STABLE, single user mode, ICH5R controller
detects these SATA-II drives
had in mind.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seagate employees.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Judge wrote:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Am 21.07.2007 um 00:18 schrieb Tom Judge:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
As for performance issues with the SAS5/i, there is a problem in
the controller. A work arround was created by Scott Long which
created a sysctl that could
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
As for performance issues with the SAS5/i, there is a problem in the
controller. A work arround was created by Scott Long which created a
sysctl that could be set to cause the controller to turn on the on
drive write cache's. These changes where
and haven't had this
panic at all.
Here is one of the original threads I started regarding this issue:
http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-hackers/200703/msg00127.html
Cheers,
Scott Oertel
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
a new kernel / world?
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and it won't be ready for several months.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to configure these options?
Are you asking about FreeBSD or Windows 2000?
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dmose wrote:
Scott Long-2 wrote:
dmose wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:
Richard Tector wrote:
Is there any information I could obtain that would be of use to you in
tracking this one down?
You could maybe contact the driver's author(s) directly
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Seems some latest comments to mpt(4) and/or mfi(4) broke RELENG_6.
Scott, this looks like your doing. *poke poke* :-) I've two separate
boxes which now can't build world.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/mfi/mfi_cam.c
Fixed, sorry about that.
Scott
installed on their ATA disks. If you have big problems with storage
or network, freebsd-update isn't going to be of much use to you.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
I reconfigure the RAID. Any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks!
I'm running 6.2/amd64 from a fresh CD install.
Look in /sys/conf/NOTES for a long discussion on wiring SCSI device order.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
sides (and please don't worry about offering to be an
eager early tester right now), so we'll see how that works out over the
next few months.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Vivek Khera wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Look in /sys/conf/NOTES for a long discussion on wiring SCSI device
order.
Thanks! That looks like it should do the trick. I'm assuming those go
into /boot/loader.conf or do they go into the kernel config file
itself
.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the original poster's
question has already been answered, I believe.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sachin Sharma wrote:
Hi All,
NIC (Network Card) is not detected by FreeBSD 6.2 into PowerEdge Blade
1955 Server. I need FreeBSD in these server . Please help me.
Thanks
Support for this card has been added since 6.2 was released.
Scott
foot on the Intel campus =-)
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or from man page?
6.2-RELEASE-p4
Each shared CARP IP should have the same VHID. The example in the
handbook lists two CARP IP addresses.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
prepping and adding the symbol file for acpi.ko, I
got the exact same backtrace. Any other thoughts?
Regards;
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
David Wolfskill wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:14:01PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
...
Not sure that this impression is entirely accurate. The biggest problem
with MFI machines is online RAID management. The storage driver itself
matured very quickly and has been very reliable.
Ah; good
up a large directory and writes the the file to a different
partition on the same raid array.
Can anyone point me towards the next step to debug this issue? I can
pursue any other debugging info that may be required.
Regards;
Scott Swanson
Inetz Media
uname -a
FreeBSD pyrite.inetz.com 6.2
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:49:45PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have
-visible production workload. :-} [My laptop is a different
matter, of course]
This sounds purely like a filesystem issue, not an MFI driver issue.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:49:45PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Hello all,
I have a couple dozen SuperMicro servers in production and have had
reoccurring crashing issues on a couple of them that are under higher
load.
After managing to pry one out of production, I have
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:00:00PM -0600, Scott Swanson wrote:
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xc95a5900 for 5 seconds
What is thread 0xc95a5900 doing?
Kris
Is this the best way to determine the action of the thread
just recompiling the kernel and hoping for the best?
I see that it is still listed in NOTES, but maybe this option should now
be avoided?
Regards;
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
Ian Smith wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Scott Long wrote:
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
[..]
PS: why is iostat(1) not working for acd(4) devices?
Because acd doesn't make use of the standard kernel facilities that make
iostat work. It's a deliberate choice by the driver author.
Same
, and they are all
arguing with each other. I know that ata-usb was inspired by the ata
author having problems with umass and not wanting to fix them there,
but I don't know exactly what was broken or what was fixed.
Perhaps Scott can share some SCSI wisdom on this matter. I really need
to use this drive via
it. But
an argument could also be made to leave well enough alone =-)
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the contents of saved_cmd and also zero out
request-u.atapi.sense before issuing every command.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Quinot wrote:
* Scott Long, 2007-04-27 :
Oh hell, I know exactly what the problem is! The opcode for a
TEST_UNIT_READY is 0x00. This is probably the command that is
generating the CHECK_CONDITION. The test for saved_cmd is entirely
bogus.
H. Looks like a very plausible culprit
)?
Please check the archives for my numerous discussions on how the memory
layout works on x86.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAE
Maybe i look in the wrong place?
I'm not going to waste my time explaining for the hundredth time how the
x86 memory layout works. If you want to recover the missing 256MB, go
look in your BIOS for an option about memory hole remapping.
Scott
were rejected or perhaps
there just isn't an active maintainer anymore.
It does work well though...
Looks like there is a 4.1 version floating around:
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/freebsdspamd/
Please note that I have not tested this personally.
Scott
Phillip N. wrote:
Im getting the following on Releng_6 from Apr 4.
Is this related to the areca driver?
thanks.
It's not directly coming from the areca driver. It could be that there
is some memory or disk corruption that is triggering these panics, but
that's just a wild guess.
Scott
18:10:20 Tue Apr 10 # time ls -ln | wc -l
3070
real0m0.055s
user0m0.031s
sys 0m0.022s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home
18:10:21 Tue Apr 10 # time ls -ln | wc -l
3070
real0m0.059s
user0m0.041s
sys 0m0.012s
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:05:59AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 01:19, Scott Lambert wrote:
I've run into an interesting performance issue with ls on a
6.2-STABLE box, web1. This box is going to replace my current 4.11
box, ns, and is not currently active. It's
something broken
on Tinderbox and expect that it will be fixed quickly.)
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
Xander: How could you let her go?
Giles: As the soon-to-be-purple area on my jaw
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/30/07, Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió:
Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver
sources: http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/arcmsr.simq.diff.
Scott
Just in case you mind
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/30/07, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/30/07, Phillip Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 10:11 -0600, Scott Long escribió:
Please try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver
sources: http
JoaoBR wrote:
hi, somebody knows to interprete this scsi error I get after upgrading amd64
with sources from 26/03/ or is this a hardware problem?
You either have a failing disk or a power supply that is underpowered
and/or failing. In short, check your hardware =-)
Scott
try the following patch against the latest 6-STABLE driver
sources: http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/arcmsr.simq.diff.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
/uploads/areca/
Added erich and scott to the cc list.
Well, you may notice im using RELENG_6
im using the latest versions for releng_6:
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.c,v 1.8.2.3
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.h,v 1.1.4.2
unfortunatly cannot move the box to -CURRENT to test arcmsr.c
fine for me.
I had a PCI-X nvidia card
PCI-X? Or PCI Express? PCI-X is not the same thing.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
screen for so long, if I had to use nohup I'd
have to look up the syntax)
I think it's something like nohup sh -c $(your_command) but I could be
wrong.
--
Scott
GPG KeyID EB3467D6
( 1B848 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
Giles
Do you not have 'device apic' in your config?
Scott
Ivan Voras wrote:
Continuing my problems with the IBM blade: Booting with ACPI module
enabled (btw. live boot CD with sysinstall doesn't load ACPI, but the
installed system does?) hangs the system somewhere after first USB bus
is found
I've had no problem getting FreeBSD 6 to boot on Dell 1950 and 2950
machines. Where does it hang for you, and what changes have you made
to your kernel config?
Scott
Sam Baskinger wrote:
Adding a datapoint: Dell 1950s exhibit similar behaviour but have 2
cores in a single physical CPU
malloc-backed size larger than some trivial (and arbitrary) value, like
say 1MB. It's really inferior to being swap-backed, and it only
encourages foot-shooting and these unclear panics.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
anyone run into this before?
Craig
Fixed in 7-CURRENT. Contact Warner Losh to make sure that your device
is quirked appropriately.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Am Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:58:23 -0800
schrieb Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
machine is opteron hardware, but running a regular i386/SMP
kernel/world. With everything at 6.2RC2 (as of 29th of December)
except the areca driver the machine is rock solid
log:
Please compile KDB and DDB into your kernel so we can see exactly where
the panic is happening.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
get both reliable and
fast storage with just two drives. Some strings are
attached.
The head movement that this causes makes it a poor performer. It is
an option, but not a terribly popular one.
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello,
I am currently working with a Nexcom 1086 that features 2 Marvell
chipsets with 8 total nics. This device is slated to become a
FreeBSD/pfSense router.
During probing, all nics show up okay sk0-sk3 and skc-0-3 but the skc
nics do not show up in ifconfig.
Is there something that I am
Nevermind, I found
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-January/009543.html
Now the nics are working. Thanks anyways!
Scott
On 1/16/07, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am currently working with a Nexcom 1086 that features 2 Marvell
chipsets with 8 total nics
version is
to do, after downloading
egrep REVISION|BRANCH /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
--
Scott
GPG KeyID EB3467D6
( 1B848 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
Angelus: I wanna torture you. I used to love it, and it's been
such a long
Jim Rees wrote:
We've had nothing but trouble with various models of Adaptec RAID hardware,
and now only use software RAID even where hardware is available. But we
only run a handful of servers.
Adaptec RAID doesn't apply to this discussion.
Scott
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 1/15/07, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found the quickest way to figure out if I got the right version is
to do, after downloading
egrep REVISION|BRANCH /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
egrep ^REVISION|^BRANCH
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
Running of a 3ware 9550, on a
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:25:34AM -0800, Scott Oertel wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:06:24PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
Does anyone know if the Release is still going to happen today?
--
Scott T. Hildreth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
(Scott: I should have emailed you this earlier, but Christmas and various
other things got in the way.)
Ian West wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 02:25:02PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:43 AM 1/7/2007, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 06:59:10PM +0200
protocol?
Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 12:15:37AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Did you know that ATAPI is actually just the SCSI command set that is
merely encapsulated into the IDE wire protocol?
This is something Linux has done (you can still use the direct ATA
201 - 300 of 795 matches
Mail list logo