On 4/24/20 06:42, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2020, at 18:15, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 4/22/20 01:45, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> On 22 Apr 2020, at 10:20, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 4/14/20 02:51, Kristof Provost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation
On 22 Apr 2020, at 18:15, Xin Li wrote:
On 4/22/20 01:45, Kristof Provost wrote:
On 22 Apr 2020, at 10:20, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 4/14/20 02:51, Kristof Provost wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation I’ve been able to
work on
improving the throughput of if_bridge.
It change
Just using pf is enough to provoke this panic. I had the same back trace. This
patch from Kristof fixed it for me.
diff --git a/sys/net/if_bridge.c b/sys/net/if_bridge.c
index 373fa096d70..83c453090bb 100644
--- a/sys/net/if_bridge.c
+++ b/sys/net/if_bridge.c
@@ -2529,7 +2529,6 @@ bridge_input(st
On 4/22/20 01:45, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2020, at 10:20, Xin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 4/14/20 02:51, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation I’ve been able to work on
>>> improving the throughput of if_bridge.
>>> It changes the (data path)
On 22 Apr 2020, at 10:20, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 4/14/20 02:51, Kristof Provost wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation I’ve been able to
work on
improving the throughput of if_bridge.
It changes the (data path) locking to use the NET_EPOCH
infrastructure.
Benchmarking shows
Hi,
On 4/14/20 02:51, Kristof Provost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation I’ve been able to work on
> improving the throughput of if_bridge.
> It changes the (data path) locking to use the NET_EPOCH infrastructure.
> Benchmarking shows substantial improvements (x5 in te
On 16 Apr 2020, at 10:36, Peter Blok wrote:
Another issue I found with pf was with "set skip on bridge”. It
doesn’t work on the interface group, unless a bridge exists prior to
enabling pf. Makes sense, but I didn’t think of it. Other rules work
fine with interface groups.
I am aware of this
Hi Mark/Kristof,
I have been using ng_bridge for more than a year. It was very stable and it
allowed to have members with different MTU. My jails were using jng to setup
the bridge and I changed iohyve to use ng_bridge.
But I recently switched to if_bridge. I needed to have pf work on a member
Hi Mark,
I wouldn’t expect these changes to make a difference in the
performance of this setup.
My work mostly affects setups with multi-core systems that see a lot of
traffic. Even before these changes I’d expect the if_bridge code to
saturate a wifi link easily.
I also wouldn’t expect ng_b
On 16 Apr 2020, at 8:34, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
Hi!
Thank you for your work!
Do you know if epair suffers from the same issue as tap?
I’ve not tested it, but I believe that epair scales significantly
better than tap.
It has a per-cpu mutex (or more accurately, a mutex in each of its
per-cpu str
вт, 14 апр. 2020 г., 12:51 Kristof Provost :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation I’ve been able to work
> on improving the throughput of if_bridge.
> It changes the (data path) locking to use the NET_EPOCH infrastructure.
> Benchmarking shows substantial improvements (x5 in tes
Kristof
Up until a month ago I ran a set of FreeBSD based ap in my house and even
long ago at work . They were Pc engines apu ‘s or Alix’s with one em/igb nic
and one ath nic in a bridge . They worked well for a long time however the
need for more robust wifi setup caused me to swap them ou
On 15 Apr 2020, at 19:16, Mark Saad wrote:
All
Should this improve wifi to wired bridges in some way ? Has this
been tested ?
What sort of setup do you have to bridge wired and wireless? Is the
FreeBSD box also a wifi AP?
I’ve not done any tests involving wifi.
Best regards,
Kristof
___
All
Should this improve wifi to wired bridges in some way ? Has this been tested
?
---
Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 1:08 PM, Raúl Muñoz - CUSTOS via freebsd-stable
> wrote:
>
> El 14/4/20 a las 11:53, Kristof Provost escribió:
>
>> Patches for stable/12: http
El 14/4/20 a las 11:53, Kristof Provost escribió:
> Patches for stable/12: https://people.freebsd.org/~kp/if_bridge/stable_12/
Bridges and taps here, r359859 with your if_bridge patches, happily
running for more than two days ;).
Regards,
Raúl
___
free
Hi,
Thanks to support from The FreeBSD Foundation I’ve been able to work
on improving the throughput of if_bridge.
It changes the (data path) locking to use the NET_EPOCH infrastructure.
Benchmarking shows substantial improvements (x5 in test setups).
This work is ready for wider testing now.
16 matches
Mail list logo
