Announcement
The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is pleased to announce the availability
of FreeBSD 6.0-BETA2.
Because suitable pre-build packages are not widely available (see the
Known Issues section below) BETA2 only has disc1 and bootonly ISOs
available, and there are no FTP in
How/where should we be reporting such bugs? I reported a *very* easy to
reproduce hang situation with unionfs in BETA1 (and have updated/retested
as I see commits going through) over a week ago, and the biggest
'interest' I got out of it was from Robert Watson giving me suggestions on
other
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:08:50 -0300 (ADT)
> From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> How/where should we be reporting such bugs? I reported a *very* easy to
> reproduce hang situation with unionfs in BETA1 (and have updated/retested
> as I see commits g
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 21:08:50 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How/where should we be reporting such bugs? I reported a *very* easy to
reproduce hang situation with unionfs in BETA1 (and have updated/r
Is this the last beta before release (assuming there are no show stopping
bugs)?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
How/where should we be reporting such bugs? I reported a *very* easy to
reproduce hang situation with unionfs in BETA1 (and have
updated/retested as I see commits going through) over a week ago, and
the biggest 'interest' I got out of it was from R
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Indigo 23 wrote:
Is this the last beta before release (assuming there are no show
stopping bugs)?
Normally release cycles consistent of a pre-release period, which includes
betas, release candidates, and releases. Betas usually continue until
substantal movement has ceas
Kevin Oberman wrote:
I would suggest that it would have been better to post to current as 6.0
is not yet stable and most of the people who deal with problems are much
more likely to see problems reported there.
Ok, so I'm a bit confused. The answer given for the the DMA_WRITE and
DMA_READ
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:40:32AM -0400, J. T. Farmer wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> >I would suggest that it would have been better to post to current as 6.0
> >is not yet stable and most of the people who deal with problems are much
> >more likely to see problems reported there.
> >
> >
>
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, J. T. Farmer wrote:
Kevin Oberman wrote:
I would suggest that it would have been better to post to current as
6.0 is not yet stable and most of the people who deal with problems are
much more likely to see problems reported there.
Ok, so I'm a bit confused. The answer
10 matches
Mail list logo
