Hi!
Finally someone thought about this!
My 5 cents:
IPFIREWALL_FORWARD <- no comment))
options VIMAGE <- not yet production ready, but keep in mind it
Forgot this two very usefull options:
options RACCT <- resource limits for jail and etc.
options RCTL<- resource limits for jail and etc.
-
Am 14.02.2012 um 12:37 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
> 1 FLOWTABLE
The last time I included this in a kernel it seemed to have odd effects on TCP
connections. Admittedly, that was probably two years or so ago, and I never
bothered to find out what was happening in detail. Is it safe now?
Ste
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> Quoting Freddie Cash (from Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:26:54
> -0800):
>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 2:37:55 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> > 1 IPSTEALTH -> cha
Quoting Freddie Cash (from Tue, 14 Feb 2012
08:26:54 -0800):
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 2:37:55 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> 1 IPSTEALTH -> changes ipfw module only?
I don't think this is specific to ipfw. From /sys/con
Quoting Nenhum_de_Nos (from Tue, 14 Feb
2012 10:49:56 -0200):
On Tue, February 14, 2012 08:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Embedded devices are out of the scope of this, normally you do a lot
of other modifictions to such systems anyway, so a custom kernel
should be not a big problem.
I wi
>> - CPU_SOEKRIS, CPU_GEODE, CPU_ELAN, NO_SWAPPING for embedded devices
>
>Embedded devices are out of the scope of this, normally you do a lot of
other modifictions to such systems anyway, so a custom kernel should be
not a >big problem.
Just as a quick data point here, I have just installed Fre
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 2:37:55 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > 1 IPSTEALTH -> changes ipfw module only?
>
> I don't think this is specific to ipfw. From /sys/conf/NOTES:
>
> # IPSTEALTH enables code to support stealth fo
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 2:37:55 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Here is what I got, the first column is the number of requests, the second
> what is requested, and the 3rd my comments (basically it means, if there is a
> comment, it is not needed/possible to include in a modular kernel):
> ---s
Quoting Attilio Rao (from Tue, 14 Feb 2012
12:38:17 +):
2012/2/14, Alexander Leidinger :
2 SW_WATCHDOG
This can become a module with very little effort I guess.
What's the TODO list for this?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
No man is lonely while eating spaghetti.
http://www.Leidinger.net
On Tue, February 14, 2012 08:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Paul Schenkeveld (from Fri, 10 Feb 2012
> 15:44:50 +0100):
>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
>>> the
2012/2/14, Alexander Leidinger :
> Quoting Alexander Leidinger (from Fri, 10
> Feb 2012 14:56:04 +0100):
>
>> Such a kernel would cover situations where people compile their own
>> kernel because they want to get rid of some unused kernel code (and
>> maybe even need the memory this frees up).
>>
Quoting Alexander Leidinger (from Fri, 10
Feb 2012 14:56:04 +0100):
Such a kernel would cover situations where people compile their own
kernel because they want to get rid of some unused kernel code (and
maybe even need the memory this frees up).
The question is, is this enough? Or asked
Quoting Paul Schenkeveld (from Fri, 10 Feb 2012
15:44:50 +0100):
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
can't as they
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:00 +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > > IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
>
> Unless something's changed, julian@ has pointed out (paraphrasing) that
> this adds bits of code to various parts of the stack and was thought to
> impact per
Quoting Volodymyr Kostyrko (from Mon, 13 Feb 2012
17:44:33 +0200):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Feasible: depend upon your definition of "feasible". You would have to
add all keymaps statically into the kernel. No idea which parts exactly
we talk about, but:
---snip---
% du -h /usr/share/sysco
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Feasible: depend upon your definition of "feasible". You would have to
add all keymaps statically into the kernel. No idea which parts exactly
we talk about, but:
---snip---
% du -h /usr/share/syscons/
40k /usr/share/syscons/scrnmaps
570k /usr/share/syscons/fonts
1.1M /
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:05:41PM +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >I want to note here: the pf ALTQ options are a pain in the butt, quite
> >honestly. I've found in the past that removing the ones you don't use
> >won't result in a successful build, thus one must inclu
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:05:41PM +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I want to note here: the pf ALTQ options are a pain in the butt, quite
honestly. I've found in the past that removing the ones you don't use
won't result in a successful build, thu
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I want to note here: the pf ALTQ options are a pain in the butt, quite
honestly. I've found in the past that removing the ones you don't use
won't result in a successful build, thus one must include them all. We
do need ALTQ support though, for rate-limiting capability.
Quoting per...@pluto.rain.com (from Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:17:46 -0800):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:05:02 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas
> > wrote:
> > > is there another place to put o
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:05:02 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas
> > > wrote:
> > > > is there another place to put options to atkbd and sc, like
> > > > these ones:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
> > >> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
> > >> debug options which are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are there options
> > >> which you add which you can not add as a module (SW_WATCHDOG com
Le dim 12 fév 12 à 12:06:33 +0100, Alexander Leidinger
écrivait :
> There is already a way to configure this as soon as you have a working
> userland. What this setting is doing is to replace the compiled-in
> default keymap with a different one, so that you have the one which
> matches your key
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:05:02 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas
> > wrote:
> > > is there another place to put options to atkbd and sc, like
> > > these ones:
> > >
> > > options ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP # speci
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:00 +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 10. Feb 2012, at 15:56 , Panagiotis Christias wrote:
>
> > On 10/2/2012 15:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
> >> the problems was that som
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas
> wrote:
> > is there another place to put options to atkbd and sc, like
> > these ones:
> >
> > options ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP # specify the built-in keymap
> > makeoptions ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP=fr.iso.acc
> > ...
>
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:33:08 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
>
> > various parts of the network stack being loadable, which is not
> > as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable again
> > currently ...
>
> Seems to me unloadability does not matter to th
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas
wrote:
> Le ven 10 fév 12 à 14:56:04 +0100, Alexander Leidinger
> écrivait :
> > Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> > The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
> > compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:13:53 -0800 Adrian Chadd
wrote:
> I've done this a few times.
Me too, and others probably too, so let's end the waste of time and
provide one officially.
> The /boot/loader takes a _long_ time to suck in the 25 odd modules my
> eeepc requires to load a completely modular
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:15:00 + "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
wrote:
>
> On 10. Feb 2012, at 13:56 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one
> > of the problems was that some people would like to use
> > freebsd-update but can't as
Le ven 10 fév 12 à 14:56:04 +0100, Alexander Leidinger
écrivait :
> Hi,
Hello,
> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
> debug options zhich are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are there options
> which
on 11/02/2012 01:30 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> This won't work for us. This requires manual intervention. When we
> have a machine that panic's, we want it sitting at a ddb> prompt
> indefinitely until an admin gets to it to find out what happened. There
> may be some way to automatic
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
> various parts of the network stack being loadable, which is not
> as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable again
> currently ...
Seems to me unloadability does not matter to the case under
discussion, which is modularizing the kernel to reduce the
number
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:10 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> * Addition: device ichwd
> - Note: We do not use features of this driver given known problems
> with the watchdog firing during ddb> and similar environments. I
> have no idea if this has been fixed, but I do remember it being
>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:25:21PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:10 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > * Addition: device ichwd
> > - Note: We do not use features of this driver given known problems
> > with the watchdog firing during ddb> and similar environments. I
> >
On 02/10/2012 12:13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I've done this a few times.
>
> The /boot/loader takes a _long_ time to suck in the 25 odd modules my
> eeepc requires to load a completely modular kernel.
For those modules not directly related to booting you're better off
putting them in kld_list in rc
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one
> of the problems was that some people would like to use
> freebsd-update but can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all
> the kernel modules we provide,
I've done this a few times.
The /boot/loader takes a _long_ time to suck in the 25 odd modules my
eeepc requires to load a completely modular kernel. It takes a _very
long_ time to suck these in over USB.
It's a great idea and I think we should start down this path in the
10-CURRENT trajectory bu
2012/2/10 Andreas Nilsson :
> IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT, DEVICE_POLLING and HZ=1000.
HZ can be set via /boot/loader.conf, and I think via sysctl as well.
--
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
On 10. Feb 2012, at 13:56 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of the
> problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but can't as
> they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we provide, th
On 10. Feb 2012, at 15:56 , Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> On 10/2/2012 15:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
>> the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
>> can't as they are using a cust
On Fri, February 10, 2012 11:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
> the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
> can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules
> we provide,
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we
provide, the need for a custom kernel should be small, b
On 10/2/2012 15:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules we
provide, the need for a custom
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one of
> the problems was that some people would like to use freebsd-update but
> can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all the kernel modules
Le 10 févr. 2012 à 15:36, Marek 'Buki' Kozlovský a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>
>> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
>> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
>> debug options zhic
2012/2/10 Marek 'Buki' Kozlovský
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one
> > of the problems was that some people would like to use
> > freebsd-update but can't as they are using a c
On 2012-02-10 14:56:04 (+0100), Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
> debug options zhich are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are there options
> which you add which you can
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one
> of the problems was that some people would like to use
> freebsd-update but can't as they are using a custom kernel. With all
> the kernel modules we
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:56:04PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
> compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
> debug options zhich are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are there options
> which you add
50 matches
Mail list logo
