On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>
> It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop.
>
> I guess there is a switch already prsent to have
On Sep 21, 2013, at 3:40 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
>> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>>
>> It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the lap
To be honest, I had my "They did whaaat?" moment when I initially saw
booting after that update, nonetheless when I've got reference I decided
that it was all in good spirit and appropriate even... I was definitely
disappointed that it was backed down in the end.
Now I have orb manually set up t
On 21.09.2013 12:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>
> It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop.
>
> I guess there is a switch already
FWIW, I've meant "tribute" not orb.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-2-PRE-switch-off-that-stupid-Nakatomi-Socrates-tp5845622p5845814.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
free
On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
>> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>>
>> It is only cosmetics, but it bothers me whenever I switch on the laptop.
>>
>>
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
>>> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>>>
>>> It is only cosmeti
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
>>> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>>>
>>> It is only cosmeti
On 28.09.2013 00:12, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
reminds me on Linux and their c
On 28.09.2013 00:32, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
reminds me on Linux and their c
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, David Demelier
wrote:
>
> >> I have loader_logo="orb" and I still have a message at the right bottom
> >> with that stupid joke.
I know that you're passionate about this topic, but if you could drop
the subjective parts and focus on the facts, that would be more
c
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:57 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> On 28.09.2013 00:12, Teske, Devin wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Demelier wrote:
>>
>>> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi
On 09/28/2013 08:06, David Demelier wrote:
[..]
Also in the future you can just forgot that crappy ideas as you can see,
nobody liked it.
I beg to differ.
cheers,
gja
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
Quoth David Demelier :
>
> I personally think (but you may totally disagree with) that an operating
> system *is* an operating system. And I really hate easter eggs or
> anything else not serious being integrated into the system. I think
> about a new user installing FreeBSD 9.2, I would not imagi
On Sep 27, 2013 5:05 PM, "grenville armitage" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/28/2013 08:06, David Demelier wrote:
> [..]
>
>> Also in the future you can just forgot that crappy ideas as you can see,
>> nobody liked it.
>
>
> I beg to differ.
I know it's not a poll, but myself and the 5 people in my
On 9/27/13 7:14 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 27, 2013 5:05 PM, "grenville armitage" wrote:
On 09/28/2013 08:06, David Demelier wrote:
[..]
Also in the future you can just forgot that crappy ideas as you can see,
nobody liked it.
I beg to differ.
I know it's not a poll, but mys
On 28/09/2013 12:17 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 9/27/13 7:14 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 2013 5:05 PM, "grenville armitage"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/28/2013 08:06, David Demelier wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>
Also in the future you can just forgot that crappy ideas as you can
Devin,
I just want to say that I really liked the reference. I was teaching
myself loader/forth and working on a version of it for my own amusement
when I saw the commit. Please do continue to make these silly things in
the future. I actually run FreeBSD in production and my boss loved it
28.09.2013 02:06, David Demelier пишет:
> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
>>> reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
>>>
>>> It is only cosmetics, but it bot
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
>
> If you work seriously on serious issues long enough... you'll become burned-
> out. Let me just come right out and say it...
>
> I coded it.
And thanks, you got me chuckling - nice to see some humor once in a
while.
To the offended poster:
On 28/09/2013 10:44, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 28.09.2013 02:06, David Demelier пишет:
>> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
reminds me on Linux and their childish naming
On 28/09/2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> To the offended poster: read the last line of tunefs(8) - there's
> probably
> many more places you could use serious time looking for deviations from
> corporate correctnes.
There used to be a function in the shutdown utility called
d
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:17:44 -0700
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 9/27/13 7:14 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> >
> > Lighten up. Go outside, take a deep breath of fresh air. Move on. Life is
> > too short for this. :)
> >
> Agreed. When it stop being fun, then it will see a decline in
> participation.
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Ben Morrow wrote:
Quoth David Demelier :
I personally think (but you may totally disagree with) that an operating
system *is* an operating system. And I really hate easter eggs or
anything else not serious being integrated into the system. I think
about a new user installi
This thread has wonderful bike shed potential.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-2-PRE-switch-off-that-stupid-Nakatomi-Socrates-tp5845622p5847358.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Demelier wrote:
>
>> On 21.09.2013 12:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2013 11:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'd like to switch off this silly "Nakatomi Socrates" message which
reminds me on Linux and their childish naming schemes.
It is onl
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Jakub Lach wrote:
> This thread has wonderful bike shed potential.
>
Potential? I think we passed potential at least 6 messages into this
thread.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
___
fr
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:57 PM, David Demelier
wrote:
> Seriously, I don't understand why people waste time to create jokes like
> that instead of working on serious issues.
>
> You may think I'm putting to much significance on this kind of matter
> but I like (and I'm not the only one) serious,
On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
>> If you work seriously on serious issues long enough... you'll become burned-
>> out. Let me just come right out and say it...
>>
>> I coded it.
> And thanks, you got me chuckling - nice to see some humor once in
On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
>> Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
>>> If you work seriously on serious issues long enough... you'll become burned-
>>> out. Let me just come right out and say it...
>>>
>>> I coded it.
>> And tha
Em 29-09-2013 19:11, Charles Sprickman escreveu:
On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
If you work seriously on serious issues long enough... you'll become burned-
out. Let me just come right out and say it
Le 30 sept. 2013 à 01:54, Ricardo Ferreira
a écrit :
> Em 29-09-2013 19:11, Charles Sprickman escreveu:
>> On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
>>
>>> On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
> If you work seriously on serious issues long
On 30/09/2013 14:50, Matthieu Volat wrote:
Le 30 sept. 2013 à 01:54, Ricardo Ferreira
a écrit :
Em 29-09-2013 19:11, Charles Sprickman escreveu:
On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
If you work serio
On 9/30/2013 10:12 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
> root@build:/pseudosrc/misc # make love
> make: don't know how to make love. Stop
In this day and age, there is no excuse for not knowing how to make love.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On 09/27/2013 15:06, David Demelier wrote:
>
> Also in the future you can just forgot that crappy ideas as you can see,
> nobody liked it.
>
Glad you aren't my dad, Grinch.
--
Dave Robison
Sales Solution Architect II
FIS Banking Solutions
510/621-2089 (w)
530/518-5194 (c)
510/621-2020 (f)
On 30.09.2013 15:50, Matthieu Volat wrote:
>
> Le 30 sept. 2013 à 01:54, Ricardo Ferreira
> a écrit :
>
>> Em 29-09-2013 19:11, Charles Sprickman escreveu:
>>> On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
>>>
On 28.09.2013 11:32, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) wri
On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:23 AM, David Demelier wrote:
> On 30.09.2013 15:50, Matthieu Volat wrote:
>>
>> Le 30 sept. 2013 à 01:54, Ricardo Ferreira
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Em 29-09-2013 19:11, Charles Sprickman escreveu:
On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On 28.09.2013
Le 30/09/2013 20:23, David Demelier a écrit :
> Nice, but how does it handle if a Makefile contains a love target?
Then (f)make makes love the way we want him to do ;°
--
Florent Peterschmitt | Please:
flor...@peterschmitt.fr| * Avoid HTML/RTF in E-mail.
+33 (0)6 64 33 97 92
My apologies for being rude the few days ago.
I don't know what happened to me, I'm usually not naughty like that.
Bapt who knows me IRL would also say that. My personal life is not at
its best state currently and everything that upset me get me nervous
and rude..
I've been using FreeBSD for 5 ye
On Sep 30, 2013, at 1:13 PM, David Demelier wrote:
> My apologies for being rude the few days ago.
>
> I don't know what happened to me, I'm usually not naughty like that.
> Bapt who knows me IRL would also say that. My personal life is not at
> its best state currently and everything that upset
Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
> >
> > Nice, but how does it handle if a Makefile contains a love target?
>
> Right, bmake gives us all the chance to implement love in our own
> unuque way ;D
^^
Is that halfway between eunuch and unique love ?
Yes, it's off topic at th
On Sep 30, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Teske, Devin (Devin.Teske) writes:
>>>
>>> Nice, but how does it handle if a Makefile contains a love target?
>>
>> Right, bmake gives us all the chance to implement love in our own
>> unuque way ;D
> ^^
>
> Is that halfway between
On 9/30/2013 11:23 AM, David Demelier wrote:
Nice, but how does it handle if a Makefile contains a love target?
The easter egg only appears if the target isn't defined.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:23:16 +0200
> From: David Demelier
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: 9.2-PRE: switch off that stupid "Nakatomi Socrates"
> Message-ID: <5249c194.8030...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; ch
According to Ullrich Franke on Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 05:01:00PM +0200:
> We really should have a /bin/bikeshed. :-)
/usr/bin/bikesched
(now it begins anew :)
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.net
In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Ollivier Robert
wrote:
> According to Ullrich Franke on Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 05:01:00PM +0200:
> > We really should have a /bin/bikeshed. :-)
>
> /usr/bin/bikesched
Would schedulers get their own binary? Wouldn't it just be compiled into
the kernel? Or are you p
46 matches
Mail list logo
