On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 23:20, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:27, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Actually that is an interesting point, the swap
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Maybe. Could you paste kern.geom.confdot, kern.geom.confxml and
mount output to pastie.org or the like.
I've attached it..
Hmm, I do not see whats wrong here. ZFS already opened the devices
and I see no /dev/gpt/* entries. Maybe there is some
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:48, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor
docon...@gsoft.com.auwrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
operator 0, 164 Oct 21 15:34
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Maybe the UUID label got their first so it won't have an alias
(although the UUID is an alias for /dev/ad4p2..)
Maybe that's been asked already but what version are you using?
Does glabel work at all?
8.0-RC1
glabel works fine, I use it for
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 13:32, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Maybe the UUID label got their first so it won't have an alias
(although the UUID is an alias for /dev/ad4p2..)
Maybe that's been asked already but what version are you
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Actually that is an interesting point, the swap partitions don't
have an entry in /dev/gptid, although perhaps that is because
glabel has grabbed that node.
If I remember correctly nodes vanish when another name for the same
device is opened.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:27, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Actually that is an interesting point, the swap partitions don't
have an entry in /dev/gptid, although perhaps that is because
glabel has grabbed that node.
If I
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:27, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Actually that is an interesting point, the swap partitions don't
have an entry in /dev/gptid, although perhaps that is
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 01:53, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
There's no need to detach anything.
I'll try it when I get home and see how it goes.
Unfortunately I get..
[midget 11:20] ~ sudo zpool replace tank ad4p2
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
operator 0, 164 Oct 21 15:34
/dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc
Have you tried naming the GPT partitions and using /dev/gpt/* ?
Nope, how would I do that?
I'd be surprised if it worked TBH..
--
Daniel O'Connor software and
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.auwrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
operator0, 164 Oct 21 15:34
/dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc
Have you tried naming the GPT partitions and using /dev/gpt/* ?
Nope, how would
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:44, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
operator 0, 164 Oct 21 15:34
/dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc
Have
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniel O'Connor
docon...@gsoft.com.auwrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
operator0, 164 Oct 21 15:34
/dev/gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc
Have you tried naming the GPT
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
There's no need to detach anything.
I'll try it when I get home and see how it goes.
How can I show what partition has what UUID?
gpart list and gpart show do not say..
I suspect if I booted verbose glabel would say but that is a bit
annoying :)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 23:15, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
There's no need to detach anything.
I'll try it when I get home and see how it goes.
How can I show what partition has what UUID?
gpart list and gpart show do not say..
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 23:15, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
There's no need to detach anything.
I'll try it when I get home and see how it goes.
How can I show what partition
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
There's no need to detach anything.
I'll try it when I get home and see how it goes.
Unfortunately I get..
[midget 11:20] ~ sudo zpool replace tank ad4p2
gptid/6866d8b0-a8ac-11de-8e07-00241dd192cc
cannot use
Am 28.10.2009 um 01:41 schrieb Daniel O'Connor:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, jfar...@goldsword.com wrote:
Check the archives for stable@ and f...@. I believe that there was a
thread not that long ago detailing exactly how to do that. IIRC,
while it took a bit of work, it wasn't difficult.
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 28.10.2009 um 01:41 schrieb Daniel O'Connor:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, jfar...@goldsword.com wrote:
Check the archives for stable@ and f...@. I believe that there was a
thread not that long ago detailing exactly how to do that. IIRC,
while it took a bit of work, it
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 28.10.2009 um 01:41 schrieb Daniel O'Connor:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, jfar...@goldsword.com wrote:
Check the archives for stable@ and f...@. I believe that there was a
thread not that long ago detailing exactly how to do that. IIRC,
while it
On Sat, November 14, 2009 5:43 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 28.10.2009 um 01:41 schrieb Daniel O'Connor:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, jfar...@goldsword.com wrote:
Check the archives for stable@ and f...@. I believe that there was a
thread not that long ago detailing exactly
Larry Rosenman wrote:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
vault ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1ONLINE 0 0 0
ada1ONLINE 0 0 0
ada2ONLINE 0 0 0
ada3ONLINE 0
On Sat, November 14, 2009 6:03 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
vault ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1ONLINE 0 0 0
ada1ONLINE 0 0 0
ada2ONLINE 0
Am 15.11.2009 um 00:58 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
On Wed Jul 15 at 16:22, Freddie Cash fjwcash at gmail.com wrote:
Yep. It's as simple as:
* label all the drives using glabel, while they're still attached to
the pool
* use zpool replace pool ad4 label/disk01 to replace 1 drive
* wait for
Am 15.11.2009 um 00:49 schrieb Daniel O'Connor:
It would be nice if the man page mentioned this case though, currently the
zpool replace entry covers the case where the new disk has the same device
node.
Huh?
zpool replace [‐f] pool old_device [new_device]
Replaces
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Pete French wrote:
just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering
what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is
these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have
done in the past, or is it better to use GPT to create a
partition
Unfortunately it appears ZFS doesn't search for GPT partitions so if you
have them and swap the drives around you need to fix it up manually.
When I used raw disk or GPT partitions, if disk order was changed the
pool would come up in 'DEGRADED' or UNAVAILABLE state. Even then all
that had to be
2009/10/27 Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au:
Unfortunately it appears ZFS doesn't search for GPT partitions so if you
have them and swap the drives around you need to fix it up manually.
Every GPT partition have unique /dev/gptid/uuid, you can find it out with:
glabel status
and
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:00:27AM +0200, Artis Caune wrote:
2009/10/27 Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au:
Unfortunately it appears ZFS doesn't search for GPT partitions so if you
have them and swap the drives around you need to fix it up manually.
Every GPT partition have
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Artem Belevich wrote:
Unfortunately it appears ZFS doesn't search for GPT partitions so
if you have them and swap the drives around you need to fix it up
manually.
When I used raw disk or GPT partitions, if disk order was changed the
pool would come up in 'DEGRADED'
Quoting Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Artem Belevich wrote:
Unfortunately it appears ZFS doesn't search for GPT partitions so
if you have them and swap the drives around you need to fix it up
manually.
When I used raw disk or GPT partitions, if disk order was
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, jfar...@goldsword.com wrote:
Check the archives for stable@ and f...@. I believe that there was a
thread not that long ago detailing exactly how to do that. IIRC,
while it took a bit of work, it wasn't difficult.
Hmm do you have any idea what the subject was? I'm
just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering
what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is
these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have
done in the past, or is it better to use GPT to create a
partition over the whole disc, which is marked as
being
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:19 +, Pete French wrote:
just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering
what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is
these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have
done in the past, or is it better to use GPT to create a
On Mon, October 26, 2009 13:38, Robert Noland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:19 +, Pete French wrote:
just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering
what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is
these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have
35 matches
Mail list logo
