http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40744 >
You're right. If you consider %d turn as a determinant to cease-fire, it
makes grammatical sense, and the PL_ is good for languages such as mine.
OK, then.
Joan
2009/3/8 Madeline Book
>
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4074
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40744 >
> [book - Sat Mar 07 20:30:02 2009]:
>
> > [joan.cr...@gmail.com - Sat Mar 07 18:28:20 2009]:
> >
> > While updating my translation, I have noticed that a few
> > new strings in text.c had a double singular/plural form,
> > but the plural o
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40744 >
> [joan.cr...@gmail.com - Sat Mar 07 18:28:20 2009]:
>
> While updating my translation, I have noticed that a few
> new strings in text.c had a double singular/plural form,
> but the plural one was the same as the singular.
>
> The sentences
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40744 >
This transaction appears to have no content
While updating my translation, I have noticed that a few new strings in
text.c had a double singular/plural form, but the plural one was the same as
the singular.
The sentences were about "%d turns