Sorry, forgot to attach the diff for activating the fonts.
diff --git a/data/base/resources.properties b/data/base/resources.properties
index d20ca31..69a0f75 100644
--- a/data/base/resources.properties
+++ b/data/base/resources.properties
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
# Decorative font to use for panel
Hi,
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Juli 2015 um 11:35 Uhr
Von: Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
An: win...@genial.ms
Cc: freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Freecol-developers] Release: DHYB
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:48:51 +0200
win...@genial.ms wrote:
as I'd really like to
100% agree. FreeCol is still technically in beta, some removal of dead
weight code should be considered, if not encouraged. FreeCol should take
advantage of any features of Java 1.7 that it can.
On Jul 24, 2015 2:56 PM, win...@genial.ms wrote:
Hi,
it crossed my mind that some time ago people
Hi,
it crossed my mind that some time ago people were complaining
about the Mac builds not working. I did not pay much attention
back then, as I don't have one and don't know about them, but
I thought I should remind you.
Another thought I had was, that the codebase collected many
compatibility
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:56:28 +0200
win...@genial.ms wrote:
it crossed my mind that some time ago people were complaining
about the Mac builds not working.
AFAICT that was due to Apple's somewhat adversarial treatment of Java.
There were follow ups saying install the some-version-of-Java package
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Caleb Williams cale...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Freecol-developers] Release: DHYB
To: Michael T. Pope mp...@computer.org
- I stumbled upon a forum post saying jsmooth does not support 64bit,
but dont know
